By Walid Shoebat

No State of Israel? No America too? It’s easy if you try reading your Bible, Huckabee 

My quest began half a century ago in Bethlehem—the village of my birth and the cradle of my youth—where I first sought to grasp the prophets but failed to understand. My failure to understand continued even after I moved to the United States, where I was told that whenever you read “Israel” is the state of Israel. So I became an ardent zionist and so I appeared on countless platforms and media outlets throughout the United States. I then left zionism. Why? Christian Zionism is that “suicide belt” wrapped not only around the POTUS but around the entire earth; if it is not dismantled, it will trigger a nuclear Armageddon. The only way to diffuse it is by using the very instruction manual they abuse: The Holy Scriptures. We will start with their favorite city Jerusalem. They take pride how Israel controls Jerusalem. But the scriptures reveal that whoever controls that city is clearly given a “Sodom” status:

“… The Great City Sodom and Egypt where also their Lord was crucified”. (Revelation 11:8)

Christian Zionists must address a critical question: Was Christ crucified in Cairo (Egypt) or in Sodom by the Dead Sea? Certainly not. It is evident that the prophets employed allegorical language to convey their message; those who govern Jerusalem will emulate ancient “Egypt” (symbolizing persecution) as well as “Sodom,” in that they tolerate—and even shield from prosecution—perpetrators of homosexual violence. Today, while citizens of that state defend those accused of such acts, Christian Zionists look the other way.
No Zionist can evade this verse, for it clearly reveals that the central headquarters of this “cancer” stems from the very place where the “Lord was crucified.” This is undoubtedly Jerusalem become “Sodom.” Furthermore, it is not only the “Sodom” status that St. John applies to the city Zionists so adore; Jerusalem also acquires a “Babylon” status, being labeled “the mother of harlots.” While Christian Zionists do not dare dispute that Jerusalem was transformed into “Sodom,” they argue ad nauseam that it can never be “Babylon.” This defense fails, however, once one reads the other prophets who completely debunk Zionism—Isaiah, for example, prophesies that “Elam” (Iran) will crush not only Israel but also Israel’s strange bedfellow, “Arabia”:

“The burden against the Desert of the Sea. As whirlwinds in the South pass through, So it comes from the desert, from a terrible land. A distressing vision is declared to me; the treacherous dealer deals treacherously, and the plunderer plunders. Go up, O Elam! Besiege, O Media! All its sighing I have made to cease ... Babylon is fallen, is fallen!  …  My people [the Hebrews] who are crushed on the threshing floor, I tell you what I have heard from the LORD Almighty, from the God of Israel … The burden against Arabia … All the glory of Kedar will fail” (see Isaiah 21:1-2, 9-10, 13, 16).

As Arabic-speaking people, we call Arabia, Al-Jazeera al-Arabia (the Arabian Peninsula). It is effectively an island—a “desert of the sea” surrounded by waters. “Elam” is obviously Persia (Iran), and we are watching this prophecy preparing to unfold in real time. Iran, allied with Yemen, is poised to become the regional superpower. Even the Kurds (“Media”) will join this coalition, and from the “south,” Yemen will deliver the final strike that ends both Arabia and the State of Israel. When Isaiah says, “My people [the Hebrews] are crushed on the threshing floor,” it represents only one “Babylon” falling. Isaiah casts the Wahhabist world order (“Arabia”) into the same mill, as it also acquires “Babylon” status. This becomes obvious as we continue reading Isaiah “And He removed the defense of Judah. In that day …” (Isaiah 22:8) as also confirmed by Micah (5:10-14).
All the fanfare surrounding the Abraham Accords or Zionists burning “red heifers” is merely wishful thinking. The only “heifers” to be found are the wealthy Arabs of the Peninsula. Today, they are despised by non-Peninsular Muslims who are exhausted—not only by this Jewish “harlot”—but especially by the “fat heifers” of Arabia who lie with her: Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar. The ultimate victory is only achieved through Christ. According to the prophet Daniel, the rescue of a remnant of decent Jews (who will convert) and the destruction of the rest is inevitable:

“… there shall be a time of trouble, such as never was since there was a nation, even to that time. And at that time your people [the Hebrews] shall be rescued, every one who is found written in the book … But you, Daniel, shut up the words, and seal the book until the time of the end; many shall run to and fro, and knowledge shall increase.” (Daniel 12:1, 4)

Those who disagree with our assessment must answer a debilitating question: If only those whose names are “found written in the book” via conversion are “rescued,” what happens to the rest? They obviously perish in the final holocaust, a fate we shall shortly explain using the very scriptures they claim to uphold. For the Zionist, Daniel poses a crippling dilemma: How can they be so confident that they have decoded these prophecies when Daniel himself was told to “seal the book until the time of the end”? Was the father of Christian Zionism, John Nelson Darby (1800–1882), “wiser than Daniel”—the very prophet who (like Isaiah) also mentions the demise of all Jews who are not in the book and even includes the rise of Iran? Historically known as the Achaemenid Empire, this powerful dual monarchy was formed around 550 BC when Cyrus the Great unified the Median and Persian peoples. While modern Persia is synonymous with Iran, Media no longer exists as an independent state, occupying much of what is now Kurdistan. This historical shift is foretold in Daniel 7, where the description of these empires provides a critical proviso. The “bear”—representing Medo-Persia—is depicted rising up on one of its sides, symbolizing the eventual dominance of the Persian element over its Median counterpart:

“And suddenly another beast, a second, like a bear. It was raised up on one side, and had three ribs in its mouth between its teeth. And they said thus to it: ‘Arise, devour much flesh!’” (Daniel 7:5)

Today, this prophecy is no longer a mystery. The “bear” which represents the Medo-Persian Empire is “raised up” but only “on one side”.  The Persian side (modern Iran) remains prominent while the Median side (the Kurds) does not. Following the collapse of the Ottoman Empire after WWI, Kurdish territory was partitioned among Turkey, Iran, Iraq, and Syria, leaving them without a sovereign state. We now wait to see which “three ribs” Iran might “gulp up” into its sphere of influence. In years past, none of these prophecies would have made sense unless Zionism was the principal subject. No one imagined that Peninsular Arabs would “lie” with the Zionists or entertain an idea like the “Abraham Accords.” Yet Isaiah foresaw that those who would hate this duo (Arabia and Israel) are none other than “Elam” (Iran). The Zionist who claims 1948 was a fulfillment of prophecy must answer: Where in the entire Bible does God command Jews to enter the Land of Promise while still in a state of sin? This modern “homecoming” is an attempt to force prophecy-fulfillment by hook or by crook. Though the prophets predicted this false-homecoming they clearly reveal that such actions are strictly forbidden and ancient warnings still stand. For example, in Daniel 11:14, we find: “The violent ones among your people will also raise themselves up to fulfill the vision, but they will fall down.” While Daniel refers to a historical conflict between the Seleucid (North) and Ptolemaic (South) kingdoms—specifically when militant Jews allied with Antiochus III against Egypt in a failed bid for autonomy—the principle remains: “violent” efforts to force a vision lead only to demise. The Zionist must also answer: Where in the New Testament is there a command to build “Greater Israel”? The only “Great” found in the New Testament are “Babylon the Great” and “the Great City, Sodom and Egypt, where also their Lord was crucified” (Revelation 11:8). This is a clear reference: all who adore a Zionist Jerusalem are assigned the status of the “Mother Prostitute.” She is the “mother” for the likes of Huckabee, Graham, Hegseth, and Cruz. Those who attempt to finagle the clear meaning of the text must also endure this:

“And upon her forehead was a name written, Mystery, Babylon the Great, the Mother of Harlots and the Abominations of the Earth” (Revelation 17:5)
“And another angel followed, saying, “Babylon is fallen, is fallen, that Great City, because she has made all nations drink of the wine of the wrath of her sexual immorality.” (Revelation 14:8)

The phrase St. John uses, “Babylon is fallen, is fallen,” is found in only one place in the entire Old Testament: Isaiah 21:9. This is the very prophecy we just discussed, depicting Elam (Iran) gaining victory over both Israel and Arabia. Nowhere do the prophets station this “Babylon” in Iraq. “Elam” is not destroying Iraq. It clearly dismantles the “Mother Harlot” adored by the likes of Huckabee. But what of the “sexual immorality” St. John emphasizes? Who is at the helm spreading these sexual aberrations?  This “Mother of Harlots” has transformed Jerusalem into a “Sodom.” Who today can deny that Israel has one of the highest rates of bisexuality in the world? How then can Netanyahu’s sycophants preach “moral values” while supporting a Sodom-state? Historically and scripturally, “Sodom” status necessitates total annihilation. Furthermore, is this “Great City” strictly Jerusalem, as many Catholics claim, or is it Rome, as many Protestants argue? Neither side explains why Isaiah includes “Arabia” in the mix. It is obvious that today’s Wahhabist world order is inextricably linked with the Zionist world order. Scripture reveals that we are facing a triple-tiered Babylon:

“And there were flashes of lightning and sounds and peals of thunder; and there was a great earthquake, such as there had not been since mankind came to be upon the earth, so great an earthquake was it, and so mighty. The great city [mystical Babylon] was split into three parts, and the cities of the nations fell …” (Apocalypse 16:18-19)

The likes of Huckabee are ignorant to this ancient style of allegorical speech. They read the word “earthquake” and imagine a high magnitude on the Richter scale striking a single city; far from it. In a scriptural sense, allegorical “earthquakes” are spiritually seismic. A schism is a “great earthquake” that splits church unity (see Zechariah 14), creating a “great valley”—a wide gorge between two sides. One party looks toward the East (the right side), while the other looks toward the West (the wrong side), until the two become diametrically opposed. At times, an “earthquake” is God’s action to fragment a false unity—a “Babel syndrome.” When the Antichrist establishes a false peace and unifies the centers of the three monotheistic religions, this entire structure (“the Great City”) represent the “three parts.” We find a “Babylon” in Jerusalem and a “Babylon” in Arabia, just as St. Peter referred to Rome as “Babylon.” St. John lumps “the cities of the nations which fell” into these “three parts.” Under the guise of “peace,” the world will believe it is a grand idea to come together ecumenically, as seen in the Abraham Accords. However, this defines the “Babel syndrome” of the rebellious Nimrod (Micah 5:6); at “its entrances” are these very waterways that controls all commerce. This is when God sends an allegorical “earthquake” to fracture this unity, forcing each to revert to their separate dispositions to end “the cities of the nations.” Their unipolar world order is why they are described in the singular as “the Great City.” In Genesis 10:10–12, ancient Babel was also called the “Great City” in the singular, despite being a collection of plural cities: Babel, Erech, Accad, Calneh, Rehoboth-Ir, Calah, and Resen. Collectively, they were “the Great City.” Prophetically, we no longer look to ancient ruins; rather, the “Great City” of prophecy represents “the cities of the nations” coalescing into a triple-tiered structure: 1-Jerusalem: The Zionist world order, 2-Arabia: The Wahhabist world order and 3-Europa (The West): A syncretistic power that unites the others by adopting the ecumenical order of the Antichrist. The text supports the conclusion that these three are viewed as a singular “Great City” and we actually find mention of all three centers, each or all are labeled as “Babylon”. The State of Israel—this “harlot-mother”—controls the earth through the United States and spreads “sexual immorality.” While in the West, we find “Pride” parades from Rome to New York but where in the Middle East do we find such sexual aberrations out in the open outside of the Jewish-filled cities from Jerusalem to Tel Aviv? The prophets left no stone unturned. Zionists practice selective prophecy; however, once these elements are retrofitted into a single framework, the picture becomes crystal clear, and Zionism is revealed not only as a farce, but at the helm of leading Satan’s evil plans. Isaiah 3:9 laments, “They parade their sin like Sodom,” which unquestionably includes the “Mother Harlot” in the “Great City, Sodom and Egypt, where also their Lord was crucified” (Revelation 11:8). Obviously, Christ was not crucified in Cairo or in the Sodom by the Dead Sea. It is clear from today’s headlines that the zionist invaders who seized Jerusalem have transformed it into Sodom.

