Homosexual Activists Tell Kim Davis: ‘We Will Kidnap Your Husband, Tie Him Up And Force Him To Watch Us Raping You. We Will Burn You Alive.’ Civil Unrest Is Coming To America

By Theodore Shoebat

Homosexual activists are sending sadistic threats to Kim Davis, saying that they will capture her husband, tie him up and force him to watch them rape her. They also said that they will burn her house as they sleep and burn them to death. Here is the video with the full story and commentary:

Kim Davis said in an interview:

They told my husband they were going to burn us down while we slept in our home… He’s been told that he would be beaten up and tied up and made to watch them rape me. I have been told that gays should kill me.

The homosexual movement is the most hateful and most vile group in all of the Western world. The sodomites are supremacists; they believe that they have the superior lifestyle, a disposition and constitution more superior than the “others,” who they consider as inferior breeders. This is the ideology of sodomism.

Sodomism is the ideology of homosexual superiority, in which the homosexuals desire to usher in — through propaganda, violence and state coercion — a utopia in which homosexuality is seen as a supreme ideal, and those who believe in the conjugal union as is affirmed and established by the Christian Faith, are viewed and treated as enemies.

Many empires have advanced sodomism, with each attaching it to a particular religion. The Roman Empire advanced sodomism as it was associated with their own religion; the Seleucids advanced sodomism as it was associated with their hybrid religion of Syrian and Greek mythologies; the Greeks did the same, as did the Samurai and the Muslims.

St Paul was a witness to this supremacist way of thinking. He described the homosexuals as “proud, boasters,” (Romans 1:30) and as “leaving the natural use of the woman” (Romans 1:26). They are proud because they reject the woman, and this can only be described as someone esteeming himself as superior because of his homosexuality. While the modernist heretics of today want to accuse us of sexism, they praise the greatest form of sexism, and that is homosexuality, where gender is seen as insignificant, the role of the woman is seen as nothing, and where a child having the chance to be raised by a woman, is viewed as frivolous, and any objection to this is viewed as dangerous.

Its quite interesting that the Bible describes the sodomites as proud, and today they flood the streets and call their assemblies a “pride rally.” They are proud of their sodomism, and lift their heads above humanity. We see this in the story of Lot in Sodom and Gomorrah. The homosexuals surround the house and cry out, “Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us that we may know them carnally.” (Genesis 19:5) They immediately wanted men, seeing the conjugal union as inferior.

This dark sentiment fully manifested itself once Lot cowardly offered his daughters to satisfy their violent lusts, and they said: “Stand back!” (Genesis 19:9) They wanted nothing to do with women, because at that point, they had totally plunged themselves into the prison of the demonic and fled away from the higher humanity; but not only this, it was because they saw the woman as inferior, and homosexual sodomy as superior.

There is no other reason as to why the sodomites wanted to abolish marriage between a man and a woman, than that they view the conjugal union as inferior to their sexual anarchy. They see sexual anarchy as superior to orthodox monogamy, and this is why they demanded the redefining of marriage. It was purely a supremacist push.

The problem is that the Christians of the West kept insisting that they “loved” sodomites, and that sodomites needed to be treated as equals. Instead, what we should have been doing from the beginning, and what we should continue to do, is declare the Christian Faith as superior to the diabolical ideology of sodomism; we should always be exclaiming the Christian religion to be supreme, as opposed to continuously apologizing and pre-qualifying our affirmations against the homosexuals. We should not be referring to modern thinking, but to St. Peter when he described the homosexuals as “natural brute beasts made to be caught and destroyed” (2 Peter 2:12).

The modernly minded Christian will say, “All homosexuals are made in the image of God,” but St. Peter compares them to animals, and we can refer to Christ Who said: “Do not give what is holy to the dogs; nor cast your pearls before swine” (Matthew 7:6). Christ calls them animals, because they have lost that image of God that was infused into humanity when God created Adam and Eve. The demons possessed two men, and when they saw Christ, the men were ready to be liberated from the bondage of darkness. The demons begged to be cast into pigs, because through Christ man is an icon of God, and no demon can possess him unless he has reduced himself to the prison of Satan.

