Obama’s Brother joins Hamas, says ‘Jerusalem is ours; We are Coming’

By Walid Shoebat and Ben Barrack

While in Sanaa, Yemein in 2010, President Barack Obama’s brother Malik Obama was at an event billed as the Orphans Development Fund (ODF) Conference. It’s quite the ironic title considering a group photo Malik is in that he has posted to his website. In the photo, he can be seen wearing a Hamas scarf (keffiyeh) that bears a well-known Palestinian slogan – ‘Jerusalem is ours – WE ARE COMING!’ It also includes a map of Palestine that says, ‘From the River to the Sea!’ In other words, Malik is saying, THERE IS NO ISRAEL.

Scarf translated: Jerusalem is ours - WE ARE COMING!

Scarf translated: Jerusalem is ours – WE ARE COMING!

Here is the full photo:

Malik: Expressing support for Hamas at an 'orphan' conference.

Malik: Expressing support for Hamas at an ‘orphan’ conference.

Here is Malik Obama’s boss (Malik works for him officially in his capacity as IDO Executive Secretary), Suar al-Dahab during a visit to Gaza last year at a Hamas event with the group’s Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh and Muslim Brotherhood spiritual leader Yusuf al-Qaradawi. Notice he’s wearing a similar keffiyeh at a conference entitled, ‘Aiding Jerusalem and Gaza”:

Malik's boss, Suar al-Dahab, wearing a similar keffiyeh in Gaza.

Malik’s boss, Suar al-Dahab, wearing a similar keffiyeh in Gaza.

Here is Malik in 2010, with al-Dahab in Khartoum, Sudan during the Islamic Da’wa Organization (IDO) conference, presided over by Sudan’s terrorist leader Omar al-Bashir, who belongs to the Muslim Brotherhood and is wanted for crimes against humanity:

Malik Obama and Suar al-Dahab.

Malik Obama and Suar al-Dahab.

Like British politician George Galloway, Malik is comfortable associating with those who support the message emblazoned on these scarfs:

British politician George Galloway and Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh with similar scarfs.

British politician George Galloway and Hamas Prime Minister Ismail Haniyeh with similar scarfs.

Galloway and Haniyeh, wearing and surrounded by keffiyehs.

Galloway and Haniyeh, wearing and surrounded by keffiyehs.

Just in case we’re told that Malik was conned into wearing such a hateful and racist symbol like Swedish King Carl Gustaf and his wife Queen Sylvia were, consider a few things. Carl and Sylvia quickly took the keffiyeh’s off after having them placed on them by an opportunist and distanced themselves from the message.

Malik is a much different story.

Swedish King Carl Gustaf and Queen Sylvia: deceived into wearing hateful keffiyehs.

Swedish King Carl Gustaf and Queen Sylvia: deceived into wearing hateful keffiyehs.

Malik reads and speaks fluent Arabic as do many in his family, like cousin Musa Ismail Obama and uncle Sayyid, who’ve been to at least one prominent Wahhabist university in Saudi Arabia. Barack recited the opening lines of the Arabic call to prayer with a ‘first-rate accent’ according to the New York Times’ Nicholas Kristof.

Musa Obama and Sayyid Obama at Umm al-Qura University.

Musa Obama and Sayyid Obama at Umm al-Qura University.

The keffiyeh (or scarf) doesn’t just say, ‘Al Aqsa is ours and is not their temple’. It also says ‘Innana Qadimun’, which translates to mean ‘We are marching forward’. This famous battle command which is a reference to the prophecy that some day the Muslim world will march on Jerusalem and then the trees and stones will cry out, ‘here is a Jew hiding behind me… come O Muslim, come and kill him’.

Here is Khansa, the Mother of the Resistance movement, donning the keffiyeh:

Khansa, mother of the Resistance movement, dons the keffiyeh.

Khansa, mother of the Resistance movement, dons the keffiyeh.

This is a photo of Khansa sandwiched between Haniyeh (L) and Hamas leader Khalid Mash’al, who is donning the keffiyeh in this picture:

Khansa between Hamas Prime Minister and Hamas leader Khalid Mash'al.

Khansa between Hamas Prime Minister and Hamas leader Khalid Mash’al.

Those who see this as a matter of guilt by association run into some major problems. President Barack Obama and Malik are much closer than is being admitted publicly. In an interview published in GQ Magazine last July, Malik took offense at the characterization of him and the president as being merely ‘half’ brothers:

“Everyone’s referring to us as half, quarter,…step, things like that,” he says, displeased even by the taste of those words. “I think that’s like weights and measures. This didn’t even occur to us until he became president, until he gained prominence. And now we’re sort of like celebrities.

“But this is a streak of ignorance,” he adds. “Here in Africa we don’t think of each other as ‘half’ this or that. In an extended family, someone is your brother even if he is just in your clan. So I…am Obama.”

A photo of Malik as best man at Barack’s wedding tends to back up the claim:

Malik best man at Barack's wedding.

Malik best man at Barack’s wedding.

So do photos of Malik visiting Barack at the White House on more than one occasion:

Barack and Malik in the Oval Office.

Barack and Malik in the Oval Office.

In the same GQ interview, Malik insists that he and his brother (the word ‘half’ left out in deference to Malik) are indeed close:

Ask Malik how often he and his brother talk nowadays and he boasts that it’s about once a year, as though that’s proof of their intimate bond. “Of course we’re close!” Malik says, just a bit too loudly. “I’m the one who brought him here to Kogelo in 1988! I thought it was important for him to come home and see from whence his family came—you know, his roots.”

As for Barack’s take on the relationship with his brother, well, he doesn’t say much about it but Barack has a history of dishonesty when it comes to being forthcoming about how close he is to his family. Late last year, Barack had to admit that he’d stayed with his uncle Onyango during the former’s days at Harvard. Prior to the admission, the American public had been told that Barack never met his uncle. White House Press Secretary Jay Carney put forth a very unbelievable explanation for the inconsistency.

Onyango Obama: Barack lied about knowing him.

Onyango Obama: Barack lied about knowing him.

Another Obama brother – Mark Ndesanjo Obama – accused the President of lying about their relationship as well, after Barack said the two had only met one time, presumably during the President’s visit to China in late 2009. Ndesdanjo insists they met several times, dating back to the 1980’s, during an interview with Laura Ingraham, via National Review:

“I heard that after the meeting we had in Beijing and I can tell you I was floored by it — I don’t know why he said it,” Ndesandjo said to Laura Ingraham, adding that he had met the president several times over the years and still isn’t sure what his motivation was for making the claim. “I think he was being president and was not being my brother,” Ndesandjo said.

Ok, so according to Barack, he only met his brother Mark once and that meeting was in China, right?

Barack and brother Mark Ndesanjo Obama met in China in 2009.

Barack and brother Mark Ndesanjo Obama met in China in 2009.

If Barack only met Mark once (in China), how does he explain this photo of Mark in the White House ten months earlier, half-way around the world during Barack’s inauguration (Mark is circled and Malik is on the far left)?

Mark Ndesandjo Obama at White House for Barack's inauguration in 2009.

Mark Ndesandjo Obama at White House for Barack’s inauguration in 2009.

The point here is that Barack cannot be trusted to issue a full disclosure when it comes to the relationships he has with his family members.

Once again, this leads us to his relationship with Malik. How is it that Malik received 501(c)(3) status for his Barack H. Obama Foundation in less than 30 days and had it illegally backdated 38 months by Lois Lerner? If Barack had anything to do with it, history says he might be lying if he denies it. In order to come full circle here, Malik’s foundation is tied to a State Sponsor of Terrorism in Sudan.

As we’ve said before, Lois Lerner should be granted immunity and compelled to testify about why she granted tax exempt status to a man who is tied to terrorism and just so happens to be the brother of the President of the United States.

Lerner: Granted Malik Obama's foundation illegal tax exempt status.

Lerner: Granted Malik Obama’s foundation illegal tax exempt status.

If Osama bin Laden’s driver was convicted of material support for terrorism, shouldn’t Malik be brought up on charges of supporting Omar al-Bashir, a world-renowned terrorist? After all, the Egyptian government wants Malik Obama to appear for questioning about this.

Malik Obama’s Barack H. Obama Foundation (BHOF) raises money and likely provides material support to terrorists. PLEASE DONATE TO RESCUE CHRISTIANS TO SAVE CHRISTIAN LIVES from terrorists who are in solidarity with Hamas.

