Muslims In Italy Go Wild And Are Now Forming Mobs And Openly Attacking Police In The Streets

Muslims gangs have been terrorizing European citizens, and now they have become so emboldened they are openly forming mobs and attacking police officers in the streets. One such major incident was recently caught on video in Italy, showing police struggling to keep the mob back as they attempt to close in on them:

The grainy video was posted to the Comitato Quartiere Vasto (the Vasto District Committee) group on Facebook, representing residents living in the Vasto area of central Naples near the Piazza Garibaldi.

The video shows soldiers arresting a man, who looks to be of African descent and is lying on the ground. Others are seen approaching the group and attempting to pull the detained man away. Eventually, two other black men succeed, but the patrol catches up to them and encircle the original suspect, while more onlookers arrive. Somebody is heard shouting, “Do not beat him!”

It is not clear what the man was being arrested for, nor whether he was being abused by the soldiers in any way. Another video taken at the same scene shows no sign of violence towards the soldiers.

The incident has provoked a sharp reaction from local residents.

“Abandoned and betrayed!” wrote Lello Cretella, the user who posted the video. “Episodes like these happen every day in our neighborhood and everyone pretends not to see!”

“We feel alone and abandoned… we fear for us and our families!”

Since being uploaded on Sunday, the video has been shared by hundreds of users, including right-wing politician Matteo Salvini.

“Men in our army are surrounded and attacked by dozens of immigrants who wanted to prevent the arrest of one of them,” he wrote. “We are now in urban warfare.”

Matteo’s party, the Northern League, once advocated separatism from southern Italy, including Naples, which it saw as backward, but is now trying to court southern voters on an anti-immigration platform.

“The tension is very high every day,” said Naples councilor Alessandro Gallo, commenting on the video. “However, something very serious is happening with the army being surrounded. It is necessary to intervene.”

The soldiers in the video had been patrolling the streets as a part of Operation Safe Roads, launched in 2008, which deployed thousands of troops on the streets of 38 Italian cities to help safeguard sensitive targets and patrol against petty crime. The same year extra troops were also deployed to the Naples and Campania regions to help quell gang violence by the Camorra, the local mafia. In September 2008, race riots broke out in a nearby town, Castel Volturno, after Camorra killers shot dead six West Africans and one local arcade owner at random in an attempt to intimidate immigrant drug gangs. (source)

It is true- Muslim gangs are more emboldened with each passing week as the European government show they will do nothing for now to stop the growing violence in their own societies. It is nothing short of treason, and everybody in government who is not actively taking a stand against it deserves punishment because of the serious consequences which this is having and will have in the years to come, for if this is not stopped, then Europe does not have a future, for the future it will have will be that of desolation and destruction.

But take particular note of the passage I highlighted. Note that Matteo Salvini is the leader of the “Northern League,” which is Italy is called the “Lega Nord.” They are an “anti-immigrant” and “pro-nationalist” party which has been a long supporter of Nationalist and Socialist ideas. In other words, they are Nazis and they support all of the evils of National Socialism, including neo-paganism and an utter hatred of Christ and His Church:

And in Austria, the FPÖ had a strong anti-clerical component. The Lega Nord in Italy even promoted neo-pagan rituals. In the Netherlands the Lijst Pim Fortuyn (LPF; Pim Fortuyn List) and the PVV gave zero precedence to Christian values over libertarian views on ethical, economic, and social issues.

While church leaders are said to be considered part of society, these conflict with the church and only use Christian symbols for show.

The Italian Lega Nord cultural base is neo-pagan, made of Celtic crosses and veneration of the god Odin in which they administer every year the purification rites.

Smart dogs need to pay attention, populists speak of identity while true churches speak of faith.

While European populism calls to stop “the Islamization of Europe” by banning headscarves and the construction of mosques and campaigns to prohibit circumcision and halal food in Norway, the victim in the end will be two groups: Jews and Christians. (source)

Nothing of this is said to deny the evils of what the Muslims are doing. Indeed, it would be gravely wrong to ignore this. What is important is that the solution that is being touted as the answer to the problem is not a solution at all, but simply another way of extending and aggravating the same problem while giving the illusion that something is being done to solve it. Like a political speech were a politician will say a lot about nothing at all to give the impression he is either knowledgeable or cares, so do these National Socialists, who are politicians, doing the same thing but with much more serious consequences.

We know for an undeniable fact that the rise of National Socialism in Europe is taking place. It is a well-orchestrate movement that involved giving license to the Muslims so that by allowing them to naturally engage in socially dysfunctional behaviors, it will cause a counter-reaction which can be exploited to further the cause of National Socialism. As such, this entire event with the Muslims must be viewed in the light of these events.