We should be referring to St. Paul who referred to homosexuals as “deserving of death, not only do the same but also approve of those who practice them.” (Romans 1:32) St. Peter tells us that when Lot lived in Sodom he “was oppressed by the filthy conduct of the wicked (for that righteous man, dwelling among them, tormented his righteous soul from day to day by seeing and hearing their lawless deeds)” (2 Peter 2:7-8). His very soul was oppressed by the homosexual darkness. So are we not oppressed? Why don’t we sense the hand of the deranged tyrant, why don’t we revolt against the tyranny of confusion and anarchy that is being imposed upon us?

The problem is that many people, while expressing disagreement to homosexual “marriage,” are attached to the sodomites. They have “gay friends,” or they have “relatives who are gay,” and they are attached to them because of their likeableness. They do not adhere to the command of Christ: “Remember Lot’s wife.” (Luke 17:32) Lot wanted to flee Sodom, he hated it, but his wife, on the other hand, had an attachment to the wicked city, and so she “looked back behind him, and she became a pillar of salt.” (Genesis 19:26) The next time you hear someone say, “Christ never mentioned homosexuality,” you can quote Christ when He said: “Remember Lot’s wife.” (Luke 17:32)

People are confused as to why “gay marriage” has had so much success in the US when the majority of Americans oppose it. You can complain at the government all you want, the ultimate reason as to why “gay marriage” succeeded, is because many of these same Americans who oppose “gay marriage” do not want to remember Lot’s wife. They are attached. They are attached to their “gay friends,” they are attached to their favorite gay characters on their favorite TV shows, they are attached to Sodom. The ultimate cause for same-sex marriage’s success is because the West is filled with Lot’s wives.

Lot's wife turns around to see Sodom and Gomorrah

Lot’s wife turns around to see Sodom and Gomorrah

The homosexual movement cloaks itself as a gentle and tender group, with gay men portraying themselves as caring, sensitive to your emotions, and concerned for your hurt feelings. This is far from the truth. Underneath all of the smiles, is an offense against the good, and while they present themselves as outgoing and fun-loving, within them is a declaration of war against Heaven itself. What most do not know, is that the common image of the “fun loving gay man,” was a propaganda tool that the sodomites made up as a way to help portray themselves as harmless in order to desensitize the society to sodomism.

Terrorist sodomites threaten to kill their enemies, who they term as "fascists."

Terrorist sodomites threaten to kill their enemies, who they term as “fascists.”

In 1987, an article entitled, The Overhauling of Straight America, by two sodomites — Marshall Kirk and Erastes Pill — was published. In the article lied the strategy to conquer America with sodomism. One of the strategies was called, “PORTRAY GAYS AS VICTIMS, NOT AS AGGRESSIVE CHALLENGERS” and “TALK ABOUT GAYS AND GAYNESS AS LOUDLY AND AS OFTEN AS POSSIBLE”, to which they explained how to use the portrayal of gays as harmless victims and the utilization of Hollywood as a means to remove the guard that American society once had against homosexuality:

In any campaign to win over the public, gays must be cast as victims in need of protection so that straights will be inclined by reflex to assume the role of protector. If gays are presented, instead, as a strong and prideful tribe promoting a rigidly nonconformist and deviant lifestyle, they are more likely to be seen as a public menace that justifies resistance and oppression. For that reason, we must forego the temptation to strut our “gay pride” publicly when it conflicts with the Gay Victim image.

… The visual media, film and television, are plainly the most powerful image-makers in Western civilization. The average American household watches over seven hours of TV daily. Those hours open up a gateway into the private world of straights, through which a Trojan horse might be passed. As far as desensitization is concerned, the medium is the message–of normalcy. So far, gay Hollywood has provided our best covert weapon in the battle to desensitize the mainstream. Bit by bit over the past ten years, gay characters and gay themes have been introduced into TV programs and films (though often this has been done to achieve comedic and ridiculous affects).

