In recent news, the infamous attention seeker and supporter of homosexual child abuse Milo Yiannopoulos claims to have entered into a homosexual union with another man:
Milo Yiannopoulos has married his partner John – but has bizarrely cropped out his new husband’s face from all their photos on their big day.
The right-wing troll jetted out to Hawaii to marry his long-term boyfriend, named only as John, whose identity Milo has gone to some lengths to hide.
Milo shared a photo of him and his partner – who is facing away from the camera – appearing to say their vows underneath a tree. On the back of his new husband’s white tuxedo, were the words ‘blind for love.’
In another where the grooms are both pouring champagne into a tower of glasses. John’s face is barely visible in the second photo where he’s been all but cropped out.
The last photo Milo shared on his Instagram account was of his wedding cake which featured tiny models of the alt-right journalist and his African American husband holding hands on top.
‘It’s official,’ he wrote as the caption.
The wedding took place at the Four Seasons Resort Hualalai on the big island of Hawaii, on Saturday.
Yiannopoulos, 32, became an alt-right poster boy, after his frequent misogynistic, racist, and even homophobic rants.
Yet the extremist agenda he pushes, which has won – and lost – him book deals, speaking events and his job as a writer at Brietbart, seem contradictory with his own life.
He once told Bloomberg he generally didn’t employ gay people because he ‘didn’t trust them’.
‘They don’t show up on time. They don’t do the work. They get all queeny with drama,’ he said. ‘I like straight white men. They do the work. I like black guys for my love life, straight white males as employees, and girls as drinking buddies.’ He doesn’t drink anymore.’
He added that he also disapproved of all Muslims – except his boyfriend of 10 years.
Milo, who has compared feminism to cancer in a bid to be as outrageous as possible, once spoke about his hypocrisy on Real Time saying he struggled to fit in as a ‘gay Jew who never shuts up about his black boyfriend’.
The right-wing firebrand thrives on controversy, and was stoking the fires again last week when he arrived at UC Berkeley for a free speech forum and was greeted by dozens of counter-protesters.
The official event was cancelled but wrote on Instagram: ‘I did what I said I would do. I showed up. Sorry to the hundreds of people the police refused to let in.’
According to the Los Angeles Times, security was only letting 100 people or so in at a time and they had to go through metal detectors to enter the plaza. (source)
While Milo is know for his “attention-seeking” antics in the past- who knows if this story is objectively true? However, even if he did say it was true, the story would still be false. Milo never married, cannot marry, and will never get married to another man because it is impossible for him to do so. This also applies to all people who enter into unnatural unions- their unions are not marriages, and they can never be marriages no matter how much the laws of society claim to assert they are so.
In the Catholic Church, marriage per canon law is called “natural marriage” because it refers to the natural union of men and women who, by coming together, engender new life by their relations. St. Thomas Aquinas in the Summa Theologica expounds on this, saying that by natural inclination in combination with the will, men and women come together to bear and raise up the next generation of people:
A thing is said to be natural in two ways. First, as resulting of necessity from the principles of nature; thus upward movement is natural to fire. In this way matrimony is not natural, nor are any of those things that come to pass at the intervention or motion of the free-will. Secondly, that is said to be natural to which nature inclines although it comes to pass through the intervention of the free-will; thus acts of virtue and the virtues themselves are called natural; and in this way matrimony is natural, because natural reason inclines thereto in two ways. First, in relation to the principal end of matrimony, namely the good of the offspring. For nature intends not only the begetting of offspring, but also its education and development until it reach the perfect state of man as man, and that is the state of virtue. Hence, according to the Philosopher (Ethic. viii, 11,12), we derive three things from our parents, namely “existence,” “nourishment,” and “education.” Now a child cannot be brought up and instructed unless it have certain and definite parents, and this would not be the case unless there were a tie between the man and a definite woman and it is in this that matrimony consists. Secondly, in relation to the secondary end of matrimony, which is the mutual services which married persons render one another in household matters. For just as natural reason dictates that men should live together, since one is not self-sufficient in all things concerning life, for which reason man is described as being naturally inclined to political society, so too among those works that are necessary for human life some are becoming to men, others to women. Wherefore nature inculcates that society of man and woman which consists in matrimony. These two reasons are given by the Philosopher (Ethic. viii, 11,12). (source)
Later in the discussion, he adds that marriage is something that in beneficial for individuals and society, that it is not sinful, and that it is natural to man, for while man possesses a nature similar to the animals, he also partakes of the angelic nature of God, and this is what is reflected through marriage, which is the nature of God Himself. God the Father is likened to the Father, God the Son is likened to the Mother, and God the Holy Spirit is likened to the children, who proceed forth from both the Father and the Mother as their natural product of the love between the two.
Outside of the natural union between one man and one woman, anything else is called unnatural marriage because it goes against the order of creation. Homosexuality is, as the Catechism of the Catholic Church notes, particularly and gravely disordered because it is a complete inversion of the order of creation for which the genitive act is intended. When a man enters into a woman, there is the natural chance that new life might generate, for this is the explicit and first purpose of relations- the generation of new life, and there is the added benefit of mutual enjoyment for both the husband and wife. When a man enters into another man, or a woman attempts relations with another women, it is impossible to generate new life. The genitive act is reduced to a purely hedonistic pursuit of dominance of one person over another that creates nothing and, owing to the many diseases that homosexuality transmits as we have documented in our previous articles, brings with it the possibility of spreading or worsening deadly diseases or causing serious medical issues.
A photo of an LGBT liberated colon, complete with cancer growth.
