By Walid Shoebat (Shoebat Exclusive)

I could never wrap my mind on such evil as having sex with animals. I don’t even try to think or imagine how people like in this interview explain themselves the way they do:

Denmark is planning to banish bestiality, following the recent examples of Germany and Norway, said the country’s food and agriculture minister. The bill was long-awaited both inside the country and abroad. In 2012, Germany’s lower house which has also passed a ban on bestiality, which has been considered technically lawful in the country since 1969. The act has split the nation and the government of Angela Merkel introduced the new law against the practice, saying animals should not be used “for personal sexual activities or made available to third parties for sexual activities … thereby forcing them to behave in ways that are inappropriate to their species.”

Europe is plagued with animal sex and sexual animal brothels in which dogs are treated as you see in the photo above.

“We are not policing morality but we are improving animal protection law, where we would like to specify that it is forbidden to cause suffering through a sexual relationship. But the line is when you cause suffering to an animal for your personal sexual gratification,” Hans-Michael Goldmann, MP Chairman of the parliamentary agricultural committee, said.

German media outlets followed suit, with in particular the Berlin tabloid BZ featuring the issue on its front page in October with a picture showed a man holding his dog with the headline reading “we call it sodomy, he calls it love.” Bild magazine then joined the cause.

They complain about sex with animals as sodomy but homosexuality seems to be alright in those societies including in the United States.

Bestiality is the unbiblical act of a human being engaging in sexual relations with an animal. This is a perversion and, under Jewish Law, punishable by death (see Old Testament verses such as Exodus 22:19, Leviticus 18:23, Leviticus 20:15 and Deuteronomy 27:21).

Are such laws obsolete?

Here is where so many say “we are done with the law”. In today’s modernized churches, when one says “we are not bound by the law” they believe that this really means “we are not bound by everything in the Old Testament”. We always find deceptive expressions asking “how should we judge such and such issues from a New Testament perspective” as if there was no “biblical perspective”.

But the modern church today tolerates much. It is pumping out literally millions of easily offended mutants who call themselves Christians who listen to daily quick-and-dirty sermons that isolate New Testament verses. They produce a different vintage from what was known in the last two millennia in which they attack the law and the Ten Commandments by gymnastically quoting verses while they ignore Romans 13:8-10:

“Let no debt remain outstanding, except the continuing debt to love one another, for whoever loves others has fulfilled the law. The commandments, “You shall not commit adultery,” “You shall not murder,” “You shall not steal,” “You shall not covet,” and whatever other command there may be, are summed up in this one command: “Love your neighbor as yourself.” Love does no harm to a neighbor. Therefore love is the fulfillment of the law”.

“You shall not commit adultery,” “You shall not murder,” “You shall not steal,” “You shall not covet,” …

Yet they paint “love” as absent of the very essence of the moral law:

You would never find that mutant in the video quote Romans 13. This is isolating Scripture.

These always isolate verses and tolerate almost anything under the banner of “grace” and is why its becoming rare to find Christians today who would want to pass a bill calling for capital punishment for all sorts of demented behaviors. The moment anyone suggests to pass laws against such evil, he would instantly get a chastisement that goes like this: Christ came and died for our sins, there is no limit to Christ’s forgiveness, therefore, who are you to judge … Peter denied Jesus 3 times and Jesus forgave him … we are living in the new covenant, therefore this is not biblical … we are no longer under the law. And the remarks go on ad nauseam to infinity with all sorts of combinations of verse gymnastic play that go back and forth as if the Bible all of the sudden is a chess game in which the proper rules are still being discovered by amateurs who spring back to when the New Testament first came out. So they form councils of Nicaea using social media and manufacture endless simplistic creeds. These mutants ignore all the decisions on all such issues which has already been very well established throughout Church history by wiser minds that were directed by the Holy Spirit from the apostles and after.

So once in a while, you throw them a monkey wrench asking them a simple question: sure, we live in the age of grace, indeed God forgave Peter but did He forgive Judas?

They do not even know why you are asking the question. They never have monitored the wit of Jesus in setting up His enemies.

Was it the difference between “denial” by Peter and “betrayal” by Judas that sentenced Judas to hell and Peter to heaven?

Or was it that Judas never confessed and asked for forgiveness and later killed himself, therefore he was a murderer who never repented? Its back to Romans 13:8-10.

So one can bail out as a Christian today and he is still “saved”?

Can someone say that Judas was not a “believer” especially when he regretted and even returned the 30 pieces of silver? He was so depressed about what he had done, yet he is still going to hell since he betrayed Christ and then murdered a life, himself and by that he met the rule of hellfire:

“But the cowardly, the unbelieving, the vile, the murderers, the sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars–they will be consigned to the fiery lake of burning sulfur. This is the second death.” (Revelation 21:8)

There are sets of rules to watch and its back to Romans 13:8-10.

People can play gymnastics with Revelation 21:8 and say that these were the unsaved who never invited Jesus.

But the verse is very clear, the “unbelieving” ends up in hell and the rest, regardless if they are believing cowards, believing vile, believing murderers, believing sexually immoral, those who practice magic arts, the idolaters and all liars, they go to hell.

If it is true what the mutant says that these were unbelievers who never accepted Jesus, why isn’t the verse constructed this way? It never said the unbelieving cowards, unbelieving vile, unbelieving murderers … it categorically breaks it down: unbelievers, then the vile … regardless of the claim.

Does that mean that murderers cannot repent? Hardly. This means that these mutants continue fooling themselves that they are “saved” and bought into all the falling away ear-itching modernistic biblical teaching that is so prevalent today.

Indeed, there are sets of rules and there are limits and Judas doesn’t pass.

When one find arguments galore that states “yes, I realize that it says this, but what it really is trying to say …”