Lois Lerner: Signature at bottom of Malik Obama's tax-exempt approval letter.

Lois Lerner: Signature at bottom of Malik Obama’s tax-exempt approval letter.


, ,

  • billobillo54

    Of all the issues dealt with in this article, the most chilling (along with the Lois Lerner aspect) is the prominence of the scarf: “Hamas scarf (keffiyeh) that bears a well-known Palestinian slogan – ‘Jerusalem is ours – WE ARE COMING!’ It also includes a map of Palestine that says, ‘From the River to the Sea!’ In other words, Malik is saying, THERE IS NO ISRAEL.”
    It is sobering, stunning and evident that most of the entire world is aligning itself against the Israelis. Even a large portion of the Jews in Israel itself are in step with the world’s agenda for dividing the Land with guarantees of security (e.g. “peace and safety”).
    Atheism, secularism, mere nationalistic Israelism, liberal Judaism, liberal Christianity, and the remainder of the Christianity that subscribes to replacement and/or “fulfillment” theology are all in for a good dose of Joel Ch.3 at some later (or sooner) time. Even though, in my opinion, the strict geopolitics of dividing the Land is a prescription for disaster, the justification for the existence of Israel weakens to indefensibility without the truth of God supporting it. We are heading for a catastrophe of literal Biblical proportions if and when the international order decides to and the Israelis agree the infamous treaty of death.

    • shirleyanne12

      The Word, HAMAS, is in the bible.. It Means, VIOLENCE!!!

    • shirleyanne12

      Billo, that COVENANT with DEATH, was Already signed, when the parties concerned, Partook of the COVENANTAL Meal = ”IFTAR” dinner, on July 30th. 2013.
      In N.E. Covenant Treaties, the MEAL Ratifies the Covenant.
      We WILL See something Very OMINOUS in APRIL!!!

  • shirleyanne12



    Zechariah 12:2-10

    King James Version (KJV)

    2 Behold, I will make Jerusalem a cup of trembling unto all the people round about, when they shall be in the siege both against Judah and against Jerusalem.

    3 And in that day will I make Jerusalem a burdensome stone for all people: all that burden themselves with it shall be cut in pieces, though all the people of the earth be gathered together against it.

    4 In that day, saith the Lord, I will smite every horse with astonishment, and his rider with madness: and I will open mine eyes upon the house of Judah, and will smite every horse of the people with blindness.

    5 And the governors of Judah shall say in their heart, The inhabitants of Jerusalem shall be my strength in the Lord of hosts their God.

    6 In that day will I make the governors of Judah like an hearth of fire among the wood, and like a torch of fire in a sheaf; and they shall devour all the people round about, on the right hand and on the left: and Jerusalem shall be inhabited again in her own place, even in Jerusalem.

    7 The Lord also shall save the tents of Judah first, that the glory of the house of David and the glory of the inhabitants of Jerusalem do not magnify themselves against Judah.

    8 In that day shall the Lord defend the inhabitants of Jerusalem; and he that is feeble among them at that day shall be as David; and the house of David shall be as God, as the angel of the Lord before them.

    9 And it shall come to pass in that day, that I will seek to destroy all the nations that come against Jerusalem.

    10 And I will pour upon the house of David, and upon the inhabitants of Jerusalem, the spirit of grace and of supplications: and they shall look upon me whom they have pierced, and they shall mourn for him, as one mourneth for his only son, and shall be in bitterness for him, as one that is in bitterness for his firstborn.

    And the House of Judah, Will say, Baruch Haba B’Shem Adonai….
    Blessed is He Who Comes In The Name Of The Lord…

    He is Reconciling us, the Northern 10 Tribes called Ephraim (the Prodigal Son)
    With Brother Judah ( the 2 Southern Tribes, AKA as the Son that Remained with his
    And so we should Ever be with Yeshua when He Establishes His Kingdom, upon earth, for a Millennium….

    • billobillo54

      Dear SA: Yes, I agree with the scripture and the many others that shout our triumph with God. And, fear is normally an ungodly attitude. However, fear that motivates to repentenance is good. And the church in the west needs to repent and should show a little “respect” (and subsequent opposition ) for the evil that is at hand in the ever more evident form of the AntiMessiah and his order. It’s really easy to profess courage when we are protected from harassment, threats, violence, torture and reprisals for our faith. I do not savor the prospects of watching my loved ones marched into the spectacle of the amphitheater. Better to fear now and act in defense and be one of the nations in Micah Ch. 5 who will assist the Israelis than to have to exercise great courage in the face of death and torture because we did nothing but talk.

      Habakkuk 3:16: 16 I heard and my [a]inward parts trembled,
      At the sound my lips quivered.
      Decay enters my bones,
      And in my place I tremble.
      Because I must wait quietly for the day of distress,
      [b]For the people to arise who will invade us.

      or Joseph in Matthew 2:22:

      22 But when he heard that Archelaus was reigning over Judea in place of his father Herod, he was afraid to go there. Then after being warned by God in a dream, he left for the regions of Galilee,

      • shirleyanne12

        Yes.. There must be a HEALTHY Fear.. AWE & REVERENCE for the GREAT Elohim of Abraham, Isaac, & Jacob…

        Then ONLY will one come to TRUE REPENTANCE.

        What we say in Hebrew, TESHUVAH….

        That means to ADMIT our WRONG, in HUMILITY, & with a CONTRITE Heart…

        T H E N , One Makes a 180 degree TURN Around, To the Opposite Direction, & Walks in Faith ( Emunah ) T R U S T . Like Abraham’s.

        The Greek Western Thinking is Very Linear, & Philosophical (Head Knowlede.)

        The Hebrew is CYCLICAL… Ecclesiastes 1:9

        Complete Jewish Bible (CJB)

        9 What has been is what will be,
        what has been done is what will be done,
        and there is nothing new under the sun.

        And It Is FUNCTIONAL…. Ones’ WALK ( Halakha ) Determines What’s in the Heart…

        Faith (Emunah) Without Works Is Dead…

        For example, The Greek would Look @ a Bowl, and if asked, What is it??? He’d Reply, a ”Bowl.” In other words, Its FORM!

        A Hebrew would tell you It’s FUNCTION… What PURPOSE that Bowl Fulfills!!…. Kneads Dough…

        Now if it breaks, It NO Longer is a Bowl !!! It Can NOT Fulfill its purpose!

        Jeremiah 17:9

        Complete Jewish Bible (CJB)

        9 “The heart is more deceitful than anything else
        and mortally sick. Who can fathom it?

        • Woody

          Very Good, Shirl, but how come no Protestant here as smart as they are can answer my simple quiz. Why can none of them name the founder of the World’s Largest Christan Church by far–

          1.3 billion Members to date:

          The Chosen People:

          Moses Judaism 17th Century BC

          Confucius Confucianism –551-BC – 479 BC

          Zeno of Citium Stoicism 333 BC – 264 BC

          ??? Catholicism 29


          Nagarjuna Madhyamaka 150–250

          Mani Manichaeism 216–276

          Arius[n 3] Arianism[n 4] 250–336

          Pelagius[n 3] Pelagianism[n 5] 354–430

          Nestorius[n 3] Nestorianism[n 6] 386–451

          Eutyches Monophysitism[n 7] 380–456

          Luther Lutheranism and Protestantism in general 1517-Present

          Calvin Calvinism 1509-1564

          Knox Presbyterianism 1510

          Smyth Baptists 1570

          Jakob Ammann Amish 1656

          Wesley Merhodists

          So On Today

          • shirleyanne12

            Many AmeriKans, Don’t care Much for History…
            That’s the reason we are in a MESS, OVER HERE!!
            They Don’t Realize that if Changes are NOT Made, History Will REPEAT ITSELF!!!
            And NO One Can Say, that this IS NOT HAPPENING !!!
            Well, going back to your question, the Answer is CONSTANTINE, in the 3rd. Century!!
            He Knew that the Best way to Get the Troops on the SAME PAGE, HE WOULD HAVE TO MAKE A STATE ”RELIGION!”
            Can you Say, C A T H O L I C I S M ?!?!?
            B I N G O !!!!
            Now the NWO IS USING THE SAME M. O.
            L U C I F E R !!!!!!

          • Woody

            Another unbalanced one–a woman who starts out extolling history and doesn’t know history herself; how rationale is she?

            Constantine was a pagan who converted on this death bed.