As we have noted, rates of Anal and Colorectal Cancer have been skyrocketing in recent years and scientists have called this the next great LGBT health crisis. This is let alone the increasing and expanding HIV/AIDS crisis among homosexuals. However, almost no scientist or doctor wants to talk about the influence of the LGBT in this crisis because it is a “death sentence” for one’s career, yet this is a great majority of the cause behind these crises.
The Bible in both the Old and New Testaments speak about the abominable nature of homosexuality, calling it a sin worthy of death and only one of four sins that specifically “cry out to heaven for vengeance.” All of Christian Sacred Tradition support this from the earliest days through today, likewise bolstered by the writing of the mystics and those of the saints. As God came in Christ to save the human race, to restore man to new life after the darkness of sin had overtaken him by his own hand in choosing to reject God in Eden, to accept homosexuality as something worthy is to reject the salvation of Christ and this rejection is made known by the fruits which homosexuality bears.
As noted above, there is the spread of disease and sickness that has been directly connected to homosexual activity, but the effects of this behavior go well beyond just medical problems. Even homosexuals themselves admit that there is a shocking about of violence among fellow sodomites- far from being “gay” as in “happy,” those who have been in the LGBT community for a time or around it understand the tremendously disproportionate amount of violence, alcoholism, drug abuse, and outright sadistic, evil behavior that takes place as a part of normal life or is prevalent enough that, with respect to the rest of the population, it is a natural cause for alarm.
Armin Meiwes and Berndt Brandes. They met online in a chat room for cannibals. After sodomizing each other, Brandes willingly let Armin cut off his penis, and the two cooked it and ate it together. After, Brandes allowed Armin to slaughter him like an animal, cut up his flesh, and store it where he ate it over the course of several months. He says he did it for sexual pleasure
This is not the only case of such acts among the LGBT. Here at Shoebat.com, there was a story of a similar case where a man by the name of Stefano Brizzi murdered and ate another homosexual, Gordon Semple, and cut up his body into pieces, including dissolving his flesh in acid in a bathtub and gnawing of his dismembered ribs.
Evils such as cannibalism exist anywhere in society. However, the proportion and prevalence of this and other heinous acts is much greater than with regard to the general public.
The essence of homosexual marriage is the assumption that marriage is an institute established by man and therefore can be modified as he wills. This is reflected in how America and other societies around the world, especially in the formerly Christian-turned-apostate nations of Europe, have either legalized or are attempting to legalize “homosexual marriage.” However, such attempts are impossible because marriage was not established by any man. Instead, it is a part of the natural order which man partakes of in accordance with his vocation, as the Bible states:
When Jesus had finished saying these things, he left Galilee and went to the region of Judea beyond the Jordan. Large crowds followed him, and he cured them there.
Some Pharisees came to him, and to test him they asked, “Is it lawful for a man to divorce his wife for any cause?” 4 He answered, “Have you not read that the one who made them at the beginning ‘made them male and female,’ and said, ‘For this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and be joined to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’? So they are no longer two, but one flesh. Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.” They said to him, “Why then did Moses command us to give a certificate of dismissal and to divorce her?” He said to them, “It was because you were so hard-hearted that Moses allowed you to divorce your wives, but from the beginning it was not so. And I say to you, whoever divorces his wife, except for unchastity, and marries another commits adultery.
His disciples said to him, “If such is the case of a man with his wife, it is better not to marry.” But he said to them, “Not everyone can accept this teaching, but only those to whom it is given. For there are eunuchs who have been so from birth, and there are eunuchs who have been made eunuchs by others, and there are eunuchs who have made themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. Let anyone accept this who can.” (Matthew 19:1-12)
This reflects the Catholic teaching on marriage. Some are called to marriage. Others are called to be single. Some are called to religious life. All are called to chastity per their particular state of life and to follow in the order the God has ordained.
This is not a marriage. It is two perverts in tuxedos blaspheming against the natural order of creation so they can masturbate into each other’s rectums in a power play that mirrors the abuse and disorder of hell before anything to do with God.
This is the reason why homosexuality is called a sin that is “worthy of death” in the Bible, because it is a serious sin, and the wages of sin is death in both the physical, mental, and ultimately, spiritual sense.
Ultimately, there is no such thing as “homosexual marriage” because two men or two women, or any other combination of people/animals/objects cannot form a marriage in the natural sense, and all such attempts at union are unnatural. Even if a person calls himself a “homosexual”- meaning he feels for whatever personal reason a sexual attraction to people of the same gender as he (as we know there is no such thing as a “gay gene,” for homosexuality is not a biological to or a part of any man’s creation)- he still can get married provided it is to person of the opposite sex in accordance with the natural law.
Whether Milo actually entered into a sodomite union with another man or not is irrelevant because the point being made here is that what he is describing and what laws illicitly call a “marriage” is not a marriage at all but an unnatural, illegal, and perverse union, and that is what they need to be called because it accurately identified what is taking place for the perversity that it is. No law can ever be passed that can change the definition of marriage because marriage came from God and it is not for man to define. To attempt to do such a thing is as absurd as attempting to redefine the laws of gravity, thermodynamics, or even just basic physics- all the proclamations in the world will not change what is unchangeable fact.
In the words of St. Augustine and St. Thomas Aquinas, lex iniusta non lex est- An injust law is no law at all.
A happily married couple in the truest sense of the word. This is the only kind of “gay marriage” that is allowed, and indeed, all couples should strive for. Just as God as loved us and desires our ultimate happiness with Him, so should the love between a husband and a wife ultimately attempt to reflect the goodness of God.