Witnesses to what happened in Benghazi on 9/11/12 will absolutely play a part in getting to the truth. In addition to putting the video below in this post, we have also introduced it as EXHIBIT Y in our report / case against Egypt, Mohammed Mursi, and Ansar al-Sharia Egypt in the deaths of four Americans – including Ambassador Christopher Stevens. There are two particularly important aspects to the video excerpt from Fox News Channel’s Special Report from July 11, 2013.

1. Host Bret Baier reads excerpts from a book entitled, “Under Fire: The Untold Story of the Attack in Benghazi”. One of those excerpts, which include eyewitness accounts of what happened during the attack, involved claims that it was very clear the attackers had targeted Stevens specifically. Again, this takes us back to evidence that implicates Ansar al-Sharia Egypt and Mohammed Mursi, then the president of Egypt and a Muslim Brotherhood leader. If Mursi was involved, why would Stevens be targeted? This lends further credence to claims that Stevens was to be kidnapped, especially if Mursi was involved. He had made no qualms about his staunch desire to see the “Blind Sheikh” released.
2. These eyewitnesses were interviewed by the FBI in Germany on September 14, 2012. This was three days after the attack and two days prior to U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice’s claims on five separate Sunday talk shows that the attack was spontaneous and arose from protests over the anti-Muhammad video, Innocence of Muslims. If these witnesses told the FBI that the operation was highly organized, professional, and involved the targeting of Stevens, why would Rice say something completely at variance with those accounts?

Eyewitnesses in Benghazi: Stevens was targeted:

Time for Susan Rice to seek Immunity?