            So no bingo for you…as their are plenty of extant texts long before Constantine which relates the lives of the Popes prior to Constantine: (36 Popes by the time of Constantine–,most or all of them martyred for the Faith):

            St. Peter (32-67)

            St. Linus (67-76)

            St. Anacletus (Cletus) (76-88)

            St. Clement I (88-97)

            St. Evaristus (97-105)

            St. Alexander I (105-115)

            St. Sixtus I (115-125) Also called Xystus I

            St. Telesphorus (125-136)

            St. Hyginus (136-140)

            St. Pius I (140-155)

            St. Anicetus (155-166)

            St. Soter (166-175)

            St. Eleutherius (175-189)

            St. Victor I (189-199)

            St. Zephyrinus (199-217)

            St. Callistus I (217-22) Callistus and the following three popes were opposed by St. Hippolytus, antipope (217-236)

            St. Urban I (222-30)

            St. Pontain (230-35)

            St. Anterus (235-36)

            St. Fabian (236-50)

            St. Cornelius (251-53) Opposed by Novatian, antipope (251)

            St. Lucius I (253-54)

            St. Stephen I (254-257)

            St. Sixtus II (257-258)

            St. Dionysius (260-268)

            St. Felix I (269-274)

            St. Eutychian (275-283)

            St. Caius (283-296) Also called Gaius

            St. Marcellinus (296-304)

            St. Marcellus I (308-309)

            St. Eusebius (309 or 310)

            St. Miltiades (311-14)

            St. Sylvester I (314-35)

            When Jesus founded His Church the Flock called it merely “the People of the Way”–“the Way” meaning Jesus’ Way; by 107 AD heresies were already beginning to confuse the Flock [just as they are today-your point on “history repeating itself”], thus some of them asked St. Ignatius 3rd Bishop of Antioch (Peter as the “Bishop” had appointed him and in fact had been 1st bishop of Antioch before he went to Rome) “how do we know which Church is the true Church of Jesus?”

            and he answered …look to Rome where the Bishop is there is His Church…(by this time St. Alexander I (105-115) was the Bishop of Rome–Peter and his early successors

            [A note: Ignatius was on his way to his execution and had no reason to lie going to his death—he did die, eaten by lions]


            To refute heresies Jesus gave His Church the Power to refute heresies (like a bouncer in a night club) directly to Peter and the Apostles “Whatsoever you bind on earth I shall bind in Heaven; whatsoever you loose upon earth I shall loose in Heaven” and “I shall be with you until the End of Days.” [among the Jews binding and loosing meant the power to create and eliminate laws]

            So, as we see today, there is a list of heresies which can be googled; the Church’s language is “Let them be Anathema.”
            [A good tool and Keeps Jesus’ Truth Clean for He knew, being God that men would screw up his teachings as the devil is an opportunist)
            And this is why only Jesus has and had the authority to “found a Church” and Biblicably = that is what He did. Yes no Luther, Calvin, Swingley and none of them mentioned in Martin’s false doctrine of “Sola Scriptura” which makes it an oxymoron.
            You ought to read your great Protestant scholar and Theologian as he is correct on many points (like Peter went to Rome), as at least he moves to true “history.”
            There are so many extant texts on all of these points and, if one follows Jesus “Know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free.” Today, these sources are easily available with the Inet, etc., there is no excuse for one remaining ignorant unless one wants to remain in this state.

            Yes, this is like saying the 44 Presidents started with Abraham Lincoln…? Huh?

            Pope Francis is the 266th Bishop of Rome to hold that wonderful Office of Our Lord and Savior Jesus Christ of His One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church (the Marks of the True Church)
            G-d Bless

          • Woody

            But don’t feel bad; at least you had the cajonies to try while none of the hundreds of others on this site has even attempted my simple quiz

          • Jesus. Jesus is the founder.

          • Woody

            Wow, you have renewed my faith in mankind; one answer over 2 weeks and correct (out of how many on this site–100? Several answered Constantine (4th Century AD?) This is for some reason getting big press????
            later, I looked around the 7th Century and I saw there appears to be a Pope Constantine hanging out there?? Don’t know what he did thou.

            G-d Bless, Terri

          • sumsrent

            It’s a loaded question…

            To Woody… the answer implies that “Christ Jesus” founded the Catholic Church and only the Catholic Church. Which is one of the lies manufactured by the satanically influenced Catholic fake Church.

          • sumsrent

            The Ten Commandments Website Reports:

            “This quote says Catholics should follow the Pope even if he were Satan himself. Again, I just simply cannot agree with this. Evil should never be worshipped and nor should any man on earth be worshipped as this is a form of idolatry in itself. Only the God head is worthy of worship according to the Bible.

            “Even if the Pope were Satan incarnate, we ought not to raise up our heads against him, but calmly lie down to rest on his bosom. He who rebels against our Father is condemned to death, for that which we do to him we do to Christ: we honor Christ if we honor the Pope; we dishonor Christ if we dishonor the Pope. I know very well that many defend themselves by boasting: “They are so corrupt, and work all manner of evil!” But God has commanded that, even if the priests, the pastors, and Christ-on-earth were incarnate devils, we be obedient and subject to them, not for their sakes, but for the sake of God, and out of obedience to Him.” — St. Catherine of Siena, SCS, p. 201-202, p. 222, (quoted in Apostolic Digest, by Michael Malone, Book 5: “The Book of Obedience”, Chapter 1: “There is No Salvation Without Personal Submission to the Pope”).”


            It also says…

            ““The Pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, but he is Jesus Christ, Himself, hidden under the veil of human flesh.” — Catholic National, July 1895.”

            YOU ARE deceived into a satanically influenced Catholic fake Church!

          • Woody

            A head in search of a brain

          • Woody

            Terri above has all the smarts on this site.

    • yahshua love’s you


    • Woody

      Only Proves you can read, but “meaning” escapes you like most here.

      • shirleyanne12

        Woody I pray for Yeshua to ”OPEN” your eyes!!

        Isaiah 6:9-10

        King James Version (KJV)

        9 And he said, Go, and tell this people, Hear ye indeed, but understand not; and see ye indeed, but perceive not.

        10 Make the heart of this people fat, and make their ears heavy, and shut their eyes; lest they see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and convert, and be healed.

        • Woody

          Thank you Shirley Anne that is so nice and I told Jesus and Mary what you posted to me above and Mary said she “thinks it is very nice too.”

          • shirleyanne12

            The Dead in Yeshua Have NOT Risen… YET …
            You are ”HEARING” Voices..
            Check whose Voice you’re Hearing!

          • Woody

            Proves you can read but not interpret; “self-interpretation” of Scripture is just another heresy. The Bible is replete with promptings (locutions) of the Holy Spirit–the trick is to separate one’s own voice from that of the Holy One.I long ago checked whose voice I am hearing and it is the HS many times. Protestants have little faith – recall “Oh, thous of little faith” and if you have the faith of mustard seed you can move a mountain. A few years ago I was relating to a group of friends in Chicago how many times St Anthony had found lost articles for me (as I track them) and at the time it was up to about 186. Well, one at the table sneared and said, “I asked St Antony to find somethin’ fo me, an he dint do nuttin.” [recognizing immediately that he was a well-educated Prot) I asked him “Do you believe in St Anthony?” He said, “No.” “Why would he do anything for you then?” (no faith)
            Three years ago I was on the job sitting with my most beautiful Baptist girl friend who has been dying of cancer since 1998. As she tried to take her cancer pill she dropped it onto the floor. Before long a lady came up and looked for it; then another, then another, soon a guy, and I watched them crawl along on the floor for about 20 minutes; Tired of the charade I said, to Jean (my friend) “How bad do you need that pill?’
            Almost in tears she said, “Bad.” So I said “watch this,” and recited” (a prayer I had learned as a kid)
            “Tony, Tony, Look around something is lost and must be found.” and upon that I pointed to the floor to the left of her feet, “There it is I said!”
            “Oh, my gosh, ” she screamed…”but I looked there before.”
            I smiled and said, “Sometimes he moves things.”
            I miss her but called her a week ago and reminded her of this incident and she said, “I forgot. I am going to tell my daughter (who had just returned to her) about that.”

            G-d Bless, and yes, Faith can move mountains. (and pills)

          • shirleyanne12

            You and your heretical Vatican martyrdoms and Self-Appointed Sainthoods!!!
            Now I understand that Pope John Paul’s BLOOD is MISSING..
            You’ll are FULL of Necromancy !!!!!