For decades, Christian Zionist discourse has focused on the imagery of the “harlot” riding the “beast.” However, the Apocalypse (17:18, 18:3, 9) explicitly reveals that the harlot exerts a profound influence over the “kings of the earth.” This dynamic is manifested through the disproportionate Zionist influence originating from the United States and its broader Atlanticist framework. Who then is this “harlot,” and who is this “beast”? Zionists have ignored a truth held from the Church Fathers down to the most prominent Protestant scholars: the final threat to humanity is not Russia or China, but the Roman Empire. This has been the dominant view across all three major branches of Christianity—Catholic, Orthodox, and Protestant—and is a teaching so widespread and enduring that it requires no detailed examination. St. John refers to this power as the “great city that rules over the kings of the earth.” Because the text uses the present tense—”rules”—it refers to the contemporary power of St. John’s time, which was unquestionably Imperial Rome. What once constituted the Roman Empire poses the final threat to humanity. Crucially, since Judea became a Roman province in AD 6, this empire definitively includes the land of Judea. When St. John penned the Apocalypse (c. AD 95–96), he pointed toward Jerusalem as the future “mother” harlot. Following the destruction of the Temple in AD 70, Rome eliminated the risk of further rebellion by upgrading Judea to an Imperial Province, governed by a high-ranking Senatorial Legate and garrisoned permanently by the elite X Fretensis legion within the ruins of Jerusalem. Consequently, Jerusalem’s transformation into “Sodom” is an integral part of this Roman structure. Therefore, it is unfruitful to study biblical eschatology without first understanding that the principal threat is a composite of the nations stemming from this empire. In the past, the Roman Empire was identified primarily through the Book of Daniel and the Apocalypse of St. John. It was rare to search for this empire in the other prophets, where it appears under different labels—such as the maritime thalassocracy, “Tyre.” In Ezekiel 28:2, the prophet clearly identifies the Antichrist as the “Prince of Tyre” who proclaims, “I am a god.” Isaiah 23 further expands on this “Tyre” empire by adding her “colonies”:

“Is this your jubilant city, whose origin is from antiquity, whose feet used to carry her to colonize distant places?” (Isaiah 23:7)

This is not a single “city”. This is a unified unipolar world order. Isaiah catapults his vision toward the end-times by referring to the Roman Empire’s origin as being “from antiquity.” After all, was it not the ancient Roman Province of Britannia that, much later, birthed the colony known as the United States? While Zionists obsess over which specific nation will produce the Antichrist, such a figure cannot be identified by cherry-picking prophecies while ignoring the rest of the scriptural canon. For example, which of these Zionists ever mentions Habakkuk 2:5, who speaks of the “proud man” or the “arrogant man”? This is the same figure whom Jeremiah calls “The Proud One”:

“The proud one shall stumble and fall, with none to raise him up, and I will kindle a fire in his cities” (Jeremiah 50:32)

This is the same tyrannical-Antichrist (“The proud one”) found where no one seems to look:

“Indeed, because he transgresses by wine, he is a proud man, and he does not stay at home. Because he enlarges his desire as hell, and he is like death, and cannot be satisfied, he gathers to himself all nations and heaps up for himself all peoples. He increases what is not his—For how long—and makes himself rich with loans. Will not your creditors rise up suddenly, and those who collect from you awaken? Indeed, you will become plunder for them. Because you have looted many nations, all the remainder of the peoples will loot you—because of human bloodshed and violence done to the land, to the town and all its inhabitant … Woe to you who make your neighbors drink, who mix in your venom even to make them drunk so as to look on their nakedness! The cup in the LORD’S right hand will come around to you, and utter disgrace will come upon your glory.” (Habakkuk 2:5-8, 15-16)
“in indignation You [God] marched through the earth; in anger You [God] trampled the nations. You went forth for the salvation of Your people, for the salvation of Your anointed. You struck the head of the house of the evil to lay him open from thigh to neck. Selah. You thrust through with his own arrows the head of his villages. They stormed in to scatter us; their exultation was like those who devour the oppressed in secret.” (Habakkuk 3:12-14)

Obviously, there are righteous nations whom this “Proud One” seeks to “devour” and “scatter.” A cursory reading of these passages often fails to discern the depth of God’s voice. The “Proud One”—this tyrannical Antichrist—is described as one who “transgresses with wine” and “does not stay at home.” The naive might envision a neighborhood bully, a permanent fixture at the local pub stirring up trouble. But God uses the microcosm as a mirror for the macrocosm. Habakkuk addresses the rise of an Antichrist nation that enforces a unipolar world order, aggressively expanding its control over all peoples. The description—“gathers to himself all nations and heaps up for himself all peoples”—disqualifies local hoodlums; though God observes them with mockery, they act on a global stage. The “proud man” rules a nation that cannot be satisfied by staying at home; his pride compels him to meddle in the affairs of other countries to plunder their resources. If he were merely a drunkard in a village, why use the phrase “gathers to himself all nations”? With the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of the Cold War, a US-led unipolar world emerged, revealing an aim for global primacy cloaked in elaborate rhetoric. President George W. Bush famously exclaimed that “there is no substitute for America,” arguing that the US must replace “repression and fear” with “liberty and hope.” It was framed as “democracy versus autocracy,” yet the threat of nuclear war has since escalated to a fever pitch. These policies even challenged the principles of supply and demand, suggesting that global prices—from currency values to oil—were centrally controlled by the United States which controls the water ways of commerce by hook or by crook. They fear most the fall of the mighty dollar, for it is in the “greenback,” not God, that they place their trust. This “New World Order” is not new; it is as ancient as the Tower of Babel. Habakkuk describes this tyrant-Antichrist as a unipolarist. This is not the signature of Putin who confronted NATO promising to advance a multipolar world order where nations can keep their dignity and sovereignty. The “proud man” does not only “gathers all nations” but is weighed down by astronomical debt—he “makes himself rich with loans.” Unlike the leaders of the BRICS nations, this power is unable to pay its creditors. To solve his insolvency, he becomes restless, spreading trouble abroad to maintain his status until his creditors are forced into a war that ultimately cancels the debt through destruction. In all of history, no nation has had the insurmountable debt that the United States has.

The Roman Empire has two halves that are depicted in the colossus of man as two feet in Daniel (2): the Eastern (Constantinople) and the Western (Rome), which today compose NATO, not BRICS nations, though Christian Zionists make-believe they are the “good guys” while Russia and China are the “bad.” When St. John speaks of “Sodom and Egypt, where also their Lord was crucified,” we must not ignore that word: also. It encompasses the entire expanded empire, including Jerusalem as the “Mother of Harlots.” To explain St. John’s phrasing via allegory: assume a headline reads, “Gay parades were seen throughout the United States, where also their President resides.” The President resides in the White House in Washington D.C. (a “Great City”), which is just one city among hundreds in a nation of fifty states. Their unified agenda with “Sodom” makes them “one city” (the Great City), even though each individual city (like New York) is also great. But by adding “also” the focus is not only on the United States, but “also” where their president resides in Washington D.C. What St. John reveals is that Jerusalem—the site of the Crucifixion—has become an integral part of this immoral Roman enterprise, exerting influence through the “kings of the earth.” Therefore, the Two Witnesses are technically martyred in the Roman Empire which “also” includes Jerusalem “where their Lord was crucified”. Isaiah expands this empire to include her “colonies.” A cursory approach that ignores allegorical detail is costly; every word has a purpose. In the art of deciphering the divine scrolls a foundational rule by St. Chrysostom must be followed: 

“There is nothing written there idly and to no purpose.”–Chrysostom  Hom. Gen. 44,18, pg. 54, 410-411

St. Chrysostom instructs to examine every expression with the eye of a jeweler. We must move with extreme vigilance, for as the Saint declares that every syllable has its orbit; every word is a seed carrying the weight of eternity. St. Jerome of Bethlehem instructs: “ignorance of scripture is ignorance of Christ”. In summary, Jerusalem serves as the “Mother” of numerous harlot daughters. While few scholars have linked St. John’s “Mother of Harlots” to the broader prophetic tradition, the connection is explicit: this figure (Jerusalem’s zionist world order) is accompanied by multiple offspring, as indicated by the plural “harlots.” To date, no one has fully synthesized this apocalyptic “house of harlotry” through the lens of Ezekiel:

“Son of man, make known to Jerusalem her abominations …” (Ezekiel 16:2)

Are these “Abominations” restricted to downtown Jerusalem? Not in totality, Ezekiel’s parable explains an entire structure:

“However, I will restore the fortunes of Sodom and her daughters and of Samaria and her daughters, and your fortunes [Jerusalem] along with them, so that you may bear your disgrace and be ashamed of all you have done in giving them [Sodom and Samaria] comfort [support] And your sisters, Sodom with her daughters and Samaria with her daughters, will return to what they were before; and you and your daughters will return to what you were before. You would not even mention your sister Sodom in the day of your pride, before your wickedness was uncovered.” (Ezekiel 16:54-57)

“Then you will remember your ways and be ashamed, when you receive your older and your younger sisters; for I will give them to you for daughters, but not because of My covenant with you” (16:61)

“Indeed everyone who quotes proverbs will use this proverb against you: ‘Like mother, like daughter!” (16:44)

Who among these Zionists pays any attention to Ezekiel 16? One must ask: When was Jerusalem’s “fortunes” restored? And what of Sodom? When was that one “restored”? Ancient Sodom vanished long ago under fire and brimstone. Therefore,  “restore” only means one thing: to rebuild or revive what has fallen. This defines what occurred in 1948/1967 and how God Almighty views this illegitimate restoration. He ends it with one more holocaust as clearly declared in the prior chapter. This parable catapults ancient names into the future to describe Jerusalem’s alliances. It suggests she is destined to provide “comfort” and support to “Sodom” symbolizing the very sexual perversions we already witness emanating from the state of Israel. It matters little if figures like Hegseth, Huckabee, or Cruz claim to be Jesus-loving or anti-LGBTQ; to support a harlot-nation with a “Sodom” status means they are in bed with her—and they are destined for total annihilation once the righteous remnant departs after the Two Witnesses confront Jerusalem. Lot’s sons in law to be were not homosexual, yet they perished and even Christ warned regarding His second coming to “remember Lot’s wife” that when the church turns her head towards “Sodom” that the time is near. So we ask: When were “Samaria” and “Sodom” ever the sisters of Jerusalem? Keep in mind, Ezekiel 16:44 adds the unifying phrase: “Like mother, like daughter” so that if Sodom supports homosexuality so will mother-Jerusalem, and so will Samaria. As we Palestinians say in Bethlehem, the lid (daughter) fits the pot (mother). Jerusalem (the “Mother”) carries the same infections as her daughters (Sodom and Samaria). In this context, neither ancient Samaria nor ancient Sodom is the principal subject; rather, they are depictions of two sister-allies of the Zionist world order. These two “sisters” eventually become Jerusalem’s daughters: “I will give them to you for daughters” (16:61). This is precisely why St. John defines Jerusalem as the “Mother [singular] of Harlots [plural].” The mention of “daughters” confirms that Jerusalem is the mother of at least two harlot entities that encompass their cities/nations where each city is itself a daughter-harlot (great city). Through the “Great City,” we begin to understand why St. John depicts the “Mother of Harlots” as the one who rules a collective city in the singular: it is this unipolar world order. Her “daughters” represent the multitude of cities that support that state. Any alternative claim must first answer: When were Jerusalem’s “fortunes” revived? And how were the “fortunes” of Sodom and her “daughters” (cities) restored, especially since Sodom was wiped out by fire? When did Zionist Israel ever have a “Sodom” as a sister-ally? How is Samaria restored to her former state? Here, the interpreter faces a terminal dilemma: ancient Sodom is no more, and “Israel” the ancient Ten Tribes of the Northern Kingdom (where Samaria resided) are gone, destined never to rise again:

“Fallen is Virgin Israel, never to rise again, deserted in her own land, with no one to lift her up.” (AMOS 5:2)

To claim that ancient Israel (Samaria) can be revived is a farce; the prophet Amos is explicit: she is “never to rise again.” How can anyone put a spin on “never to rise again”? Therefore, Ezekiel’s “Samaria” serves as an allegorical reference to the transgressions of an allegorical Israel—the Church—which is now infected with the same syncretism that doomed ancient Samaria, while simultaneously emulating the moral decay of Sodom. Today, this is visibly manifested in the Vatican’s “Pachamama” controversies and the pervasive crisis of institutionalized pedophilia within the priesthood. The word “restore” carries a significant weight that cannot be avoided. To “restore” Jerusalem is to revive what has fallen, returning it to what it was “before” God blessed it—which is why Ezekiel 16:3 gives it the original title of “Canaanite.” Throughout the prophets, the components of the Roman Empire are tucked away under these ancient names. What were once Christian nations are now reverting to their pagan roots. The eastern Empire will be ruled by “Gog” (Gyges) which is not located in Russia but Asia Minor. This system is mystically called “Egypt” or “Daughter Egypt,” while its Western half—the Western coalition—is mystically labeled “Babylon,” “Daughter Babylon,” “Canaan,” “Philistia,” “Tyre,” “Sidon,” or “Sodom”. Isaiah 23 speaks of an allegorical “Tyre” as the kingdoms of the Antichrist. These are also the kingdoms of Canaan, frequently depicted as Philistia. If by “Philistia” are the ancient Philistines, why would Philistia appear in Joel’s account of Armageddon? This Tyre/Canaan/Philistia complex is a cluster of nations led by the “Prince of Tyre”—the tyrant Antichrist. Zionist Israel (Jerusalem) must therefore be “restored,” but not by God’s design. This is why God mockingly views her establishment as a sinful nation, whose “redemption” involves one final, massive holocaust. This event is detailed in the preceding chapter: Ezekiel 15 speaks of not one, but two holocausts of the Jews:

“Although they have come out of the fire [the first holocaust by Nazi Germany] the fire will yet consume them [another holocaust]. And when I set my face against them, you will know that I am the Lord. I will make the land desolate [again] because they have been unfaithful, declares the Sovereign Lord.” (Ezekiel 15:6-8)

Though the world is well aware of the first holocaust in Europe, Ezekiel insists upon a second Holocaust that must occur in Jerusalem itself, for the same recurring sins. A “Sodom” status necessitates only one outcome: all who fail to escape are burned by fire, and this is why Christ, regarding His second coming, warned to “remember Lot’s wife.” When the Church (including Jerusalem) turns its head backwards towards Sodom, the end is near. Therefore, the advice given to Jews to leave the land is the correct counsel; Huckabee’s persistence in telling them to ‘hold your ground’ is the devil’s advice. The advancement of “Sodom” is the catalyst for the punishment, which flows seamlessly into Ezekiel 16 to explain the reasons for—and the construct of—this global Sodom. Therefore, the word “restore” obviously addresses the recent return of the Jews: it was a return not in redemption, but in sin—the worst form of sin: Sodom. Why then object that Jerusalem gains a “Babylon” status while admitting the “Sodom” status which is much worse? The reason these heretics do not deny this, is that because John left no loopholes for the “Sodom” status since it rules “where also their Lord was crucified”, and this leaves no room for doubt. Therefore, it is the New Testament that is in the ‘driver’s seat’ on how we interpret the Old. Both holocausts (past and future) involve the Jews spreading homosexuality. Before the Holocaust happened ,Jews were the pioneers for spreading homosexuality in Weimar Germany. Today, Jews are at the forefront for the sodomite agenda.

