If a man who calls himself a woman approached you and said that he wanted a date and you refused him because he “identifies as trans,” is that discrimination? That is the question that people are debating in the UK right now after a reality TV show star was kicked off the show for saying that he would not:
A reality television programme kicked off a debate about whether it’s discriminatory or transphobic to refuse to date a transsexual person.
The argument started on UK reality television show Celebrity Big Brother, where minor celebrities are locked into a studio made to look like a house, then filmed 24/7.
As might be expected in such a situation, tensions run high and conversations can be fractious. One of the housemates is India Willoughby, a TV journalist who had an established career as a man before transitioning to become a woman.
Willoughby asked her housemates about their dating preferences, and the resulting conversation kicked off a social media storm.
“Would you go out with a transsexual woman?” she queried.
“I believe it’s your choice… I would choose not to,” replied the R’n’B singer Ginuwine. “That doesn’t make me scared.”
“You would go out with a woman?” Willoughby asked.
“But you wouldn’t go out with a transsexual woman?”
The conversation rumbled on. When Willoughby suggested “Let’s have a kiss,” Ginuwine replied “no” and leaned away from her. (source)
In other words, is it “discrimination” for a man who refuse a date with a man who cuts off his penis and calls himself a woman? If so, is that “anti-homosexual” discrimination or “transophobia,” or both?
The fact is that there is no “discrimination” in the contemporary sense here, for all of the obsession over “gender identity” is sickness and evil rooted in the diabolical chaos of the times. The Bible is clear about the differences between men and women and the purpose of human sexuality, and anything outside of that is a perversion that only breeds more perversity.
The philosophy of homosexuality is one of license because it teaches that the purpose of sexuality is the maximization of human pleasure and “experience” for the self. Since the desires of all men are inconsistent and have the potential to change with the will and are defined by the will there is no end to the extent or forms which a man can seek personal gratification through and nor is there a clearly defined, consistent, firm limit to his behavior. They say that as long as their behavior is either accepted by another or “does not harm” another, then anything is permissible.
This is the reason why the homosexuals are consistently found to engage in the most deviant forms of behavior as well as the worst forms of sin. By choosing to be entirely guided by their passions they become slaves to their passions, thinking they are free when in reality they have given themselves over to the most bestial impuses of man. This is why St. Paul in his letter to the Romans says:
…God gave them over to a depraved mind, so that they do what ought not to be done. They have become filled with every kind of wickedness, evil, greed and depravity. They are full of envy, murder, strife, deceit and malice. They are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, insolent, arrogant and boastful; they invent ways of doing evil; they disobey their parents; they have no understanding, no fidelity, no love, no mercy. Although they know God’s righteous decree that those who do such things deserve death, they not only continue to do these very things but also approve of those who practice them. (Romans 1:28-32)
The majority of people in America and the Western world now accept homosexuality. With their acceptance of the behavior also means they have accepted, whether consciously or not, the licencious philosophy of homosexuality as well that inevitably breeds more license. Whereas in the recent past it was “discrimination” not to accept homosexual behavior in society, it is now becoming articularly among Generation Z that he who does not actively seek out sexual encounters with men either as “openly gay” or as “transsexuals” are abnormal and in some cases, engaging in “discrimination.”
One can see this change among Generation Z taking place on 4Chan, particularly on the “random” board, known as /b/. It is one of the oldest and arguable the “darkest” area of 4Chan, as almost “anything goes” on the board. What one will notice is that at ANY given time of day there are always lengthy threads dedicated to promoting bisexuality or “traps,” which are men dressed to look indistinguishable from women, such as below:
While /b/ tends to have more explicit pornography, what is even more telling is the “meetup” board, known as /soc/. This has material intented for people wanting to meet for friendship or sex, and there is tremendous amount of both homosexual as well as transsexual material on it directed towards “straight” men:
4Chan is the 62nd most popular website in the USA and the 187th most popular in the world, so trends that one sees on 4Chan are certainly indicative of social movement. But given what critics call the “autistic” nature of 4Chan visitors, could this focus on “transsexuality” and “traps” simply be a reflection of perhaps behavior privy to certain segments of society instead of a larger and more permanent trend?
In response to this question, one can take a look at Craigslist, which is ranked as the 15th most popular website in the USA and the 105th most popular website in the world. Since Craigslist has existed for many years, certainly this could add another balanced perspective on this trend if one looks at the “Personals” section and specifically, the “casual encounters” area, which is basically people looking for sex categories by straight, homosexuals, and transsexuals.
Since Craigslist is sorted by cities, results can vary by region. For example, what one finds in New York City will be very different from somewhere in the middle of Nebraska. As such, we have chosen to look at Lynchburg, VA because according to a recent study, Lynchburg was ranked as the most “average” city in America, and it has its own Craigslist page.
