In the latest political nonsense, a man who admits he is a pedophile and has fantasies about raping his own daughter is seeking to run for office in Virginia:
Nathan Larson, a confessed pedophile and prospective congressional candidate in Virginia who once spent 16 months in prison for threatening to kill former President Barack Obama, says he now wants to legalize incest so he can have sex with his young daughter.
Larson who lives in Fauquier County and works as an accountant has filed the requisite paperwork, including 1,000 endorsing signatures, to run as an independent for Virginia’s 10th Congressional District, which is currently represented by Republican Barbara Comstock.
“The state should not interfere with people’s decisions. Like if people were to say, well, the genetic quality might not be as good if people inbreed, they could say the same thing about a lot of people who have bad genetics who should be passing on. These days there’s a lot of genetics tests. We can tell what kind of things people have,” Larson told WUSA9 in a recent interview.
Larson lost custody of his now nearly 3-year-old daughter in 2015 after a legal battle with his former in-laws. The child was reportedly born after he became estranged from his late first wife who committed suicide. Before her death, he admitted to her that he had sexual feelings for both children and adults.
In a report last Thursday, Larson confirmed to The Huffington Post that he created the now-defunct websites suiped.org and incelocalypse.today which attracted pedophiles and violence-minded misogynists like him. Both websites have since been taken offline.
…
He further told WUSA9 that even though he has never had sexual relations with his young daughter, he would like to. Larson’s daughter currently lives in Colorado with her grandparents.
On his campaign page, Larson describes himself as a “quasi-neoreactionary libertarian” who wants to end the war on drugs, protect gun ownership rights, and put an end to U.S. involvement in foreign wars arising from America’s alliance with Israel. He also pledged to restore “benevolent white supremacy,” private borders, patriarchy, freedom of speech, freedom from age restrictions, suicide rights, jury trial rights, discrimination rights, and free trade. (source)
Why should any of this be a surprise?
Incest-based pornography is rampant. A simple way to see this is just to look at pornography consumption statistics, which not only shows an increase in incest-based content, but for 2018 is the most popular form of pornography consumed worldwide.
It is absolutely true that the consumption of pornography affects a person’s perspectives on themselves and the world. “Shocking” porn is perhaps the purest example of this, as it’s purpose is to induce psychological trauma or emotionally-heightened states so as to draw attention and cause the person to focus on the particular act. It’s the “highway accident” phenomenon- where many will slow down to look at an automobile accident for the purpose of seeing something potentially horrible even though they know they will be disgusted by what they see if they do see something. This exploitation of human thought functions similar to a drug, that if given prolonged exposure will require more and “harder” forms of material in order to achieve the same initial “shock” reaction.
Another important factor to consider in pornography consumption is that people consume porn is primarily because the are projecting themselves into the actions taking place so that they become the “actor” or “actors”. Psychologically the brain does not distinguish between reality and film, so in the case of a commonly consumed “commodity” by many people, the problem is not so much one of the distortion of perspective by the media but the media consumed being a reinforcement of already held beliefs or ideas.
This is why the type of pornography consumed by a society is critical to monitor, because while there are individuals who will attempt to alter the standards of what is considered socially acceptable, usually by encouraging more extreme forms of material, and while the more of such media a person consumes the more extreme forms of media a person will need to obtain the same sense of contentment that he had from previous types, what is considered socially acceptable is a metric for the internal health of a society.
Above are stills of two scenes from “Weird Al” Yankovic’s Amish Paradise (a parody of 90’s rapper Coolio’s Gangsta’s Paradise), showing two Amish boys comically looking at an “adult” magazine showing an Amish woman “scantily” showing off her bare calves. This is funny to most people today, but it is also a reflection of the point, albeit in a humorous way, of how the standards for what is “extreme” or “scandalous” reflects the cultural state and standards of a people.
For a more realistic comparison, here are two photos. On the left is Annette Kellerman, an Australian champion swimmer who was arrested on charges of public indecency for wearing the above bathing suit in Massachusetts around the year 1907, when she was 20. Kellerman also did some of the first nudity work in Hollywood on film, and for her time would have been considered an “extreme” liberal. On the right is spring break 2018 for women of the same comparable age. In spite of the public drinking, presence of strange men, and being in clothing that is less than one’s underwear, there is absolutely no problem now with this, and those who do criticize it are immediately attacked for being “repressive.” Remember that the woman on the left is wearing clothing that for her time was considered something only an extreme liberal would wear, while the women on the right are wearing “standard” beach clothing for women of their age.
Social standards can and are manipulated just as much as they are reflections of the people. It is the same with politicians, for while there can be truly unjust politicians who rise to power, often times those in power reflect the nature and desires of the people because they are from the same people themselves. This is why the “ruling classes” throughout history have been taught historically the concept of “noblesse oblige,” for while a man in power may rule over a people, being that he is the head and that he has power, he must use his power to better society by holding himself as a standard by which the people can look to for inspiration and against which to judge their own actions for the glory of God and the assistance to aid his fellow man in their salvation.
Returning to the original topic about the politician in Virginia who is an admitted pedophile and wants to legalize sex between family members, his desires would have been considered extreme at one point but cannot be anymore. This is because while incest-based porn once upon a time was treated so, it is now in 2018 the most popularly consumed form of pornography in the entire world, including in the USA. Incest naturally leads to pedophilia because if there is no barrier to having sex with family members, why should age therefore be an obstacle as well? If one takes the position of the most “extreme liberals” today, one could argue that pedophilia is a “human rights” violation and a form of “age discrimination”.
Don’t think it could happen? It was scarcely a century ago that Annette Kellerman was jailed for her “extreme liberal” swimsuit.
Jack Donovan and Varg Vikernes
In a similar way but as it regards the sociopolitical realm, it is why one must pay attention to voices such as Jack Donovan or Varg Vikernes. Both men are pagans, both promote some form of “masculinity,” and while Donovan emphasizes the homoeroticism of the Spartan warrior and Vikernes the intense, anti-Christian, völkisch racialism and eugenics similar to those promoted by Himmler, both are viewed by many as “extreme” and yet they attract many followers and their influence is not to be understated. If anything, their influence has grown and among many identitarians and “nationalist” Generation-Z types looking for a sense of culture and identity but without Christianity, their ideas are influencing them. While they are not the “standard” yet, they are setting a standard that is gradually becoming a standard among their circles.
Instead of considering how a problem could have happened when it is discovered, it is more productive to look to the origins from which the problem came and to trace them back as far as possible, ideally to the philosophical origins, and then to deal with the philosophy itself by deposing it and replacing it with a correct one. For one cannot simply remove a problem without providing a solution, as nature abhors a vacuum and if a solution is not ready the nearest available one, be it good or bad, will take its place.
Concerning the moral decline in society, there are many factors that have brought about the current state of affairs, including the pornography itself. It is true that much adult material needs to be banned (knowing that it will not stop people from consuming adult material illicitly, but it curbs its immediate access and many of the effects that long-term unabated exposure will have on a large number) as a matter of public health. But such a ban must take place not as a single act, but as part of a general trends towards a philosophical reorientation of the nation itself.
This why not only are men such as this pedophile now running for office, but why homosexuality itself has increased and laws continue to liberalize in favor of the LGBT, and why for each law that is instituted against the LGBT it is almost immediately “struck down” by a “court ruling.” The philosophy has not been addressed among the people, and until this is absorbed on some level by a percentage, even a small one, of the masses, the social race towards the morals and practices of the inhabitants of Sodom and her sister city of Gomorrah will continue.