  • Dave

    Its articles like this that show me that Shoebat is a fraud. No true Palestinian would call the keffiyeh a “Hamas scarf.” What a load of gibberish! The black and white keffiyeh is a traditional Palestinian scarf that has been worn for centuries by Arabs all over the Arab world, mostly by Palestinians. It became a symbol of Palestinian nationalism against the BRITISH occupation of Palestine in the 1930’s- 50 years before Hamas even existed. To call it a “Hamas scarf” is utter propaganda and is in noway a honest testimony of the scarf’s historical meaning.

    lol the keffiyeh is a “Hamas scarf????” What a load of gibberish!

    • Does it matter where the scarf comes from and who started it ??? It still call war on Israel… These people want to own the world…. There is no peace with the Muslims and all they know is (Dam)…BLOOD

      • Dave

        I care because the article incorrectly states that the keffiyeh is a “Hamas scarf,” and attempts to tie it with the Islamic terrorist group. That is like saying that the sombrero is the official scarf of illegal immigration or Mexican drug cartels.

        No, its not a “call to war against Israel.”

        And who are “these people” who want to own the world? You mean the Palestinians- who were displaced by Zionist terrorists from their little strip of land and who go to the UN every year asking to be recognized on 27% of their homeland? The ones who have even refused citizenship of other nations so they can return to their own sovereign homeland???

        Yeah… really seems like the Palestinians want to “own the world.” Bull crap.

        • Schawminator

          Eyes and mind wide shut you have.

        • Todd Baumann

          Dave, are you blind? No one is discussing the scarf, its the Graffiti that is on the scarf. Its like your wife is asking “honey its not your lips, its the lipstick.” I am sure you get it, but your so dense because you hate zionists.

        • sumsrent

          You incorrectly say…

          “… that has been worn for centuries by Arabs all over the Arab world, mostly by Palestinians.”
          1) Arabs don’t wear this scarf… satanic worshipping muslims do!
          2) The fake Palestinians weren’t created until 1967… how could they have worn such a thing for centuries?

          PS… satanic worshipping muslims are commanded to force satanic Islam upon the entire world… even upon death. The fake Palestinians are just tools to retrieve Israel in accordance to Dar al Islam.

          • Dave

            lol so little you know.

            “The keffiyeh/kufiya (Arabic: كوفية‎,kūfiyyah, originally from the city of Kufa (الكوفه), plural كوفيات,kūfiyyāt), also known as a ghutrah (غُترَة) or shemagh(شماغ), and also known by some as ḥaṭṭah (حَطّة), mashadah (مَشَدة), or in Persian chafiye (چَفیِه), Hebrew soderah (סודרא) and in Kurdish cemedanî ( جه مه داني), is a traditional Middle Eastern headdress fashioned from a square, usually cotton, scarf. It is typically worn by Arabs, as well as some Kurdsand Jews.

            It is commonly found in arid regions to provide protection from direct sun exposure, as well to protect the mouth and eyes from blown dust and sand. Its distinctive woven check pattern may have originated in an ancient Mesopotamian representation of either fishing nets or ears of grain,[1] but the true origin of the pattern remains unknown.

            How were Palestinians created in 1967? Palestinian nationalism was created during the Palestine Revolt of 1836. I guess you’ve never heard of the Palestinian Arab National Party of 1937. Plus even if they weren’t called “Palestinians” centuries ago that does not mean they are “invented.” Even according to Turkish surveys, over 500,000 Arabs lived in Palestine as of 1850.

            PS- the PLO, PFLP, DFLP and many other Palestinian militant groups were founded by Palestinian Christians. And today there are dozens of prominent Palestinian Christian politicians such as mayors, ambassadors, etc living in the West Bank.

          • Christian Groenheide

            Man are you dense. That thing calls for the extermination of the jews. Whatever pattern it has. If you wear a bandana on your head it’s fine. If that thing calls for genocide and terrorism it’s something else.

          • sumsrent

            Oh silly me…

            You’re the Jew hater… I didn’t see the connection until now. Besides I’ve already debunked your Christian Palestinian Founder propaganda.

            Get this… you don’t accept satanic Islamic ways as a representative of Christianity. Maybe you should go define what a Christian is… and you’ll discover your so called “Christian” Terrorist organization founders were more Islamic than anything.

            Habash may have been born into a wealthy Christian family… but he was served satanic Islam… even handing the reigns over to a satanic worshipping muslim.

            In fact maybe you haven’t heard that Habash’s PFLP was Marxist-Leninist… fitting satanic Islam’s socialist, communistic imperialistic domination on the world.
            Also… don’t give me the bull that only Israel is Palestine… all of the Ottoman Empire was known as Palestina. And the satanic worshipping muslims already possess all that territory… except they still need to retrieve that small sliver of land called Israel back too.
            In fact… Liberation doesn’t even apply! Right? It’s nothing but a keen word to play and use on the ignorant masses… aye? Considering that thousands of Jews have lived in Israel for over three thousand years!
            Regarding the scarf… so you’re telling me that this “scarf” is the same thing terrorists use to cover up their identity when shooting rifles in the air to strike fear into the Infidels? Kinda like the modern day Turban… aye? Which… confirms me saying… only satanic worshipping muslims use.

          • 4-Q-2

            HA…Crackin me UP Dave…LOL

            “PS- the PLO, PFLP, DFLP and many other Palestinian militant groups were founded by Palestinian Christians. And today there are dozens of prominent Palestinian Christian politicians such as mayors, ambassadors, etc living in the West Bank.”

            YAW YAW…The PLO, just LOVE LOVE their Christian brothers….LMAO…

            This is how they showed their love:

            Do you not remember Damour Lebanon. Let me remind you. Arafat and the PLO plunged Lebanon into “massacres, rape, mutilation, rampages of looting and killings. Out of a population of 3.2 million, some 40,000 or more people had been killed, 100,000 wounded, 5,000 permanently maimed

            In January of 1976, the destruction of Damour, a town of some 25,000 was completed by the PLO within two weeks. “The priest of Damour, Father Mansour Labaky desperately trying to save people of the town telephoned Kamal Jumblat [one of the Lebanese leaders], in whose parliamentary constituency Damour lay. ‘Father, Jumblat said, ‘I can do nothing for you, because it depends on Yasser Arafat’ ” . All efforts were useless. In the morning following the first night of invasion, when more than fifty people were massacred, Father Labaky “despite the shelling managed to get to the one house, to bring out some corpses. An entire family had been killed, the Canan family, four children all dead, and the mother, the father, and the grandfather. The mother was still hugging one of the children. And she was pregnant

            The eyes of the children were gone and their limbs were cut off. No legs and no arms” (123). In total, 582 people were massacred in the storming of Damour. Father Labaky went with the Red Cross to bury them. “Many of the bodies had been dismembered, so they had to count the heads to number the dead. Three of the men they found had had their genitals cut off and stuffed in their mouths”

          • Woody

            How do you stay so ignorant of history; you must really work at it?

            From our Rabbis’ friends:

            How Pius XII Protected Jews

            Share on twitterShare on emailShare on printShare on gmailShare on stumbleuponMore Sharing Services

            By Jimmy Akin

            The twentieth century was marked by genocides on an monstrous scale. One of the most terrible was the Holocaust wrought by Nazi Germany, which killed an estimated six million European Jews and almost as many other victims.

            During this dark time, the Catholic Church was shepherded by Pope Pius XII, who proved himself an untiring foe of the Nazis, determined to save as many Jewish lives as he could. Yet today Pius XII gets almost no credit for his actions before or during the war.

            Anti-Catholic author Dave Hunt writes, “The Vatican had no excuse for its Nazi partnership or for its continued commendation of Hitler on the one hand and its thunderous silence regarding the Jewish question on the other hand. . . . [The popes] continued in the alliance with Hitler until the end of the war, reaping hundreds of millions of dollars in payments from the Nazi government to the Vatican.”[1]

            Jack Chick, infamous for his anti-Catholic comic books, tells us in Smokescreens, “When World War II ended, the Vatican had egg all over its face. Pope Pius XII, after building the Nazi war machine, saw Hitler losing his battle against Russia, and he immediately jumped to the other side when he saw the handwriting on the wall. . . . Pope Pius XII should have stood before the judges in Nuremberg. His war crimes were worthy of death.”[2]

            One is tempted simply to dismiss these accusations, so wildly out of touch with reality, as the deluded ravings of persons with no sense of historical truth. This would underestimate the power of such erroneous charges to influence people: Many take these writers at their word.

