Government Coverups Behind Islamic Invasion of America

By Ben Barrack

If ever there was a political ‘odd couple’, George H.W. ‘Felix’ Bush and Bill ‘Oscar’ Clinton fit the bill. Sure, living U.S. presidents share things in common no one else on earth shares but the relationship between the 41st and 42nd Presidents respectively, always seemed to smack of being suspiciously close. In 2006, I saw Bush 41 speak at the University of Mary Hardin-Baylor and he referred to this relationship as such; he acknowledged it without explaining it.

The subsequent and logical unanswered question “why?” asked by several people, silently in their own minds, hung in the air and was never answered.

The catalyst for this relationship being so close may have nothing to do with America’s Islamic problem but the consequences of the desire to keep the details of it secret is another matter.

Compromised_Cover

In the 1994 book COMPROMISED: Clinton, Bush and the CIA – which is still doing very well on Amazon – former Air Force Intelligence operative and CIA Agent Terry Reed chronicles nefarious dealings between then-Arkansas Governor Clinton and former CIA Director Bush, who was Vice President at the time. According to Reed, Clinton allowed the CIA to set up shop in his state, manufacturing untraceable weapons for the Contras in Nicaragua and much more. From the inside flap of the book, which is over 500 pages and packed with documents and photos:

The Arkansas-CIA connection became Clinton’s darkest secret – a secret shared by then Vice-President Bush, who himself was compromised by his involvement in the Iran-Contra scandal. Their shared guilt kept them silent and tied their hands as they faced off in the 1992 Presidential election with neither mentioning Iran-Contra… Reed puts Clinton directly in the “Iran-Contra Loop”. Both attended a secret meeting where CIA arms arrangements, illegal Contra training and money laundering were discussed… reveals the details and names of all who were involved, including those faceless power brokers now in positions of public prominence in Washington, D.C... More than $9 million a week in cash was secretly air dropped into Arkansas, which became the CIA’s domestic “banana republic”. These clandestine funds were laundered for the Agency and then used for the development of Arkansas industry… Bush’s sons were involved in a criminal conspiracy with the Medellin drug cartel in Colombia, a conspiracy that was being contained by the CIA…

That part about Clinton and Bush remaining silent with tied hands can logically be extended to their families (Hillary, George W. and Jeb), advisers (Karl Rove), leaders in the political establishment of both parties, and Party leadership groups like the DNC and the RNC. The administration of George W. Bush protected the Clintons as well. Perhaps no case better exemplifies this than the Oklahoma City bombing. When J.D. Cash uncovered the truth about Clinton administration involvement, the Bush Justice Department stonewalled like it was protecting Bush himself.

(to read more about the smoking guns Cash found, read Chapter 8 of Unsung Davids).

Terry and Janis Reed today.

Terry and Janis Reed today.

The Iran-Contra scandal broke open when an American cargo plane carrying weapons was shot down over Nicaragua in 1986. Pilots William Cooper and Wallace Sawyer, Jr. were killed. Damage control predictably ensued. The scandal, as it has become known, involved the CIA – which is not to be operating on U.S. soil – selling weapons to Iran in exchange for the release of hostages. An added benefit was that the funds were diverted to aid the Contras in their war with the Communist Nicaraguan Sandinistas.

That official narrative is at near complete variance with Reed’s claims.

The Reagan administration circumvented Congress to support the Contras but if it were to be revealed that the CIA was operating on U.S. soil, involved in manufacturing untraceable weapons in Governor Bill Clinton’s state, and then shipping them outside the country, it would become a scandal that would disgrace, neuter, and criminalize some powerful families.

Fast forward to 2010. Operation Fast and Furious was exposed when Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry was gunned down near the Mexican-U.S. border. Guns found at the scene were traced back to an operation run out of the Department of Justice, in which ATF Agents instructed gun store owners to sell guns to straw purchasers who would be permitted to traffic those guns unimpeded into Mexico and delivered to drug cartels.

Brian Terry: His death led to Operation Fast and Furious being exposed.

