New Evidence Links U.S. Federal Government to FILMMAKER behind Benghazi Fiasco (Shocking)

By Walid Shoebat and Ben Barrack

The explosiveness of a ‘smoking gun’ email from a White House Deputy who directed then U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice to blame a video for the Benghazi attack is missing an essential link, a U.S. Federal informant. The man who made the inflammatory movie himself – Nakoula Basseley Nakoula.

Nakoula became an informant for U.S. Federal agents in a deal (which we have court records) to capture his recruiter in exchange for leniency; this was granted. When Nakoula’s recruiter was caught, he was amazingly let go by U.S. Federal agents.

And here is all the evidence:

The court case for Nakoula can be reviewed when The Daily Beast effectively made the case that Nakoula had very likely been an informant during the Clinton administration in 1997. The Smoking Gun also reported that Nakoula was arrested in June of 2009 on charges related to bank fraud, then wrote:

Denied bail, Nakoula, a married father of three, was locked up at the Metropolitan Detention Center in L.A. when he began cooperating with Justice Department lawyers and federal agents. During a series of debriefing sessions, Nakoula provided investigators with a detailed account of the fraud operation and fingered the man who allegedly headed the operation, according to comments made by his lawyer at sentencing.

Nakoula identified the ring’s leader as Eiad Salameh, a notorious fraudster who has been tracked for more than a decade by state and federal investigators. In his debriefings, Nakoula said he was recruited as a “runner” by [Eiad] Salameh, who pocketed the majority of money generated by the bank swindles, according to James Henderson, Nakoula’s attorney.

Court Document reveals Nakoula becoming informant to help arrest Eiad.

Court Document reveals Nakoula becoming informant to help arrest Eiad.

As a result of Nakoula’s cooperation, Henderson told Judge Christina Snyder, “We all know what’s gonna happen. Salameh is gonna get arrested some day and based on the debriefing information turned over, he is gonna enter a guilty plea or if he doesn’t, then Mr. Nakoula is gonna be called on to testify at trial.”

Henderson was right about one thing; that ‘some day’ eventually came. He was wrong too. Eiad was arrested by Canadian Peel Police (CPP) in January of 2011 as reported by I was notified by Jeffrey Mason, my contact at CPP that attempts were made to turn Eiad over to U.S. Federal agents for seven months but to no avail. After months of unsuccessfully pleading with the FBI to take Eiad, the Canadians put him on a one-way flight to Palestine.

Coincidentally, this was about the same time that Nakoula allegedly began casting and shooting the video using facilities that belonged to Christians. Actors were used and exploited by Nakoula, who dubbed inflammatory lines over their voices.

What we report here is not conjecture and neither is it conspiracy theory. We have the exchanged emails with the Canadian Peel Police from its constable, Jeffrey Mason. Nakoula was allowed to plea bargain in exchange for helping the feds capture someone they didn’t want. What they wanted was leniency for Nakoula. How does it make any sense that the evidence supports that U.S. Federal agents aided Nakoula using a bone to convince judge Snyder, while that bone was thrown away when it was in the jaws of the U.S. Federal government? Nakoula was given a lighter sentence in return for something other than reasons given at the time.

What makes our case stronger is that is uniquely qualified to speak to this because of a familial connection to the maker of the film Innocence of Muslims Nakoula Basseley Nakoula through Nakoula’s partner in crime Eiad.

You can read our previous reports here, here, here, and here.

The administration was helping to push the Muslim agenda behind blaming the video. We know conclusively that the Obama Justice Department was involved with the maker of the video as early as 2009.

Obama and Hillary: We had 'nothing to do with' this.

Obama and Hillary: We had ‘nothing to do with’ this.

And there is more. Earlier this year, reported on a mysterious call Walid received from the maker of the film himself, Nakoula (we have it recorded). What is more mysterious is how Nakoula got Walid’s private contact numbers at a time Walid reported publicly in an interview with WRKO talk show host Jeffrey Kuhner, that he was being harassed and that his phone conversations were being monitored and / or tapped.

When asked, Nakoula said he got it from an individual. When we checked with that individual, he was amazed stating that he “didn’t give it to him”.

And how could Nakoula even know that individual without knowing Walid’s phone records? As for the purpose of the call, Nakoula wanted us to help him clear the name of his longtime partner in crime – Eiad.

America has been told that Nakoula is an “Anti-Islam filmmaker” who is a Coptic Christian from Egypt. Yet, Eiad is a Muslim fundamentalist who hates Copts. It made no sense for him to partner with a Coptic Christian for so many years, nor did it make sense that the supposed Coptic Christian (Nakoula) would be so interested in clearing a Muslim fundamentalist’s name.

Nakoula: 'Christian' partnered in crime with Muslim fundamentalist.

Nakoula: ‘Christian’ partnered in crime with Muslim fundamentalist.

So here is what we conclude:

The White House has officially been caught lying about the video being responsible for the attacks. Shouldn’t everything it asserted about the video be called into question? For example, a mantra that came out of the mouths of both Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton repeatedly was that the video was something the United States government had absolutely “nothing to do with”.

Hillary on September 14, 2012, hours prior to the ‘smoking gun’ email sent by White House Deputy Ben Rhodes:

Hillary on September 13, 2012 in a promotional video for Pakistan:

Barack Obama on September 25, 2012 at the United Nations:

Two days after the Benghazi attacks, revealed the motive behind Muslims in the Middle East blaming the video. That motive was simple and calculated; it was to pressure non-Muslim countries to enact and enforce laws that would make any and all criticism of Islam illegal and punishable. During his September 18, 2012 interview with David Letterman, Obama said the video caused great offense in the Muslim world and then stated, “extremists and terrorists used this as an excuse to attack a variety of our embassies”, which shows he understood at least part of the motive. He knew what the Muslim fundamentalist agenda was and continued lying about the video being responsible, which had the effect of aiding and abetting those fundamentalists:

Despite knowing that Benghazi was not about a video, the Obama administration – and Obama himself – continued to push the narrative that the video was responsible for both Benghazi and the larger unrest in the Middle East. This allowed Muslims who wanted to criminalize criticism of Islam in non-Muslim countries to share at least the means behind furtherance of an agenda, with the Obama administration.

Conventional wisdom is that the Obama administration blamed the video exclusively because it didn’t want harm to come to the election year narrative that “al-Qaeda was on the run”. However, when one trafficks in tangled webs, there is seldom one reason for anything. It’s quite possible that the truth about Benghazi would reveal a dastardly operation – reportedly run by then CIA Director David Petraeus – to run weapons out of Libya and to Syria through Turkey. This operation allegedly began in early 2012, which would put the blood of four dead Americans on the hands of many in the administration.

The fact remains that by pushing the movie narrative on Benghazi, the Obama administration was pushing a Muslim fundamentalist agenda, which was to criminalize speech.

When it comes to Nakoula’s schemes, in fact, Eiad was identified as the bigger fish.

In 2009, Nakoula accepted a lighter sentence in exchange for his help in arresting Eiad.

Nakoula became a federal informant, which makes him an agent of the U.S. Government; he was involved with the Obama administration, as reported.

How would I know all this? How was I made involved in all this?

EIAD SALAMEH is my FIRST cousin.


, , ,