By Walid Shoebat (Shoebat Exclusive)
The West in its era under Christianity has not known the phenomenon we call the homosexual movement until the 20th century. During the Christian era, whenever homosexuality was discussed, it was almost always considered an abberation imported from the Muslim orient which there it was always considered not just an acceptable practice but a norm and is why homosexuals tend to be more sympathetic towards Islam over Christianity.
The proof to this is simple. All one has to do in order to understand Islamic history is to review ISIS and they will see is a microcosm of the times of Muhammad and his companions, Khalid, Ali, Omar, Abu Bakr including all the Muslim dynasties after them … ghosts from a dark history past who miraculously were released from the depths of the pit into your social media network and youtube all with the original mascara eyes men, red dye henna beards, long hair like women (Revelation 9:8), dress, sexual habits including all the depraved strange preferences and unimaginable brutality.
What the western analyst fails to consider is that the Muslim world underwent a period of westernization in which the British Empire slowly rid us the sickness of Sate in India, child brides throughout the Muslim world and to somewhat set up laws which collided with Shariah but failing to completely obliterated it.
Detractors argue over ISIS and we argue back asking; how can these small band of Muslim terrorists transform a society in Syria and Iraq into a living hell? They counter saying that ISIS is an unusual pheomenon which is different from the traditional Muslim culture and we ask; since after the dismantlement of the Ottomans was there anything that existed even close to a Muslim culture? In Egypt where the hub of Muslim civilization thrived there thrived British arts which covered its ruins and today we still have fifty percent of the ‘Muslims’ in Egypt are the Muslim ‘protestants’ fighting to keeping it that way and is why these insist that they alongside the Copt worship the same God concocting yet a new Islam which has never existed.
ISIS has a religion, in fact, the purist forms of Islam: Islam itself. Islam is ISIS and ISIS is Islam in its purest form. Our critics will argue, how so, especially since ISIS’s understanding of Islam has been debunked a thousand times over by major Muslim theologians worldwide. They always exclaim ‘How dare you?’
We dare, for even daring to go against the tide is a western phenomenon not Muslim. The ISIS phenomenon is Islam itself which simply was catapulted from the time-tunnel of history to reveal its original reality. Islam throughout history has always transferred any region it occupied into a land of corruption, sodomites and degenerates while Christianity transferred the entire Middle East after the Ottomans into a land of milk and honey.
One honest expose argued on how Islam is the religion of sodomites was written by Muslim Saudi writer Dr. Zuhair Mohammed Jamil Kutby who laments (I translated from Arabic): “The Arab Nation and through its scholars, jurists and intellectuals, think of the Muslim world as one of the best nations. They say it is a nation like no other in the universe. But the fact is that it went through periods of physical and moral degeneration that even history is embarrassed of.”
“When we come back to read some pages of our history—not the history written by the western orientalist lest we claim they are antagonistic. We find that our Arab history is full of conflict, crowded with a culture of lying and exposed by sexual and moral deviation … is it not considered wrong and shameful the spread of corruption and sexual deviation in the corridors and palaces during [Muslim] Arab rule?”
Kutby was not discussing some odd ruler or some abberrant phenomenon, no, he was discussing the highest pride of Muslim history rulers: “Plentiful were these [deviations] written in our history books, novels and stories. For example, The Abbasid Caliph Harun al-Rashid spent his nights with a boy named Al-Majin and the immoral poet Abu Nawas…Here are the verses that indicate sexual decadence and corruption in which Abu Nawas says ‘Adela blames my choice, a boy smooth as an Oryx … leave me alone, I said, do not blame me, I am committed to what you hate and until death do us part . Did not the book of Allah instruct? To prefer boys over girls…’”
And if one thinks what future lays for the West with its promotion of homosexuality in the military, they need to look no further than the Muslim history to see the results. Throughout Muslim history, Muslim sultans were very fond of handsome young slaves whom they kept close to their persons as pages, service-boys, bodyguards, special troops and as gay companions. Infatuation for such slaves was a bane of the life of Muslim royalty and nobility in particular, although they considered it to be a fashion. In fact, the whole of the Muslim armies and system was a gay tryst.
Almost all of the Muslim caliphates beginning with the Rashidun, Umayyad, Abbasid, Córdoba Spain, Fatimid all the way down to the Ottomans, from the highest leaders to the lowest of low they indulged in ghilman (boy love).
Under the Khilji Dynasty (1290-1320) Sultan Alauddin Khilji sodomized his most beloved soldier Malik Kafur, a slave boy from Gujarat after he “was castrated, converted to Islam, and was taken into Alauddin’s service”. Vincent Smith describes for example Sultan Khilji’s “addiction to disgusting vice.” Kafur ended up murdering Khilji the Sultan taking over the dynasty to only end up beheaded and taken over by Khilji’s son Qutb-uddin Mubarak Shah who was also among the bisexual, pedophile Muslim sultans.