Brian Terry: His death led to Operation Fast and Furious being exposed.

Frustrated Americans couldn’t understand why House Republican leadership (Speaker John Boehner) seemed disinterested in pursuing the scandal despite overwhelming evidence that implicated the Obama administration in a federal agent’s death. Based on the accepted version of events about Iran-Contra, awkward comparisons were being made between the two scandals by Democrats.

However, based on Reed’s claims, the comparisons were not awkward at all. They were spot-on. If Reed’s account is right, Boehner’s stonewalling would make sense if it meant keeping the truth about Iran-Contra in the closet. Ditto the Benghazi investigation. Boehner began his tenure in the U.S. Congress in 1991 and has long ago demonstrated his loyalty to the Republican Party establishment.

Speaker Boehner and RNC Chair Priebus.

Speaker Boehner and RNC Chair Priebus.

Speaking of the Republican Party establishment, every Presidential candidate endorsed by said establishment since Reagan would have either a.) had a personal stake in keeping Reed’s account of Iran-Contra silent (George H.W. Bush and George W. Bush) or b.) been someone who could be controlled by the establishment’s political consultants (Bob Dole, John McCain and Mitt Romney). It’s obvious that Jeb Bush is the establishment’s choice for 2016 and he falls into the ‘personal stake’ camp.

Jeb would have a stake in suppressing Reed's account.

Jeb would have a stake in suppressing Reed’s account.

Conversely, on the Democrat side, Bill Clinton didn’t need to be controlled relative to Iran-Contra and neither did Hillary, who is assuredly the Democrats’ choice in 2016. If Reed is correct, Clinton vs. Bush in 2016 would be a ‘mission accomplished’ moment for those who seek to keep the truth about Iran-Contra hidden.

The only president since Reagan who has not had a personal stake (or consultants who did) in keeping Reed’s account secret is Barack Obama. In fact, he has been able to control both parties quite well. The Democrats are all-in on his agenda and the Republicans have been inexplicably paralyzed in the face of his repeated abuses.

If Reed’s account is right, what would Karl Rove – George W. Bush’s closest adviser – be doing today? Would he not be doing exactly what he’s doing today? He refuses to go away and Bob Woodward called him out on it. In 2012, Rove’s PACs and the RNC chose Mitt Romney. Many believe Reince Priebus is merely a figurehead for the RNC and that Rove is calling the shots. In addition, Rove’s mug is everywhere on the Fox News Channel and his Op-eds in the Wall Street Journal are quite prolific.

Rove: Won't go away.

Rove: Won’t go away.

Another key player in the Reagan administration was Grover Norquist, who founded Americans for Tax Reform (ATR) at Reagan’s request in 1985, a year before Iran-Contra was exposed. It’s not clear what Norquist may or may not know about the scandal but what is clear is that his connections to Muslim Brotherhood groups and individuals in the U.S. is irrefutable. One such individual is Abdurahman Alamoudi. Another is Suhail Khan, whose father helped found the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA) and the Muslim Students Association (MSA). His mother sat on the board of a Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) chapter.

George W. Bush and ISNA President Muzammil Siddiqi, days after 9/11 attacks.

George W. Bush and ISNA President Muzammil Siddiqi, days after 9/11 attacks.

In fact, Norquist helped Khan become the White House gatekeeper relative to selecting Muslim leaders who the Bush administration partnered with before and after 9/11. Those Muslim leaders belonged to Muslim Brotherhood front groups.

In 2004, Norquist married a Palestinian Muslim woman named Samah Alrayyes. If – again I say IF – Reed’s account of Iran-Contra is correct and Norquist knows the truth, what are the odds his wife does as well? What are the odds that Suhail Khan knows it? Alamoudi? Multiple Muslim Brotherhood leaders? If they do know, what are the odds that Rove knows they know?

Grover Norquist with Palestinian Muslim wife Samah.

Grover Norquist with Palestinian Muslim wife Samah.

