How to Spot a Muslim “Slick Willy” (The Simple Guide for Naïve Americans)

By Walid Shoebat

When the man behind the Ground Zero Mosque Feisal Abdul Rauf was asked “how does a Muslim engage westerners in a dialogue”, he answered with: “deal with them as one courts a pretty girl he wants to date; stop thinking like a typical Muslim. Then you can engage.”

An American is to be viewed as naïve. A Muslim must treat Americans as a naïve girl assuring her that their worst nightmares are unfounded.

So how can a naïve American spot the Muslim Slick Willy?

Here are 6 rules to follow:


Spotting a Muslim Slick Willy who supports violence is as easy as asking: what is Islam?

A Muslim Slick Willy will always tell you that Islam is “the religious faith of Muslims, based on the words and religious system founded by the prophet Muhammad and taught by the Koran, the basic principle of which is absolute submission to a unique and personal god, Allah”.

If you believe that the definition of Islam is what you find on Wikipedia, then you are a naïve American in need of recovery.

Truth is that in everything Muslim you will find one element from the following definition of what Islam is:

Islam is religious conditioning, by using allusions of misery and reflecting to the glory days of the past when Islam was triumphant, in order to convert masses into angry, pride-filled, remorseless killers and suicide seekers. The goal is to intimidate non-Muslims by deceit, fear, intimidation and threats, in order to re-establish a utopian theocratic world order in which Islam and Muslims are dominant, and all non-Muslims are subservient.

In other words, the Muslim’s goal is that he submits to Allah while you submit to him.

Just plug the word Islam in Google and see. You will find in everything you read and see that it falls under one of the categories in our definition. You will always find Islamic religious conditioning. You will always find allusion of misery, while ignoring the reasons for such misery. You will always find Muslims proud about their aggressive invasions. You will always find Muslim terrorism and suicide. You will always find Muslims intimidating anyone who exercises the freedom to expose them. You will always find them speaking of a utopia in which the world is all Muslim. You will always find them taking a dominant position and have a superiority complex.


This is Islam in a nutshell. The ultimate goal is Jihad-ul-Saif (Jihad by the Sword). Period.

Everything else besides violence, from Islamic information centers, books and websites are simply propaganda tools following the two first forms of Jihad: Jihad-ul-lisan (Jihad by the tongue or the “talking slick willies”) and Jihad-ul-Qalam (Jihad by the Pen, or the writing slick willies).

If a Muslim does not truly believe in aggressive violence he is truly not a Muslim in the first place and is naïve. These are much fewer in number than you think.

A Muslim Slick Willy will always tell you that Jihad does not include terrorism and aggressive killing of innocent people. Such claims are made in most of their websites.[See example here].

But such websites are Jihad by the Pen and here is exactly what you will find in all their writings and speeches:


A Muslim Slick Willy always brings up the Crusaders. Naïve Americans quickly confess their sins. They do not know that Muslims have attacked Christian countries well before the Crusades were ever initiated in 1095.

In fact, ask the Muslim Slick Willy to show you any historian who denies that Muslims invaded Sicily in the ninth century including Rome where they plundered the churches of St. Peter and St. Paul. There were also attacks against Christians in Spain and in the Levant, the Battle of Manzikert occurred in 1071 with the Muslims defeating the Byzantine Christians. In 1091 Muslims drove the Christian priests out of Jerusalem. Nearly four hundred years after the Muslim conquests in Palestine, they destroyed the Church of the Holy Sepulcher in Jerusalem in 1009 under Caliph el Hakim.

Such invasions are before 1095 when the Crusaders finally retaliated.

The Crusaders were right to war with Muslims. These numerous attacks on Christian sites, which went on for a period of over five-hundred years, provided more than enough justification for the Crusades to begin a defensive attack against the Muslim pagans.


Emperor Alexius in the East asked Pope Urban II in the West to help him recruit soldiers for the Byzantine army. The objective of the Crusaders was to roll back the Turkish Muslim conquest of Asia Minor, as well as to keep Christianity from being completely destroyed in the East and to also protect Turkish and European Christian pilgrims. The Crusades were not an act of imperialism nor a pre-emptive strike but an act of self-defense.

But the fact remains that it was the Muslims who were the invaders. Islam conquered Spain for 800 years; Portugal for 600, Greece, 500; Bulgaria, 500; Rumania, 400; Serbia, 400; Sicily, 300; and Hungary for 150 years.

Ask the Muslim Slick Willy; why their champion Tariq ibn Ziyad terrorized Spanish Christians when conquering Spain ordering Christian prisoners to be “cut to pieces and their flesh boiled in cauldrons” (Mark Williams, The Story of Spain (Malaga, Spain: Santana, 2000), 52)

Westerners must understand that a Muslim Slick Willy has a reveralist mind. He never sees what he does as evil and is why when you say “Jihad” they think “mercy” and when you say “invasions” they think “liberations” and when you say “peace” they cry “justice”.

For example, Hassan al-Banna, the Godfather of the Muslim Brotherhood saw Jihad as a God-ordained “defensive strategy”, stating that most Islamic scholars: “Agree unanimously that jihad is a communal defensive obligation imposed upon the Islamic ummah (nation) in order to broadcast the summons (to embrace Islam), and that it is an individual obligation to repulse the attack of unbelievers upon it.”

Did you get this? Anyone who wants to stop Jihad invasions is viewed as aggressors.