K.S. Lal, in his book, Muslim Slave System in Medieval India, documented the bisexual, pedophile Muslim sultans. Qutb had a boy lover, Hasan. Ultimately the degraded creature was killed by his minion when one homosexual lover named Khusrau Khan engaged the king in his intimate company and got him killed just as happened to his father.
The culture of the west is becoming so debased to the extent that even the professing Christians, they do not see what lays on the horizon lacking to learn from history that such behavior in the Muslim world fulfilled Romans 1:26-27 in which God gave them over to shameful lusts were men abandoned natural relations with women and received in themselves the due penalty for their perversion. The whole of Scripture is prophetic and that penalty was death through assassinations, corruption and judgments from the Almighty God who gave us the most beautiful and wonderful pure faith of Christianity. A convert from Islam bows at the mention of the word “Christianity” while the west denounce its most wonderful history and amazing civilization in which even the Messianic and the Evangelical denounce Crusaders and Constantine without any shame. A debased society that says “thou shall not judge” always laying it as rule to defend the homosexual yet continually judges with such slander and malice the men who carried the shield of the cross to which I bow to and am not ashamed to make the sign of the cross.
Christianity gave me the light. While I attended high-school at Dar Jasser in Bethlehem where the Muslim history was scrubbed of all the debauchery, but truth was whispered at times when teachers would every now and then expressed their concious having run into obvious words in the poetry and the Quran using the word “ghilman” (sex boys) which compelled them to finally tell the obvious.
ISIS’s Islam is no different from when Qutub’s Islam whom was succeeded by Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq who was murdered by his son Muhammad bin Tughlak. Even the famed Ibn Batuta who was an African traveling historian documents the story on how Ghiyath al-Din Tughluq dabbled in mathematics, physics and Greek philosophy (what the west likes to pick up to complement Islam) yet the demented Tughluq surpassed his predecessors in bloodshed and brutality and just as ISIS did laid waste with pillage and murder till the inhabitants fled to the jungle. And just as ISIS does, he killed so many Hindus that in the words of the Moslem historian Ibn Batuta, “constantly in front of his royal pavilion and his Civil Court a mound of dead bodies and a heap of corpses, while the sweepers and executioners were wearied out by their work of dragging” the victims “and putting them to death in crowds.” In order to found a new capital at Daulatabad he drove every inhabitant from Delhi and left it a desert and hearing that a blind man had stayed behind in Delhi, he ordered him to be dragged from the old to the new capital, so that only a leg remained of the wretch. (Durant, page 461) And who would believe a couple decades ago when we lambasted our warnings that such history would be catapulted into our time:
And lest they say that such behaviors do not represent true Islam, pedophilia stems from the Qur’an and Muhammad himself. Muslim doublespeak covers up Muhammad’s marriage with Aisha, his six-year old wife and argue that he waited to consummate his marriage when she was nine. Such a story is repeated ad nauseam, but so few investigate the truth behind what is rarely known regarding that story. For example, the Huffington Post has an article by an ignoramus convert to Islam who was ashamed of the very Christian heritage I so longed to admire, named Dr. David Liepert defend the story by using a slick method of shuffling dates by using less than credible Islamic sources. However, such arguments are shattered when we examine the most credible of Islamic sources like Al-Tabari, truth is, even the supposed “waiting” that Muhammad did not have sex with the child bride until the age of 9 had nothing to do with Aisha’s maturity or reaching the age of puberty. It all had to do with a financial transaction: “…then Abu Bakr asked [the Prophet] “O Messenger of God, what prevents you from consummating the marriage with your wife?” The Prophet said “The bridal gift (sadaq).” Abu Bakr gave him the bridal gift, twelve and a half ounces [of gold], and the Prophet sent for us. He consummated our marriage in my house, the one where I live now and where he passed away. [The History of Al-Tabari: Biographies of the Prophet’s Companions and Their Successors, translated by Ella Landau-Tasseron, SUNY Press, Albany, 1998, Volume XXXIX, pp. 171-173]
Muhammad’s companions and most of these old geezers married underage girls. Ali gave his underage daughter to Umar to have sex with a girl that have not reach pubescent: “Umar asked ‘Ali for the hand of his daughter, Umm Kulthum in marriage. ‘Ali replied that she has not yet attained the age (of maturity)… Thus ‘Ali gave his daughter Umm Kulthum a dress and asked her to go to ‘Umar’ ‘Go and tell your father that you are very pretty …’. With that ‘Ali married Umm Kulthum to ‘Umar.” [In Tarikh Khamees, Volume 2, p. 384 (‘Dhikr Umm Kalthum’) and Zakhair Al-Aqba, p. 168]
In The Summary for The Message of Prayer, How To Teach Our Children Prayer by Sheikh Yousuf Al-Asfuri AlBahreini, First Edition, 1989, this book is for the elementary schools in Bahrain (for Shiites) (photo of page in Arabic here). In it, it gives the etiquettes of washing from ejaculation.