Have you ever heard Rove speak out against the Muslim Brotherhood? Inexplicably, last August, Rove was a signatory on a letter that expressed support for Syria’s Muslim Brotherhood Jihadists. Individuals who joined Rove included Bill Kristol, who was the Chief of Staff to Vice President Quayle during the first Bush administration; Elliott Abrams, a high-ranking diplomat under Reagan and both Bush administrations; and other Republican establishment figures. Regardless of motives, these 75 signatories were inexplicably and unnecessarily aligned on an issue the American people were overwhelmingly against.

Last year it was reported that Norquist’s ATR is largely funded by Rove’s Crossroads SuperPAC and that Norquist was the recipient of $26 Million in 2012, courtesy of Rove.

Silent with hands tied indeed.

Suhail Khan and Grover Norquist at CPAC in 2011.

Suhail Khan and Grover Norquist at CPAC in 2011.

Consider the issue of immigration. Conservatives all across America have been completely vexed by the desire of Republican establishment figures to grant amnesty to so many illegal aliens. Even the normally astute and incisive Rush Limbaugh couldn’t explain it. He gave it a shot by saying that Chamber of Commerce donors have been demanding it but doing so in exchange for the party committing suicide just didn’t make sense, even to Limbaugh.

Take a look at who supports amnesty:

What could support for amnesty have to do with Reed’s allegations about Iran-Contra? If both the Democrats and the Republican establishment have an inherent interest in keeping such truths hidden, who doesn’t?

Answer: Tea Party conservatives.

By passing amnesty, the conservative vote is marginalized. If this is one of the reasons behind such a strategy, the Republican establishment views Party survival as being less important than the self-preservation of the individuals who would be exposed. Would the desires of wealthy donors trump party survival? Would such a nefarious truth about Iran-Contra?

The part about ‘shared guilt (keeping people) silent’ is very real and an interesting dynamic. To illustrate the point, the same could be said about the Islamic connections of Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton (Malik Obama and Huma Abedin). Speaking of Obama and Clinton, the issue of the former’s relationship with Bill Ayers came up just once during the 2008 campaign debates when Hillary pointed out that her opponent served on boards with the unrepentant terrorist. Obama responded by bringing up the fact that Bill pardoned two Weather Underground members – Linda Evans and Susan Rosenberg – while president; the issue was dropped and never brought up in another debate.

Weather Underground members pardoned by Bill Clinton.

Weather Underground members pardoned by Bill Clinton.

The issue widely attributed to sinking George H.W. Bush’s 1992 re-election campaign was his ‘Read my Lips. No new taxes’ moment.

However, an unexpectedly strong variable was thrown into the mix – Ross Perot. His decision to run siphoned more votes from incumbent Bush than Clinton.

If you lend credence to Terry Reed’s charges – and he makes a compelling case – Bush couldn’t sink Clinton with Iran-Contra because the fingerprints of both men were on it. Both men had been compromised.

The Clinton administration courted Muslim groups and individuals in the U.S. who had nefarious connections and deadly motives for the country. In 1996, a woman with extensive familial ties to the Muslim Brotherhood – Huma Abedin – began working for Hillary. The Muslim Brotherhood’s stated goal is to destroy the United States from within. Since that time, Abedin has risen to become Hillary’s closest and most trusted adviser, to include a stint as Deputy Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Clinton during Barack Obama’s first term.

Abedin has been with the Clintons for nearly 20 years. Again, if Reed is correct, what are the odds Hillary has filled Huma in on her husband’s exploits with the CIA in Arkansas?

Answer: Pretty darned good.

Just like the inexplicable Republican push for amnesty, so too was the establishment’s defense of Huma Abedin when Rep. Michele Bachmann and four other congressmen called attention to Abedin’s familial connections to the Muslim Brotherhood.

Republican defenders of Abedin included Senator Marco Rubio (R-FL), who has shown loyalty to Jeb Bush and has supported amnesty; Boehner; Rep. Mike Rogers, who as House Intelligence Committee Chairman must know the truth; Senator John McCain (RINO-AZ); and others.

