President Netanyahu has made many statements that have given people concern that he supports ideas and causes which are dangerously supremacist and darwinistic in nature. Such concerns were revealed again when he declared that Israel is a state only for the Jewish people, and then when a well-known Jewish actress criticized him, he publicly rebuked her on Instagram and stood by his previous statements according to reports:
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu found himself on the wrong end of Wonder Woman’s wrath Sunday when the Israeli actress who plays the comic book superhero backed his opponent in a roNetw over the place of Arabs in the country.
Gal Gadot expressed support for fellow actress and model Rotem Sela, who slammed the prime minister for saying that Israel is the national state only of the Jewish people, and “not a state of all its citizens.” Sela, Gadot said, was “an inspiration for us all.”
“When the hell will someone in this government tell the public that Israel is a country of all its citizens,” Sela wrote on Instagram, referring to Netanyahu’s frequent talking point that his political rival, Benny Gantz of the Blue and White party, would form a government with Arab political parties.
Netanyahu responded by saying that Israel “is the national state, not of all its citizens, but only of the Jewish people.” His remarks caused waves in Israel, but the prime minister again spoke of the issue at the start of Sunday’s weekly cabinet meeting, making similar comments.
He called Israel a “Jewish, democratic state” with equal rights, but “the nation-state not of all its citizens, but only of the Jewish people.”
“Love thy neighbor as thyself,” Gadot wrote in Hebrew on her own Instagram account in response. “It is not a matter of right or left, Jewish or Arab, religious or secular. It’s a matter of dialogue for peace, equality and tolerance for one another. It is our responsibility to plant hope and light for a better future for our children. Rotem, you are an inspiration for us all.”
In his comments on Instagram, the prime minister went on to say all citizens, including Arabs, had equal rights, but referred to the deeply controversial law passed last year declaring Israel the nation-state of the Jewish people.
“According to the basic nationality law we passed, Israel is the nation-state of the Jewish people — and only it,” he wrote in response to Sela.
“As you wrote, there is no problem with the Arab citizens of Israel. They have equal rights like all of us and the Likud government has invested more in the Arab sector than any other government,” he said of his right-wing party.
Netanyahu has been accused of demonising Israeli Arabs, who make up some 17.5 percent of the population, ahead of the April 9 polls in a bid to boost right-wing turnout.
He has continually warned that his opponents will receive the support of Arab parties and that they will make significant concessions to the Palestinians.
Netanyahu, under threat of indictment for corruption, is facing a tough challenge from a centrist political alliance led by former military chief Gantz and his own former finance minister Yair Lapid.
The alliance’s centrist positions and its security credentials — it includes three former military chiefs of staff — have helped it beat back Netanyahu’s claims that its leaders are “weak” leftists.
Arab parties would be extremely unlikely to be part of any coalition government after elections.
The Jewish writer Leo Strauss in 1953 said that in arguments, some people try to prove their point by a “reductio ad Hitlerum,” or saying that if somebody did X, he is “like Hitler,” and that such arguments are consequently invalid.
He does have a point, for many topics. It is, generally speaking, the same logic used and now commonly accepted by many to accuse somebody of “racism” for having a difference of objective opinion.
However, there are times when this is true. There are people who support national socialists. Their are people who hate other men because of their race. These things can be ascertained through an examination of their principles for which they stand. A person is not necessarily a “racist” or a “Nazi” for having a difference of opinion, but such a person can be if a person’s view aligns with the definition of a Nazi or racist.
National Socialist philosophy is, to state it briefly, a form of applied darwinism. It is a belief system that believes in the superiority of some groups of people due to some form of inherited superiority, however that inheritance takes place, and therefore some groups of people are better by their very nature over others and are allowed to abuse or destroy the “weaker” groups. It is why darwinism is called “survival of the fittest,” as it is says that the “proof” of the superiority of one group over another is found in its ability to dominate another group.
The Bible is clearly against this. The Bible says that man is superior to the other created things of the world such as the animals, plants, and minerals. The Bible state a distinction in roles between men, and even large groups of men. However, as it does this, it does not say that man is absolutely bound by this, but that such views are general paradigms and to that, all men are equal in terms of their dignity and creation before God, and that which distinguishes a “greater” man from a “lesser” man in God’s eyes is not something of biology, but the act- both belief in and practice -of faith that transcends race, time, and history. It is a quality of the soul for truly, paraphrasing the popular saying in the US, “only God to judge.”
Netanyahu’s statements concerning Israel are not a surprise because he is not simply “following the law” as he alluded to in the article. Indeed, this is historical trope used by tyrant and people with tyrannical impulses throughout history to indulge in barbarism with the cover of legality. It was the same logic used by the Jews- Pharisees and Sadduccees alike -to justify murdering God and then their pride in doing so.