In films and TV shows, sodomites have been and are being portrayed as nice and humorous people. This is being done as a way to cover up for their true demonic goals: tyrannize Christians in a utopia where homosexuals are superior to people who are not sodomites. In the same article that was just quoted, the sodomite authors write that “the campaign should paint gays as superior pillars of society.” And this is what they have been doing: portraying sodomites as more intelligent, and morally supreme.

The homosexuals desire to establish a utopia: where homosexuality is seen as superior, esteemed as surpassing the natural fashion of intercourse between man and woman in a higher level of human evolution in the Darwinian scale, and where natural love between man and woman is deemed as only a breeding mechanism to keep the propagation of humanity sustained. Lower humans — the heterosexuals — are just breeders to keep mankind going; they are slaves whose purpose it is just to produce children who can maintain the world, and be absorbed into the homoerotic utopia. The breeders breed, so that we can keep living. This is how the sodomite agenda sees us in the end.

Of course I am sure it is hard for many of you to believe this, but we know this mindset to be existent just from what the homosexuals themselves write. The homosexual writer James Baldwin, according to pro-homosexual author Byrne R.S. Fone, “presents homosexuality positively as an ethically superior kind of love”. (Byrne R.S. Fone, The Columbia Anthology of Gay Literature, p. 675) The idea of promoting homosexuality as a “superior kind of love” can only signify the dark sentiment that sodomites are superior to people of natural attractions.

The homosexual movement is a supremacist movement, that sees homosexuality as not only intellectually and spiritually superior, but genetically superior. Have you ever wondered why the sodomites are so fixated on proving that they are “born this way,” and obsessed with discovering the “gay gene”? Its because if they can prove that homosexuality is genetic, then they can be more enabled to gradually inculcate the idea (which they already believe) that they are genetically superior to normal people.

Its the same reason why atheists are very enthusiastic on finding the “God gene,” because if they can prove that some people are genetically inclined to be religious, then atheists are genetically superior to Christians (and from such thoughts, mountains of bodies and skulls are erected).

Bertram Cohler, one of the devisers of the idea of the “gay identity” that so many today are subscribing to, wrote of one idea that taught that “the homosexual gene, in proper proportion, would confer an evolutionary advantage to the population in which it existed”. (Bertram J. Cohler & Robert M. Galatzer-Levy, The Course of Gay and Lesbian Lives, p. 57)

Bertram Cohler

Bertram Cohler

Jim McKinight, Chair of Psychology Department at the University of Western Sydney, wrote that “straight” men who carry the homosexual gene are superior to those without it. His writing is quite reminiscent to the type of language used by the eugenists and the Nazis. He speaks of how “homosexual genes confer a benefit to the species”, and goes on to say:

Those straight men who have one homosexual gene (and here we are assuming a single gene for simplicity’s sake; the actual situation is more likely polygenic) probably have an enhanced sex drive which leads to great numbers of children and to a retention of the blanched homosexuality gene. These straight men are therefore genetically superior by virtue of having a dose of gayness — least in this respect. (Jim McKnight, Straight Science? p. 76)

When I read all of this talk of “benefit to the species,” and being “genetically superior,” I cannot help but be reminded of the Nazis and the social Darwinists who dominated Western society in the 20th century. I also cannot help but make several observations: 1) That when the leftists claim to be against racism, they are not only liars, but promoters of racism and supremacy of the worst kind — Darwinist racism and supremacy; 2) When the homosexuals claim to be for “equality,” they are actually for superiority, superiority over those who have natural affections for the opposite gender, superiority over women who want to partake in their God-given roles of motherhood and wifely duties, superiority over men who want to be men and not try to recreate man into an diabolical image.

Ruse M., another pro-sodomite writer, wrote that “the existence and persistence of homosexuality is a function of superior heterozygote fitness.” (See Richard C. Friedman, Male Homosexuality, p. 31)

Actress Lisa Kudrow, says that homosexuals are “superior beings”:

I don’t know who I’m going to offend by leaving them out, but I need to say that I think gay men are superior beings in my mind… The two sides of the brain communicate better than a straight man’s, and I think that has to be really important. They’re not women — they’re still men — and women also have thicker corpus callosums, so I think it’s the combination of those qualities that makes them like a superhuman to me.