In other words, a Muslim Slick Willy is programmed never to loose an argument. You are not dealing with an individual who comprehends evil, but he masquerades it as good.

This is why Muslims believe that they are always attacked and are victims, for all they did was enforce Allah’s will.

The most typical comment I get from naïve Americans is this: “My Muslim doctor is nice”.

If so, ask your Muslim doctor a simple question: What wrongs were done by Muslims during the Islamic invasions into Christian Egypt, the Christian Levant and Christian Europe?

The honest answer should be “invasions”, period.

Muslims had no right to invade these lands in the first place. Any other answer is a sign that your Muslim doctor is a Slick Willy.

Muslims never even call Muslim invasions “invasions”, but use the Arabic term “Futuhat” which means: “Conquest”.

Muslims simply believe that they liberated Christians from believing in the Trinity by conquering them.

But to get right down to it as to what “Futuhat” literally means, it is the plural for “Fatah” “to open”. It is also used in a sexual context as when a Muslim sleeps with a virgin, they say he “Fatah-ha” (opened her). In this case he conquered her because they have the sick idea of domination and is the main reason why they allow Muslim males to marry non-Muslim females but never vise-versa.

Fatah is also the name of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO), which stemmed from the Quran (see Quran, chapter “Al-Fath” (The Conquest).



At the beginning of a debate I had in Barbados with a Muslim Slick Willy Imam they all promoted as “moderate”, but as soon as I took the microphone I asked him:

“Are you a peaceful Muslim?”

“Yes” he replied.

My second question was: “Islamic law (Sharia) imposes harsh-punishments for minor infractions. Therefore, are you willing to denounce Shariah in front of this western audience?”

He quickly replied: “No”.

While he was dishonest about the first question, that he is peaceful, the next question pinned him between a rock and a hard place since he had his congregation present at the event whom he daily was brain washing to fight for Sharia.

It’s what I call a checkmate Jesus style question.

I told the crowd that “this man is a Muslim Slick Willy and this dialogue is over, thank you for coming.”

One of the liberal pastors who promoted the event accused me of being “less than cordial”, of course, criticizing me while he kissed up to the Muslim Slick Willy.

So besides spotting a Muslim Slick Willy, it’s crucial you know how to identify the wolf in sheep clothing who is no different than the Muslim Slick Willy; both dress up in similar garb.


Slick Willy Muslims always quote stories from Islam that sound kind and loving. These are what I call “alkaline” that is meant to cover an acid reality. For example on Jihad warfare they teach:

“Listen and obey the following ten commands and instructions: Do not betray any one (if you give a pledge). Do not ever steal from the war booties. Do not breach your pledge of allegiance. Do not mutilate the body of the killed enemy fighters or deceased. Do not kill a child or a minor. Do not kill an elderly man or woman. Do not kill a woman. Do not pull out a date palm tree (or any other trees) and do not burn it either. Do not cut or destroy a fruit tree. Do not slaughter a female sheep, a cow, or a camel except for your (required) food. You surely will pass by some people who isolate themselves and are secluded for worship of Allah as monks and else, thus leave them alone and do not disturb them ever. You will, surely, stop at some people on the road, who will bring forth for you all types of food dishes. Whenever you eat their food utter the name of Allah each time you eat. You will, surely, pass by a group of people who shaved the hair in the center of their heads, and left the surrounding hair long braids. Go ahead; kill these people, as they are the fighters and worriers who carry their swords against you, of the enemies. Go ahead, with the name of Allah.”

Isn’t there a contradiction between “Jihad expansion” and all this talk of loving captive peoples? Why invade them in the first place?

But what a Muslim Slick Willy will never share is the acid reality. For example, Jihad by Al-Ghazali states:

“One must go on jihad (i.e., warlike razzias or raids) at least once a year…one may use a catapult against them when they are in a fortress, even if among them are women and children. One may set fire to them and/or drown them…If a person of the Ahl al-Kitab [People of The Book – Jews and Christians, typically] is enslaved, his marriage is [automatically] revoked…One may cut down their trees…One must destroy their useless books. Jihadists may take as booty whatever they decide…they may steal as much food as they need.”

Both Muslim apologists (slick willies) and western orientalists (Muslim foot-kissers) love to quote Al Ghazali, the famous theologian, philosopher, and paragon of mystical Sufism as a prime example of moderate Islam.

For example, Western prominent Muslim foot-kisser, the “eminent” W. M. Watt describes Al-Ghazali as “acclaimed in both the East and West as the greatest Muslim after Mohammed, and he is by no means unworthy of that dignity.”

One must study Al-Ghazali regarding Jihad and the treatment of the vanquished non-Muslim dhimmi peoples to avoid being deceived by any Slick-Willy.


Always ask the Muslim who denounces extremism of his record encountering “extremists” and insist on verifiable proof.

You will never find them debating Muslim fundamentalists.


Americans sought to bring freedom from tyranny in Afghanistan, freedom from tyranny in Iraq and the Kurdish Muslims are overjoyed at the prospect of freedom. America even helped Kuwaitis when Iraqi soldiers were raping their little girls and they bombed the hell out of the Iraqi rapists as they fled on the Highway of Death. In the end of the last century America stupidly fought Serbia to supposedly liberate Muslims. During that time Jewish doctors treated Kosovar Muslims contrary to the way they were treated by Islam.

Who today from these Muslims appreciated it? So few. The rest are what constitutes Muslim Slick Willies.


, , , , , ,