Video: White House is telling us exactly why Muslim riots happening

Every once in a while, a paradox comes along that’s so blatant, it makes complete sense. For example, White House press secretary Jay Carney is adamant that the protests in the Middle East are in response to the anti-Muhammad video.

In reality, the protests are about getting people like Carney to blame it on the video so that actions will be taken which will prevent criticism of Muhammad / Islam in the future; that’s what the two men most likely at the center of the protests in Egypt have already told us.

When Barack Obama allegedly contacted Google to see if the Muhammad video ‘violates’ their terms of use, the same dynamic was at work.

Via the Daily Caller:

Tommy Vietor, a spokesman for the National Security Council, told the Washington Post midday that the White House has “reached out to YouTube to call the video to their attention and ask them to review whether it violates their terms of use.”

Youtube’s executives shut down videos that they deem “hate speech.” A YouTube spokesperson said Sept. 12 that the video “is clearly within our guidelines and so will stay on YouTube,” and repeated that message late Sept. 14, so rejecting Obama’s unprecedented request.

Obama’s request complied with the Sept. 13 demand and threat by the brotherhood, which now governs the Arab world’s largest country, Egypt.

“Hurting the feelings of one and a half billion Muslims cannot be tolerated, and… we demand that all those involved in such crimes be urgently brought to trial,” according to an English-language statement on the brotherhood’s website.

These things only help make our case more ironclad. Wisam Abdul Waris and Nader Mahmoud Abdulsalam Bakkar told us exactly what this was about. Here are the translated words Wisam, on September 9th:

We have moved to review… all the legal procedures today by which we created The Voice of Wisdom Coalition (I’itilaf Sawt al-Hekma); it will hold accountable everyone who insults Islam locally and internationally, in accordance with every country’s laws. We all know the problems Yasser Al-Habib had in London and after that in Berlin… in Germany, an extremist group was allowed to publicize cartoons that insult the prophet in front of the Salafist Mosque in Berlin, through a legal decision. So what we did was to ask Sharabi Mahmoud to reject this legal decision on behalf of the Egyptian people who are Muslim; for this reason, we created this coalition. We also made an official request from the Church in Egypt to issue a public announcement, to state it has nothing to do with this deed.

When Carney says the ‘disgusting’ video is the reason for the riots and when Barack Obama attempts to get the video pulled from YouTube, they’re reacting exactly how Wisam wants them to act. The video is a means, an excuse to further intimidate other countries into making it a crime to insult Islam and the reactions from the White House prove it.

Here are a couple of clips from Carney. Note in the second clip, via GWP, that he is dumbfounded when asked if he thinks the video was the cause of the riots in Benghazi.

Via MediaIte:


, , , , , , , , ,

  • sumsrent

    We need to learn what’s going on and compare all this to Biblical Prophecy. What we’re seeing take place in Egypt can happen here in America too.

    On 15 July 2011 Hillary Clinton coordinated a meeting with OIC (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) in Istanbul to implement resolution 16/18… which is… ‘defamation of Islam’.

    Forbes Reports:
    Could You Be a Criminal?

    “While you were out scavenging the Wal-Mart super sales or trying on trinkets at Tiffany and Cartier, your government has been quietly wrapping up a Christmas gift of its own: adoption of UN resolution 16/18. An initiative of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (formerly Organization of Islamic Conferences), the confederacy of 56 Islamic states, Resolution 16/18 seeks to limit speech that is viewed as “discriminatory” or which involves the “defamation of religion” – specifically that which can be viewed as “incitement to imminent violence.”

    Whatever that means.

    What’s worse, the measure codifies into the UN agenda support for the very notion democracies now wrestle with, and which threatens to destroy the very fabric of our culture: tolerance of the intolerant, or rather, the question of whether a tolerant society must also tolerate ways of life that are intolerant –”

    **** Here’s good incite on how all this works… as Infidels we will not be permitted to expose the truth about Islam. We will be expected to be tolerant of their intolerance.

    Tell me… is that messed up or what?

    It’s like a free pass for the Muslims of this world to continue in their ways while the rest of the world is banned from speaking out about Islam’s behavior.

    Let’s take a look at what Forbes also had to say in this article…


    “Because who, exactly, arbitrates what is “incitement to imminent violence”? Violence by whom? If drawing a caricature of the Prophet incites violence by Islamic radicals to the tune of riots, arson, and murder, all sanctioned by the IOC itself – then drawing such a caricature (or writing a book like the Satanic Verses) will now constitute a criminal act. And that is exactly what the OIC was aiming for. It is also in direct violation of the principles of Western democracy – and the First Amendment. (Though it is crucial to note that any resolution passed by the General Assembly remains nonbinding, which makes you sort of wonder what the point of all this is, anyway.)

    Moreover, since many would claim that the persecution of blasphemers is mandated by their religion, conflicts emerge between guarantees of free expression and the guarantee of freedom of religion and the practice of one’s faith. In othr words: your free speech allows you to insult my prophet: my freedom of religion compels me to kill you for it.

    What was that about “incitement to violence”?
    Whose violence?

    This is how the Organization of the Islamic Cooperation plays “Gotcha”.”

    So basically… us Infidels/Unbelievers/Non-Innocents are being restricted in order to prevent Muslims from getting mad. It’s basically our duty, through force, to control and watch carefully for what we say so as not to incite Muslims to go out and terrorize, bomb, murder, mutilate, rape, maim and torture the non-innocents.

    And we can understand why our… NWO Luciferian Globalist Muslim President Barrack Hussein… is pushing to silence everything rather than holding accountable the Islamic World for their atrocities.

    It’s all a backwards approach to protect Islam… the perfect One World Economic government. That’s why the banks have been converting to Sharia Finance and setting in place a One World Islamic Economic System.

    See folks… The NWO Luciferian Globalists are backing up their anti-Christ, One World Economic, totalitarian government called Islam.

    Let me tell ya… there’s article after article on the Internet describing how the Governments of this world want to put a “kill switch” on the internet.

    IMO… there is no other group more motivated for such a thing to exist other than the Islamic World. Their objectives is to hide and cover up their satanic ways so the masses can be deluded into their anti-Christ occult.

    There’s a reason why Islam is referred to as Islamonazism. A Socialistic, Master Class, all controlling government that incorporates an aspect of religion, bent on killing anything that opposes its conquest of the world.

    See… a lot of Christians are duped into thinking that the Christian Crusades are evidence of cruelty and conquest. What they don’t realize is that the Christian Crusades were implemented to stop the Islamic conquests that had already been going on for decades. And the Spanish Inquisition afterwards was a result of all this too.

    My point here in all of this is… as these things keep progressing as they are… one day we won’t be allowed to blog about exposing the evil truths behind Islam.