As we have pointed out, there is a pattern between anti-immigrant parties and movement with National Socialism and ultimately, eugenics and darwinism. Whereas communists take an internationalist approach to imposing socialist through the worship of the state economy, the nationalist approach is to worship the self as a part of the state as an alternative life form, and it makes its idol of worship one’s own race. While for the international socialist immigration is seen as a way of restructuring society to break down the state in order to form a nondescript culture that can be easily manipulated by the central government, the nationalist sees immigration as a way to advance itself off of the dislike of another people’s differences, and the way for the National Socialist to do this is to simply encourage the bad tendencies which already exist until they spill over into fighting.

Islam is as we and many others have pointed out an anti-social, anti-human, evil religion. Its theology possesses few redeeming qualities, and those which it does have are reflections of teachings it adopted from Christianity and suited to its needs, for Islam is simply the final form of all Christian heresy. Since the violence of Islam is inseparable from its theology, the more Islamic orthodoxy is promoted in society the more violent Muslims will generally become. Since Muslims for the most part come from cultures that are noticeably different from those in Europe- their skin color, language, and customs immediately identify them and there is no way to hide the differences- and in combination with the inherently evil disposition of the Islamic religion, for a person who has absolutely no care at all for the human race and sees men as simply tools to exploit for their personal advantage, Islam makes for an ideal lever to alter the course of social discourse and perspective in order to seize power for oneself.

Do not look at the events that took place in Italy just as a case of “good versus bad,” or “European versus Muslim,” because this is a false framework. In fact, it is the framework the National Socialists want you to adapt because they want you to choose their solution as they present it as the only opposition to the Muslims. But there is another option. It is the Christian way, which is the Catholic way. There is no better choice between Muslims or Socialists because both lead down the path to destruction. Indeed, as it has always been, it is either the way of Christ or the way of perdition.

Indeed the Muslims must be confronted, but so must the National Socialists, for neither group is an option.



  • Coombes Larry

    Catholic prophecy says that the chastisement of the Earth after the 20th Century begins with civil war breaking out in Italy and Paris at the same time followed almost immediately in England.

    Thnigs seem to be aligned for that.

    The Earth then goes through four and half years of chastisment through war, famine and disease, even a comet strike… finished by the three days and three nights of demonic darkness (literal darkenss, no light will shine except special blessed candles) where demons kill many. At the end 75% of the world’s population are dead.

    That seems to be the road map we are on now.

    Er, the AntiChrist is supposed to FOLLOW a period of peace after this. I know Shoebat rads the prophecies differently but I would argue that the consensus of scholars on the matter is rather more ‘with me’ than with him. But I have to finish my book to demonstrate. I have JUST had a bit of rest (at last!!!) and finished my latest Anime music video for light relief. Like, today! But I am moving away from Yahoo. Looking towards NicoNico. I do not trust the West at all any more.

  • David W

    We have Muslim imams uniting with the well-funded Communist groups calling for insurrection and violence. None have been arrested.

    Rest assured that the BATFE, FBI, DHS and TSA would come down on any conservative preacher for saying what Sekou Odinga or Linda Sarsour openly advocate!

  • Stephen,

    I read the works of Dupont:

    So lets delve and seriously and thoroughly examine some of these prophecies in light of certain prophetic scale accepted by both Catholics and Protestants and in light of the Bible itself. One prediction states:

    “He [the great monarch] shall reign over the House of Agar, and shall possess Jerusalem.” (Isidore of Seville, 7th Century)

    So far so good, until we read one prophecy collector, Yves Dupont interprets:

    “The Jews will be converted and, after a short period, probably a few years, Christ will come down again and judge the nations”.

    This, they predict, will usher in what is termed as “an era of peace” and only then, after that era of peace is over, that the Antichrist will finally appear to be destroyed by Christ’s coming.

    While there is no doubt that God will raise “seven shepherds” (Micah 5) who will combat the “Assyrian” (Antichrist) and these will redeem many in Israel, but to think there is an “era of peace prior to the advent of Antichrist” should be questioned in light of crucial factors well etched and established in both scripture and by many other saints.

    First of all, we do not find anywhere in the whole of Scripture anything remotely close to “an era of peace” preceding the coming of Antichrist, where Israel is restored.

    This idea which states that Israel is restored by a monarch needs to be examines in light of scripture which clearly states:

    And so all Israel should be saved, as it is written: There shall come out of Sion, he that shall deliver [Israel], and [he Christ] shall turn away ungodliness from Jacob. (Romans 11:26)

    We find no monarch here, “All Israel should be saved” by Christ and this is preceded by the Church’s ultimate trial after “a religious deception” and “the falling away come first” which seems within sight more than “an era of peace”.

    Perhaps one might write-off this critique we just made here, but lest someone objects, it is not only the Bible which states this, but the Catechism of the Catholic Church itself does. Both agree, that only “Christ as king” is to be manifested in “the last days” and his recognition is by “all Israel”.