Rarely do you ever hear the historic version of how before the first Holocaust, Jews played a major role in trying to turn Berlin into the grandest “Sodom” known in recent history, that surpassed anything we see today in San Francisco. Germany was infested by Jews like Magnus Hirschfeld who was the pioneer in creating the largest library known in history to advance all sorts of debauchery and homosexuality. Friedrich Radszuweit was a Jewish bookseller and author, and was a leading figure in early homosexual activism. In 1920, he founded the Federation for Human Rights (Bund für Menschenrecht), an organization that advocated for gay and transgender rights. He published several homosexual and transgender journals, including Der Eigene (variously translated as “The Unique One” or “His Own Man”) and Die Freundschaft (“Friendship”), which built a sense of community. Max Spohr, another Jew, was one of the co-founders of Hirschfeld’s Scientific-Humanitarian Committee (1897), and was a publisher who helped disseminate some of the first media dedicated to homosexuals. Gert Wollheim: A German-Jewish Expressionist painter, captured the shifting social mores of the Weimar Republic in his art. His 1926 painting, Untitled (Couple), famously depicted a gender-ambiguous pair to advance changing perceptions of gender and sexuality. Margo Holzmann: A Jewish dancer and cabaret performer in Weimar Berlin was part of a vibrant lesbian subculture with her non-Jewish partner, Marta Halusa. Charlotte Bara (originally Charlotte Abel): A German-Jewish expressionist dancer who worked extensively in Berlin’s cabaret scene during the Weimar era. She was known for her avant-garde style and for performing in male clothing, embracing gender expression.

Karl Giese: A Jewish archivist and museum curator, was a longtime partner of Magnus Hirschfeld, worked tirelessly with Hirschfeld at the Institute for Sexual Science, running it during Hirschfeld’s world tour in the early 1930s. Felix Abraham: A Jewish dermatologist and colleague of Hirschfeld at the Institute for Sexual Science, Abraham assisted in surgeries performed at the Institute to change gender. Many Jewish physicians worked at Hirschfeld’s institute providing a range of services, including early gender-affirming so-called care, counseling, and social support for sexual and gender minorities. Today, from the United States, Jews take the role of globally advancing and exporting homosexuality. There are ample prophetic verses explaining all this mayhem that was carried out by the Zionists whom God clearly destroys once and forever. The Holocaust, as awful as it was, was God’s judgment regarding this mischief in Ezekiel 16. This Holocaust and the coming second holocaust is inevitable.  There is no need to expose what some already take pride in; headlines from the major Jewish publication, Tikkun, like “How The Jews Brought America To The Tipping Point On Marriage Equality” confirm the trajectory. Keep in mind, the phrase used by St.John “Babylon is fallen, is fallen” appears nowhere in the Old Testament except in Isaiah 21:2, 9–10, which describes the destruction of two regional Babylons: Israel and Arabia. Meanwhile, Europe (the West) is called “Daughter Babylon” and is destroyed from her north (by Orthodox Russia), as explained in Zechariah 2 in light of Jeremiah 50–51. While that is beyond the scope of this study, it is clear that St. John gleaned his olives from the same tree as the ancient prophets.

Still in doubt? Perhaps we can nudge these Zionists with the testimony of Jeremiah, who also dooms this Mother Harlot to utter destruction. In Revelation 17:4, we find a “golden cup in her hand” passed to her by God Himself. In the entire Old Testament, this “golden cup” is found only in Jeremiah:

“For Israel is not forsaken, nor Judah, by his God, the LORD of hosts, though their land was filled with sin against the Holy One of Israel. Flee from the midst of Babylon, and every one save his life! Do not be cut off in her iniquity, for this is the time of the LORD’s vengeance; He shall recompense her. Babylon has been a golden cup in the hand of the LORD, intoxicating all the earth. The nations have drunk of her wine; therefore the nations are going insane.” (Jeremiah 51:5-7)

Is this “Babylon” located in Iraq—a nation the Zionists obliterated while massacring its people—or is it “Judah” and “Israel,” as Jeremiah clearly reveals “their land was filled with sin?” Regarding Iraq, Daniel says:

“[Babylon, the lion] its wings [expansive power and dominion] were plucked off; and it was lifted up from the earth and made to stand on two feet like a man, and a man’s heart was given to it.” (7:4).

The primary threat to God’s people no longer originates from what was once ancient Babylonia in Iraq. In Genesis 10:10–12, the “Great City” (singular) was a collection of plural cities: Babel, Erech, Accad, Calneh, Rehoboth-Ir, Calah, and Resen. Individually or collectively, they were referred to in the singular form as “the Great City.” But none of these ancient cities encompass “Mystical Babylon”. This status has been transferred to Jerusalem, which, as the “Great City,” includes all her daughter nations (Israel)—explaining why she is titled the “Mother of Harlots.” Most analysts fail to recognize that Jerusalem is the “Mother” of several “harlots”—nations that were once Christian but are now allied with her. This collection of nations constitutes the “Great City,” many of which are located “across the sea”—specifically the Mediterranean—unquestionably pointing to Europe and beyond. References to these “coastlands” (the water ways of commerce) appear in an array of prophecies: Isaiah 41:1, 5; 42:12, 15; 49:1; 59:18; and Jeremiah 25:22. These regions “across the sea” represent Europe (see also Ezekiel 26:15–18) on “the day of your fall”; 27:3, which defines “Tyre” as the coastlands; and Ezekiel 39:6, where they are destroyed with Gog of Asia Minor. Gog’s dominion and the coastlands are the two parts of the Roman Empire. Isaiah 23:2–11 notes, “He has stretched out his hand; he has shaken the kingdoms,” while Jeremiah 48:32 observes, “Its tendrils reached across the sea”, unquestionably across the Mediterranean. This is the West as we know it. She will be destroyed from her “east” (Russia). Prophecy has dual-fulfillments where ancient events reflect toward the end:

“Remember the former of old for I am God, and there is no other; I am God, and there is none like Me, declaring the end from the beginning and from ancient times [history] things that are not yet done [future] I call a bird of prey [the eagle] from the east, a man for my purpose from a far country [distant nation]. Yes, I have spoken; so I will also bring it about. I have planned it; I will also do it”. (Isaiah 46:9-11)

Behold the Plan Of God: “I have planned it; I will also do it.” Do what?  Plan what? To end aggression from “the west,” (59:18-19) God summons a “bird of prey from the east, a man for My purpose from a far country”, a holy nation from the northeast (see Isaiah 41:2,25). To its “west” are nations that were historically influenced by Germany and Austria-Hungary which later on deepened their ties with NATO. When western publications discuss Russia as the Third Rome, they often label it as a Russian-imperialist ‘myth,’ while these same publications avoid to compare, or contradistinguish this one from their countless historic myths. How can the scoffing-swine find a pearl, much less (from scripture) see themselves as tyrant? While critics point to Russia’s dark history under the sickle, that period and the nation’s subsequent redemption under the cross were foretold in Zechariah 6:6–8, a prophecy that continues to confound scholars. Isaiah (59:18-19) exposes “the west” adding:

“Their webs will not become clothing, nor will they cover themselves with their works; their works are works of wrongdoing, and an act of violence is in their hands. Their feet run to evil, and they hurry to shed innocent blood; their thoughts are thoughts of wrongdoing, devastation and destruction are in their paths. They do not know the way of peace, and there is no justice in their tracks; they have made their paths crooked, whoever walks on them does not know peace.” (59:5-7)

The destruction of “the West” as we know it stems from its east:

“According to their deeds, so will He repay: Wrath to His adversaries, retribution to His enemies; to the coastlands He will deal retribution. So they will fear the name of the LORD from The West and His glory from the rising of the sun, for He will come like a rushing stream which the wind of the LORD drives.” (Isaiah 59:18-19)

Since the “coastlands” are “across the sea,” they are unquestionably situated in the Northwest (Europe, the Western Roman Empire) facing the Northeast (also see Isaiah 41:2, 25). But Isaiah (59:18) refers to these “coastlands” from the proximity of “the holy city,” which is east (“the rising of the sun”). We also find these “coastlands” at enmity with the servant (see 41:5 in light of 2, 25). Jeremiah (25:22) also situates “the kings of the coastlands” north “across the sea” which Isaiah also condemns, and literally calls these northwestern “coastlands” as “the West”. Therefore, it is the West as we know it. It “fears” its holy enemy facing them from the East: “the rising of the sun,” which is from where God’s glory shines (“His glory from the rising of the sun”), and can only land upon Holy Russia (far northeast).

To dispute this one must examine the entire scriptures. We find nothing holy stemming from the south where Jerusalem sits. On the contrary, Zechariah 6:6-8 sentences the “south” with the hail of destruction which Isaiah 21 reveals as Arabia and the state of Israel are located in the south. No one can find an entity given a holy-status unless it is situated in the far “north,” particularly the far northeast (also see Daniel 11:44-45) of Asia Minor. Unfortunately for nations like Sweden, Norway and the rest of western Europe they are missing an “east”.

The language in Isaiah is clear. He separates friend from foe as he addresses the war from Russia’s proximity east and to its west: “they will fear the name of the LORD from the West [the West as we know it] and His glory from the rising of the sun” (Holy Russia to Eurṓpē’s east). This “fear” by “The West” is no fear as in reverence, but fear of chastisement, since these are clearly “His adversaries” “His enemies” explicitly here named as “The West,” “the coastlands,” which shall “fear” “His name,” while from the “rising of the sun” (far east of Eurṓpē, Russia) stems “His glory” and is the holy city.

Eurṓpē, “west” of Russia “fears,” and even will “flee,” chased by the “east wind” in Psalm 48 regarding a distant northerly Sion invaded by Tyre aka “ships of Tarshish” in Isaiah 23:1. The “east wind” (“rising of the sun,” farthest northeast) has been a clue set from as far back as Genesis in the story of Joseph. This mystical “Joseph” unlocks another major mystery that leads to the Third Rome. In Ezekiel (37) it is allegoric “Joseph” who binds “Israel” and “Judah” together as one stick occurs in the city of refuge; “Mount Sion in the far north”. This is where the decent remnant Jews will escape to and from Orthodox Russia and they will gain their victory in Christ by uniting with it. To defeat Russia, this Haman (NATO powers)—whether these dismantle or remain in tact—still composites the Roman Empire. Who today can define Russia as “Sodom?” Encouraging support for “Sodom” and “Babylon” while suckling from their teat is a direct violation of moral norms. This cluster of nations, summed up as “the Great City,” consists of several prostitute nations. In the prophetic vernacular, a “Babylon” status no longer refers to Iraq, just as a “Sodom” status is no longer found by the Dead Sea, and an “Egypt” status is nowhere near Cairo. When Ezekiel 16 grants Jerusalem a “Sodom” status, it mirrors exactly how St. John identifies Jerusalem’s restoration as a “Sodom-state.” Both “Babylon” and “Sodom” statuses signify one thing: utter destruction—but only after the rescue of the decent few “whose names are written in the book.” Even Isaiah explains this process:

“And the remnant that is escaped of the house of Judah shall again take root downward [south] it [only] bear fruit [converts when they go] upward [north, Russia]: For out of Jerusalem a remnant will go [they flee] and [they finally come] out of Mount Sion survivors. The zeal of the LORD of armies will perform this.” (Isaiah 37:31-32)

Judah’s fruitless escape from the holocaust out of Europe back to the land of promise (downward, south) will be dismal since he will only “bear fruit” (conversion) by remigrating “upwards” (north):

“But on Mount Sion there will be those who escape, and it will be holy.” (Obadiah 1:17)

Where is this kingdom Sion? While the judgment of the harlot occurs, Jewish escapees survive and are converted in Russia where “the daughters of Judah shall rejoice because of Your judgments” (48:11). In this psalm the “daughters of Judah” reside in: “Mount Sion in the far north” (48:2). This is not the unholy Jerusalem (south) but Holy Russia (far north) where the Jews escape and where they are finally reeducated spiritually. The metaphorical style of the prophets exposes a major flaw widespread in Evangelical circles. These groups speak of “biblical prophecy” and “spiritual warfare” while ignoring Jeremiah 6:21, which warns that God Himself sets up “stumbling blocks.” These minefields are designed to trap the “wolves” who are the authors of confusion. They fall directly into spiritual landmines that are marked with warning signs for the sheep but remain hidden as “goat traps” within parabolic expressions. To the novice warrior, missing these traps may cost a limb; for the “goat,” it results in the loss of eternal life.

Danger can only be detected through the “infrared” of the parabolic lens. The novice ignores that prophetic “stones of stumbling” are numerous, embedded into every nook and cranny so that “many will stumble over them” (Isaiah 8:15). To navigate these names, we must focus on the uniform allegorization found throughout the scriptures. Hosea provides the golden rule: “Through the prophets I speak in parables” (12:10). God does not merely say He tells parables; He says He speaks in parables—meaning His entire prophetic communication is parabolic. Regarding the art of interpreting metaphor and allegorical language, St. Clement laid the foundation, defining an allegory as

“a discourse that leads one who understands from what is not the principal subject but is similar to the principal subject to the true and principal subject.” (on the Parables of Jesus, Strōmateis 6.15.126.4)

St. Clement’s instruction serves as a foundational pillar: ancient “Babylon” in Iraq is “not the principal subject,” although it is “similar” to the true and principal subject. That true and principal subject is Jerusalem, which has become “Babylon” and the “Mother of [several] harlot [nations].” Ignoring this fundamental rule is Zionism’s persistence on hyper-literalism—an error that will become their downfall. Even Christ warned that He speaks in parabolic expressions; that which is not the principal subject veils the true subject so that “the knowledge of the secrets of the kingdom of God has been given to you, but to others I speak in parables, so that, ‘though seeing, they may not see; though hearing, they may not understand’” (Luke 8:10). This mirrors the seal placed on Daniel regarding the understanding of end-times prophecy: “Many shall be purified, made white, and refined, but the wicked shall do wickedly; and none of the wicked shall understand, but the wise shall understand” (Daniel 12:10). Zionists interpret through the lens of the “wicked” who cannot understand. Yet, Daniel provides a proviso where all are given a chance: “Many shall be purified, made white, and refined.” God, the merciful invites all (including zionists) to repent. Prophecy is allegorically interpreted. Ignoring this rule has become a pandemic, infecting every pro-Israel author and pastor who fancies themselves a “decoder” of prophecy. This “Babylon” is obviously not Iraq; rather, a regional “Babylon” status ensures that Persia will eventually strike the Jews and the Arabian Peninsula into oblivion. These ancient prophecies are written such that when the lost read them, they imagine Jews merely returning from ancient Babylonia. They remain behind because they see a “sitting duck,” while the prophets are actually pointing to a “fleeing rabbit.”