            Stepping out of the nightmare fantasyland of Hunt and Chick and back into sunlight of the real world, we discover that, not only was Pius XII no friend of the Nazis, but that his opposition to them began years before the War, before he was elected to the papacy, when he was still Cardinal Eugenio Pacelli, the Vatican Secretary of State.

            On April 28, 1935, four years before the War even started, Pacelli gave a speech that aroused the attention of the world press. Speaking to an audience of 250,000 pilgrims in Lourdes, France, the future Pius XII stated that the Nazis “are in reality only miserable plagiarists who dress up old errors with new tinsel. It does not make any difference whether they flock to the banners of social revolution, whether they are guided by a false concept of the world and of life, or whether they are possessed by the superstition of a race and blood cult.”[3] It was talks like this, in addition to private remarks and numerous notes of protest that Pacelli sent to Berlin in his capacity as Vatican Secretary of State, that earned him a reputation as an enemy of the Nazi party.

            The Germans were likewise displeased with the reigning pontiff, Pius XI, who showed himself to be a unrelenting opponent of the new German “ideals”—even writing an entire encyclical, Mit Brennender Sorge (1937), to condemn them. When Pius XI died in 1939, the Nazis abhorred the prospect that Pacelli might be elected his successor.

            Dr. Joseph Lichten, a Polish Jew who served as a diplomat and later an official of the Jewish Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rith, writes: “Pacelli had obviously established his position clearly, for the Fascist governments of both Italy and Germany spoke out vigorously against the possibility of his election to succeed Pius XI in March of 1939, though the cardinal secretary of state had served as papal nuncio in Germany from 1917 to 1929. . . . The day after his election, the Berlin Morgenpost said: ‘The election of cardinal Pacelli is not accepted with favor in Germany because he was always opposed to Nazism and practically determined the policies of the Vatican under his predecessor.’ “[4]

            Former Israeli diplomat and now Orthodox Jewish Rabbi Pinchas Lapide states that Pius XI “had good reason to make Pacelli the architect of his anti-Nazi policy. Of the forty-four speeches which the Nuncio Pacelli had made on German soil between 1917 and 1929, at least forty contained attacks on Nazism or condemnations of Hitler’s doctrines. . . . Pacelli, who never met the Führer, called it ‘neo-Paganism.’ “[5]

            A few weeks after Pacelli was elected pope, the German Reich’s Chief Security Service issued a then-secret report on the new Pope. Rabbi Lapide provides an excerpt:

            “Pacelli has already made himself prominent by his attacks on National Socialism during his tenure as Cardinal Secretary of State, a fact which earned him the hearty approval of the Democratic States during the papal elections. . . . How much Pacelli is celebrated as an ally of the Democracies is especially emphasized in the French Press.”[6]

            Unfortunately, joy in the election of a strong pope who would continue Pius XI’s defiance of the Nazis was darkened by the ominous political developments in Europe. War finally came on September 1, 1939, when German troops overran Poland. Two days later Britain and France declared war on Germany.

            Early in 1940, Hitler made an attempt to prevent the new Pope from maintaining the anti-Nazi stance he had taken before his election. He sent his underling, Joachim von Ribbentrop, to try to dissuade Pius XII from following his predecessor’s policies. “Von Ribbentrop, granted a formal audience on March 11, 1940, went into a lengthy harangue on the invincibility of the Third Reich, the inevitability of a Nazi victory, and the futility of papal alignment with the enemies of the Führer. Pius XII heard von Ribbentrop out politely and impassively. Then he opened an enormous ledger on his desk and, in his perfect German, began to recite a catalogue of the persecutions inflicted by the Third Reich in Poland, listing the date, place, and precise details of each crime. The audience was terminated; the Pope’s position was clearly unshakable.”[7]

            The Pope secretly worked to save as many Jewish lives as possible from the Nazis, whose extermination campaign began its most intense phase only after the War had started. It is here that the anti-Catholics try to make their hay: Pius XII is charged either with cowardly silence or with outright support of the Nazi extermination of millions of Jews.

            Much of the impetus to smear the Vatican regarding World War II came, appropriately enough, from a work of fiction—a stage play called The Deputy, written after the War by a little-known German Protestant playwright named Rolf Hochhuth.

            The play appeared in 1963, and it painted a portrait of a pope too timid to speak out publicly against the Nazis. Ironically, even Hochhuth admitted that Pius XII was materially very active in support of the Jews. Historian Robert Graham explains: “Playwright Rolf Hochhuth criticized the Pontiff for his (alleged) silence, but even he admitted that, on the level of action, Pius XII generously aided the Jews to the best of his ability. Today, after a quarter-century of the arbitrary and one-sided presentation offered the public, the word ‘silence’ has taken on a much wider connotation. It stands also for ‘indifference,’ ‘apathy,’ ‘inaction,’ and, implicitly, for anti-Semitism.”[8]

            Hochhuth’s fictional image of a silent (though active) pope has been transformed by the anti-Catholic rumor mill into the image of a silent and inactive pope—and by some even into an actively pro-Nazi monster. If there were any truth to the charge that Pius XII was silent, the silence would not have been out of moral cowardice in the face of the Nazis, but because the Pope was waging a subversive, clandestine war against them in an attempt to save Jews.

            “The need to refrain from provocative public statements at such delicate moments was fully recognized in Jewish circles. It was in fact the basic rule of all those agencies in wartime Europe who keenly felt the duty to do all that was possible for the victims of Nazi atrocities and in particular for the Jews in proximate danger of deportation to ‘an unknown destination.’ “[9] The negative consequences of speaking out strongly were only too well known.

            “In one tragic instance, the Archbishop of Utrecht was warned by the Nazis not to protest the deportation of Dutch Jews. He spoke out anyway and in retaliation the Catholic Jews of Holland were sent to their death. One of them was the Carmelite philosopher, Edith Stein.”[10]

            While the armchair quarterbacks of anti-Catholic circles may have wished the Pope to issue, in Axis territory and during wartime, ringing, propagandistic statements against the Nazis, the Pope realized that such was not an option if he were actually to save Jewish lives rather than simply mug for the cameras.

            The desire to keep a low profile was expressed by the people Pius XII helped. A Jewish couple from Berlin who had been held in concentration camps but escaped to Spain with the help of Pius XII, stated: “None of us wanted the Pope to take an open stand. We were all fugitives, and fugitives do not wish to be pointed at. The Gestapo would have become more excited and would have intensified its inquisitions. If the Pope had protested, Rome would have become the center of attention. It was better that the Pope said nothing. We all shared this opinion at the time, and this is still our conviction today.”[11]

            While the U.S., Great Britain, and other countries often refused to allow Jewish refugees to immigrate during the war, the Vatican was issuing tens of thousands of false documents to allow Jews to pass secretly as Christians so they could escape the Nazis. What is more, the financial aid Pius XII helped provide the Jews was very real. Lichten, Lapide, and other Jewish chroniclers record those funds as being in the millions of dollars—dollars even more valuable then than they are now.

            In late 1943, Mussolini, who had been at odds with the papacy all through his tenure, was removed from power by the Italians, but Hitler, fearing Italy would negotiate a separate peace with the Allies, invaded, took control, and set up Mussolini again as a puppet ruler. It was in this hour, when the Jews of Rome themselves were threatened—those whom the Pope had the most direct ability to help—that Pius XII really showed his mettle.

            Joseph Lichten records that on September 27, 1943, one of the Nazi commanders demanded of the Jewish community in Rome payment of one hundred pounds of gold within thirty-six hours or three hundred Jews would be taken prisoner. When the Jewish Community Council was only able to gather only seventy pounds of gold, they turned to the Vatican.