But perhaps the most vitriolic critic of Bachmann and defender of Abedin was Bachmann’s former Campaign Chief, Ed Rollins. He issued a stinging rebuke of Bachmann for going there. In part, Rollins – also a Fox News Contributor – wrote the following:

I can assure Mrs. Bachmann, that Ms. Abedin has been thru every top clearance available and would never have been given her position with any questions of her loyalty to this country.

Rollins began working in the Reagan administration in 1981 and was the National Campaign Director for Reagan’s 1984 re-election effort. Again, assuming Reed’s account is correct, Rollins could have a personal stake in keeping it suppressed as well. He was a Reagan loyalist and is likely very interested in keeping the 40th President’s legacy untarnished, even if Reagan knew much less about what was going on than did his Vice President. Can anyone come up with a better explanation for why Rollins would defend the increasingly indefensible Abedin?

Rollins: Defended Abedin, Smeared Bachmann.

Rollins: Defended Abedin, Smeared Bachmann.

In fact, Rollins addressed not one fact in his smearing of Bachmann.

Abdurahman Alamoudi with George W. Bush.

Abdurahman Alamoudi with George W. Bush.

Another example is that of Abdurahman Alamoudi. According to IPT News, Alamoudi became a representative for the Bill Clinton State Department in 1992 and spent Clinton’s two terms being the State Department’s representative for American Muslims. In 2003 – under the George W. Bush administration – Alamoudi was arrested on charges related to terrorism. In 2004, he was convicted. The Bush-appointed FBI Director at the time – Robert Mueller – resigned in 2013. Shockingly, when asked by Rep. Louie Gohmert at a House Judiciary Committee hearing if he knew the mosque attended by the Boston Marathon bombers was founded by Alamoudi, Mueller said “no”.

In fact, Mueller has seemingly done all he can to avoid mentioning or acknowledging Alamoudi. It’s such a radioactive subject that simply exploring it in any depth would implicate the two administrations he worked for – as well as the one that preceded it. Alamoudi may just be the key to unlocking the betrayal of this nation through Clintonian action and Bush inaction, both of which helped to usher in Obama administration destruction.

These realities have kept otherwise powerful people ‘silent and tied their hands’.

In any event, something has prevented the Republican Party from fighting the opposition while simultaneously motivating it to fight its conservative base.

So far, no one has come up with the answer and those who know aren’t telling us why they think selling out their nation is the best option.

Penn State University thought not telling us about Jerry Sandusky was the best option too.

How’d that work out?

Print Friendly

,

  • http://yahoo.com/ DustyFae

    Dirty people and we can never trust our government , not knowing this…

  • Shannon E

    Hello Tea Party or Goodbye America!!

    • http://www.Starman3000.com/ Mike Ramirez

      The Only Vote that Republicans and Democrats should be getting in 2014 and 2016 is a Vote of NO CONFIDENCE! It will take ousting the RINOs and the Liberal Left Democrats who have compromised their due-diligence while in office and breached the trust of the American citizenry. Both parties want to give the “appearance” that they are working for the good of the people and this country but in reality they are in collusion to steer this country toward socialism and the “New World Order”.

      • JCW

        “even if it means helping to create the Islamic Caliphate”

        Most insightful me thinks Mike! Cheers!

    • poptoy1949

      The Most Accurate Statement ever typed written or Read. I thank you for putting it where everyone could see it.

  • Schawminator

    It always seems these corrupt people are driven by their self-serving needs related to arms, drugs, oil and the money it creates for the all too few.

    • texasjo

      Well, you might give them a break…they don’t get the arms, drugs, oil and money…but they get it for our country. I can tell you Bush and Cheney didn’t make a penny on oil when they served. They did before and maybe after, but not during. I think Cheney was almost broke, after. But, I believe his wife had money. I do know Bush’s hate Perot because they lost the election and I worked for Perot. But, in the recent “family album” on TV of elder (H.W.) Bush, it was said it was the “no new taxes, ” that did it…They did not even MENTION Perot. I liked Perot because he didn’t need a darned thing, and did not like those who lobbied who were crooked.