As soon as I went to the “casual encounter” area, IMMEDIATELY there was an advertisement for bisexual activity as one can see below, with most of it being under the “m4m” designation:
To compare, we checked the men seeking transsexuals (t4m) category. While the postings were spread from December 2017 through January 2018, one can note a consistent pattern of posting from diverse individuals, many of them millenials, seeking homosexual encounters with men dressed as women:
The ads? They spoke for themselves:
So we can say that based on 4Chan and Craigslist, while homosexual interactions with ostensibly “straight” men are not “common” per se, they are increasing as part of a general trend that follows with age, for the younger the person, the more likely he is to engage in “voluntary” homosexual activity, i.e. he does not “identify” as a “homosexual” or even “bisexual” but he will engage in homosexual activity if he so elects to at a particular time for any particular reason.
This finding is also confirmed by Pornhub.com infamous “Insights” blog, which provides detailed information into “viewing” trends in adult material and is quite relevant as the site is the largest pornographic website in the world. According to the blog, both “cuckhold” and “transgender” porn made major increases in this year in popularity which were followed up by increases in an interest in “cartoon,” “amateur,” and “fetish” pornography:
Topping off the gaining categories for 2017, is ‘Cuckold’ (nsfw) where views have increased by 72%. Popularity for the Transgender (nsfw) category increased by 36%, and ‘Cartoon’ (nsfw) is up by 25%. ‘Amateur’ (nsfw) caught viewers’ attention for the longest amount of time at with views on videos in the category lasting an average of 14 minutes and 31 seconds, which is 132 seconds longer than last year. Views in the ‘Fetish’ (nsfw) category are also up with a 117-second increase from last year, at 11 minutes and 55 seconds.
It is well known that millenials are the most “gay friendly” generation yet in the Western world and also the most open to being “gender fluid”. According to the UK Gay times, possibly up to 10% of millenial men who are “straight” have had or are willing to partake in homosexual activity. As the article notes, this does not necessarily mean “penetrative” sex, but the openness to experiment with sodomy:
When I first interviewed 20-year-old Dillon for Mostly Straight: Sexual Fluidity Among Men (Harvard University Press), he was a goalie for his college hockey team.
Similar to straight guys, he had casual hookups with women, dated several women, and currently has a long-term girlfriend. Yet, since elementary school Dillon has had intense infatuations with guys and slight same-sex attractions. He has gone to gay bars with gay friends where he has occasionally made out with a guy.
His friends believe Dillon will eventually come out as gay—and several have volunteered to be his first male sex partner. Dillon laughs it off because he’s neither bisexual nor gay. He’s mostly straight, and has identified as such for over a decade—including the last time he contacted me earlier this year when he was 29.
A mostly straight young man resides in a region between heterosexuality and bisexuality on the sexual/romantic spectrum from exclusively straight to exclusively gay. In previous generations, he might have called himself “straight but not narrow,” “heteroflexible,” “bending a little,” or “bicurious.” Now, he has a home, an identity, and an orientation: mostly straight.
Although it’s difficult to establish the precise number of mostly straight young men, it’s likely to be at least 10% of the male population—a greater percentage than those who identify as gay or bisexual combined. Perhaps if our culture were less stigmatizing of same-sex sexuality a greater number would so identify.
Dillon belongs to a growing trend of young men who are secure in their heterosexuality yet remain aware of their sexual and/or romantic arousal to guys. How much gayness? Not much—around 5% to 10% of their sexual and romantic attractions. Perhaps, like Dillon, they’ve made out with a male friend or have had several guy crushes. Or, they’ve participated in an all-male group masturbation or are willing to receive oral sex from an attractive guy.
It’s unlikely, however, that they have had penetrative sex with a guy, though they might be willing to do so if the right guy came along. They’ve cuddled with a best friend, but to fall passionately in love with a guy might be too much.
That said, mostly straight guys are flexible, as 21-year-old Mike claimed: “If I could be like Walt Whitman was with some of his friends, I could… [be] open to the possibility of pursuing men because [you] never know who one can fall in love with and [it] could be a male.” (source)
While these numbers are being reported from a pro-homosexuality source, the fact is they seem to be accurate in light of a 2016 study published by the New York Post, which found that approximately 10% of Millenials were open to homosexual experiences:
Bisexuality is booming, with the number of people who bed men and women more than doubling, a study says.
Some 7.7 percent revealed they had bi romps in 2014, compared to 3.1 percent in 1990.
The stats follow the openness of Brit model Cara Delevingne and other celebrities about their bisexuality. In the same period the percentage of men who reported having had sex with at least one man rose from 4.5 percent to 8.2 percent.
And the number of women who said they had bedded at least one female leapt from 3.6 percent to 8.7 percent.
Meanwhile, acceptance of same-sex sexuality has increased among all generations, says the US study of 30,000 adults.
Levels were up from just 13 percent in 1990 to 49 percent in 2014. (source)
The support for homosexuality has increased consistently. In a recent study we reported on in December by the Los Angeles times which found that regarding Generation Z- who is said to be more “pro-LGBT” than even millenials- up to 25% of them consider themselves “gender fluid” and are open to sexual “interactions” with both men and women regardless of gender:
According to a new study out of UCLA, more than a quarter of California adolescents feel comfortable enough to dismiss societal pressures to identify with one gender or another.