To see the “rabbit,” one must ask a single question: According to Jeremiah, whose “land was filled with sin”—the land that Jeremiah then labels “Babylon”? Here is the prophecy once more; pay close attention:

“For Israel is not forsaken, nor Judah, by his God, the LORD of hosts, though their land was filled with sin against the Holy One of Israel. Flee from the midst of Babylon, and every one save his life! Do not be cut off in her iniquity, for this is the time of the LORD’s vengeance; He shall recompense her. Babylon has been a golden cup in the hand of the LORD, intoxicating all the earth. The nations have drunk of her wine; therefore the nations are going insane.” (Jeremiah 51:5-7)

It is impossible to file this “Babylon” under Iraq. If this was Iraq, why the urgency to flee Babylon when the ancients strolled safely out of Iraq? These heretics are easily recognized by this: What is rendered inconvenient is always filed to the annals of history. But for the likes of Huckabee (the “duck”), ancient Iraq is the usual scapegoat because the alternative—the truth of the prophecy—is extremely inconvenient. Huckabee needs to answer: Whose “land was filled with sin against the Holy One of Israel” that God then labels “Babylon”? The scriptural record restricts the answer to only two candidates: “Israel” and “Judah”. This is a question impossible to evade. “Babylon” is obviously a nickname—not for Iraq (ancient Babel, Erech, Accad, Calneh, etc.)—but for “Judah” and “Israel.” We all know who “Judah” represents: the Hebrew people. The real question is: who is this “Israel,” and why is “Judah” separate from her? This “Israel” is none other than the “Samaria” of Ezekiel 16. First, Jacob was renamed “Israel”. He was promised to spawn a “company of nations.” Note that “nations” is plural. These are the nations of Israel fulfilled in Christ, often addressed as the “mountains [nations] of Israel”—which are certainly not the physical hills of Judea and “mount [kingdom] Sion in the far north” is not the state of Israel which resides south of the earth. Those who reject this must face a lethal question: Christ said, “I will build My church.” Where, then, is Christ’s Church in the prophets? This question alone debunks the entire framework of Christian Zionism. The deterioration of the Church Universal is clearly addressed when God instructs the “mountains of Israel” to listen and in Daniel (2) God finally breaks a “stone” out of the mountain of the Roman Empire which is a “kingdom” that spiritually rejuvenates “in the days of these kings” (2:44). Physical mountains do not have ears and this holy kingdom only arises during the lifespan of ten acolytes of Antichrist (represented as ten toes in the colossus of man). This cannot be the universal church established long ago. Through this “stone” God finally redeems this “Israel” in Isaiah 11, addressing them as a collection of “Gentile” nations that He explicitly calls “Israel”:

“And in that day there shall be a Root of Jesse, Who shall stand as a banner to the people; for the Gentiles shall seek Him, and His resting place shall be glorious. On that day the Lord will extend his hand a second time to recover the remnant of his people who survive  —  from Assyria and Egypt, from Pathros and Cush, from Elam [Iran] and Shinar [Iraq], from Hamath [Syria] and the islands of the sea. He will set up a banner for the nations [the Gentiles] and will assemble the outcasts of Israel and gather together the dispersed of Judah from the four corners of the earth.” (Isaiah 11:10-2)

The text is explicit: this exodus occurs “a second time.” This detail is impossible to file away into the annals of past history. When, then, did this “second exodus” occur—the one that includes these “Gentiles”? This event has not yet been fulfilled, as the first exodus was under Moses. This event occurs “to recover the remnant of His people who are left, from Assyria, Pathros and Cush [Sudan, Somalia], from Elam [Iran] and Shinar [Iraq], from Hamath [Syria], and from the islands of the sea.” Isaiah clearly bestows the name “Israel” upon these Gentiles; he includes them alongside “Judah,” all arriving for the final homecoming to the New Jerusalem. All such homecoming prophecies pertain to the New Jerusalem—not the old city of today with its falafel, hummus, and kebab stands. Isaiah’s definition of “Israel” aligns perfectly with St. Paul’s:

“For not all who are descended from Israel are Israel”—Romans 9:6

The name “Israel” actually becomes a vice-grip that cripples these racialists, as their entire paradigm falls apart when faced with these simple questions: What name does St. Paul give the Church, whether Jew or Gentile? Which nations does Isaiah include in his definition of “Israel?” There is only one way to answer: “Israel” is not composed of gefilte-fish eaters alone; rather, it is a “combination burrito”—a union of both Jew and Gentile together in Christ. It includes peoples from Iran to Africa. Isaiah’s “Israel” is identical to St. Paul’s “Israel.” Is Paul’s “Israel” restricted to gangsters like Netanyahu, Smotrich and Ben-Gvir? Clearly, there is a rejected “Israel of the flesh” that is contradistinguished from the “Israel of the spirit,” the latter of whom are not necessarily biological descendants. For example, in the prophecy of Gog and Magog which the Zionist fails to understand we find:

“The nations will know that the house of Israel went into exile for their wrongdoing, because they were disloyal to Me, and I hid My face from them; so I handed them over to their adversaries, and all of them fell by the sword.” (Ezekiel 39:23)

“And the house of Israel will know that I am the LORD their God, from that day onward”. (39:22)

The rejected “house of Israel” all “fell by the sword” and only those who “know that I [Christ] am the LORD” are rescued.  The main place of refuge for these remnants is found in Jeremiah:

“In those days the house of Judah will walk with the house of Israel, and they will come together from the land of the north to the land that I gave your fathers as an inheritance” (Jeremiah 3:18)

“At that time they shall call Jerusalem the throne of the LORD; and all the nations shall be gathered unto it, to the name of the LORD, to Jerusalem: neither shall they walk any more after the imagination of their evil heart.” (Jeremiah 3:17)

As we previously discussed from Isaiah 37:31-32, the Jews can only “bear fruit” “upwards” and in Jeremiah this becomes as clear as the sun. The conversion of Jewish remnants mainly occurs in “the Land of the North” in Orthodox Russia. Jeremiah’s prophecy throws in a ‘monkey wrench’ onto the zionist conveyor belt. It reveals that the Christian Orthodox world becomes the light on a hill. 2 Thessalonians 2 clearly reveals that the Christian world falls into disarray. The solution? Daniel 2 reserves a “kingdom” that arises to the occasion. But Daniel insists, this “kingdom” arises “in the days of those [evil] kings”. The lifespan of a king cannot exceed a century. This cannot be the church universal founded two millennia ago. Jeremiah reveals this kingdom. It exists in the “north”. Jeremiah too addresses the spiritual famine (the falling away): “Truly, in vain is salvation hoped for from the hills [religious institutions], and from the multitude of mountains [nations]; truly, in the LORD our God is the salvation of Israel.” (Jeremiah 3:23) “Mountains” are kingdoms. Christendom spiritually and completely falls apart, yet in the “north” a nation repents and prospers:

“Go and proclaim these words toward the north, and say: ‘Return, backsliding Israel,’ says the LORD; ‘I will not cause My anger to fall on you. For I am merciful,’ says the LORD; ‘I will not remain angry forever.” (Jeremiah 3:12)

“Return, you backsliding children, and I will heal your backslidings.” The north responds to God’s calling: “Indeed we [the north] do come to You, for You are the LORD our God” (Jeremiah 3:22) and in verse 18 it positions this “north” in “the land of the North.” All this represents to where the “white horses” of Zechariah 6 are sent to “the land of the North”. But the remnant Jews mainly convert in the “land of the north”. This is not the land of Israel.

What now? The conversion of the Jews cannot occur unless the Jews first leave the “Land of Promise,” which they have unlawfully entered. How can Huckabee explain this unless a total exile is planned? How can the Jews commence a homecoming from the “Land of the North” in a state of complete repentance if they are currently sitting in Jerusalem in complete unrepentance? Then we have these phrases “in those days” and “at that time” are inescapable. This event did not occur in 1948, or 1967, or during the Perestroika migration from Russia, or as I am writing here. So these prophecies in Jeremiah are clearly not talking about the Zionist project. To fulfill all these prophecies that pertain to this homecoming, they must first return to Russia for the ultimate cleansing process—which is obviously conversion to Orthodoxy. This is certainly not happening as I write, especially since any true homecoming must be preceded by repentance: “neither shall they walk any more after the imagination of their evil heart.” The forensic synchronization of these texts utterly collapses the 1948 narrative. All of this happens “in that day” and “at that time,” confirming that the exile described in Ezekiel 39:22–23 is no ancient historic event: “And the house of Israel will know that I am the Lord their God, from that day onward”—not before.

This “from that day onward” is perfectly synchronized with Jeremiah’s “in those days.” Only then does the true homecoming ensue—to a New Jerusalem, never the old one—since “they shall call Jerusalem the throne of the Lord.” But the New Testament clearly reveals this Jerusalem is a city no man fathoms. By identifying the “Throne of the Lord” as the destination, the prophets distinguish the “New Jerusalem” from the “Sodom” currently being struck by Persian missiles. Because the current state remains secular and “filled with sin,” the “day” of knowing Him has not yet arrived. The Apocalypse make clear that they are occupying the land as bastards born out of wedlock, proving that 1948 was not a divine restoration, but a geographic and spiritual trespass as a Sodom. This “Throne of the Lord” is a city that no man fully fathoms. It does not have hummus, kebab, or falafel stands. It does not have rainbow flags hovering from electric polls or does it have Jews spitting at Christians. The Jews will leave without their hummus. In Palestine, there is an old saying: “He came out of the festival (Mawlid) without any chickpeas.” The Jews will convert in the “Land of Borscht”—the Slavic North. Even this is explained in the same prophecy in Jeremiah 3:15: “And I will give you shepherds according to mine heart, which shall feed you with knowledge and understanding” (Jeremiah 3:15). This occurs in Russia in the “land of the north”. This geographic marker is also found in this lonely Psalm:

“…the daughters of Judah shall rejoice because of Your judgments.” (48:11)

Huckabee must answer: What “judgments”? And where are these Jewish girls hanging out while these “judgments” commence? The answer is found in the very same Psalm:

“Mount [nation/kingdom] Sion in the far north.” (48:2)

How can this be Jerusalem located south? This is when and where the remnant of the Jews will convert, and it will be the primary destination as the city of refuge. Every occurrence of the true homecoming event must agree with Jeremiah and this includes the valley of the dry bones in Ezekiel (37). Even the prophecy of Ezekiel’s Gog and Magog should cause us to ponder this specific verse: “The house of Israel will know that I am the Lord their God, from that day onward.” One must ask: Don’t religious Jews already claim to know that Yahweh is their God? As a public figure, I have personally roamed Jewish halls, from the Chabad to Aish HaTorah. So holy is the name “Yahweh” to them that they are not even permitted to utter it, preferring instead to use “Hashem” (הַשֵּׁם), which simply means “The Name.” However, God’s phrasing—which most read in a cursory fashion—is hinting at a monumental surprise. What religious Jews currently deny is that Christ is God. Therefore, the “day” Ezekiel speaks of is the moment these remnants will “know that I [Christ] am the Lord their God, from that day onward”. In fact, the Gog and Magog war completely crushes zionism. In this prophecy we find Daniel’s key—a profound query from the mouth of God Himself:

“Are you [Gog] the one of whom I spoke in former days through My servants the prophets of Israel, who prophesied in those days for many years that I would bring you against them?” (Ezekiel 38:17)

The word “prophets” is in the plural form, yet in the entire Old Testament only Ezekiel mentions Gog. God’s query baffled Bible scholars, who could offer no better response to God’s question than twiddle their thumbs. Only one solution solves this conundrum: in the other “prophets,” Gog has other titles besides the name “Gog”. Once discovered (especially in Daniel), this becomes the key to opening Daniel’s lock. Once we resolve this meta-puzzle—finding Gog in all the prophets—our conclusions will force these critics to change their minds and ask: ‘Where is victorious Holy Russia not mentioned by the “Prophets” who spoke about him for “many years” (throughout the generations)? Where is Gog in Daniel? Regardless of the scholars’ caliber, to find Gog in Daniel, all the sheep must be corralled by the Shepherd into one location, to a prophetic segment that sits just before the seal is placed; Daniel 11:21-45, where this northern Gog is given a fitting title: “the king of the North” is of Türkiye not Russia. His fall is in the final two verses: “And he shall plant the tabernacles of his tents [mosques] between the seas [Mediterranean to the Caspian] and the glorious holy mountain [holy nation to his north] yet he shall come to his end [falls], and no one will help him” (Daniel 11:44-45). God’s enemies must be corralled to this location, exactly where God appoints a holy Kingdom that brings about Gog’s end:

“Who has stirred one from the east whom He calls in righteousness to His feet? He turns nations over to him and subdues kings. He makes them like dust with his sword, like the wind-driven chaff with his bow … I have aroused one from the north [far north] and he has come; from the rising of the sun [farthest northeast] he will call on My name; and he will come upon rulers as upon mortar, even as the potter treads clay … Who has declared this from the beginning, that we might know? Or from former times, that we may say, “He is right!?” There was no one at all who declared, there was no one at all who [historically] proclaimed, there was no one at all who heard your words.” (Isaiah 41:2,25-26)

Is this merely Cyrus reborn? We must pause at the precipice of that single, shattering word: ‘not.’ Of the ancient Persian, the Almighty declared, “though you have not known Me”—a pagan vessel used for a holy purpose. But the one who emerges from the frost of the far ‘North’ toward the ‘Rising of the Sun’ shatters that mold. This servant does not walk in ignorance; he “calls upon My name” from the very inception of his march. He is the baptized successor to the Cyrus-type, rising from the exact northeastern horizon where Daniel’s vision ignites:

“horrifying news from the East [“the rising of the sun”] and from the North [farther north of Türkiye] will terrify him [Gog]”.