            “In his memoirs, the then Chief Rabbi Zolli of Rome writes that he was sent to the Vatican, where arrangements had already been made to receive him as an ‘engineer’ called to survey a construction problem so that the Gestapo on watch at the Vatican would not bar his entry. He was met by the Vatican treasurer and secretary of state, who told him that the Holy Father himself had given orders for the deficit to be filled with gold vessels taken from the Treasury.”[12]

            Pius XII also took a public stance concerning the Jews of Italy: “The Pope spoke out strongly in their defense with the first mass arrests of Jews in 1943, and L’Osservatore Romano carried an article protesting the internment of Jews and the confiscation of their property. The Fascist press came to call the Vatican paper ‘a mouthpiece of the Jews.’ “[13]

            Prior to the Nazi invasion, the Pope had been working hard to get Jews out of Italy by emigration; he now was forced to turn his attention to finding them hiding places. “The Pope sent out the order that religious buildings were to give refuge to Jews, even at the price of great personal sacrifice on the part of their occupants; he released monasteries and convents from the cloister rule forbidding entry into these religious houses to all but a few specified outsiders, so that they could be used as hiding places. Thousands of Jews—the figures run from 4,000 to 7,000—were hidden, fed, clothed, and bedded in the 180 known places of refuge in Vatican City, churches and basilicas, Church administrative buildings, and parish houses. Unknown numbers of Jews were sheltered in Castel Gandolfo, the site of the Pope’s summer residence, private homes, hospitals, and nursing institutions; and the Pope took personal responsibility for the care of the children of Jews deported from Italy.”[14]

            Rabbi Lapide records that “in Rome we saw a list of 155 convents and monasteries—Italian, French, Spanish, English, American, and also German—mostly extraterritorial property of the Vatican . . . which sheltered throughout the German occupation some 5,000 Jews in Rome. No less than 3,000 Jews found refuge at one time at the Pope’s summer residence at Castel Gandolfo; sixty lived for nine months at the Jesuit Gregorian University, and half a dozen slept in the cellar of the Pontifical Bible Institute.”[15]

            Notice in particular that the Pope was not merely allowing Jews to be hidden in different church buildings around Rome. He was hiding them in the Vatican itself and in his own summer home, Castel Gandolfo. His success in protecting Italian Jews against the Nazis was remarkable. Lichten records that after the War was over it was determined that only 8,000 Jews were taken from Italy by the Nazis[16] —far less than in other European countries. In June,1944, Pius XII sent a telegram to Admiral Miklos Horthy, the ruler of Hungary, and was able to halt the planned deportation of 800,000 Jews from that country.

            The Pope’s efforts did not go unrecognized by Jewish authorities, even during the War. The Chief Rabbi of Jerusalem, Isaac Herzog, sent the Pope a personal message of thanks on February 28, 1944, in which he said: “The people of Israel will never forget what His Holiness and his illustrious delegates, inspired by the eternal principles of religion which form the very foundations of true civilization, are doing for us unfortunate brothers and sisters in the most tragic hour of our history, which is living proof of divine Providence in this world.”[17]

            Other Jewish leaders chimed in also. Rabbi Safran of Bucharest, Romania, sent a note of thanks to the papal nuncio on April 7, 1944: “It is not easy for us to find the right words to express the warmth and consolation we experienced because of the concern of the supreme pontiff, who offered a large sum to relieve the sufferings of deported Jews. . . . The Jews of Romania will never forget these facts of historic importance.”[18]

            The Chief Rabbi of Rome, Israel Zolli, also made a statement of thanks: “What the Vatican did will be indelibly and eternally engraved in our hearts. . . . Priests and even high prelates did things that will forever be an honor to Catholicism.”[19]

            After the war, Zolli became a Catholic and, to honor the Pope for what he had done for the Jews and the role he had played in Zolli’s conversion, took the name “Eugenio”—the Pope’s given name—as his own baptismal name. Zolli stressed that his conversion was for theological reasons, which was certainly true, but the fact that the Pope had worked so hard on behalf of the Jews no doubt played a role in inspiring him to look at the truths of Christianity.

            Lapide writes: “When Zolli accepted baptism in 1945 and adopted Pius’s Christian name of Eugene, most Roman Jews were convinced that his conversion was an act of gratitude for wartime succor to Jewish refugees and, repeated denials not withstanding, many are still of his opinion. Thus, Rabbi Barry Dov Schwartz wrote in the summer issue, 1964, of Conservative Judaism: ‘Many Jews were persuaded to convert after the war, as a sign of gratitude, to that institution which had saved their lives.’ “[20]

            In Three Popes and the Jews Lapide estimated the total number of Jews that had been spared as a result of Pius XII’s throwing the Church’s weight into the clandestine struggle to save them. After totaling the numbers of Jews saved in different areas and deducting the numbers saved by other causes, such as the praiseworthy efforts of some European Protestants, “The final number of Jewish lives in whose rescue the Catholic Church had been the instrument is thus at least 700,000 souls, but in all probability it is much closer to . . . 860,000.”[21] This is a total larger than all other Jewish relief organizations in Europe, combined, were able to save. Lapide calculated that Pius XII and the Church he headed constituted the most successful Jewish aid organization in all of Europe during the war, dwarfing the Red Cross and all other aid societies.

            This fact continued to be recognized when Pius XII died in 1958. Lapide’s book records the eulogies of a number of Jewish leaders concerning the Pope, and far from agreeing with Jack Chick that he deserved death because of his “war crimes,” Jewish leaders praised the man highly:[22]

            “We share the grief of the world over the death of His Holiness Pius XII. . . . During the ten years of Nazi terror, when our people passed through the horrors of martyrdom, the Pope raised his voice to condemn the persecutors and to commiserate with their victims” (Golda Meir, Israeli representative to the U.N. and future prime minister of Israel).

            “With special gratitude we remember all he has done for the persecuted Jews during one of the darkest periods in their entire history” (Nahum Goldmann, president of the World Jewish Congress).

            “More than anyone else, we have had the opportunity to appreciate the great kindness, filled with compassion and magnanimity, that the Pope displayed during the terrible years of persecution and terror” (Elio Toaff, Chief Rabbi of Rome, following Rabbi Zolli’s conversion).

            Finally, let us conclude with a quotation from Lapide’s record that was not given at the death of Pius XII, but was given after the War by the most well-known Jewish figure of this century, Albert Einstein: “Only the Catholic Church protested against the Hitlerian onslaught on liberty. Up till then I had not been interested in the Church, but today I feel a great admiration for the Church, which alone has had the courage to struggle for spiritual truth and moral liberty.”[23]

            [1] Dave Hunt, A Woman Rides the Beast (Eugene, Oregon: Harvest House, 1994), 284.
            [2] Jack Chick, Smokescreens (China, California: Chick Publications, 1983), 45.
            [3] Robert Graham, S.J., ed., Pius XII and the Holocaust (New Rochelle, New York: Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, 1988), 106.
            [4] Joseph Lichten, “A Question of Moral Judgement: Pius XII and the Jews,” in Graham, 107.
            [5] Pinchas E. Lapide, Three Popes and the Jews (New York: Hawthorn, 1967), 118.
            [6] Ibid., 121.
            [7] Lichten, 107.
            [8] Graham, 18.
            [9] Ibid., 19.
            [10] Lichten, 30.
            [11] Ibid., 99.
            [12] Ibid., 120.
            [13] Ibid., 125.
            [14] Ibid., 126.
            [15] Lapide, 133.
            [16] Lichten, 127.
            [17] Graham, 62.
            [18] Lichten, 130.
            [19] American Jewish Yearbook 1944-1945, 233.
            [20] Lapide, 133.
            [21] Ibid., 215.
            [22] Ibid., 227-228.
            [23] Ibid., 251.

            AND RABBI DALIN:

            Dalin first presents evidence to support his conclusion that popes
            through history have defended the Jews, and that they have refuted attacks like
            the blood libel.

            Then he gets to the main part of the book: defending the
            reputation of the late Pope Pius XII by presenting extensive
            documentation culled from Church and State archives throughout Europe. Rabbi
            Dalin suggests that Yad Vashem should honor Pope Pius
            XII as a “Righteous Gentile”, and documents that Pius was praised by
            many leading Jews of his day for his role in saving more Jews than Schindler. Pius’s admirers included Chief Rabbi Yitzhak HaLevi Herzog of the Palestinian Mandate and Israel, Israeli
            Prime Ministers Golda Meir and Moshe Sharett, and Israel’s first president Chaim Weizmann.

