Hillary’s Sidekick And Muslim Brotherhood Aid Huma Abedin Investigated For “Fraud” Including “Theft Of Public Money” (Read Official Letters)

By Walid Shoebat

The State Department concluded this year that Huma Abedin, one of Hillary Rodham Clinton’s closest aides had committed violations of rules governing vacation and sick leave during her tenure as an official in the department. Abedin, as Shoebat has extensively documented her links and ties to Wahhabists including the Muslim Brotherhood.

humahillary2

The finding — which Abedin has formally contested — emerged publicly Friday after Sen. Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) sent letters to Secretary of State John F. Kerry and others seeking more information about an investigation into possible “criminal” conduct by Abedin concerning her pay.

According to Grassley’s description of the investigation, Abedin’s time sheets indicated that she never took vacation or sick leave during her four years at the State Department, from January 2009 to February 2013. But the investigation, the senator wrote, found evidence that Abedin did take time off, including a 10-day trip to Italy, and that she told colleagues in e-mails that she was out “on leave.”

OIG found at least a reasonable suspicion of a violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 641, theft of public money through time and attendance fraud, and Title 18, United States Code, Section 208, acts affecting a personal financial interest related to conflicts of interest connected to her overlapping employment as an SGE and her employment at Teneo and at the Clinton Foundation. The Judiciary Committee first inquired about related issues in June 2013. In May 2013, the Department of State allegedly paid Ms. Abedin approximately $33,000 for “unused” leave, though it is unclear whether she should have been entitled to such a payment.”

The letter to Abedin can be read in full:

Ms. Huma Abedin
July 30, 2015
Page 2 of 3

In May 2013, the Department of State allegedly paid you approximately $33,000 for
“unused” leave, though it is unclear whether you should have been entitled to such a payment.
During approximately three and a half years as a full time government employee, you reportedly never requested, were approved for, or had your leave balance reduced for use of any sick leave, annual leave, administrative leave, or maternity leave. Yet, the allegations illustrate that you were in fact on leave on numerous occasions. If these allegations are true, then it raises questions for you and your Department supervisors about why you were paid the cash value of leave taken but not reported and whether you were entitled to such a payment.

On June 13, 2013, the Judiciary Committee asked that you provide, among other things,
all documents and communications between the Department of State and Teneo, and any client or entities they represent. You did not provide the requested documents in your response on July 5, 2013. Since then, the Judiciary Committee has received additional allegations that further inform the original request. The Committee has learned of allegations that, during your simultaneous employment by the Department of State, Teneo, and the Clinton Foundation, you were solicited for and delivered favors for preferred individuals. For example, while employed by the Department of State, you allegedly sent or received approximately 7,300 emails on your official Department of State address that involved Mr. Douglas Band, President of Teneo. In one exchange, Mr. Band allegedly emailed you to request that you reach out to then-Secretary
Clinton to encourage President Obama to appoint Ms. Judith Rodin to a White House position.

At the time, Ms. Rodin was a client of Teneo and President of the Rockefeller Foundation, a large donor to the Clinton Foundation, a fact which Mr. Band allegedly noted in his email. In addition, you allegedly forwarded this email and others to your non-government account ending in @clintonemail.com. As a result, investigators were unableto review any subsequent emails on the chain, as they were shielded from the Department’s records systems on Secretary Clinton’s non-government server. In light of this new information, please provide the following documents and information:

1. All documents and communications responsive to the June 13, 2013, letter from the
Judiciary Committee.

2. All documents and communications referring or relating to time and attendance, all
approved timesheets, leave requests, and any requests for paid or unpaid excused
absences or administrative leave.

3. All documents and communications referring or relating to any amount received as
compensation for unused leave.

4. All documents and communications referring or relating to your designation as an SGE.

Ms. Huma Abedin
July 30, 2015
Page 3 of 3

5. All e-mails forwarded from your Department of State account to any of your other e-mail accounts.

6. What was the purpose of your trip to Italy and France in 2011? If it was to conduct Department of State business, was a government travel voucher submitted? If so, please provide a copy.

7. Please provide all records relating to your stay at the U.S. Ambassador to Italy’s
residence in Italy. In addition, did you pay for all aspects of your stay at the residence?

If not, then which aspects of your stay at the U.S. Ambassador’s residence did you pay for, if any?
In responding to these requests, please provide all responsive records from all of your email accounts, including non-government email accounts. Please number your responses according to their corresponding questions. Please submit your responses by August 10, 2015. If you have any questions, contact Josh Flynn-Brown of my Committee staff at (202) 224-5225.
Thank you for your cooperation.
Sincerely,

Charles E. Grassley
Chairman

print
  • susan

    Wow! Why does she think she can get away with ripping off the U.S. tax payer? Who does she think she is? Hillary Clinton?

    • Diana

      Hillary probably gave it to her via a cashier’s check.

  • richinnameonly

    Of course this is minor compared to the very fact of her being the 24/7 assistant to the Secretary of State, Islamic Muslim Brotherhood ties and all. I’ve read that she is helping Hillary on her presidential campaign also.

    • knight

      Sounds like almost up Hilary’s backside, how close does she want to be.

  • Julie LaBrecque

    Does anybody think she’ll ever be charged? Not as long as Obama is in office.

    • Grandmere

      I’m surprised it is only $33,000. If push comes to shove Hillary will pay it. She owns Huma anyway.

      • Julie LaBrecque

        Probably cost them more than that to have Vince Foster done away with.

  • marah natha

    I wish Fox News or a Conservative newspaper would pick up your column. Or even a liberal newspaper.

  • Tom_mcewen

    What! Under socialism what is mine is her’s and what is her’s is her’s. It is just taxpayer’s money and taypayers are just serfs working for the bright and shining masters.

  • Catbr

    What’s new about this? There are hundreds of thousands of muslim immigrants with terrorist backgrounds ripping off the government at the taxpayers expense. This is one that just got caught. She’ll probably scream that this whole thing is racist and offends her and that’ll be the end of it.

  • Simon Stauber

    Gentlemen, Please!!! We are witnessing here a clear Case of an Old Circumsized MUSLIM Spinster who has not 1 in a 1,000 chance to become anybody’s Wife & Mother..hillary employs her as “advisor” because they share many characteristic Fasets…despite hillary being a “BRITISH flower” & the other female comes from a Beduin family, yet she is clearly a 5th. Colomn in our midst.

  • Diana

    Surprise, surprise. I’ll give you three guesses when the $$ went.

  • knight

    Like to know her real intent been in Italy, and was her husband with her. If no husband I would be looking at other reasons for her stay.

    Let’s hope she has cooked her own goose, and catch her out with terrorism.

  • knight

    Thought it was banned for a Muslim female to marry outside Islam, or is it Murana

  • knight

    No Muslim woman is allowed to be dominated by a Non-Muslim.

    They will defineately have. Fatwas made against them, best for both to seek safety from Islam.

    Males can marry non Muslim as he has far more rights than the woman or girl.