    Even St. Augustine confirms: “the Jews shall believe in the true Christ, that is, our Christ, thanks to this great and admirable prophet Elias …” St. Augustine confirms scripture which does not say what Dupont says.

    Also, we cannot, and should not, completely and strictly rely on everything we read on the internet and in ill-sourced books. It is this crucial problem that I see amongst many Christians, especially today. With many of these predictions, it is nearly impossible to even verify the authenticity of some quotes that are supposed to be about the ‘Great Monarch’. Many of the quotes mentioned in books and on websites about him do not give original sources.

    Even “Prophecy for Today” which many use as a source for these prophecies by Catholic Edward Connor, he agrees with my warning:

    “Public prophecy ceased with the death of St. John the Apostle. Private prophecy, even if received from God, is not reliable because the prophet is fallible. He can forget, misunderstand or misinterpret. Even when he does not err, those who hear him and who transmit the message can err“

    Not only can interpreters err, but Conner himself erred. One could find a multitude of unverifiable quotes in his book. For example:

    “The Great French Monarch, who shall subject all the East, shall come around the end of the world…. ” – St. Hyppolitus (235 AD)

    Not only that France as a nation did not exist in the 3rd Century AD, but Conner simply gives no source.

    Go ahead, try to hunt down this quote and you will never find it written in any historic reference. Many of the Great Monarch prophecies originate from a book titled “From Hell with Love” By Zak Portelli and even he failed to provide sources for some of these supposed ‘original quotes’.

    For another example “He shall inherit the Crown of the Fleur-de-Lis (Bishop Ageda, 12th Century)” is a quote which one cannot find a source from any credible reference.

    One needs to wisely sift. Indeed, the Jews will return in unbelief and while some Catholics object about establishing Israel, while Protestants claim that the popes have always been anti-Israel, this is not true. Popes unanimously agree Israel’s return is of God. For example, Pope Benedict XV (died 1922) and before Israel was established he correctly interpreted and predicted:

    “The return of the Jews to Palestine is the will of God, hence they will have to leave many countries.”

    “The Jews shall return to Palestine and become Christians toward the end of the world.” (Anne Catherine Emmerich, died 1824)

    The papacy always had a certain care for the Jewish people and Catholic history debunks the notion that the Catholic Church was anti-Semitic. We also do not find popes saying that we will have an “era of true peace” just before Antichrist comes. The Vatican’s position is clear on this issue.

    The impossible to answer Jesus-style question to many who solely focus on such prophecies is this:

    Which of the prophecies is true, the ones who say that the “Great Monarch” is French, German, Roman, Spanish, Bourbon, of the House of Habsburg, a descendant of Constantine, Charlemagne or King Louis IX, especially that these bloodlines are not the same?

    These rulers all belonged to different ethnicities, different races, different families, different countries, and possess different lineages.

    Whenever one find die speculation, one sees multitudes filled with a false hope.

    Always keep in mind that the bulk of these prophecies stem from when the claim was made by Saint Remigius, bishop of Reims and apostle of the Franks in 496 “vision” of the last monarch to descend from France. This prophecy was related through Hincmar (806-882), archbishop of Reims, and Rabanus Maurus Magnentius (780-856) O.S.B., archbishop of Mainz.

    However that may be, Marie-Julie Jahenny (1850-1941), also known as the “Breton” stigmatist, prophesied that Henry V, the Count of Chambord, was the chosen King. Yet despite his death, one of her predictions dated 1890 declares he is yet “reserved for the great epochs” (the end of time). So here we have a factor of human error.

    We must always keep a balance. For example, I have poured much effort in evaluating the works of Valtorta and wrote two articles one in favor and another in critique where I show how some of her ‘amazing finds’ can easily be obtained from other sources. While there are claims that Pope Pius XII approved Valtorta’s writings, this is questionable. Therefore, we should not take a dogmatic approach to certain seer or prophecies or interpreters or nuns lest we err in interpreting them or someone else erred in transmitting their predictions. Collectors err tremendously. For example, Dupont (who collects these prophecies) includes other serious contradictions to scripture. For example, he gives a supposed quote by Venerable Bartholomew Holzhauser:

    God will bind Satan for a number of years until the days of the Son of Perdition…there will be an ecumenical council which will be the greatest of all councils. By the grace of God, by the power of the Great Monarch, and by the authority of the Holy Pontiff [Angelic Pope], and by the union of the most devout princes, atheism and every heresy will be banished from the earth. The Council will define the true sense of Holy Scripture, and this will be believed and accepted by everyone (Dupont, p. 40).

    Contrary to this private prophecy, that satan is bound before all heresy is eliminated, in scripture Satan is never bound before the Son of Perdition come but strictly after. We find absolutely nothing (not a single verse) in scripture to support this conclusion.