Lisa Kudrow

Lisa Kudrow

Moby, a well known musician, states that gays are superior to people of natural affections:

I’m straight but I’ve grown up around gay people and gay clubs. They are superior to straight people. If you have a gay child you’re more inclined to be a prouder parent.



Satoshi Kanazawa, evolutionary psychologist at the London School of Economics, wrote a long paper on the connection between superior intelligence and homosexuality. He wrote:

Regardless of their true sexual orientation, more intelligent individuals may identify themselves as homosexual, engage in homosexual behaviour or report homosexual fantasies and desires.

Satoshi also said, “more intelligent individuals are more likely to identify themselves to be homosexual, while more educated individuals are less likely to do so.” He also wrote: “more intelligent individuals in the United Kingdom have had significantly ( p < 0.05) more same-sex cohabitation partners in their lifetimes than less intelligent individuals." He then went on to say:

My paper represents one of the most comprehensive empirical attempts to establish the association between intelligence and homosexuality, using large, prospectively longitudinal and nationally representative samples from two different nations. While other studies have noted a potential empirical association between intelligence and homosexuality, to the best of my knowledge, the Hypothesis provides the only theoretical explanation for why we may expect such an association to exist at all. It explains why more intelligent children may grow up to identify themselves as homosexual, express homosexual attraction, have more homosexual sexual and cohabitation partners than less intelligent children.

Satoshi Kanazawa

Satoshi Kanazawa

You will deny that this is what the homosexual agenda truly believes, you will say that this is a false accusation. But, the reason why I make these affirmations with confidence, is because of the history of homosexuality. In history, we see the future. It is in their very history, in their very wicked disposition, to believe that they are superior to those of natural affections.

Just look at pagan history, where homosexuality dominated, and you will see how pagans did indeed esteem homosexuality as a superior love.

The sodomites, when articulating this warped view, are inspired by the pagan world — such as the Samurai, and especially the Greeks and Romans — where homosexuality was seen as a supreme action, superior to any relations between man and woman, and a virtue that even had spiritual significance and meaning.

They also believe that because the pre-Christian pagan empires were dominated by homosexuality and homosexual religion, that homosexuals are thus the founders of civilization, and Christians — because they conquered the pagan world — are the ruiners of their sodomite golden age.

The supreme view of homosexuality was innate within the religion of both the Greek and Roman Empires. It is all inherent within the pagan spirit itself. The exaltation of the male body was rooted in the pagan hatred for women, which was inherent in the Greco-Roman religion. Hesiod, one of the greatest prophets for the religion of the Roman empire, wrote that Zeus actually created women as a curse to men, a belief completely contrary to the civilized and beautiful Genesis account of Adam and Eve:

Both immortal gods and mortal men were seized with wonder when they saw that precipitous trap [woman], more than mankind can manage. For from her is descended the female sex, a great affliction to mortals as they dwell with their husbands–no fit partners for accursed Poverty, but only for Plenty. …even so as a bane for mortal men has high-thundering Zeus created women, conspirators causing difficulty.

Bust said to be that of Hesiod

Bust said to be that of Hesiod

This verse establishes the position of inferiority upon the woman, and the exaltation of men, created by Zeus. This inferiority would be instrumental in the exaltation of homosexuality within the pagan religion. Zeus himself was a homosexual, sodomizing a young man named Ganymedes. Clement of Alexandria exposed the homosexual nature of the Greek religion when he listed the young men who the gods sodomized:

For your gods did not abstain even from boys. One loved Hylas, another Hyacinthus, another Pelops, another Chrysippus, another Ganymedes. These are the gods your wives are to worship!(Clem. Alex. Exhort. 2)

Clement of Alexandria

Clement of Alexandria

The homosexual intellects will quote and point to various statements made by the pagan ancients that praise homosexuality as superior to the natural affections. One of them is the statement by Protogenes, recorded in one of the dialogues of Plutarch. In the conversation, Daphnaeus asks Protogenes,

Do you call the marriage and union of man and woman most disgraceful, than which no holier tie exists nor ever did?