            Dalin also presents Albert Einstein as one of the Jews who
            supposedly praised Pius XII, writing that Einstein “paid tribute to the
            ‘courage’ of Pope Pius and the Catholic Church”.[2] He references a 23
            December 1940 article in Time magazine and quotes Einstein as saying in the article
            that “Only the Catholic church stood squarely across the path of Hitler’s
            campaign for suppressing the truth.”[2] However the article
            actually quoted Einstein saying, “only the church”, not the
            “Catholic church”.[3] In a 1943 letter
            Einstein said he made a statement “which corresponds approximately”
            with Time article, but that it was made much earlier than 1940 “during
            the first years of the Nazi regime” and that his actual comments were
            “more moderate.”[4] In a 1950 letter Einstein
            said that his quoted remarks from the Time article were “not
            my own”, that they had been “elaborated and exaggerated nearly beyond
            recognition” and that he was “predominantly critical” of the
            clergy.[5] In a 1943 interview
            Einstein was extremely critical of the Catholic Church’s behavior under the
            Nazis, and also singled out Pope Pius XII for criticism because of his
            Concordat with Hitler, saying “Since when can one make a pact with Christ
            and Satan at the same time?”[6]

            Dalin writes:

            “anti-papal polemics of ex-seminarians like Garry Wills and John Cornwell (author of Hitler’s Pope), of ex-priests like James Carroll, and or other lapsed or angry liberal Catholics
            exploit the tragedy of the Jewish people during the Holocaust to foster their
            own political agenda of forcing changes on the Catholic Church today.”

            Dalin also argues that there really was a
            “Hitler’s cleric”, Hajj Amin al-Husseini,
            the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, who spent the
            war with Hitler,
            was a friend of Adolf Eichmann, and later became the mentor of Yasser Arafat.

          • shoebat

            well put.

          • Woody

            Thanks, but I don’t post–the Holy Spirit does,,, Deo Garatias, Deo Gratias, Deo Gratias {I must thank Him 3 times in honor of the Trinity when he helps, my poor sinful mind,

            God Bless, Shoe

          • sumsrent

            Copy & Paste?
            So what does this have to do with what I said?

          • Woody

            You’ll understand when you grow up and learn to read; remember to sound out words first; take a lesson from shoebat who reads and understands well.

        • Maranatha

          I guess you didn’t read the Balfour Declaration or the British Mandate or nothing close…did ya!!.
          Israel RE-PURCHASED their God given land starting 1917 till 1948..
          Mind shut….

    • shoebat

      What do you have to say about the map of Palestine that is absent Israel? What do you have to say about Hamas Prime Minister and Mesha’l wearing a similar scarf? Nice try, Dave.

      Actually, it’s a very poor try.

      By the way, what is your opinion of Hamas? Do you condemn the group?

      • Dave

        If you’re asking my opinion, I am for a two state solution based on the 1967 borders. I think a Palestinian state should be based on these borders! However, a keffiyeh with all of Palestine bothers me no more than the numerous Israeli maps you see that do not separate the Palestinian territories from Israel proper.

        What about them wearing a keffiyeh? Most Palestinians wear them, regardless of their political stances or religion. If you’re from Baty Sahour like you said, you know darn well that Palestinian Christians wear them too!

        My opinion is that Hamas is a radical terrorist organization which has done far more harm to the Palestinians, and to peace, than any other Palestinian group.

        Now can I ask you- do you condemn the Irgun group for their bombings of Arab market places, hotels, public areas? If you are truly against terror, you are also against Irgun.

    • Well Done

      LOL So I guess the “river to the sea” thang is just poetic licence, huh? Huh?

    • GoldenRudy

      In land without paper making trees, it is really “take anywhere” TP.

    • 4-Q-2

      HA…he calls it a Hamas Scarf ONE time a followed by (keffiyeh)
      ALL others references are scarf or keffiyeh … NOT HAMAS SCARF…LOL

      Any way you look at it…It is a symbol of hatred and we know where you stand defending it…

    • RandomJerk

      Dumbass – they aren’t saying that the keffiyeh was invented by Hamas. They are saying that this particular keffiyeh has Hamas slogans and iconography on it.

  • Schawminator

    Gee, what reporter will ask Jay Carney – does the president agree with his brothers actions with Hamas towards the destiny of Jerusalem?

    • The whole bunch of OBAMAS are against Israel l.. and Yes, POTUS is against Israel also….

      • Woody

        Why wouldn’t he be’ he’s no Christian; I still remember when he tried to quote from the Bible, he—peeking down at it, said “ah,,uihhh,,ahhh…ohhhh, ya ya goo, goo gah, bah, so there….

        Hey! how about that demonic possession in Gary Indiana yesterday–cool, huh? All emergency room nurses were laughing until the 6 yr old kid started walking up the wall backwards and then along the ceiling…AHHHHHHHHHH! they all shagged-ass out of the emergency room and called 911. The police were on their way and one officer testified his radio spoke at him (as one of the demons said, “you’re not wanted here, Get the hell out of here!” (and then his back seat moved up and back;up and back) (Ahh, I luv it!) [it tood six men to hold the 6 year old down when he became unruly in the emergency room]
        Ultimately the local Parish priest was called in who was given permission by his Bishop to perform an exorcism, and he determined that the “possession” was not in the boys being transferred to them by the mother whose live in boyfriend was the real culprit. When the priest placed a crucifix to her forehead, she “convulsed” and the demons were sent out of her and the others. Later, the priest being interviewed by the doctors and police said, there were actually 6 demons, and he knows their names but will not reveal them because he does not want people to be calling on them to enter their bodies (I can see this happening like that kuk on this site who cannot go 1 paragraph without called on satan. (What’s his name–SandFlea or something like that?) he is a cartoon character.
        G-d Bless

        • l have not heard about this…..

          • Woody

            Ahh, you’re awake early; I heard it on TV – Megan last night but the better description on the radio this morning (megan did not have the complete story last night as it just came in. I think I will google the Gary Indiana newspaper and see if more detail is on there. I Lov it! (When I was a kid age 12–my friend’s dad told me about a case which happened several years before and I checked it out–it was true.

        • sumsrent

          I rebuke you in Christ Jesus name!

          • Woody

            From the guy who thinks Beelzebub is his friend I will take that as a compliment.

    • Michael Fremer

      Gee, what does his brother’s actions have to do with the president’s? (Answer: NOTHING)

      • Schawminator

        Obama supports the Brotherhood, as the good Islamist he is. that’s what it has to do with his brother and the other Muslim appointees in the White House.
        I pray you won’t get what you voted for.

        • Michael Fremer

          Obama does not support The Muslim Brotherhood you cretin. He supported getting rid of Mubarak, one reason being our support for the Shah of Iran or any unpopular dictator doesn’t end up well for us. The election then supported the Muslim Brotherhood, unfortunately.

          Perhaps you remember when Bush encouraged democratic elections in Gaza and Hamas was elected. Only an imbecile would say “Bush supported Hamas” and no doubt you’d take umbrage (look it up). Likewise, saying “Obama supports the Muslim Brotherhood” is idiotic, which of course is why you wrote it.

          I have been following the conflict in the Middle East. Clearly you haven’t. There’s nothing wrong with appointing Muslims in the White House. Or Christians or Jews or atheists. Just not imbeciles. So don’t expect an appointment any time soon

          • Schawminator

            I see you have your eyes and mind wide shut. Typically you are all over the place with your response because the truth hurts your innocent little mind. I wish you good luck and go back to sleep.
            FYI; I have spent over 20 years working in the ME and know what you can’t or won’t ever know with your closed mind.
            I will listen to the Jordanians, Israeli’s and Shoebat for my information than the uninformed as you.
            Muslims that follow the Quran are the enemy of the American people, All Christians, European, African people and Asian people as well.
            You couldn’t follow your nose and it is very evident. Or you just believe it’s the Bush’s fault mantra for your belief. Therefore you are most likely my enemy and the enemy of my country.

          • Michael Fremer

            So all Muslims are enemies of America and I’m the “close-minded” one? You are the true enemy of America and guess what? This is not “your” country.

          • Schawminator

            Go back to sleep child. Read the Quran and the Hadith for your dreams.

      • Obama told them to give him tax exemption …. Obama support Muslim Brotherhood, you should know that if you been following the conflict across the middle east….

        • Woody

          BO is a Muslim Brohood

  • Juan Rodriguez


  • yahshua love’s you

    Hahaha malik fled Egypt to go to the Palestinian’s men what an fool I hope that Mr al sisi gets a hold of him and by the way that keffiyeh looks like a tallis hahaha Muslims always hijack our stuff that’s to show how original they are pffff not!!!! And for all politicians and terrorists and so called believers joining God’s enemy’s I got a vers for all you haters and murderer’s Yoel 3:2,8 shalom

    • Well Done

      A Moslem is nothing but a bizarro wannabe-Jew.

      • yahshua love’s you

        Yep you got that right hahaha

  • Dave

    I’m not very religious, but I come from an Orthodox Christian family.

  • Dave

    Yes, and I don;t like the writing, but the article specifically says “A Hamas scarf(keffiyeh)” I am pointing out that the keffiyeh is just traditional Arab attire. The problem is when readers see any Palestinian keffiyeh(yes, most of which have no writing) they will think its a “Hamas scarf” which isn’t true.