    On the contrary, St. Bellarmine who did an entire essay on Antichrist, he correctly instructs never to proclaim such things. He refers to Second Thessalonians where God instructs:

    And then [after the falling away happens] that wicked one [Antichrist] shall be revealed whom the Lord Jesus shall kill with the spirit of his mouth; and shall destroy with the brightness of his coming, him, Whose coming is according to the working of Satan, in all power, and signs, and lying wonders … (2 Thess 2:8-9)

    “And then that wicked one shall be revealed”? This “then” comes right immediately after the great apostasy and there is no epoch of peace. It is strictly a falling away first and then immediately the Antichrist appears.

    Lets again examine:

    “God will bind Satan for a number of years until the days of the Son of Perdition”

    This goes contrary to Scripture which clearly states the devil is bound way after the Antichrist appears and is captured (see Apocalypse, 19:20-21; 20:1-2).

    We do not have two separate bindings of Lucifer. This alone puts a dent in all of these claims of an “era of peace” that supposedly comes before Antichrist shows up.

    And here is another danger. Such reliance on “an era of peace” would lax the saints to roam and be worry free like the virgin without oil to only be caught when the Bridegroom comes and be left out. This is a very serious issue to consider.

    Other problems can be found. It was the Apocalypse of Pseudo-Methodius, which shaped and influenced the bulk of these prophecies. St. Methodius was from the fourth century. So the prophecies would sound amazing especially that they mention a monarch (king) combating the Muslim world. Islam only appeared in the seventh century after Pseudo-Methodius was written. St. Methodius of Olympus of the fourth century never wrote the Apocalypse of Pseudo-Methodius which became heavily accessed by some seers.

    This takes the thunder of the miraculous factor of predicting Islam in many of these prophecies. Dupont for example whom I have poured much time into his works, I found grave errors. He naively credits prophecies to the fourth-century theologian St. Methodius of Olympus when in fact it was from the Apocalypse of Pseudo-Methodius (7th century). He wrote:

    St. Methodius. “A day will come when the enemies
    of Christ will boast of having conquered the whole
    world. They will say: ‘Christians cannot escape
    now!’ But a Great King will arise to fight the enemies
    of God. He will defeat them, and peace will be given
    to the world, and the Church will be freed from her
    So this would be another source where this “era of peace” was deduced: “peace will be given to the world”.

    But this was never uttered by St. Methodius. Pseudepigrapha are falsely-attributed works, texts whose claimed author is not the true author, or a work whose real author attributed it to a figure of the past.

    Such mistakes are not only done by Catholics. Many pre-tribulation evangelical Protestants who use Pseudo-Ephraem which also relies upon the Pseudo-Methodius to prove a ‘pre-tribulation rapture’ when in reality neither Methodius or Pseudo-Ephraem ever mention anything about a pre-tribulation rapture. Yet so many books are written on the subject and people consume them to no end believing they will vanish before WWIII erupts.

    Scripture clearly speaks of a false peace (not an era of peace) which is established after some turmoil by Antichrist, not a monarch. Therefore, be careful lest you fall for the Antichrist believing he is the monarch.

    We ought to ask: isn’t the world today calling for peace between Shiite and Sunni? Isn’t Erdogan of Turkey approaching the Jews and just made a deal with them on cooperation becoming the defender of Gaza and for benefits from the Mediterranean he already made a pact with Israel? Isn’t the world tired of ISIS and here comes Erdogan promising to restore peace? Isn’t the world crying for peace and the end of bloodshed? Doesn’t scripture tell us that when the world says “peace and safety” is when “sudden destruction comes”? Therefore, this “era of peace” is dangerous for it is built on false hope.

    Another danger is this: imagine if a nationalist arises in Europe (altra-nationalists are already arising in Europe) and alongside stands a bad pope. A multitude of Catholics would gladly follow them believing them to be the ‘great monarch’ and the ‘angelic pope’. After all, Antichrist comes after (not before) the great monarch. So we still have time to be merry. But as it turns out, these (as Paul warned in 2 Thess 2) are agents of Antichrist or are even “the beast” and “the false prophet,” who will lead these souls to hell, while the true Christ who later comes to combat them is viewed as the Antichrist.

    This is why doctrine is the scale and not prophecy. The Catholic Church today is not the same as it was during Pope Pius XII during Hitler. God forbid in the future the Vatican embraces more Protestantism to accept a Protestant tyrant from Germany and then we have a German Antichrist whom we think is the “great monarch”. Catholics and Protestants should remain miles apart when it comes to the mixing of what each considers essential theology.

    Remember Christ said to be like the five wise virgins, to be prepared and be ready for His coming and not the coming of another (unless they are the two witnesses). So then here comes Christ to find the five slumbering virgins instead are standing on the wrong side of the fence and then He shuts the door.