To which Protogenes replies:

Why, as all this is necessary for the human race to continue, our legislators do not act amiss in crying up marriage and eulogizing it to the masses, but of genuine love there is not a particle in the woman’s side of a house; and I also say that you who are sweet on women and girls only love them as flies love milk, and bees the honey-comb, and butchers and cooks calves and birds, fattening them up in darkness. But as nature leads one to eat and drink moderately and sufficiently, and excess in this is called gluttony and gormandizing, so the mutual desires between men and women are natural; but that headlong, violent, and uncontrollable passion for the sex is not rightly called love. For love, when it seizes a noble and young soul, ends in virtue through friendship; but these violent passions for women, at the best, aim only at carnal enjoyment and reaping the harvest of a beauteous prime, as Aristippus showed in his answer to one who told him Lais loved him not, ‘No more,’ he said, ‘do meat and wine love me, but I gladly enjoy both.’ For the end of passion is pleasure and fruition: but love, when it has once lost the promise of friendship, will not remain and continue to cherish merely for beauty that which gives it pain, where it gives no return of friendship and virtue. You remember the husband in the play saying to his wife, ‘Do you hate me? I can bear that hatred very easily, since of my dishonour I make money.’

Not a whit more really in love than this husband is the one, who, not for gain but merely for the sexual appetite, puts up with a peevish and unsympathetic wife, as Philippides, the comic poet, ridiculed the orator, Stratocles, ‘You scarce can kiss her if she turns her back on you.’ If, however, we ought to give the name of love to this passion, then is it an effeminate and bastard love, and like at Cynosarges, taking us to the woman’s side of the house: or rather as they say there is a genuine mountain eagle, which Homer called ‘black, and a bird of prey,’ and there are other kinds of spurious eagles, which catch fish and lazy birds in marshes, and often in want of food emit an hungry wail: so the genuine love is the love of boys, a love not ‘flashing with desire,’ as Anacreon said the love of maidens was, nor ‘redolent of ointment and sprightly,’ but you will see it plain and without airs in the schools of the philosophers, or perhaps in the gymnasiums and wrestling-schools, keenly and nobly pursuing youths, and urging on to virtue those who are well worthy of attention: but that soft and stay-at-home love, spending all its time in women’s bosoms and beds, always pursuing effeminate delights, and enervated by unmanly, unfriendly, and unimpassioned pleasures, we ought to condemn as Solon condemned it: for he forbade slaves to love boys or to anoint them with oil, while he allowed them to associate with women. For friendship is noble and refined, whereas pleasure is vulgar and illiberal. Therefore, for a slave to love boys is neither liberal or refined: for it is merely the love of copulation, as the love of women.” (Plutarch, On Love, section iv)



Notice how Protogenes does not deny that marriage between man and woman is necessary for the continuation of the human race, and that this conjugal union between man and woman is fit for slaves, while homosexual connections are for the superior man. This ancient homosexual view of heterosexuals reflects the modern homosexual views: normal couples are merely slaves for the purpose of breeding, while homosexual debaucheries are for the superior people. An evidence to this is the homosexual use of artificial insemination: they hijack the natural order to recruit a child into their agenda, knowing that their ways is contrary to divine nature, but at the same time seeing it as below them.

In the conversation, after Protogenes expresses his fanatic devotion towards homosexuality, Daphnaeus interrupts him, and while supporting sexual relationships between men and boys, affirms the superiority of marriage between man and woman:

But indeed, Protogenes, if we look at the real facts of the case, the love for boys and women is really one and the same passion: but if you wish in a disputatious spirit to make any distinction, you will find that this boy-love goes beyond all bounds, and, like some late-born and ill-begotten bastard brat, seeks to expel its legitimate brother the older love, the love of women. For indeed, friend, it is only yesterday or the day before, since the strippings and exposures of the youths in the gymnasiums, that this boy-love crept in, and gently insinuated itself and got a footing, and at last in a little time got fully-fledged in the wrestling-schools, and has now got fairly unbearable, and insults and tramples on conjugal love, that love that gives immortality to our mortal race, when our nature has been extinguished by death, kindling it again by new births.