This is the “terrifying news” that strikes the heart of Gog: that the North is no longer a wilderness of the unknown, but the throne of a King who knows his God. Even in Isaiah God nudges us with His Holy Questions: “Who has declared this from the beginning, that we might know?” Who today answered God’s questions? Answers to God’s questions cripples all dissenters: “who has declared this … from the former times, that we may say “He is right?” This completely eliminates the ancient Cyrus. Both Daniel and Isaiah confirm, the route to trample the “holy city” is towards the “the rising of the sun” (“east”) and “north,” of Byzantium (Türkiye) where a Tsar (“king”) will be awaiting at “Mount Sion in the far north” (Psalm 48:2).

In Daniel (11:21–43), the prophet chronicles Gog’s expeditions toward the South. However, in the final two verses (11:44–45), the focus shifts: it records his terminal campaign toward the East and the North—a move that precipitates ‘his end’ and his final fall. But this raises the ultimate question of prophetic ‘latitude and longitude’: Where exactly is Gog sitting when this horrifying news reaches his ears? If his end comes from the North and the East, then the geography itself dictates that his conqueror cannot be the one they claim. Is he in Judea? Far from it. He already conquered Judea in Daniel 11:41 which confirms without doubt the end of the Jewish state of Sodom, which Daniel calls “the beautiful land”. This is no compliment. Fact is, Daniel simply complements St. John’s rendering since ancient “Sodom” was described by Lot as “like the garden of the LORD” (Genesis 13:10) which was unquestionably a beautiful land. Being called the “beautiful land” does not imply any holy status. On the contrary, this rendering is a dead giveaway, since God’s interest is not this “beautiful land” of Sodom, but the “Holy City” called by Daniel “the Glorious Holy Mountain [nation]” which he locates north of Gog’s kingdom in occupied Byzantium.

Our assessment is difficult to refute, especially since Daniel (11:40-45) has unanimous scholarly agreement that it was not fulfilled in Antiochus IV Epiphanes. The key to resolving the Gog dilemma lies in a single, plural reality: Ezekiel says: “prophets” in the plural form. By the very nature of Scripture, we can no longer interpret these segments in isolation. Our homework remains fundamentally incomplete until we gather the testimony of Ezekiel and the collective witness of all the other “prophets,” retrofitting and bundling them into a single, unified architecture. Only then does the grand orchestra emerge, with Daniel standing as the conductor of a symphony that requires every prophetic voice to be heard. 

Why are we all confined by Daniel conducting this symphony? Daniel (11:21-45) is the only place in the entire scriptures that provides a sequential order (a timeline). This sequential timeline destroys dispensationalism’s focus to always giving the final victory to the state of Israel. This “Sodom” is clobbered by Gog in Daniel (11:41)which occurs before Gog comes to “his end”. 

Doesn’t Gog fall in Judea? It is here where all theories crumble since by “prophets,” this retrofitting is impossible to avoid. Let’s take Ezekiel’s prophecy for example. This is where every scholar must answer: where is Gog sitting at that time of his final invasion just before he falls? This is the whole theme of Ezekiel (38, 39). It is here where we come to the geographical (even including the geopolitical) verdict. The Author of prophecy, God Almighty, poses a single question that crumbles every faulty claim. In Ezekiel (38:15), just before the final fall, we are told that Gog comes “from your place.” This “place”—the home base of “Meshech and Tubal” is in Asia Minor and Byzantium. This must now be reconciled with Daniel’s account (11:44–45).

The coordinates are absolute: Daniel reveals that Gog’s terminal expeditions are aimed “East” and “North” of his Byzantine base. This geographical checkmate is the inescapable truth that silences the zionist-Sadducees: If Gog is aiming “East” and “North” of his base in “Meshech and Tubal” to meet his doom, then this Northeastern power is the seat of his conqueror. Gog occupies the same Seleucid “base” described in Daniel (11:21). The claim that this prophecy refers merely to the historical Antiochus Epiphanes collapses under its own weight, for Daniel’s vision must harmonize with Ezekiel (38:15) who explicitly warns: “You [Gog] will come from your place out of the far north.” In Daniel this “place” is his “base”—the Seleucid/Byzantine axis of “Meshech and Tubal”. Yet, Daniel reveals that the northeastern “horrifying news” is what brings Gog to “his end”. This news, coming from the Northeast, is Russo-Chinese. Even the alliance in Ezekiel (38:5) with “Cush” and “Phut” proves all past assumptions wrong; this confederation is only fully realized after Gog enters Judea as a conquering hero (Daniel 11:41). How could he be invading Judea with an incomplete alliance unless Daniel’s sequence is the master key? Daniel (11:21–45) chronicles the world’s descent into Armageddon: first, through Gog’s invasions “South” into the Middle East, and finally, through his terminal collision with the power to Byzantium’s “East and North.” That direction leads to one place and one people alone, who Jeremiah calls “the People of the North”—the Land of Rus—Russkaia Zemlia (Русская земля).

If the brightest scholars could not find Daniel’s key, how can it be claimed that “Gog” is Russian? If “Meshech and Tubal” are ‘Russia,’ what is north of Russia but the Arctic Ocean? Is Russia invading fish or Eskimos with spears riding polar bears? This false premise misled even the highest seats of power, as Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush adopted the fallacious claim of a ‘Russian Gog’—a doctrine born from treacherous authors of confusion. These figures have long labored to obscure the holy destiny of the biblical “North.” Known to the biblical prophets as “the land of the North”—this is the sacred axis that contains the centers of the Three Romes—it remains a territory entirely uncharted, undiscovered, and undefined by the world, despite sitting in plain sight upon the earth’s map and within the pages of the Bible itself. These ‘Sadducees’ are caught in a contradiction: they admit Russia is biblical, yet they try to bury it in a single verse. The critics’ dismissal of Russia collapses when one realizes that Gog is not Russian, but is Russia’s antithesis. Far from a minor detail, Gog is a dark thread running through the entire prophetic corpus. The real revelation is Russia—the Third Rome—etched into the scriptures as the Restrainer. The war of Gog and Magog is not a prelude to Armageddon as claimed by Christian zionists as a separate war. The principal subject is the Roman Empire. Ezekiel 38-39 is the final war to reclaim the eastern Roman Empire including the western and is the end of the world:

“… it will be to their renown on the day that I appear in My glory,” declares the Lord GOD” (Ezekiel 39:13)

“And I will send fire on Magog and on those who live in security in the coastlands. Then they shall know that I am the LORD. And I will make My holy name known in the midst of My people Israel; and I will not allow My holy name to be profaned anymore. But the nations will know that I am the LORD, the Holy One in Israel.” (39:6-7)

Throughout the corpus of prophecy, we repeatedly encounter the title “the Holy One of Israel.” However, there is a singular, crucial instance where the phrasing shifts to “the Holy One in Israel.” This subtle change marks the moment when the remnant joins “Gentile” Christians to become the single “Israel” defined by St. Paul. This is not Judah alone. The attribution of the name “Israel” to the Gentiles is explicitly clear in Isaiah. Additionally, in Ezekiel Gog is not invading the state of Israel (which he massacres), but the “mountains of Israel” to his north is where he is thwarted from to fall in Turkey. North of Asia Minor is the Slavic world and is where Gog heads to, which brings his end. “And you will go up” (Ezekiel 38:9) is northwards, “and you will say, ‘I will go  up [north] against the land of unwalled villages” (38:11) “and you will come up against My people Israel” (38:16) “and I will turn you around, lead you on a rope, take you up from the remotest parts of the north, and bring you against the mountains [nations] of Israel.” (39:2) Therefore, determining which “Israel” a prophecy is addressing depends entirely on the context. God’s ultimate “Israel” is a divine concept, not a biological race. There is a rejected Israel and a rejected Jerusalem, just as there is a redeemed Jerusalem and a redeemed Israel in Christ. These two sets are diametrically opposed; in fact, they are destined to collide. St. John makes this distinction undeniable. In Revelation 11:2 and 11:8, we see two different cities: the physical Jerusalem transforms into “Sodom,” while the “Holy City” is invaded:

“Then I was given a reed like a measuring rod. And the angel stood saying, “Rise and measure the temple of God, the altar, and those who worship there. Leave out the courtyard which is outside the temple and do not measure it, because it has been given to the nations; and they will trample the holy city for forty-two months.” (Revelation 11:2)

“And their dead bodies will lie in the street of the great city which spiritually is called Sodom and Egypt, where also our Lord was crucified.” (Revelation 11:8)

Is this “Holy City” the same as the ‘Sodom-Jerusalem’ ruled by the Jews? How could the “Holy City” being trampled be the same entity that the Jews have turned into a Sodom? Should we discuss the despicable current state of Israel and the reports of the systemic abuse and rape of Palestinian inmates (with the full support of Israeli society and government)? Furthermore, when the text mentions a “Temple,” is this a rebuilt structure in Jerusalem? Far from it. In prophetic language, to “measure” is not to build; it is to test on a scale—and if the subject is found wanting, it is destroyed. The message is actually the exact opposite of what the “ducks” perceive. When they hear “measure,” the Zionist sitting ducks imagine an architect at work, when in reality, this is a “rod” used to punish and destroy. God did not send an architect with a tape measure to evaluate ancient Babylon; instead, He sent a blacksmith to prepare a “rod,” which is the sword. Those who reject this interpretation must deal with the reality of October 10, 539 B.C., when Daniel told Belshazzar:

“God has measured thy kingdom … it has been weighed in the balance, and found wanting.” (Daniel 5:25-27)

By “measured thy kingdom,” did God use Persia to build Babylon? His “rod” to chastise ancient Babylon will be the same rod (Persia, Iran) used to chastise Jerusalem-Babylon as clearly explained by Isaiah (21). Persia destroys Israel before it joins Gog and now we know which rises after Persia is Turkey (the eastern Roman Empire). To “measure” is to send an iron hammer (Cyrus) who clobbered Babylon and brought its end. By what hermeneutical rule do Christian Zionists interpret “measuring the temple of God” (Apoc 11:1) or “measuring Jerusalem” (Zec 2:2) as the rebuilding of a physical temple and city? Their interpretation is the exact opposite of what the prophets intended. They have fallen into God’s trap through a rebellious attempt to veer backward toward what God made obsolete. The Book of Hebrews clearly ends any rebuilding of a temple. The “Temple” is the Church—period, end of story. It is divided between those who remain faithful and those who do not. The righteous keep the “Altar” of Communion pure; this defines the “Holy City” as distinct from those who desecrate the Altar during the time of Antichrist. The latter group includes those like Huckabee, who has effectively replaced Christ with a red heifer. To “measure” is to weigh in the balances; if found wanting, the subject is hammered and the judged kingdom is destroyed. Prophetic “measuring” entails an end to what is being measured:

“He stretched out the measuring line; he did not restrain his hand from destroying…” (Lam 2:8)

“I will make justice the measuring line and righteousness the level; then hail will sweep away the refuge of lies…” (Isaiah 28:17)

Huckabee’s interpretation must contend with Lamentations and Isaiah. He must answer: Is “justice” something to be measured by a line, or is Justice itself His measuring line? Allegorically, this “Temple” represents the global Church, separating those who adore at the Altar via the true “Daily Sacrifice” of Communion. It is the “ducks” who defile it and even reject that Holy Communion is a “sacrifice”. The racialist foundation falls apart under a single question: How does St. Paul define the Church in Romans 9:6? There is only one answer: Israel. Paul does not give the Church a new name; he defines who truly belongs to “Israel,” proving that true Israel is a spiritual concept, not a physical lineage. Anyone who says otherwise is a hireling—a wolf in sheep’s clothing deceiving while being deceived. This is also how the Old Testament prophets distinguish between the Redeemed Israel (the Church, Jew and Gentile) and the Rejected Israel (those who insist on ethnic status while rejecting Christ). Zionists trample the New Testament as well. It calls the believing community the “Body of Christ,” the “Bride,” and the “Israel of God” (Gal 6:16). By throwing this data into oblivion, Huckabee adopts an inferior disposition. Being mainly Gentiles themselves, these Zionists fail to see their own place in God’s plan. Through this demonically infused self-segregation, they have severed themselves from Christ’s Church and instead transformed the United States into Israeli-occupied territory, acting as slaves to Netanyahu—their corrupt high priest. When confronted with these flaws, they sew a patch over the hole called “The Rapture.” They claim the Church is absent from the Old Testament, essentially treating the prophets as “enemy intelligence,” much like the Nazis did. The slogan “Zionism is Nazism” is no slander; the shoe fits. These lazy servants reject the seven sacraments of the Church, yet enslave themselves to ten man-made “sacraments” of their own since they must believe in:

1-Establishing an earthly kingdom for Israel while it remains in a state of sin.

2-Animal Sacrifice: Re-ordaining blood sacrifices despite Christ ending them forever.

3-The Red Heifer: Breeding cattle for purification, ignoring Christ as the ultimate sacrifice.

4-The Third Temple: Rebuilding a physical structure despite Christ being the True Temple.

5-Chiliasm: Believing in a literal millennial kingdom—a theory the Church labeled a heresy.

6-The Resurrected Antichrist: Claiming the Antichrist rises from the dead by Satan’s power, effectively granting Satan the divine power to give life, transforming Satan to become God.

7-The Russian Bogeyman: Condemning Russia as “Gog and Magog” despite the prophets placing the city of refuge in the “Land of the North” (Orthodox Russia).

8-The Chinese Threat: Condemning China as the “Kings of the East” despite Isaiah 49:11–12 redeeming them as a nation of good.

9-The Seven-Year Escape: Insisting on a “tribulation” timeline that justifies their own flight from responsibility spells the ‘lazy servant’.

10-The Heavenly Banquet: Expecting to enjoy the “Marriage Supper” in safety while the rest of the world—specifically the Russians and Chinese—are ground into the dust in the Holy Land.

