By Walid Shoebat and Ben Barrack
In previous reports, Shoebat.com has provided readers with more than enough evidence to establish probable cause that the Obama administration was involved in the production of the anti-Muhammad video it attempted to blame for the Benghazi attacks. The filmmaker has confessed to being a Muslim and was confirmed to be an agent for Eric Holder’s Justice Department.
We have established motive, glaring inconsistencies, timelines, and a connection to Muslim Brotherhood infiltration of the U.S. Government. Still missing is how a two-bit, third-rate video was made to go viral.
This video – especially when viewed in conjunction with what we’ve already proven – may help to answer those questions:
Paul Kengor, a professor of political science and expert on all things Davis, wrote the following about the CPUSA member’s exploits in the newspaper business after moving from Chicago to Hawaii, where he would later be introduced to a young Barack Obama:
WHEN FRANK MARSHALL DAVIS sold the Star in 1948, he suddenly made his way to Hawaii, a move almost certainly dictated by the Party. There, as his declassified 600-page FBI file shows, his bread would be buttered by Harry Bridges’ Communist- controlled International Longshore and Warehouse Union. The ILWU bankrolled a Communist newspaper called the Honolulu Record, for which Davis immediately began writing a regular column that lasted through 1957. Those columns picked up where Davis left off at the Star, with the same incendiary pro-Soviet themes and Party agitprop.
The above video may help to explain the “how” when you talk about the Obama administration and its attempts to keep its fingerprints off the production of “Innocence of Muslims” but how about the “why”?
While co-chairing a meeting in Istanbul, Turkey on July 15, 2011, with the Secretary-General of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation (OIC), then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was christening “The Istanbul Process”. It would be the first in a series of meetings intended to launch a sustained assault on the first amendment.
That’s what the video was specifically intended to help accomplish, as Shoebat.com reported shortly after the attacks. Two Muslim men in Egypt – Wisam Abdul Waris and Nadder Bakkar – were instrumental in ginning up Muslim hatred against the video in the days before Benghazi.
Both men made appearances on the filmmaker’s YouTube channel as well (though not seen in the video above):
As Shoebat.com reported, Hillary tipped her hand as to how the Obama administration would use an anti-Muhammad YouTube video as agitprop after the Benghazi attacks. Her statement revealed how the administration planned…
“…to use some old-fashioned techniques of peer pressure and shaming, so that people don’t feel that they have the support to do what we abhor.”
The sick irony is that the Obama administration’s agenda involved changing societal norms – to transform – in order to get the people themselves (useful idiots) to implement its real agenda for them. In so doing, the Obama administration was simply implementing its agenda via stealth and deception.
It had help too. The Muslim Brotherhood is heavily invested in this very same agenda. Obama’s envoy to the OIC – a Muslim Brotherhood infiltrator named Rashad Hussain – echoed Hillary’s sentiment earlier this year, at the 2014 “Istanbul Process” summit, as Shoebat.com reported. Here is what Hussain said, in part:
Relying on governments to ban certain speech often ignores the root causes of bigotry, and many religious communities have found that improving education, interfaith dialogue, and media awareness are effective tools for combatting (sic) intolerance. The Istanbul Process that we are here participating in today is meant to promote implementation of those important measures.
Let’s also not forget that another Muslim Brotherhood infiltrator was on the distribution list of the September 14, 2012 email that instructed Susan Rice to blame the video for the attacks, as Shoebat.com first revealed.
The Obama administration has an agenda to censor speech by creating the perception that a grass roots movement causes it. Isn’t that exactly how this administration conducts business generally?