This statement shows that there was still some sense that was preserved amongst the pagans, and that they understood that marriage between man and woman was far older than homosexuality, and the natural process for procreation.

Nevertheless, homosexual ideology was still espoused and subscribed to in the pagan dominated empires where sodomite relations were seen either as superior or equal to natural relations. The words of Daphnaeus also shows that marriage, even in pagan dominated lands, was between man and woman, and that homosexuality came later, only to heavily percolate itself throughout the world. This is what the sodomite agenda desires to do now: to take what has already been established by God and to bring us back to what already sprung its colossal head in pagan antiquity.

In Plato’s Symposium, homosexual desires are esteemed as “great and proud thoughts” and amongst “much finer customs” (trans. Benardete). In the same dialogue of Plato, Aristophanes tells Eryximachus that the first humans were individual male and female, but beings who had two sets of genitals, some with a phallus and a vulva, and others with either two female genitalia or two male privates.

These beings tried to overthrow the gods, and as punishment, were cut in half, and from this severing came individual women and men. Homosexuals, to Eryximachus, are simply people who were originally from the line of those who had two penises, and thus, to indulge in homosexuality is to simply return to one’s natural and original nature. Eryximachus says:

First of all, the races of human beings were three, not two as now, male and female; for there was also a third race that shared in both, a race whose name still remains, though it itself has vanished. For at that time one race was androgynous, and in looks and name it combined both, the male as well as the female; but now it does not exist except for the name that is reserved for reproach.

…And each one had four arms, and legs equal in number to his arms, and two faces alike in all respects on a cylindrical neck, but there was one head for both faces — they were set in opposite directions — and four ears, and two sets of genitals, and all the rest that one might conjecture from this.



Eryximachus goes on to say that lesbians are simply related to those who were, in the most ancient of days, attached to women, and sodomites are simply related to those who were connected to men. Homosexuality, according to Eryximachus, is therefore natural, and that homosexuals are naturally superior to other men:

And all women who are sliced off from woman hardly pay attention to men but are rather turned toward women, and lesbians arise from this genus. But all who are males slices pursue the males; and while they are boys — because they are cutlets of the male — they are friendly to men and enjoy lying down together with and embracing men; and these are the best of boys and lads, because they are naturally the manliest.

Eryximachus later describes homosexual relations by saying: “this was our ancient nature and were wholes.”

In Sparta, the gymnasium was institutionalized in the role of forcing recruited young Greek boys, by the age of twelve, into becoming homosexual warriors. The historian Plutarch writes:

By this age the boys came to be courted by lovers from among the respectable young men. The older men, too, showed even more interest, visiting the gymnasia frequently and being present when the boys fought and joked with one another.

The sodomite agenda wants to see this same cruel tyranny established today, in order to build a homoerotic utopia where boys are recruited for a homosexual army, and the male body is exalted as the primal and pure physique of a warrior. Lets not forget what the Gay Manifesto says:

We shall sodomize your sons, emblems of your feeble masculinity, of your shallow dreams and vulgar lies. We shall seduce them in your schools, in your dormitories, in your gymnasiums, in your locker rooms, in your sports arenas, in your seminaries, in your youth groups, in your movie theater bathrooms, in your army bunkhouses, in your truck stops, in your all male clubs, in your houses of Congress, wherever men are with men together. Your sons shall become our minions and do our bidding. They will be recast in our image. They will come to crave and adore us. … We shall raise vast private armies, as Mishima did, to defeat you. We shall conquer the world because warriors inspired by and banded together by homosexual love and honor are invincible as were the ancient Greek soldiers.