But this ‘seven-year tribulation’ includes the suffering of ‘unbelieving Jews,’ a concept that already admits that the Jews are spiritually inferior. But how can they self-fulfill these prophecies? For this to occur they follow another manmade sacrament: they must continually urge the U.S. government to support the expansion of ‘Greater Israel’ while calling for the destruction of Russia and China. But how can this be accomplished without human sacrifice? To accomplish the trick, there is only one solution: ignore the word ‘not’ in “not all Israel are descendants of Israel”. But taking out “not” generates the catastrophe of catastrophes since:

“God is not the author of confusion but of peace” (1 Cor 14:33)

By taking “not” out of Romans 9:6, it transforms God into the author of chaos. This is evident when they become ardent defenders of humanitarian crises caused by those who genetically “descended from Israel” where they view all others as lesser pedigree. The slaughter of Gaza’s babies will hardly phase them. Reality is, these babies become sacrifices to their god Chemosh who they renamed to ‘Jesus.’ According to Matthew (7:22) not all who call on the name of Jesus by “Lord Lord” are saved, yet these always insist that no matter what, all who call on Jesus’ name are saved. Huckabee will fight tooth and nail by teaching this deception of “once saved always saved.” In the meanwhile, none of these massacres faze these spiritual bastards. They are desensitized and cannot see that their mother is a prostitute and she has a lust for blood. They are unaware of how all this blood will be required of them come judgment-day. Calling on the name of Christ means nothing if they are not transformed into the image of Christ Who hates warmongers. Even their messiah is no longer the “priest forever after the order of Melchizedek”; instead, they advance the very Levitical order Christ made obsolete. Why else do they obsess over rebuilding a temple or breeding red heifers in Texas?

The mayhem they cause is the nuclear bomb they want to detonate. Yet they remain unmoved because the victims lack the ‘correct’ genetics. Christians who insist on restoring the word “not” are rejected and met with arm-twisting tactics and utter disdain. The Orthodox Christian must endure the labels of “anti-semite” or “supersessionist” simply for refusing to replace the Gospel with their ‘Replacement Theology’ of the flesh. But who replaced spiritual Israel with genetic Israel, then undermined Christ’s sacrifice with a red heifer? Who emulates the ones who replaced God with a golden calf? Just as Moses ground the Golden Calf into dust and forced the idolaters to drink their own failure, so they too must crush their genetic idols and drink the bitter reality that the ash of a red heifer can never wash away the warmongering spirit of the flesh. They completely fail to understand Ezekiel’s temple:

“Because they [unrighteous priests] ministered to them before their idols and caused the house of Israel to fall into iniquity, therefore I have raised My hand in an oath against them, says the Lord GOD, that they shall bear their iniquity. And they shall not come near Me to minister to Me as priest, nor come near any of My holy things, nor into the Most Holy Place [the Altar] but they shall bear their shame and their abominations which they have committed.” (Ezekiel 44:12-13) 

For a physical Jewish temple to fit the prophetic narrative, many questions must first be answered. For instance, why do we find “abominations” mentioned in the very verses describing the New Jerusalem? Ezekiel’s grand Temple has long been considered an impenetrable mystery, yet it is actually quite simple to unlock. This entire prophecy was dependent on a critical “if” statement:

“Son of man, describe the temple to the house of Israel, that they may be ashamed of their iniquities; and let them measure the pattern. And if they are ashamed of all that they have done, make known to them the design of the temple” (Ezekiel 43:10–11). 

The response of the Jews to their opportunity to return and to rebuild their temple was notoriously tepid. Only a small remnant opted even to return to Jerusalem, while the rest were content to remain in Babylon. As a result, the temple they built proved to be inferior to the one that Ezekiel described. This reflects towards the future of how the majority will prefer Babylon over the Holy City. An “if” statement makes it clear since their failure transfers to a new covenant where Ezekiel describes the New Jerusalem and even includes some mishaps that occurs before its establishment. While the Jews were promised a grander temple on the condition of their obedience, their failure shifted the fulfillment of this prophecy toward a different restoration: the Church. Ezekiel never mentions this temple being in Jerusalem; he refers to it simply as “the city,” clearly depicting the City of God as the New Jerusalem encompasses the entire earth. It points to the Temple of Christ—the Church—being cleansed and then rebuilt. Why else would the “Abomination of Desolation” be mentioned in a way that exposes the sins of repentant priests? The fact that the spared priests are barred from continued service indicates that the abomination stems from the ecumenical movement within the fallen church. Does a Jewish temple in Jerusalem ‘fall away’ through the sins of its priests? If so, where is such an event described? Many believe the Antichrist commits the abomination alone, but unless these “abominations” are internal—arising from within the Church—nothing else fits the prophetic data.

This Daniel (11:31) confirms “… then they shall take away the daily sacrifices, and place there the abomination of desolation.” Who is “they?” There is more than just the Antichrist and even the Temple is more than just one church: “You defiled your sanctuaries” (Ezekiel 28:18). “Sanctuaries” is in the plural form. Even Daniel (9:26) proclaimed “desolations” are many churches. Rebuilding the temple is to restore what the locusts have eaten during the wars against the church. When God speaks of liberating “My land,” He refers to the final liberation of “the expanse of your land, Immanuel” (Isaiah 8:7-8)—the vast territory and dominion of Gog and all who preceded him. Since “Immanuel” is Christ, we cannot limit this “expanse” to the small borders of Judea. The prophets are describing the restoration of all that was chiseled away: the nations spawned through Jacob are the “mountains of Israel”. It is all this that is ultimately restored into a New Jerusalem beyond human fathom. God’s restoration is elucidated by the prophets, encompasses the collective of Christian kingdoms—the true “mountains of Israel”—that were slowly eroded by what Isaiah (61:4) terms the “desolations of many generations.” This was not merely the sudden Roman displacement of the Jews, but a protracted dismantling of the Christian world by successive waves: from the early Rashidun and Abbasid Caliphates to the Seljuks, who eventually morphed into the Ottoman Empire under Osman I. This systematic desolation of Anatolia and the East persisted for over a millennium, ending only with the Ottoman dissolution in 1922. This is why the prophets address Armenia (invoking “Aram,” “Ararat,” “Minni,” and “Ashkenaz”) and Byzantium (the former territory of the Seleucids). This restoration of all nations is obvious, as many are even mentioned by name. Besides the restoration of nations found in Isaiah 11, we have the restoration of “Ararat, Mini and Ashkenaz” which is greater Armenia liberated to join this northerly coalition. We clearly have gentiles God calls “Israel”. Isaiah 17 diminishes “Ephraim” (northern Israel) as ending up in a holocaust, while “Aram” (the Syrians and Armenians) gain strength.

“God is not the author of confusion but of peace”. To promote life abundantly is the hallmark of true saints, but a demonic spirit is what brings in death (thistles) instead of life (fruit). These “thistles” become obvious when the ‘lesser pedigree’ must be sacrificed on the altars of zionism by expunging peoples in Syria, Libya, Iraq and as of late Gaza and now Iran. The massacre at Gaza they claim is the fault of Hamas. But it was their devil high-priest Benjamin Netanyahu who aided in the creation of Hamas. This plan was originally done in order to sic Palestinian (Gaza’s Hamas) against Palestinian (the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank). This policy of divide and conquer backfired miserably as will this war on Iran. Now that they massacred the ‘inferiors’ in Gaza and kids in Iran, the whole earth hates them and rightfully so. They will counter by claiming that ‘Hezbollah’ is responsible for the killing of 241 US Marines in 1983, yet they conveniently forget they were the ones who sicced Iraq on Iran in 1980 to kill one million Shiite Iranians. Does God ignore injustice just because the victims are Muslims? Today this style of history repeats with one proviso, even the Kurds (Media) refuse to join such trickery, for the world is awakening. They will no longer listen to America’s old tricks. Even these biblical prophecies they use, completely reveals a different scenario altogether, where their beloved state of Israel is completely dismantled and the Jews will have no place to hide. The world is angered at the state of Israel for a good reason. Do the prophets of the Bible support their cause and their “Mother of Harlots?” God calls them “Babylon”. Who is this sinful “Judah” and “Israel” Jeremiah 51 speaks about, but the Jews, including the fallen away church? Who does the Bible address but His people gone mad? Who now rules this land but these racialists, supporters of pedophiles and sodomites? Who turned it into “Sodom”?

I once was brainwashed with the typical American Evangelicalism. I was told that whenever I read prophecies about “Israel,” this equals ‘the state of Israel’ established in 1948. This is what the entire Christian Zionist movement relies on. So I appeared on countless platforms from The 700 Club to John Hagee’s own pulpit, where I shared the stage with former Israeli Defense Minister Moshe Ya’alon—who himself now seems to regret how the state turned into ‘racialist-Zionism.’ It took me a while to wake up. Like Charlie Kirk, I slowly began to see the dictation of my funders always attempted to veer my conscience. Why did they have a problem with me? Having came from Bethlehem, I would never approve of either Israeli or US moral woke culture and values and especially the wars that transformed the Middle East into a hellhole. While my ‘Zionism’ was wrong, my stance against Russophobia, China-phobia, the wars in Iraq, Syria and Libya was not, and these were things I denounced. While I firmly stood against all this, for the life of me, I could not understand why the United States—Bible in hand—claims to wage a ‘War on Terror’ while simultaneously being in bed with terrorists. Now they say that Iran is a terror state, regardless that it was Shiites who fought Al-Qaeda and ISIS. From 2014 to 2019, Iran and its Shiite allies were arguably the most effective boots-on-the-ground force against the Sunni extremists of ISIS and Al-Qaeda; the Wahhabist world order of “Arabia”.

The pattern became clear: as far back as the 1980s, America/Israel would sic Iraqis to kill Iranians and later on Iraqis must kill Iraqis, Syrians must kill Syrians, Libyans must kill Libyans and Egyptians must kill Egyptians, as long as the petro-dollar and Israel remain supreme. Why then blame Iran for calling Israel and the United States “Satan?” But all this blood was not enough. To defend this man-made state, far more blood must be spilled beyond what has already drenched Middle Eastern soil. The growing tensions between the U.S. and China over Taiwan signal a looming world war. But Taiwan is not Israel; somehow it must be connected to their prophetic ‘board game’. To facilitate their ‘Rapture,’ these believe in an Armageddon that must be ushered in by hook or by crook. In their interpretive paradigm, 200 million Chinese are marked for annihilation in Israel. But to make such an outlandish claim they must answer: When was China an aggressive nation? Since 1926, the U.S. has conducted approximately 400 military interventions while China had only 3. It is the United States and Israel who are filled with aggression.

Is China in the Bible? This depends on where you search. For example, Isaiah 49:11-12 speaks of “Sinim” which according to many scholars is China. But in Isaiah “Sinim” seems to be blessed and they join God, while Jerusalem in Revelation 11:8 turns into a “Sodom” including her daughters. The northeast is clearly blessed over the northwest. But such attributes means complete and utter annihilation, not of China but Israel itself, that is after the decent Jews leave it. All Christians must at some point in time leave all nations that support Sodom.

The zionist must answer Isaiah 21: Is “Elam” not another name for “Persia,” which is Iran? Who is “Media” but the Kurds who will finally realize they must unite with Iran against Arabia and the state of Israel? Who is this “whirlwind” coming from the “south” but Yemen? All Netanyahu and POTUS are doing is to simply strengthen Iran. It is God, not Donald Trump or Netanyahu who is in control. It is God Who fulfills prophecy not man. Even if they succeed in regime change and even if Iran suddenly joins NATO the doom of their state is etched on stone since Turkey is also in NATO. Will Turkey hesitate to burn Huckabee’s incestual harlot-mother? The “beast” must burn the mother harlot, and even heaven will rejoice at this. It is inescapable that in the Apocalypse (17, 19) both heaven and beast rejoice at this event. It is only after Gog prevails will God judge this adversary. In Habakkuk (1:11), God then turns against Gog, not because he punished the nations, but because he credits his own power (accomplishments) to his god: “imputing his power unto his god.” “God” is in the singular form just as Daniel (11:36-39) also describes Gog’s “god” in the singular form. This was unheard of during Daniel’s day where only the Jews were monotheistic. The “seal” kept Habakkuk a mystery only to be unlocked by a question: since Ezekiel (38:17) says that “Gog” is in the “prophets” we must ask: Where is Gog in Habakkuk? God’s question is inescapable for in it He kept the “secret” for the right time. God’s anger at Gog is for giving the credit of his success to his god (Allah) instead of the true Triune God. It the true God who used Gog as His axe to punish the nations that drifted from God. This is also confirmed by Isaiah. To Gog (renamed as the Assyrian) God says: 

“is the axe to boast itself over the one who chops with it? Is the saw to exalt itself over the one who wields it? That would be like a club wielding those who lift it, or like a rod lifting the one who is not wood.”—Isaiah 10:15.

Gog will rightfully punish two southern regional Babylons; Israel and Arabia and today we see Israel’s crosshairs are focused to dismantle Turkey just as they are attempting to dismantle Iran. If anything, it is these attempts to dismantle Turkey and Iran that will cause this “beast” to arise. Even more surprising, in the same Isaiah prophecy the whore’s recent bedfellow “Arabia” is also doomed with La Mamacita de Babilonia. And what about Jeremiah’s “Babylon” which points to Judah? But is this proclamation only in the Apocalypse and Isaiah? Far from it, Isaiah’s “Arabia” and the Hebrews are etched in the oldest prophecy regarding the destiny of all nations. “Eber” had two sons, “Peleg” (from whom are the Hebrews) and “Joktan” the head of many Arabian tribes, yet both are destined to utter destruction:

“I see Him [Messiah], but not now; I behold Him, but not near; a Star [Hebrew “Kokba” meaning star Messiah] shall come out of Jacob; a Scepter shall rise out of Israel and batter the brow of Moab, and destroy all the sons of Sheth. And Edom shall be a possession; Seir also, his enemies, shall be a possession, while Israel does valiantly. One from Jacob [Messiah] shall exercise dominion and destroy the remnant of the cities.” (Numbers 24:17-19)

“And ships shall come from the coast of Chittim [Cyprus], and shall afflict Ashur [Assyria, Gog and Magog], and shall afflict Eber, and he [Eber] also shall perish forever” (Numbers 24:24)

How can “Israel” be victorious while “Eber” (which includes the Hebrews) is doomed to “perish forever”? This puzzle is the oldest prophecy regarding the destiny of nations, yet for the Zionist, it is tucked under the rug. They see a “sitting duck” where the prophets reveal a “fleeing rabbit.” “Israel” (the Church Victorious) is clearly distinct from “Eber” (the doomed Hebrews). In God’s economy, the wheat sees the fleeing “rabbit” while the tares see the sitting “duck.”