Page 53 discusses the necessity to cleanse oneself and the conditions for washing “1—intercourse with the vaginal part of a woman…intercourse after ejaculating in her anus…intercourse after ejaculating in a boy’s anus…after intercourse with an animal…”
‘But this book was for the Shiites, not Sunnis’ exclaims the Muslim all throughout the web. Exposing all this to the Sunnis is always responded to by the Muslim’s quick refutations providing quick verses and narrations by Muhammad showing that such behaviors are un-Islamic. But the trick lays in that while one can easily find verses and Hadith of chastity, the loopholes, always remember Islam is the religion of loopholes, is untold, that when it comes to slaves, anything goes and is taught under all four schools of juresprudence; Ja’fari (23% Muslims); Hanafi (31%); Maliki (25%); Shafi΄i (16%). For example, under the Maliki the allowance for perophelia and sodomy with enemy slaves, men, underage boys or girls including sodomy is permitted in Islam. Who can refute, if so, they must name any Muslim scholar who denounced the four schools of jurisprudence who interpreted Islam.
Moroccan journalist Hamid Tulist, in addressing the pedophilia problem in the Middle East, laments, not over some insignificant Muslim Caliphs, but the top most prestigious in Muslim history: “Even the prince of the faithful Caliph Al-Amin, son of Caliph Harun al-Rashid, bought his eunuchs and dedicated them for his private use and refused women and slaves, and anguished over his love for a boy named Kauthar, and sang for him love songs and poetry. Caliph and Commander of the Faithful of Allah, al-Wathiq bin Khalifa Mu’tasim and Caliph Harun al-Rashid’s grandson, longed for a boy called Mahj. He dedicated sweet and delicate poems for him. Commander of the Faithful and Caliph al-Walid ibn Yazid ibn Abd al-Malik was even said that he enticed his brother to sodomize him.”
To all who are shamed in the West of their Christian history I urge, speak to some of the Arab scholars who even see that the only solution to solve this problem is to convert to the Judeo-Christian form of ethics. Tulist reverts not to the Quran, Hadith or Islamic jurisprudence to solve the problem of pedophilia in the Arab-Muslim world, but to the Jewish faith itself: “The first mention of a type of sexual perversion (homosexuality) stated in the first religious book known in the Arab East was Genesis, a Jewish book and the first book of the five books of the Torah. In the story of Lot were God punished sexual perversion. In fact the Arabic word ‘Luat’ (sodomy) came from the Hebrew ‘Lot’ and not from the Arabic.”
Christianity and the West is innocent from such aberration, “The Christian West generally frowned on and even criminalized sodomy. When some nineteenth-century European elites wanted to experiment sexually, they had to go to Muslim lands. Richard Burton wrote in his terminal essay that some European elites especially, vacationed in Islamic lands specifically to experiment in the sexual perversions that were rampant, as confirmed by Murray & Roscoe and others.” (Yoel Natan, Moon-o-theism, vol. 2, p. 105) Gavin Maxwell says: “Homosexuality between man and boy was never considered in any way abnormal or shameful in Morocco until the infiltration of European opinion with the French [occupation].” (Samar Habib, Islam and Homosexuality, vol. 1, p. 65)
When the secularist in Egypt laments that Islam was hijacked, he is being either ignorant or he is deceiving while being deceived. From my youth unit now, what I see is unimaginable to even fathom; the transformation of a classical era in Egypt which all the reasonable minded in my generation laments the symphony orchestras, the wonderful blend between the Italian romantic and the eastern passion of Farid Al-Atrash (and please listen to the whole symphony to appreciate the awe and wonder from what was brought from Catholic Italy and Protestant Great Britain to the great land of Egypt):
Its called “Lahn Al-Khloud” (The Eternal Symphony). Who in my generation does not lament and weep for the memories of old, the beautiful Christian influence that swept the religion of heathens, and now the heathen is back introducing instead this utter evil:
I weep daily for my beloved Middle East. What will wipe away the tears of sorrow but only God who sent His only begotten Son and as He wept while on this earth longing to repair it, we also must weep until He lands in Egypt (Isaiah 19) and defend it from the tyranny of the Turk and bring back eternal symphonies. Was it not Egypt, the beacon of the Middle East, where the Holy Family lived and Christ will return the favor for keeping safe the Son of God. Was it not His grand father King David of Bethlehem, our beloved village, who was inspired with the harp? And was it not Muhammad who forbade using musical instruments prohibiting billions without natural joy? And I thank God, was it not an American Protestant Christian mother, an excellent pianist, who has taught me how to play musical instruments and the shepherd flute I learned from the local shepherds who kept the sheep with his simple tune? And I yearn and look forward to the future when someday the whole earth will sing this:
Muslims frequently say that we, the critics of Islam “know nothing about Islam”. They relentlessly exhaust us with this statement that ISIS terrorists do not understand true Islam.
I finally capitulate. They are correct. I humbly yield, they won this debate.
The truth is that no one truly understands true Islam, neither Muslim scholars nor Muslims in general. Even the best of its secular critics don’t understand it. The only way to fully understand Islam is to be the devil himself.