The Spartans recruited boys into a militant homosexual system, and so today we find the sodomites gradually trying to extinguish parental rights in regards to sexuality, for the purpose of convincing children into becoming sodmites, and ultimately, recruit them for their movement. This is clearly seen in Chris Christie’s decision to ban all licensed therapists from treating homosexual children to bring them back to normality and the natural order. They want the state to sever the influence of parents from their children, and make the youths open to homosexual propaganda, and thus for recruitment.

Since it would be difficult for the sodomites to actively introduce children to homosexuality, they want parents to do this for them. One reprobate has made this recent statement:

I have had intuitive thoughts that such would be a healthy way for parents to interact with their children and introduce their children to sensual/sexual pleasure and bonding and loving practices … Who better to do it, than the parents first?

Homosexual acts were not only encouraged and common, but imposed in the pagan world. In Sparta, for example, if you were a handsome man of good character and did not have a male lover at all, you were fined. The ancient scholar Aelian explains:

And any man of good appearance and character who did not fall in love with someone well-bred was also fined, because despite his excellence he did not love anyone.

Amongst the Samurai, women were seen as breeders and the conjugal union as the means to human propagation, while homosexual sodomy was esteemed as superior, even to a spiritual level. In the Encyclopedia of Gay Histories and Cultures, edited by George E. Haggerty, distinguished professor at University of California, Riverside, it says:

Among samurai, homosexuality was viewed positively, in contest to heterosexuality. Women were principally considered as breeders of heirs to ensure continuation of the family line, and they were looked down upon as inferior to men. Indeed, some sects of Buddhism in Japan taught that women were by nature more sinful as less likely to attain enlightenment than men, while menstruation was viewed as a sign of tainted karma. The Chinese idea of yin and yang also contributed to this belief — male sexuality as primarily yang, while female was primarily yin, and a yin element in man was taught to be exposed through physical contact with a woman. Consequently, association with women was considered a feminization of the male self, except for the purpose of impregnation of the mundane gratification of one’s lust carnal lusts. For spiritual uplift and enhancement of their masculinity, warriors were encouraged to associate with other men.


There is one saint who is almost unknown to the modern world, who was martyred because he refused to be homosexual: St. Pelagius, a martyr of Spain who lived in the 10th century.
St. Pelagius was a young man, and was a prisoner to the Muslim caliph ‘Abd Al-Rahman III, an inveterate homosexual, who had a whole harem of male lovers, and who would soon lust after the young Christian.

Al-Rahman invited Pelagius to a party and promised him a life of utter luxury if he would become his homosexual partner and convert to Islam. He also told him that if he accepted this offer, that he would be completely permitted to have homosexual intercourse with any man in the palace, and that he would free any of his relatives from prison.

Pelagius refused, and being utterly adverse to both Islam and homosexuality, rejected his diabolical proposition. After this rejected, al-Rahman touched Pelagius in a homosexual way, and the Christian, so repulsed by, struck the caliph in the face and said, “Take off [your hands], dog, do you think me like one of yours, an effeminate?”

Al-Rahman then had the other homosexuals in the palace try to persuade Pelagius to join the sodomite tryst, but this did not work. It is said that at this point al-Rahman put his hand firmly on Pelagius’ face, he then put his arm around his neck, and drew him to closer to kiss him. Pelagius was so incensed about this that he struck the Muslim in the face, hard enough the blow drew blood which dripped down to his beard.

‘Abd al-Rahman was so filled with homosexual frenzy, that he had the young Christian saint slaughtered in the most brutal way. For six hours he was tortured: he was slowly dismembered; they cut off his arm, then his leg, then more parts of his body were severed, until he was reduced to pieces. They then threw body parts into a river and they were later picked up by fellow Christians.

