By Theodore Shoebat
A new report reveals that almost all of the terrorist attacks in France were done by people already known by the French government. According to NBC:
The vast majority of terror attacks in France were carried out by Islamic radicals who had been known to police or intelligence services, according to a new report by a global security think tank.
Bratislava-based GLOBSEC examined 22 terror incidents in France since 2012. Nearly 80 percent of the people behind those attacks had been on a terror watchlist, and 97 percent had been on the radar of authorities, according to the firm’s new analysis, obtained by NBC News.
The figures included Saïd and Chérif Kouachi, career criminals with long records who killed 12 people in January 2015 in the offices of the satirical weekly newspaper Charlie Hebdo in Paris.
The statistics are likely to bolster the longstanding criticism leveled at France and other European countries that authorities are not doing enough to prosecute and imprison those who pose a threat. Statutes related to providing material support to terrorists, which carry long prison terms in the U.S., are not often prosecuted in France, and jail sentences are much shorter.
“The main issue throughout Europe is the sentencing, which is extremely lenient and also allows for terrorists/jihadists to be freed quite early for ‘good behavior,'” said London-based terror expert Olivier Guitta, founder and managing director of the security firm GlobalStrat.
Of 78 people suspected of carrying out the attacks, 49 percent had previous criminal convictions, including 19 percent who were repeat offenders, the report said.
That included Cherif Chekatt, killed last month after he opened fire on a Christmas market in Strasbourg.
The report urges France to deport foreigners who are convicted of terrorism-related offenses, noting that 15 percent of those on France’s terror watchlist are foreigners.
It also urges more monitoring of suspected terrorists.
What this proves is that major governments, like that of France, know that terrorists are in their society and don’t care about preventing terrorist attacks. Why is this? Remember what Bernard Connely, who worked with the European Commission in Brussels where he was responsible for the European Monetary System and monetary policies, said: The EU wants terrorist attacks. In his 2008 lecture entitled, Europe – Driver or Driven?, Bernard Connolly said that the EU wants a “global financial crises”.
From the presentation by Bernard Connelly
Why would the EU want terrorism? Look at the situation. With terrorist attacks in Europe, what you have is a generating of consent towards militarism. Major officials from Germany, Austria and Italy have discussed creating an “axis” and expanding border security into the Balkans in the name of ‘fighting terrorism.’
The Interior Minister of Germany, Horst Seehofer, has pushed for an “axis” between Germany, Austria and Italy on migration and security policies. In a news conference in Berlin with Sebastian Kutz, Seehofer said that he spoke with the Italian interior minister, “and it was his wish that Rome, Vienna and Berlin should work together at the interior minister level in the areas of security, fighting terrorism and the core issue of immigration. … I accepted that … And we will push ahead with it”. Kurz agreed and stated: “In our view, we need an axis of the willing in the fight against illegal migration.”
Matteo Salvini, the Deputy Prime Minister of Italy and the federal secretary of the northern Italian nationalist party, Lega Norte, had a phone conversation with Seehofer and later announced in Corriere della Sera on Wednesday: “We are in the process of building up an Italian-German axis based on a fundamental motto: protecting the external borders, which means defending the Mediterranean and therefore Italy.” In an interview with Der Standard, Kurz said that he wants to include countries like Denmark and the Netherlands into the axis:
“I talked about creating a European axis of the willing, calling not only Vienna, Berlin and Rome, but also the Netherlands and Denmark as possible allies.”
Kurz and the German Interior Minister Horst Seehofer’s plan to send Austrian and German police officers to Albania to supposedly stop the migrants from entering further into Europe. As Deutsche Welle reports:
“Having met with Chancellor Angela Merkel last night, Kurz had a Wednesday appointment with Merkel’s increasingly uneasy Bavarian conservative ally in the interior ministry.
Kurz and Seehofer announced that part of the plan would be putting German and Austrian police into Albania to prevent a migration route into the Balkans.”
It is no wonder that Austria has been fixated on the Balkans, with Sebastian Kurz pushing for the Balkans to become a part of the EU. In November of 2018, Kurz remarked that “the EU will be complete when the Western Balkans countries join it.” If this happens, that means that Muslim countries like Albania, Bosnia and Kosovo will be part of the EU, and not only this, these countries would also give more leverage towards Turkey, which may mean Turkish accession into the European Union. There is another possible consequence to this. If Germany succeeds in creating its EU military force (and the Germans are currently underway in this enterprise), and if Kurz gets what he wants, that would mean that Germany’s pan-European military force would also include the militaries of Albania and Bosnia; and since Kosovo is currently building its own military force, a Kosovar military would also be included in Germany’s auxiliaries.