We see clearly how the antichrist Jews during the Roman-Judean war abused this verse to justify their own revolt in the “War Scroll” extracted from the Qumran caves by the Dead Sea. During the Jewish-Roman Revolt, the revolutionaries looked toward Numbers 24 to justify an uprising against Rome, seeking a Messiah tailored to their political ambitions. This is exactly the predicament of modern Christian Zionists who obsess over temples and heifers. The foundation of their hope was Numbers 24:17: “There shall come a Star out of Jacob.” In Hebrew, the word for “Star” is Kokaba. The father of Rabbinic Judaism, Rabbi Akiva (40–135 A.D.) chose to follow a man named bar Kozba—a name meaning “son of the lie.” In the greatest case of stolen identity in history, Kozba’s supporters utilized an etymological twist: they renamed him Simon bar Kokba (“Son of the Star”), retrofitting the prophecy to the wrong man. This mirrors the modern “bad etymology” that claims “Meshech” in Ezekiel 38 is “Moscow” or Tubal is “Tobolsk” in Russia, despite the fact that these are ancient locations in Asia Minor (Turkey).

By changing a single root, the rebels transformed the “son of the lie” into a “son of the star,” attempting to usher in a messianic age through a pun while they crucified the True Star, Jesus Christ, by claiming He was the lie. Similarly, so popular is their slander of Russia that one can hardly navigate the internet when inquiring about “Gog and Magog” to discover that their false view practically took over the whole internet. This is when the Bible is used as a CIA manual to support US foreign policy against Russia. Historically, Jewish interpreters claimed the promise of Numbers 24:18—“Israel does valiantly”—for themselves, while distancing their identity from the grim verdict of verse 24: “And he [Eber] also shall perish forever.” “Eber” mainly refers to the Hebrews and encompasses the Arab pedigree. Despite the text stating that Eber (וְגַם־ה֖וּא עָדֵי אֹבֵד) shall perish, Zionists project this destruction onto external enemies, usually Iraq. Even Protestant commentaries, such as Jamieson, Fausset, and Brown, fall into this snare by arguing that Eber survives while Rome is destroyed.

Have these learned the lessons from the greatest case of stolen identity in history? This is when Rome crushed the Hebrews. However, strict linguistic analysis makes this conclusion impossible. The phrase v’gam-hu (וְגַם־הוּא, “and he also”) almost exclusively pertains to the immediate preceding subject, which in this case is “Eber”. Therefore, it is Eber who shall perish forever. The text is clear “וְגַם־ה֖וּא עָדֵי אֹבֵד” v’gam-hu adi abad. Every Jew and Arab knows what “abad” means: complete annihilation for those who refuse to escape and convert.

This grammatical pattern (v’gam-hu) is consistent throughout the Old Testament (Gen 48:19, 2 Sam 21:20, 1 Kings 1:6, Isaiah 31:2). The current Evangelical euphoria over Jerusalem is identical to the days of Bar Kozba. The rebels stamped their coins with slogans like “to the freedom of Jerusalem” and “to the liberty of Israel.” Did these slogans help? The other Israel— the early Christians who lived in those days (who today’s evangelicals would label as “replacement theologians”) wisely fled to Pella, a name meaning “escape” (falla in Arabic).

By fleeing, they became the victorious “Israel” of Numbers 24:18, while the racialist sitting-ducks remained behind to be slaughtered by Rome. Christian Zionism can only operate by overlooking the most basic warning of Christ: “I have come in My Father’s name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, him you will receive” (John 5:43). By following a political “liar,” they align themselves with the Antichrist. To flee was the only correct interpretation, for the “Star” destroys the “remnant of the city.” Though dually fulfilled, Numbers 24 is not merely an ancient event; its ultimate fulfillment is reserved for the end. And what about “batter the brow of Moab, and destroy all the sons of Sheth?” Sheth is the father of all mankind. Moab is a small insignificant nation we today call Jordan. How is minuscule “Moab” equated with “the sons of Sheth” (all of humanity)? But the secret to this riddle lays in Jeremiah who provides the key. Do we follow zionist interpretations or do we follow Jeremiah’s? He was the only prophet who interpreted this verse as follows:

“Those who fled stood under the shadow of Heshbon because of exhaustion. But a fire shall come out of Heshbon, a flame from the midst of Sihon, and shall devour the brow of Moab, the crown of the head of the sons of tumult?” (Jeremiah 48:45)

Jeremiah is the only prophet who interprets Numbers 24:17, calling the “children of Sheth” not by the name “Sheth,” but by the meaning of the name: “Tumult”. Unlike Numbers (24:17), Jeremiah did not use the name “bani-Sheth בְּנֵי־שֵֽׁת,” but the meaning of the name “Beni shâʼôwn, בְּנֵי שָׁאוֹן” “sons of tumult”. Also “Moab” means “of his father,” that is the devil. The sons of tumult are all who follow “their father” the devil and Antichrist. Jeremiah sets a precedence that is typical of the East, where the meaning of names are keys to enter with our eyes finally opened: “the declaration of the man whose eye is opened” (24:3). Ancient names does not always mean the same ancient geographies. Where is this Moab? It is “across the sea” all the way to Eurṓpē:

 “Therefore I wail for Moab; I cry out for all Moab; for the men of Kir-hareseth I mourn. More than for Jazer I weep for you, O vine of Sibmah! Your branches passed over the sea, reached to the Sea of Jazer; on your summer fruits and your grapes the destroyer has fallen.” (Jeremiah 48:31-32)

The “Sea of Jazzer” baffled scholars, since no one was able to discover its whereabouts. Why? There is no such sea by that name, just as “the Sea of Egypt” is nowhere near the nile or the Red Sea. But the name has nothing to do with a geography, but signifies the “sea” of people across the sea. “The Sea of Jazer,” in Isaiah (16:8) and Jeremiah (48:32) extended “across the sea” is obviously Eurṓpē. Across the Mediterranean is the First Rome. The parabolically inept fail to ask how can a “sea” (Sea of Jazer) be “across the sea?” From the prophet’s perspective, one sea (the Mediterranean) is literal and the other sea is allegoric. The latter represents peoples, nations, tribes and different tongues — an entire dominion that resides across the Mediterranean Sea.

Like St. Paul, both Moses and Joshua distinguish between the Rejected Israel (“Eber”) and the Redeemed Israel—those who escape the man-made “Sodom state.” To reject our interpretation of Eber, is to be confronted with Isaiah 21. One must answer a crippling question: When were the Jews ever “crushed” by Elam/Iran? And how can “Arabia” be confused as an extension of ancient Babylon in Iraq? Again, “Eber” had two sons, “Peleg” (from whom are the Hebrews) and “Joktan” the head of many Arabian tribes. Joktan was the ancestor/progenitor of all the purest Arabian tribes of Central and Southern Arabia.

From the descendants of Joktan eventually came the nomadic Arabs of later history whom even Islamic historians acknowledge as “beni Qahtan”—Arabic for the sons of Joktan! Ishmael became the father of a line of desert people who joined with the already existing sons of Joktan to find the matrix of the people later known as Arabs. So Eber’s destruction–just as Isaiah 21 also foretold– combines two peoples: the Hebrew and the Arab Peninsula. To reject our interpretation one must now confront the great prophet Isaiah. Besides the converted remnants from both, these will be destroyed together. The Abraham Accords is toast. If this is not the destruction of the Hebrews, why is Isaiah lamenting? But the prophetic thread does not only stop here. Isaiah 22:6-7 is not an oracle against a foreign nation, rather it is a prophecy that dooms Judah: “And He removed the defense of Judah. In that day …” (Isaiah 22:8) The ‘defeat’ of Judah’s defense is also expressed in the Messianic prophecy of Micah 5:

“Your hand [the Jews] will be lifted up against your adversaries, and all your enemies will be cut off. It will be in that day, declares the LORD, that I will cut off your horses from among you and destroy your chariots. I will also cut off the cities of your land and tear down all your fortifications. I will cut off sorceries [out with the Zohar and Kabbalah] from your hand, and you will have fortune-tellers no more [no more Kabbalists]. I will cut off your carved images and your sacred pillars from among you, so that you will no longer bow down to the work of your hands [your own strength]. I will root out your Asherim from among you and destroy your cities. And I will execute vengeance in anger and wrath on the nations which have not obeyed.” (Micah 5:9-15)

The duck will read “all your enemies will be cut off” and it says: “do you see?” But this avoids a necessity of exile to the “north” and repentance and victory stems from that direction. How is this a victory for Netanyahu when all of Israel’s cities and even its military fortifications and its entire infrastructure are completely cut off (destroyed)? How is it victorious when Dimona’s nuclear facility is no more? Did God fail to predict the establishment of the State of Israel? Far from it. He did, but what many ignore is how He condemns the establishment of this state for they entered the land while sinful. Jeremiah 51 defines “Babylon” as “Judah” and “Israel” and demands an escape of a remnant because “their land is filled with sin”. This escape is the only reason why neither “Judah” and “Israel” are forsaken.

The victory is only for the converts. This perfectly matches Micah’s victory of the few Jewish converts when “your enemies will be cut off”. No one can enter the theater without a ticket and the only way to purchase it is through the gatekeeper Who is Christ. In the same prophecy (Jeremiah 51), Israel is the fallen away church. Is Europe and America not “filled with sin” even with blood on their hands? Why are these terrorist states the only ones with a right to define who is and who is not a terror state? Bible prophecy is a tree with several fruits. To understand it, one cannot do what these Zionists do—simply picking the low-hanging fruit while ignoring what sits at the very top of the tree. To pick the highest fruit requires a latter to earn the correct interpretation.

The Achilles’ heel of Christian Zionism is its habit of cherry-picking prophecies while ignoring the rest, or filing the inconvenient verses into history. Under this divine logic, when we read “Babylon” this is not modern-day Iraq. When we read “Israel,” this is not the state of Israel. When we read “Sodom” this is not found by the Dead Sea and when we read “Egypt” it is not necessarily Cairo, and even when we read “Tyre” it is not necessarily in Lebanon, just as a “Babylon” is not necessarily Iraq and when we read Moab it is not necessarily little Jordan. “Through the prophets I speak in parables” is not to be ignored. Isaiah 23 describes a mega-Tyre. This is a maritime thalassocracy where Jews who “cross over to Cyprus”  “will have no rest” (23:12) because they will be massacred there as well. Fact is many Jews are already setting camp in Cyprus. Names can be simply labels God slaps to His people that describes their mischief. But some of these descriptions definitely fit the United States way more than Russia or China. Habakkuk actually gives the best definition of Antichrist’s foreign policies, and this seems to fit more the United States, yet so few pay attention to this ‘minor’ prophet. Christian zionism makes popular what they want, while they sweep everything else under their Persian rug or the Iraqi escape goat. God explains thus Antichrist’s global reach: “He increases what is not his”. “Because you have looted many nations” are several “nations”. The United States loots the world through the direct seizure of oil. New York has a vice-grip that dictates the lifeblood of their economy. This ‘world order’ further heaps up what is not its own by freezing the sovereign gold and cash of nations like Russia, Iran, Venezuela and Afghanistan, effectively mincing the survival of the poor to pay for a Babylonian board game. From the grit of cobalt mines in the Congo to the destroyed rice fields of Haiti, the “Proud One” uses sanctions and debt-traps to ensure that the wealth of nations is siphoned away to fuel a warmongering spirit that thrives on human sacrifice. And what about these “arrows?” “You thrust through with his own arrows the head of his villages.” These are not primitive arrows:

“For behold, I am going to rouse and bring up against Babylon a contingent of great nations from the land of the north, and they will draw up their battle lines against her; From there she will be taken captive. Their arrows will be like an expert warrior. None shall return in vain” (Jeremiah 50:9)

That not a single arrow (missile) will miss its target defines precision strikes. This is Russia against “daughter Babylon” (the third Babylon) in Europe (see Zechariah 2) and the western axis. While Judah and Arabia are destroyed by Gog and Persia (the beast), the Western harlot is destroyed by Russia from “the land of the north”. This massive expanse of earth has three divisions; Asia Minor, western Europe (the Roman Empire) and it also includes to their north Russia. This is why we say a “daughter Babylon” (Jeremiah 50:42, 51:33) is the western empire and a “daughter Egypt” (Jeremiah 46) is the eastern empire centered in “the land of the north”, both destroyed from their “north” by a consecrated nation which is also in “the land of the north” and is the holy axis. The ducks, in their zionist zeal, fail to pay attention to detail. Only those who obey and ‘flee’ this maniacal infestation embody the “Judah” and “Israel” that are “not forsaken” while the rest perish in their sin.