    Ah, so my name must be “Abdul.” Pretty racist of you.

    • RandomJerk

      Is a keffiyeh a scarf? Yes it is. The parenthesis is giving the American reader a translation of the word keffiyeh, not a translation of the word Hamas. You really are a moron. It’s a Hamas keffiyeh does that make your pea brain feel better?

  • lol

  • pfehrman

    I’d love to see the president ousted from office ASAP and brought up on charges. But first Americans have to gain a backbone to make it happen. You can’t just say “let someone else handle it!” I’m willing to vote for an impeachment or however it’s done, are you?

    • Vross

      Would love to see it happen, but while the House could bring impeachment charges, he would never be convicted in the Senate where it would require a 2/3 majority. That will never happen while Democrats hold the Senate. They could find Obama in the Oval Office, holding a bloody knife and standing over a bloody slaughtered baby, and Dems would call it self-defense. Ya want him out? Gotta start with putting Republicans in the Senate.

      • gregsmom

        It’s a waste of time to try to get him impeached. Instead work to get conservative candidates with good values elected this November. And then again in 2016. Let’s do something that will bring results and get this country back on track!

        • Michael Fremer

          Yes back to Bush/Cheney. That’s the ticket.

          • WhiskerPete

            I didn’t “hate” liberals or democrats under Bush/Cheney…..I do now! Thank your President, AG, and the previous Speaker of the House for that. You are dispicably stupid people.

          • Michael Fremer

            How “big” of you. And back at you, Sarah Palin, Steve Stockman, Louie Gohmert and the other conservative “geniuses”. I love how you blame Obama for YOUR hate. And anti-semites blame Bernie Madoff for their hatred of Jews.

          • Pablo Descartes

            Rand Paul / Allen West 2016!

        • Woody

          Good post

        • pfehrman

          The assumption that one party is more honest than the other is a mistake. Just look at the ridiculous rant by John McCain. There is no logic, fairness, or honor on Capital Hill. They have not just let down the American people, but they have been treasonous against our people and country. This is a generation decline and it’s been criminal for a very long time. We’re just now seeing it being completely out of control at this point.

      • Michael Fremer

        enjoy your political wet dream. Even if the right wing imbecile GOP wins the Senate there will be no impeachment because there’s no impeachable offense except in the minds of mental cases.

    • Woody

      Well, he did say in his State of the Onion…the American people want…[they want him out of office]

  • TreeOfLifeSword

    I know Barry feels the same was because he is sending weapons to Al Qaeda linked rebels. Probably Benghazi was a gun running event gone sour also. The dots are easy to follow…

    • Michael Fremer

      you are a mental case. Back on your meds.

  • Pingback: Egypt's 'Jon Stewart' talks about Malik Obama Scandal | Walid ShoebatWalid Shoebat()

  • darkknight91

    Let me fix a sentence in this article:

    “The point here is that Barack cannot be trusted.”

    That’s better.

    • Michael Fremer

      The point here is that you are an idiot.

      • darkknight91

        Another point here is you have Barry’s nuts on your chin and I can’t understand what you’re saying when your mouth is full.

        • Michael Fremer

          Don’t transfer your sex life onto me. I’m happily married. Keep your gay life out of this.

          • darkknight91

            I still can’t understand anything you’re saying. I hope you and Barry use protection. Have fun, kids.

          • Michael Fremer

            Clearly you don’t comprehend much of anything. As for that gay sex on your mind, see a shrink. Last time i looked this was a hate Obama thread.

          • darkknight91

            MUMBLER! Honestly, I can’t understand a word you’re saying when your mouth’s full.

        • Woody

          Barrry has nuts? Is this new?

  • Pingback: Barack Hussein Obama’s half-brother, Malik, joins terror group Hamas in advocating the destruction of Israel | Vine of Life News()

  • Pingback: The Blaze picks up our story on Malik Obama | Walid ShoebatWalid Shoebat()

  • Clearhead

    No doubt about their being from the same gene pool — (the shallow end).

  • RandomJerk

    There’s a typo in the fourth word of this article. Please proofread.

  • mobiasch

    Jerusalem Is Ours!
    Palestinians will be FREE! Whether you like it or not!

  • Dj

    Um wait… Don’t they know that photographs are an affront to Allah? Maybe we should stone them all.

  • Pingback: Obama's Brother Funds Hamas | Walid ShoebatWalid Shoebat()

  • Michael Fremer

    This is guilt by association B.S. My favorite line was about how President Obama’s accent was “perfect”. He tends to correctly pronounce names of countries and people instead of sounding like a rube. This kind of hysteria is puke-inducing but expected by “birther” types.

  • Pingback: Malik Obama's Hamas Scarf makes TV News | Walid ShoebatWalid Shoebat()

  • Pingback: Barack Hussein Obama’s half-brother, Malik, joins terror group Hamas in advocating the destruction of Israel | The Olive Branch Report()

  • Pingback: Brotherhood Expert: Obama's Brother a 'War Criminal and Terrorist' | Walid ShoebatWalid Shoebat()

  • Pingback: Obama wants to build Third Temple on Temple Mount (Caught on Video) | Walid ShoebatWalid Shoebat()

  • Pingback: Obama Wants To Build Third Temple On Temple Mount! |()

  • Pingback: Obama Brothers Meet Two Days before Malik visits with Cult Leader who wants to Build Jerusalem's Third Temple | Walid ShoebatWalid Shoebat()

  • robertdavidhummel

    One CRITICAL certainty, that, IS becoming more evident,

    …and IS NOT BEING …

    “Reported by Our Major Media resources,

    …IS THAT, …

    “Obamagahzi-aka-Barry Soetero-aka-B. HUSSEIN Obama”, and Obama’s DEMOCRATIC Leaders, & ADMINSTRATION CZAR’S, “ARE”, …


    Cloward-Piven STRATEGY, …


    and superbulous & VOLUMINOUS CRISIS’, ,

    ..while …simultaneously,

    …DESTROYING Our Economy, …

    and there-in Obama’s POTENTIAL, … “TO… Declare Martial Law”.

    Given the chaotic, destructive conditions created by politicians in positions of power in the United States of America, as well as the world, isn’t it comforting that God has told us He is the “same today, the same tomorrow, the same forever”…and that He “will be with us always”?

    May Our Creator Reach down to U.S. and with HIS’, Mighty Hand,


    and Save us from that Clear and Present Danger,


    BY OUR PRAYERS and ANY form of Men, Money and MATERIAL,


    To the VALIANT, Patriotic, and



    in Reaching their MISSION GOAL,




    Robert David Hummel SFC, USA, (Ret), INVERNESS, FLORIDA

  • Pingback: Obama’s Brother joins Hamas, says ‘Jerusalem is ours; We are Coming’ | Viewpoints of a Sagitarrian()

  • Pingback: Obama’s Brother joins Hamas, says ‘Jerusalem is ours; We are Coming’ | Grumpy Opinions()

  • Pingback: Obama’s Brother Joins Hamas? » RickMick()

  • Pingback: Hamas Protesters in Miami Express Solidarity with Obama's Brother | Walid ShoebatWalid Shoebat()

  • Pingback: Obama’s Brother Joins Hamas?????? Gee, go figure! | The Right Of Way()

  • Pingback: Obama’s Brother Joins Hamas? | ACGR's "News with Attitude"()

  • Pingback: President's brother Malik Obama calls for the destruction of Israel - Dr. Rich Swier()

  • Pingback: Flashback: Look at the Hamas scarf Obama’s brother is wearing… | Young Conservatives()

  • corrrine

    Jer 31:35 Thus says the LORD, Who gives the sun for a light by day, The ordinances of the moon and the stars for a light by night, Who disturbs the sea, And its waves roar (The LORD of hosts is His name):
    “If those ordinances depart From before Me, says the LORD, Then the seed of Israel shall also cease From being a nation before Me forever.”


  • Pingback: President Obama’s Brother | The Israeli Informant()

  • Pingback: Attorney for Tea Party Group Caught Suppressing Evidence of Islamic Terror Funding in Client's Battle with IRS | Walid ShoebatWalid Shoebat()

  • Pingback: Terrorist Who State Department Spokesman Says is a Christian is Funded by Muslim State Sponsor of Terrorism Who Obama's Brother Worked For in Sudan - Walid Shoebat()