Netanyahu has expressed many times his belief in Jewish supremacy. Now it is good for a man to be proud of his heritage and culture, for no man chooses his race, but it is a gift given to him by God. It is good to be content with who one is, but this is not a license to abuse another man. This latter sentiment is what Netanyahu has echoed in statements as recently as last year, where he directly paraphrased German leader Adolph Hitler almost word-for-word in a darwinistic statement articulating why the “strong” have a duty to dominate and “destroy” the “weak”:
People have conflicts with each other. Disagreements are a part of life. Things happen. However, one does not solve problems by violating moral laws, especially flagrant ones. It is why the Bible states that the four sins which cry out to Heaven for vengeance are the willful murder of the innocent, the sin of sodom, the oppression of the poor, widow, and orphan, and the deprivation of a working man of his justly earned wages. To the darwinist, these sins are of no consequence because as he believes he is “superior,” there is no wrong that he can do to another man and if a man would tell him that he is wrong, then the one who told him that he is wrong will be accused of being in the wrong.
Some will say that Netanyahu is speaking this way because of the upcoming elections, and he wants to rally his supporters in Israel, and he may not believe it. But if this is true, what does it say about a man when all of his “supporters” are darwinists who deny the humanity of other men and consequently believe in ideas that are racist and inclined to supporting mass murder?
Shoebat.com was faced with a similar situation years ago, for while we were working hard to expose to “migrant crisis,” we found that there was a disturbing amount of support for socialism as the “response” to the migrants, in particular that of national socialism. Further investigation into this confirmed such to be true, and immediately upon realizing this we focused our attention on exposing what we uncovered to warn the public as we have done before.
In the sixth chapter of John’s Gospel, most of Jesus’ followers left Him after he declared to them the teaching on the Eucharist, that He is the bread of life, and he who wishes to have eternal life must east His flesh and drink His blood:
The Jews murmured about him because he said, “I am the bread that came down from heaven,” and they said, “Is this not Jesus, the son of Joseph? Do we not know his father and mother? Then how can he say, ‘I have come down from heaven’?”
Jesus answered and said to them, “Stop murmuring among yourselves. No one can come to me unless the Father who sent me draw him, and I will raise him on the last day. It is written in the prophets: ‘They shall all be taught by God.’ Everyone who listens to my Father and learns from him comes to me. Not that anyone has seen the Father except the one who is from God; he has seen the Father.
Amen, amen, I say to you, whoever believes has eternal life. I am the bread of life. Your ancestors ate the manna in the desert, but they died; this is the bread that comes down from heaven so that one may eat it and not die. I am the living bread that came down from heaven; whoever eats this bread will live forever; and the bread that I will give is my flesh for the life of the world.”
The Jews quarreled among themselves, saying, “How can this man give us [his] flesh to eat?”
Jesus said to them, “Amen, amen, I say to you, unless you eat the flesh of the Son of Man and drink his blood, you do not have life within you. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood has eternal life, and I will raise him on the last day. For my flesh is true food, and my blood is true drink. Whoever eats my flesh and drinks my blood remains in me and I in him. Just as the living Father sent me and I have life because of the Father, so also the one who feeds on me will have life because of me. This is the bread that came down from heaven. Unlike your ancestors who ate and still died, whoever eats this bread will live forever.” These things he said while teaching in the synagogue in Capernaum.
Then many of his disciples who were listening said, “This saying is hard; who can accept it?”
Since Jesus knew that his disciples were murmuring about this, he said to them, “Does this shock you? What if you were to see the Son of Man ascending to where he was before? It is the spirit that gives life, while the flesh* is of no avail. The words I have spoken to you are spirit and life. But there are some of you who do not believe.” Jesus knew from the beginning the ones who would not believe and the one who would betray him. And he said, “For this reason I have told you that no one can come to me unless it is granted him by my Father.”
As a result of this, many [of] his disciples returned to their former way of life and no longer accompanied him.
Jesus then said to the Twelve, “Do you also want to leave?”
Simon Peter answered him, “Master, to whom shall we go? You have the words of eternal life. (John 6:41-68)
Make no mistake, we are not saying that we are like Jesus at all, or our words carry nearly the same importance in any sense. I use this passage to illustrate the principle that Jesus gave a very profound truth- the truth of the Holy Eucharist and the fulfillment of Daniel 9 as is prophesied in Sacred Scripture -to those who followed Him, and most people save for a few rejected Him because of it.
There are many things in life that can be speculated on, which we attempt to research. However, the rise of socialism, particularly national socialism, is not an issue for speculation, as we have been able to confirm this through multiple channels, including some of which we have not even written about. Darwinism as public policy has returned on a global level, and it is setting up the conditions for a Third World War. It is one thing to receive disagreement or criticism, but it is another matter to be continually attacked and the criticized for refusing to deny the humanity of another man. While Islam is evil, Muslims are still people made in the image and likeness of God, and the inclinations to mass murder that we saw increasing in frequency among the people is wrong. As a result, many have refused to follow us, something which we are glad about in so far as the dissemination of truth is concerned because all of us desire to to what is right and not simply to submit to the sentiments of the times.
Something is evil because it follows principles that are evil which are in turn based upon absolute truth, not because it is popular or unpopular. Darwinism and her sister variants are evil because of principle, not popularity, and those who support darwinism must be identified for the philosophy they preach and not for what an individual thinks on a personal level.