      • http://stonesnbones.blogspot.com/ Dr. GS Hurd

        Cheney made billions for his pals at Halliburton and when he left office they moved off shore. No taxes, no subpoenas.

        • texasjo

          You think you know it all. All that is B.S. from propaganda. He doesn’t have much money now even. Yes, in the past he was big at Halliburton…do you drive a car? Do you use gasoline? Do you pollute the air? Why don’t you get on your bike if you are going to critize.

      • Schawminator

        Clueless you.
        It is well known buy those awake that most representatives enter office with little means and leave as millionaires. In fact even Obama and his wife are both now multi-millionaires.

        • texasjo

          Not clueless. Two of my girl friends married senators. One was rich before, the other not. Obama got his money from writing his book (and he had a ghost writer), to start with. His wife got huge salary for doing nothing. Of course many in congress should be booted OUT. I think even Boehner is looking forward to retirement and making more $$$.

          • Schawminator

            Do you mean two of your boyfriends. FYI; Obama’s book did not make him the millions it was insider knowledge for investments.

          • texasjo

            No, my high school and college friends (women) who married Sen. Jackson (deceased) and Sen. Pete Dominici, still going, but has been ill. In New Mexico at that time, we had a fabulous high school as the students’ parents were in Los Alamos work, or political, education (UNM professors). Two strong military bases, Kirtland and Sandia. Now, that area is a MESS. Albuquerque, I mean. It was the Land of Enchantment, but alas. I read his life and it SAID a group in College raised the first $100,000 and the book really got him started. I’m sure he’s very, very crooked, like the rest of the Chicago Gang. That’s why he ordered secret service care for his life and added Bush’s …He bows to the Muslims and doesn’t protect our Ambassadors. Yet people today giving money to him want to buy ambassadorships…hmmmm..One didn’t even know Norway had a King..thought he was President…This is supposed to be about gays…Cheney’s girl is gay…I’ve go to go…bye. Oh, my PhD friend is close to Gov. Richardson (looking to be president…ha) and she got 400 acres saved behind her canyon house! She’s democrat, naturally, but we went to high school and are buds, even if she doesn’t believe in religion per say, and is an artist.

      • Woody

        Funny. I was Ammo Mgr for Vietnam and had several meetings with Cheney–he is the nicest person in the world but according to idiots he has been maligned (like Sarah Palin)

  • yahshua love’s you

    The invasion that’s going on is worldwide especially here in Europe where I’m from it looks a little like Afghanistan in some places I mean it this is terrible

  • Jim

    Illegal aliens are taking over this country. If they are allowed to become citizens, this country will be devoid of everything it has stood for in the past. If that happens, goodby America. Where in hell can I move to be free?

    • texasjo

      I’ve wondered about that for a long time. There’s no “new country,” to be had like our pilgrims found in America. This new generation has no idea what it was like in the thirties, forties and fifties! Imagine…you are a teen in high school. Would you know all the intimacies of a sex act while you were a virgin? Would you believe your great grandparents didn’t have a TV, and there wasn’t even a mall? Would you believe we had respect in school, said the pledge of allegiance, and even the Our Father on occasions? Would you believe they went to the Universities of their State for $100 each semester? Would you believe not many people had cars, especially almost none in high school? Everyone has their hand out, and today they are even promoting the idea of “not everyone needs a job.”

      • Woody

        Super; a return to God is needed; not even the Boy and Girl Scouts are safe anymore. iowa State has now banned Bibles from their hotels…note the ignore ,,,”nor the free exercise thereof…” (no way the Bible in a drawer is “the establisment of a religion…”

        • texasjo

          Woody (my uncle’s name…ha), I heard that on TV tonight, taking out the bibles! And, text books that say Reagan was a woman hater (misogynist, the nicer word was used) and how horrible he was. Class taught by a black woman. They are determined to get conservatives, those of faith, those of morals, those of straight thinking OUT. First God is gone, and Washington degraded, only one still up there is Lincoln, and he was a Republican…now Reagan…and that horrible war on women. …ha…Pray…Think I’ll move to a retirement home and not think about politics. Did you also hear about the man who was “dead” for 45 minutes (heart attack, he was truck driver), and his heart started again, with no damage to brain, etc? He had the near death and his mother-in-law who had died the week before came to get him and took him by the arm and said “go back, not your time, you have to take care of my daughter and the kids!” I had the near death experience, and once that happens you don’t fear death. I wonder how many of these new “get rid of God” people will pray as they near death?

