When Muslims and Muslim-backed useful, left-wing idiots complain that Facebook and twitter are facilitating the rise of Islamophobia by allowing posts that point out Muslim atrocities, they are pushing an agenda they may or may not even know about. They are part of the “Istanbul Process”, the primary and sole objective of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC).
For years, the OIC has been trying in vain to get non-Muslim countries to enact laws that make criticism of Islam a criminal act while exploiting things like the Danish Muhammad cartoons and the Innocence of Muslims video in hopes of getting their way. A few years ago, the approach was softened with U.N. Human Rights Council Resolution 16/18. As Shoebat.com reported, instead of getting behind the untenable position of supporting an over usurpation of the first amendment, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said that western leaders and their useful idiot lemmings should use…
“…peer pressure and shaming, so that people don’t feel that they have the support to do what we abhor.”
In two simple words, Hillary was advocating for political correctness, something everyone supposedly despises.
That sounds like a perfect opportunity for a shameless and politically incorrect book plug (something Shoebat has long been accused of doing anyway):If two or more Muslims participate in a gang rape, is it wrong to say “Muslims commit gang rape”? The answer to that question should be obvious. The only thing that’s understated is that it’s only two. All across the world, the overwhelming – yes OVERWHELMING – amount of heinous acts are being committed by Muslims. We’re having difficulty keeping up with Muslim gang rapes taking place in just Europe alone.
Yet, Facebook and twitter are being accused of fanning the flames of Islamophobia by not censoring posts that point out atrocities and crimes committed by Muslims.
The Daily Mail has the story:
Facebook and Twitter have been accused of allowing Islamophobia to flourish by refusing to remove hundreds of inflammatory posts which have been reported by anti-racism campaigners.
Some of the posts which have been flagged up to the two social media sites include accusations of Muslims being rapists, paedophiles and comparable to cancer.
In one shocking example, a Facebook user, who was referring to the beheading of Westerners in Syria said: ‘For every person beheaded by these sick savages we should drag 10 off the streets and behead them, film it and put it online.
Think Hillary. She called for the use of “peer pressure” to silence speech. Is that not what’s happening here?
It says quite a bit that there is more outrage directed at those who are outraged by crimes against humanity committed by Muslims than there is against those Muslims.
Folks, we’re talking about fighting for this country’s VERY FIRST AMENDMENT. If you need a reason to fight, just remember there was a reason it was the FIRST AMENDMENT:
As an aside… Facebook and Twitter filed Amicus Briefs in Garcia vs. Google, a case in which an actress wants the Innocence of Muslims removed from YouTube based on a copyright claim that she was deceived into participating in a video she never would have participated in had she known.
This case should NOT be conflated with any stand that Facebook and twitter might make relative to charges from the Muslim apologists and hypersensitive political miscreants going after them over ‘Islamophobic’ posts. While conservatives largely side with Google against Garcia, the real issue there is the level of Obama administration’s involvement in the production of the video, as Shoebat.com has reported.