AMEN! Alabama Supreme Court Rejects US Supreme Court’s Homosexual “Marriage” Ruling, Says It Would Require Citizens And Officials Of Alabama To Disobey The Will Of God

 030416f1

The Heart of Dixie still beats strong.

It is approaching one year that the US Supreme Court voted 5-4 to legalize homosexual “marriage.” The reality is that it cannot legalize it because homosexual “marriage” is an oxymoron since marriage is a function of natural law between one man and one woman, and is something which no “legal” ruling can change. The unnatural decision has placed a lot of states in a contentious position, since many do not want to support what is an objectively sinful union.

030416f2

Chief Justice Roy Moore

Thankfully, the State of Alabama’s Chief Justice Roy Moore today issued a 105-page response to the US Supreme Court in which in rejected last year’s ruling and asserted the validity of marriage as being between one man and one woman. Calling the USSC’s decision “illegitimate,” the ruling also blasted the Court’s decision for forcing Christians to support a decision which violate their religious freedom “in order to support the inordinate lusts that demean” marriage through homosexual activity.

From the Liberty Council:

“The Alabama Supreme Court has openly rejected the U.S. Supreme Court’s 5-4 marriage opinion, labeling it ‘illegitimate’ and without legal or precedential authority. This is a clear victory for the rule of law and an historic decision by the Alabama Supreme Court. The Judgement makes permanent the Alabama Supreme Court’s order prohibiting probate judges from issuing marriage licenses to same-sex couples. The Alabama Supreme Court has rejected the illegitimate opinion of five lawyers on the U.S. Supreme Court,” said Staver.

Chief Justice Roy Moore and Justice Tom Parker issued concurring opinions openly criticizing the U.S. Supreme Court marriage opinion. Using Supreme Court Chief Justice John Robert’s term of “five lawyers” when referring to the Supreme Court Obergefell opinion, Alabama Chief Justice Roy Moore wrote a blistering 105-page concurring opinion:  

Based upon arguments of “love,” “commitment,” and “equal dignity” for same-sex couples, five lawyers, as Chief Justice Roberts so aptly describes the Obergefell majority, have declared a new social policy for the entire country. As the Chief Justice and Associate Justices Scalia, Thomas, and Alito eloquently and accurately demonstrate in their dissents, the majority opinion in Obergefellis an act of raw power with no ascertainable foundation in the Constitution itself. The majority presumed to legislate for the entire country under the guise of interpreting the Constitution.  

The Obergefell majority presumes to amend the United States Constitution to create a right stated nowhere therein. That is a lawless act.  

Historically, consummation of a marriage always involved an act of sexual intimacy that was dignified in the eyes of the law. An act of sexual intimacy between two men or two women, by contrast, was considered “an infamous crime against nature” and a “disgrace to human nature.”Homosexuals who seek the dignity of marriage must first forsake the sexual habits that disqualify them from admission to that hallowed institution. Surely more dignity attaches to participation in a fundamental institution on the terms it prescribes than to an attempt to wrest its definition to serve inordinate lusts that demean its historic dignity.  

A “disgrace to human nature” cannot be cured by stripping the institution of holy matrimony of its inherent dignity and redefining it to give social approval to behaviors unsuited to its high station. Sodomy has never been and never will be an act by which a marriage can be consummated.

The definition of marriage as the union of one man and one woman has existed for millennia and has never been considered an “ill tendency.” By contrast, the Court’s attempt to redefine marriage is “a dangerous fallacy which at once destroys all religious liberty.”  

The Obergefell majority, conspicuously overlooking the “essential and historic significance” of the connection between religious liberty and “supreme allegiance to the will of God,” failed to appreciate the seriousness of imposing a new sexual-revolution mandate that requires Alabama public officials to disobey the will of God.  

***Do YOU want to save Christians? Please click here to donate so Rescue Christians can continue doing its important work***

***Because of our commitment to the truth, we will be pulled off of Facebook soon. Sign up for our newsletter today so we can keep you informed with up-to-the-minute, breaking coverage***

print

CLICK HERE TO DONATE TO KEEP THIS WEBSITE GOING