  • faxxmaxx

    Because of a handful of low life politicians, two hundred thirty seven years of tradition, freedom, and liberty is about to be destroyed leaving 300,000,000 Americans in chaos and misery. Allowing Islamic terrorists in the front door to create their own laws and destroy our constitution forever. When will we stop wishing and hoping for a miracle, and put a stop to these fat ass elitists and throw them in jail? This won’t stop in three years. You know the fix is in for Clinton. It will go on for another eight years when the next slime ball comes along. May 16th is D-Day. Millions Must converge on Capital Hill. If the Egyptians can throw out the Muslim Brotherhood, so can we. We’re Americans, damn it!

  • Why Go Nine when you can Goten

    People always argue left or right wing politics but they are so dazzled by the feathers that they can’t see the wings for the bird.

  • Pingback: Reckoning: One Man could be Obama's Biggest Nightmare | Walid ShoebatWalid Shoebat

  • richinnameonly

    Reading this, and thinking of the state of U.S. and world politics makes my head spin and I begin to feel nauseous. Idiots keep looking toward and believing the same ilk of “leaders” that have lead us into this huge mess. According to the latest polls, Hillary would win in 2016 in a landslide over other foreseeable candidates! That brings the nauseous feeling back. The left machine is ruining Christie (who is not that great anyway) and will also do their best to ruin whoever seems to be the next great hope. All the original brilliance, blood and sweat expended to make this country great is being flushed down the toilet. Too many stupid people don’t appreciate what we’ve had here and think justice will be served in changing it. That’s like swapping a gold bar for a pigeon turd.
    I have to remind myself to keep the long view in mind and look toward the future kingdom rule of Jesus from Jerusalem.

  • Halo9x

    America is in trouble because it has lost a love for the truth and gained a love of self indulgence.

  • 1Bobby8

    No other explanation of why Obama gets away what he gets away with, other than the fact that the opposition party is compromised.

  • Somekindofpatriot

    “But most of the Church continues to be weak, and helpless. Holding candles, crying, holding useless interfaith services, and misreading the word of God.”

    Yup and 54% of Catholics voted for Obama plus many of them are for womens rights (abortion) and homosexual rights (gay marriage) both complete abominations. This is what happens when a religion teaches from books devised & written by men instead of following the Word of God. I’m so tired of arguing with these so called Christians, while I think they truly believe they are real Christians, they can’t be because they won’t even try to follow what Christ has given us in His inspired words in our bibles.

    • Somekindofpatriot

      By the way I was born and baptised into Catholicism, spent nine years in a Catholic school. Religion is a huge problem, it always seems to get in the way of the gospel. In the nine years I spent in Catholic school, and for several decades following in Catholicism, (Catholic & Lutheran) I never once heard the gospel message. It’s so simple – Jesus is the only way to the Father and He offers His free gift of perfection to all, Christ’s holy blood is the only way of salvation. Acts 20:28: …the church …he hath purchased with his own blood. Romans 3:24, 25: Being justified freely by his grace through the redemption that is in Christ Jesus: Whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation through faith in his blood…. Ephesians 1:7: In whom we have redemption through his blood, the forgiveness of sins, according to the riches of his grace. Hebrews 9:12: …by his own blood he entered in once into the holy place, having obtained eternal redemption for us. First Peter 1:18: For as much as ye know that ye were not redeemed with corruptible things, as silver and gold…. But with the precious blood of Christ, as of a lamb without blemish and without spot. First John 1:7: …the blood of Jesus Christ his Son cleanseth us from all sin. 2 Corinthians 5:21 “For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that we might be made the righteousness of God in him.” “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast.” Ephesians 2:8-9 KJV