Nowhere in the entire scriptures do we find a command to enter the land of promise without repentance and nowhere do we find a nation with a holy status unless it is situated in the far north. While one group is redeemed into the Jerusalem above, the others remain bound to the earthly Jerusalem below, as outlined in Galatians 4 where St. Paul defines two separate Jerusalems we also find throughout Zechariah, where the duck reads “Jerusalem” but fails to contradistinguish which Jerusalem Zechariah is addressing. The one that reflects heavenly Jerusalem is not the one that reflects earthly Jerusalem. Zechariah (2) sets a Jerusalem in “the land of the north” (Europe) whil struck from her north in Jeremiah (50-51) is Orthodox Russia. The names in these prophecies are not what they seem to the duck’s naked eye. This is what kept these prophecies veiled to the tares. Only the wheat (the rabbit) can “see” while the tare (the sitting duck) cannot. But this renaming convention is found throughout the prophets. One must examine the text with a diligent, forensic eye. Prophecy is designed so that these tares perceive only an optical illusion, ithe repeat of the same errors of history:

“The Lord sends a message against Jacob, and it falls on Israel. And all the people know it, that is, Ephraim and the inhabitants of Samaria, asserting in pride and in arrogance of heart: “The bricks have fallen down, but we will rebuild with smooth stones; the sycamores have been cut down, but we will replace them with cedars.” (Isaiah 9:8-10)

Is Isaiah addressing a purely ancient setting, back when the primary building material in most parts of ancient Israel was mud bricks? The text says: “The bricks have fallen down, but we will rebuild with smooth stones” (Isaiah 9:10). Zionists interpret this today as establishing their own state and entering the land while still in a state of sin. Cut stone (“smooth stone”) is indeed the current mode of every modern building in Israel. This is the zionist determination that despite the fall of these ancient mud-bricks we will by our own hands establish a state with smooth stones. The Israelis planted cedar trees on a land where cedar is not native. But the cedars are dying:

“When a boy was born – they would plant a cedar, a girl – they would plant a pine, and when they would get married they would cut down [the trees] and make from them a marriage canopy.”

“Jerusalem pine (known as Pinus halepensis or Aleppo pine) has become a trademark of the Israeli landscape, the effects of climate change have become evident. Growing pine tree mortality in recent years has been attributed to an increase in droughts.”

Ezekiel (15-16) addresses “Jerusalem” as a “sister” and “mother” of “Sodom”. Any “Sodom” status faces complete annihilation after an escape of the few decent Jews. The complete destruction of Israel and the second holocaust of the Jews (Ezekiel 15:6-8, 39:23) occurs before the final homecoming:

“Therefore, this is what the Lord GOD says: ‘As the wood of the vine among the trees of the forest, which I have given to the fire for fuel, so have I given up the inhabitants of Jerusalem; although they have come out of the fire [the first holocaust by Nazi Germany] the fire will yet consume them [another holocaust in Jerusalem itself]. And when I set my face against them, you will know that I [Christ] am the Lord. I will make the land desolate [again] because they have been unfaithful, declares the Sovereign Lord.” (Ezekiel 15:6-8)

Though we all know about the first Holocaust in Europe, Ezekiel insists that a second Holocaust must occur in “Jerusalem” itself—and for the same sins:

“You have become waste metal, therefore, behold, I am going to gather you into the midst of Jerusalem as they gather silver, bronze, iron, lead, and tin into the smelting furnace to blow fire on it in order to melt it, so I will gather you in My anger and in My wrath, and I will place you there [in Jerusalem] and melt you. And I will gather you and blow on you with the fire of My wrath, and you will be melted in the midst of it as silver is melted in the furnace, so you will be melted in the midst of it; and you will know that I, the LORD, have poured out My wrath on you. And the word of the LORD came to me, saying, Son of man, say to her, ‘You are a land that is not clean or rained on in the day of indignation.” (Ezekiel 22:19-24)

Now we understand the purpose of this recent manmade homecoming. It is not blessed by God. No one can position this event historically. The Judge announces the reason for the gathering and the sentencing: Count 1: “They have done violence” (22:26), Count 2: “Her leaders within her are like wolves tearing the prey, by shedding blood and destroying lives in order to make dishonest profit” (22:7), Count 3: “practiced extortion and committed robbery” (22:9), Count 4: “they have oppressed the poor and needy” (22:9), Count 5: “have oppressed the stranger [non-Jews] without justice” (22:29), Count 6: falsely interpreting the signs by “saying, ‘This is what the Lord GOD says,’ when the LORD has not spoken”.

All of this appears to align with the daily headlines, illustrating how these figures have falsely interpreted the prophets. Rabbi David Kohen (Ha-Nazir, 1887–1972), author of Kol ha-Nevu’ah (“The Voice of Prophecy”), painted prophecy as an obscure blend of philosophy and Kabbalah. Rabbi Yitzhak Kaduri (1898–2006) was a renowned Kabbalist who claimed to have met the Messiah a year before his death. Rabbi Abraham Abulafia (13th Century), founder of Ecstatic Kabbalah, interpreted prophecy as a highly personal, meditative state achieved through complex letter-shuffling techniques (Gematria) rather than traditional historical fulfillment.

Similarly, the followers of Menachem Mendel Schneerson (1902–1994) developed the obscure interpretation that he was the Messiah; some in the Chabad movement continue to believe he never truly died and will reappear to complete the redemption. This school of thought, which incorporates Lurianic Kabbalah into its core philosophy, has been absorbed by Hasidic Judaism and various streams of Orthodox Judaism. By and large the religious Jewish sect is Kabbalist.

The prophet Amos (1:6) who resided a stone throw southeast of our village, Beit Sahour, Bethlehem, prophesied about the “offenses of Gaza”: “they led into exile an entire population.” Bible-Study Tools says this “cannot be understood of the captivity of the whole nation, either of Israel or Judah, who were never carried captive by the Philistines,” to deliver [them] up to Edom” in Jordan. The text is clear, the curse is upon who will sit in Gaza (the zionists) for “they led into exile an entire population” and forced them to move to “Edom” (Jordan) so that they can sit in Gaza which by agreement does not belong to them. The Christian zionist claims to follow scripture but they ignore how lawless they are. Scripture (which they claim to follow) condemns covenant breakers. Christian zionists abhor the United Nations, the Oslo Accords and international law. This is why they support illegal settlements and look the other way as the Jews settlers who they adore clear an “entire population” and and will force Gazans into Jordan. They fail to ask: Why is Amos pro-Palestine? And how does this prophecy fit any ancient historic event? If our assessment so far still remains unconvincing, perhaps the great Isaiah can:

“Listen to this, you descendants of Jacob [the Jews], you who are called by my name of Israel and come from the line of Judah, you who take oaths in the name of the Lord and invoke the God of Israel—but not in truth or righteousness—you who call yourselves citizens of the holy city and claim to rely on the God of Israel” (Isaiah 48:1-2)

“You have neither heard nor understood” (Isaiah 48:8).

“For my own name’s sake I delay my wrath; for the sake of my praise I hold it back from you, so as not to destroy you completely”  (Isaiah 48:9) Notice carefully: these hoodlums are of “Judah,” yet by calling themselves “Israel,” they have committed a case of stolen identity. By calling themselves “citizens of the Holy City,” they fulfill Isaiah’s foretelling of the illegitimate establishment of the state. No one can attribute the title “Sodom” to a truly “Holy City.” This denouncement includes their “oaths” and their supposed reliance on God; their claim of citizenship in the “Holy City” is entirely false. Beyond denouncing their citizenship, even the name these Jews gave themselves—the holy “Israel”—is illegitimate, unauthorized, barred, illegal, forbidden, unwarranted, and fraudulent. God clearly reveals that they have stained the name “Israel.” He even sends them this message: “For My name’s sake I will defer My anger… so as not to destroy you completely” (Isaiah 48:9).

For two millennia, God delayed His wrath, and will exceed what the Jews endured in the first holocaust. God saves a portion (who join the true Israel north) and then allows the nations to destroy the rest. Isaiah (3-5) even describes the state as we see it today. Their settlements are “attach house to house and join field to field” (Isaiah 5:5) in a clustered housing style, with dense arrangement of units to maximize land use. God even denounces their claim that: “you alone are a landowner in the midst of the land” denying the rights of others. He promises that these settlements “certainly become desolate” and their agricultural projects will turn into famine (5:10), their cocktail parties (5:22) will end. God clearly sets them up for “exile” and then judgment into hell:

“Therefore My people go into exile for their lack of knowledge; and their nobles are famished, and their multitude is parched with thirst. Therefore Sheol has enlarged its throat and opened its mouth beyond measure; and Jerusalem’s splendor, her multitude, her noise of revelry, and the jubilant within her, descend into it.” (5:13-14)

From the prophecy of Isaiah (3), the Almighty declares a terrifying severance in what seems like nuclear devastation: “For behold, the Lord GOD of armies is going to remove from Jerusalem and Judah both supply and support, the entire supply of bread and the entire supply of water” (3:1). A complete boycott by God and the nations shall fall upon that state, ensuring no nation shall bolster or supply them and they will suffer a nuclear war. We all bear witness to the rise of the mischievous, the rebellious, and the Jewish arrogant youth, who shall haunt their elders; for it is written, “And I will make mere boys their leaders, and mischievous children will rule over them” (3:4). This shall culminate in a fractured civil war, where “the people will be oppressed, each one by  another, and each one by his neighbor; the youth will assault the elder, and the contemptible person will assault the one honored” (3:5). They have denied Christ, for “Jerusalem has stumbled and Judah has fallen, because their speech and their actions are against the LORD, to rebel against His glorious presence” (3:8). Jesus is the ultimate revelation of this presence, described as the “radiance of God’s glory” in human form; a glorious presence that now resides within the Christian through the Holy Spirit, transforming them into the image of Christ. Instead, they have pridefully chosen their deviant ways, displayed in open rebellion through shameless gay parades: “The expression of their faces testifies against them, and they display their sin like Sodom; they do not even conceal it. Woe to them! For they have done evil to themselves” (3:9). Their leaders are utterly corrupt, and the Lord declares, “It is you who have devoured the vineyard; the goods stolen from the poor are in your houses” (3:14). Furthermore, their women have forsaken virtue and modesty, abandoning themselves to wanton behavior, brazenly parading their immodesty in total defiance of holiness:

“Moreover, the LORD said, because the daughters of Zion are proud and walk with heads held high and seductive eyes, and go along with mincing steps and tinkle the bangles on their feet. The Lord will afflict the scalp of the daughters of Zion with scabs, and the LORD will make their foreheads bare. In that day the Lord will take away the beauty of their anklets, headbands, crescent ornaments, dangling earrings, bracelets, veils, headdresses, ankle chains, sashes, perfume boxes, amulets, finger rings, nose rings, festal robes, outer tunics, cloaks, money purses, hand mirrors, undergarments, scarfs. Now it will come about that instead of sweet perfume there will be putrefaction; instead of a belt, a rope; instead of well-set hair, baldness; instead of fine clothes, a donning of sackcloth; and branding instead of beauty. Your men will fall by the sword and your mighty ones in battle. And her gates will lament and mourn, and deserted she will sit on the ground.” (Isaiah 3:9, 16-26)

This is obviously the outcome of nuclear flash-burns: “instead of well-set hair baldness” “plucked-out scalp”. The King James renders verse 17 as “therefore the Lord will strike with a scab the heads of the daughters of Zion, and the LORD will lay bare their secret parts” that even their pubic hair is gone and they will be naked. From the destruction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki we discover the aftermath that parallels with the description by Isaiah of the future destruction of Israel:

“Loss of hair usually began about 2 weeks after the bomb explosion, though in a few instances it is reported to have begun as early as 4 to 5 days afterward. The areas were involved in the following order of frequency with variations depending on the degree of exposure: scalp, armpits, beard, pubic region, and eyebrows. Complete baldness was rare. Microscopic study of the body areas involved has shown atrophy of the hair follicles. In those patients who survived after 2 months, however, the hair has commenced to regrow. An interesting but unconfirmed report has it that loss of the hair was less marked in persons with grey hair than in those with dark hair.”

“Radiation makes people invisible. We know that exposure to radiation can be deleterious to one’s health; can cause sickness and even death when received in high doses. But it does more. People who have been exposed to radiation, or even those who suspect that they have been exposed to radiation, including those who never experience radiation-related illnesses, may find that their lives are forever changed – that they have assumed a kind of second class citizenship. They may find that their relationships to their families, to their communities, to their hometowns, to their traditional diets and even traditional knowledge systems have been broken. They often spend the remainder of their lives wishing that they could go back, that things would become normal. They slowly realize that they have become expendable and that their government and even their society is no longer invested in their wellbeing.”

We already see the buildup of hostility against the Jews as far as south America, Japan, China and Vietnam. They will have nowhere to hide. This will embolden even the Muslims who have their own set of prophecies. The knockout blow is found here:

“holding in her hand a golden cup full of abominations and of the unclean things of her sexual immorality …” (Apocalypse 17:4)

What “sexual immorality?” Where and who is spreading this aberrant behavior? Was it us, the Palestinians, or was it the zionists who also commit genocide, cut or burn olive trees, commit unspeakable horrors, while occupying the United States, where it became common to find this headline: “How Jews Brought America to the Tipping Point on Marriage Equality?” Who can argue that the zionist world order controls the “kings of the earth” via the United States and Europe? Why does St. John focus exclusively on “the kings” omitting the people living under their rule? Why only the “kings” are in bed with her? Today these “kings” are complicit, while their peoples protest with outcries and complaints, but their voices are muffled. Protesters in England face immediate imprisonment for demonstrating against Israel, even as their leaders pledge unwavering support. This unwavering support by ‘kings’ is also in Germany, those who speak out are met with physical force. The same occurs at American universities, student activists face not only violence but the loss of their education and the threat of deportation. Across the U.S., any criticism of Israel risks social ostracization—whether it’s being ousted from an Evangelical church or terminated from a government position. For decades the peoples were ignored by their leaders in United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Italy, France, Germany, Czechia, Nigeria, Kenya, Uganda … regardless that all they demand is to end the ethnic cleansing including all these wars caused by Israel. St. John explains the “sexual immorality” as part of her agenda. Is Huckabee, Rubio, Graham, Hegseth and Cruz declaring war on the Sodom world order? Or are they declaring war on the Russian Orthodox order for forbidding ‘freedom’ of such filth? It is impossible to deny that it is them who are the greatest enemies of the Jews and that their ‘mother’ is a prostitute. They are bastards born out of wedlock for they even lay with their own mother (pun intended).