I suspect that this is part of some ideological fantasy of reviving the German empire. Lets remember that Sebastian Kurz is in coalition with the Austrian Freedom Party, an ultra-nationalist political organization. Andreas Molzer of the Freedom Party wants to revive the German Reich, stating: “this world needs states (Staatlichkeit) that have a sacred legitimation — which is the Reich”. And yes, by Reich, he is speaking of reviving the German Empire, stating that he wants to bring “Berlin and Vienna back into the centre of the New Europe”. Molzer wants to include in this new pan-German empire: the Baltic States, the Czech Republic, Slovenia, Croatia and Poland.
Thus, the Freedom Party — like Kurz — wants to extend Germanic power into Eastern Europe.
What is hilarious and disturbing at the same time, is that this is idea of merging Muslim Balkan countries with the European Union is being lobbied for in Austria by a politician who was being revered as a glimmering hope for the cause of ‘fighting jihad’ by the Counter-jihad warriors of the acrimonious and dark world of the internet.
For example, in July of 2018, Robert Spencer wrote in regards to Kurz:
Austria is about to assume the six-month rotating presidency of the European Union on July 1. This offers a glimmer of hope, given the suicidal direction of the EU in its open border immigration policy. As the new council president, Austria is adopting a hardline approach to the Muslim migrant crisis
Spencer also called Kurz’s election success “trouble for the EU”. How could it be “trouble for the EU” when Kurz is working to enlarge the EU? Even if the EU disappears, it will only be a transformation from the current system to simply another union of German domination, and will probably be tremendously more aggressive. Andreas Molzer, a pan-German and leading member of Austria’s Freedom Party, and also a former member of the European parliament, alluded to this desire of extending Europe when he said that the recreation of Europe “from the Atlantic to the Urals would be desirable but is not possible at the moment”. The Ural mountains is in Russia and borders right with Kazakstan. What these so called nationalists in Europe want is not an end to “globalization.” Quite the contrary. These so called nationalists who are raging against “globalism” are really just working to subvert or overthrow the current system and transform it into another — more dangerous — globalism. Even Le Pen holds to this fantasy of extending Europe into Russia:
“We are wrongly accused of being anti-Europe, but we are for (a Europe) that stretches from the Atlantic to the Urals, not from Washington to Brussels”
So, when you hear these nationalists — or really any other of these pan-Europeanist militarists — going on and on about immigration and terrorism, remember that it is a show to make you believe that they are saviors of Europe, when in reality they are simply using terrorism to justify some policy of expansionism (think Turkey and what Erdogan is doing in Syria in the name of fighting Kurdish terrorists). Merkel, back in 2010, said that multiculturalism in Germany “utterly failed“. In 2015, this same Merkel welcomed mass migration with the words Wir schaffen das! (“We can do this!”). Did she have a change of heart? No. for in late 2015, the same year of the migration situation, this same Merkel said: “Multiculturalism leads to parallel societies and therefore remains a ‘life lie'”.
Merkel did not have a change of mind.
Rather, what this demonstrates is that Merkel understands her people; she understands that there are many people in Germany who are against migration and so she has to say certain things to appease them (as all politicians do). Thus, she understood that there would be an angry reaction to welcoming so many hundreds of thousands of people; she understood that there would be a nationalist backlash. She says one year that multiculturalism is an utter failure, and people praised her; and then five years later she supports a policy knowing full well that the constituents who praised her for condemning multiculturalism, would turn on her (as they already have).
The point is that the migration crises was done knowing the political ramifications. If you want to bring a post-WW2 German population back to a violent tribalism, what better strategy than to bring in hundreds of thousands of non-whites into Germany?
The migration crises really helped to shift the political climate of Germany. The terrorism and crimes that were done by Muslims was a show, the masses were the audience, and the people behind the curtains knew that a Europe spring would be the result. Terrorism is theater.
But what can I say of such political manipulators? The words of the prophet Isaiah will suffice:
They hatch vipers’ eggs and weave the spider’s web;
He who eats of their eggs dies,
And from that which is crushed a viper breaks out. (Isaiah 59:5)