      This is why just before He gave up His Ghost on the cross (no one could take it from Him) Jesus said: “It is finished”

      That’s the gospel, it is so simple, believe and recieve, you can’t earn it, you can’t buy it. Jesus did it all. You accept it like you would any other gift, you thank the giver knowing it’s yours to keep.That’s it! If you did this you are now born again. Receiving Christ involves turning to God-repentance-and trusting Christ to come into our lives, to forgive
      our sins and to make us what He wants us to be. We receive Jesus Christ by faith, as an act of the will. Don’t let religious doctrines or a denomination get in your way.

      For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his
      own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?
      Matthew 16:26

      • Somekindofpatriot

        The gospel message (the good news of Jesus Christ life, death and Resurrection defeating both hell and death as payment for
        all sin, past, present, & future) is the great commission for all Christians yet I spent nearly 55 years in Catholicism before I ever heard said message. After many years of playing the
        part, when I finally started searching for the truth in Gods Word, He led me unexpectedly to bible church, a church that’s
        not even one mile from our home and had driven by countless times over twelve years. Up until that day I never felt the presence of Jesus anything like I did on that day, I can only describe it like an out of the body experience. I have no doubts that the Lord brought me there that day, for that message. Which by the way included the clear gospel message.
        My life has changed exponentially since that day. My marriage, my relationships with my children, friends & family, maybe even my life, and certainly my eternity were saved by the simple gospel of Jesus Christ. Please let us not complicate
        things. I’m not here to bash anyone, my hope in writing this is to show how easily we can get lost in religion just like the Sadducees and Pharisees. We’ll end up missing what’s important. Christ did not come to suspend the law, He did not
        come to say everything is OK now that I’m here. Rather, He came to die as a sinner under the law in our place. Christ came to bring us the righteousness of God: The only solution to our sin is the Coming of Christ. Keep and teach his word: “For by grace are ye saved through faith; and that not of yourselves: it is the gift of God: not of works, lest any man should boast.” Ephesians 2:8-9 KJV
        “Teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I have commanded you: and lo, I am with you always, [even] unto the end of the world. Amen.” (Mat. 28:20.)

        • Woody

          Yes, I can see that as Jesus said, “You have eyes yet you do not see’; you have ears yet you do not hear.” And I believe Him since Our Founder cannot lie; there are people who sleep in Church.

          You missed the fact that the Bible was affirmed (new Testament) in 315 AD at the Council of Nicea under the command of the Emperor Constantine, a pagan (to my knowledge Martin Luther was not present),

          Very few households had Bibles until Gutenberg who invented the printing press in 1440. Only wealthy person and Monasteries had them before this time which means “tradition” led the stories of Jesus and the Apostles prior to this time.

          You, like others, are viewing the past with today’s eyes (a deeply flawed error)
          Even the Bible contains only 14% of Jesus’ Life and times, but that does not mean his Life lasted only 4 years.
          G-D Bless “Know the truth and the truth shall set you free.”

      • SFTOBEY

        How could you never once have heard the gospel message as a Catholic? It’s in every Mass. Or weren’t you listening?

      • Woody

        You need to blame that on yourself as you must have been asleep for nine years; the Bible is read at every Mass along with a homily on the meanings thereof.

  • Don Sebold

    Multi- culturism WILL bring America to civil unrest….and that’s what they are hoping for….resist and rebell

  • Pingback: Obama Conspires to Control Republicans from Attacking his Muslim Jihadist Brother | Walid ShoebatWalid Shoebat

  • Pingback: Obama Conspires To Control Republicans From Attacking His Muslim Jihadist Brother |

  • Pingback: MALIK OBAMA’S (ISLAMIST) PROTECTIVE SHIELD:REPUB BUD McFARLANE DANGLES OBAMA’S “SWORD”! Commentary By Adina Kutnicki | Adina Kutnicki