Researchers out of the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law and the UCLA Center for Health Policy Research analyzed data from the 2015-2016 version of the California Health Interview Survey, which collected data from 1,300 households. For the first time ever, the survey included a question for young people (ages 12-17) about gender expression. Participants had to answer how they thought their classmates viewed them in terms of their appearance, style, dress and/or the way they walk or talk; the answers ranged from “very feminine” to “very masculine.”
The study’s authors took these answers and analyzed them in context with what gender/sex adolescents chose in the survey. With this information, researchers identified two groups of gender-nonconforming youth: “highly gender-nonconforming (GNC)” and “androgynous.” Young women who thought people at school saw them as “mostly masculine” or “very masculine,” and young men who chose “mostly feminine” or “very feminine” were categorized as highly GNC. Young people who said they were “equally feminine and masculine” were categorized as androgynous. The remaining youth were categorized as gender conforming.
Ultimately, the study’s authors found that 27 percent, or 796,000, of California’s youth, are GNC. Of the two sub-groups, 21 percent were classified as androgynous, and 6 percent as highly GNC.
Unsurprisingly, the study found GNC youth were more likely to experience severe psychological distress compared to gender-conforming teens (17 percent compared to 7 percent, respectively). “This finding highlights the need to increase access to affirming mental health care and other supports, as well as to educate parents, schools, and communities on the mental health needs of gender nonconforming youth,” the authors write. “It also makes it clear that we must focus on continuing to reduce known risk factors, such as bullying and bias, against gender nonconforming people.” (source, source, source)
So what one sees with the rise and arguments over “transsexualism” is not actually an argument at all, but simply an advancement of the Hegelian dialectic, which is the promotion of a specific viewpoint through a manufactured conflict intended to lead to a compromised concensus which is then attacked upon reaching concensus until the desired goal is reached.
Transsexualism is the “issue” of the time, but it is not really. The issue is homosexuality itself in all forms because any form of sexual activity outside of that which has been established by the natural order is sinful. The clamor about transsexualism right now is only being made in preparation for the advancement of other and even more deviant sexual behaviors, which as we have noted in the coming years will be the normalization of pedophilia and bestiality, which we have warned about at Shoebat.com before:
The natural progression of the LGBT movement, having now legalized in society and the people personally accepted homosexuality and after the idea that a man can change his biologically innate gender as something that is normal and needs to be protected, is to promote for pedophilia. This already has begun with the mainstreaming of homosexual relationships at shows aimed at a teen, pre-teen, and child audiences, but is quickly taking shape in the hyperfeminization of young boys and the hypermasculinization of young girls that is being permitted and promoted by their parents themselves. (source)
It is no accident that “trans children” are being pushed, or that boys and girls are being encouraged and taught to exchange “gender roles.” Obviously it has to do with the transsexual agenda, but ever more importantly is the advancement of pedophilia because it indoctrinates children into sexual ways of thinking and behaving at a very young and impressionable age. This will then be directed into sexual “exploration” for children, at which point pedophilia in various forms will be “legitimized” before it is fully legalized so that the people accept the concept as “normal” upon which legalization will be a mere formality.
The LGBT announced this was their plan over 30 years ago with the Gay Manifesto published in 1987:
“We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us.
“Women, you cry for freedom. You say you are no longer satisfied with men; they make you unhappy. We, connoisseurs of the masculine face, the masculine physique, shall take your men from you then. We will amuse them; we will instruct them; we will embrace them when they weep. Women, you say you wish to live with each other instead of with men. Then go and be with each other. We shall give your men pleasures they have never known because we are foremost men too, and only one man knows how to truly please another man; only one man can understand the depth and feeling, the mind and body of another man.
“All laws banning homosexual activity will be revoked. Instead, legislation shall be passed which engenders love between men. All homosexuals must stand together as brothers; we must be united artistically, philosophically, socially, politically and financially. We will triumph only when we present a common face to the vicious heterosexual enemy.
“If you dare to cry faggot, fairy, queer, at us, we will stab you in your cowardly hearts and defile your dead, puny bodies. (source)
There are many Christians who say they want to be “tolerant” towards the LGBT agenda. The fact is that to say one is “tolerant” towards the LGBT is to “tolerate” that which the Bible says is worthy of death in the Old Testament and New Testament and is roundly condemned by all of sacred tradition.
Do you believe somebody saying that Jesus is a homosexual who and he sodomizes John the Baptist each night should be tolerated?
Do you believe that making movies with eating feces and drinking urine should be tolerated?
Do you believe that the spread of incurable diseases should be tolerated?
Do you believe that masturbating into another man’s organ wounds should be tolerated?
Do you believe that deriving pleasure from deliberately choosing to infect a man with HIV should be tolerated?
If you do not believe in these, then there is absolutely no reason to support the LGBT, because these are the practices they engage in.
Keep in mind, these are the practices now. They have already revealed their intentions, and if one looks at the last 30 years, they have been true to their word and are continuing to advance their agenda.
Speak now, for if the trends continue, your silence will be forced.