The martyrdom of St. Pelagius

The martyrdom of St. Pelagius

There are other examples of Islamic homosexual tyranny on Christians. Mehmet II, the sadistic sultan who invaded the Christian city of Constantinople, tried to force two Greek Christian boys to be his sex slaves. One of them, aged fifteen, refused to be raped and so was stabbed to death by the possessed sultan. (Gibbon, Decline and Fall, vol. v, ch. lxviii, p. 1213)

Ottoman art

Ottoman art

ISIS are a bunch of homosexual, anti-Christian murderers. They are the purest form of the homosexual agenda, and they are just as evil and anti-Christian, as the reprobate sodomites in the West. There is a recent report that reveals that ISIS officials have homo sex with other men in their tents.

Look at this Islamic terrorist's face. He looks no different than the sodomites and pot heads you see walking around the mall, just without the turban. I am telling you, these Muslim terrorists are possessed by the same devils as the deviants you see in the streets, preying on children. In the West you see them attacking Christianity, and in the Muslim world you see them killing Christians. What the Muslims are doing is what the sodomites WANT to do in the West. Islamic persecution of Christians is the fulfillment of the modernist utopia.

Look at this Islamic terrorist’s face. He looks no different than the sodomites and pot heads you see walking around the mall, just without the turban. I am telling you, these Muslim terrorists are possessed by the same devils as the deviants you see in the streets, preying on children. In the West you see them attacking Christianity, and in the Muslim world you see them killing Christians.
What the Muslims are doing is what the sodomites WANT to do in the West. Islamic persecution of Christians is the fulfillment of the modernist utopia.

According to the report:

In a joint statement released on August 13 2014 two senior United Nations officials spoke out against Isis’ “barbaric acts” of sexual violence and “savage rapes” of Iraqi minorities. “We are gravely concerned by continued reports of acts of violence, including sexual violence against women and teenage girls and boys belonging to Iraqi minorities,” Zainab Hawa Bangura and Nickolay Mladenov said.

One detail in Arango’s story, however, stands out: it is the reference to homosexual sex in an Isis training camp. “He [Barho] said he saw men having sex with other men behind the tents in the desert night.”

There are homosexuals in superior levels of leadership of ISIS, such as one “prince” of the group who sodomizes new recruits as a way of initiation. Therefore, these Christians who are being killing by ISIS, are martyrs not only slain by Muslims, but by homosexuals. Are we this stupid not to connect the dots? We are that superficial and sick as a society that we cannot see with our own eyes the diabolical conspiracy happening right now? We have homosexuals in ISIS killing Christians, we have homosexuals in the West who want to control Christians through lawsuits, and not only this, the lesbian dyke mayor of Houston subpoenaed pastors for anti-homosexual sermons. The picture is clear: these homosexuals are terrorists who want to subject us through their despotism.

Stuart Kellogg, the homosexual writer and editor for the sodomite magazine, The Advocate, presents an essay by Byrne R.S. Fonethe utopian inspiration that homosexual writers have from the “Arcadian ideal” (based on ancient Greece) and how they frame their utopian fantasy in which homosexuality is superior to natural relations between man and woman based on the decadence of pagan mythologies:

I would like to suggest that the Arcadian ideal has been used in the homosexual literary tradition in a fashion that speaks directly to the gay sensibility. The homosexual imagination finds a special value and a particular use for his ideal, employing it in three major ways: 1) to suggest a place where it is safe to be gay: where gay men can be free from the outlaw status society confers upon us, where homosexuality can be revealed and spoken of without reprisal, and where homosexual love can be consummated without concern for the punishment or scorn of the world; 2) to imply the presence of gay love and sensibility in a text that otherwise makes no explicit statement about homosexuality; and 3) to establish a metaphor for certain spiritual values and myths prevalent in homosexual literature and life, namely, that homosexuality is superior to heterosexuality and is a divinely sanctioned means to an understanding of the good and beautiful” (Stuart Kellogg, Essays on Gay Literature)



Notice the use of the term, “divinely sanctioned.” These sodomites hold up homosexuality to something divine, raising themselves up as gods above the insignificant breeders of humanity. While normal humans partake in sex between men and women, the homosexual is doing something that is beyond human, beyond the natural order, beyond the creation of God, and thus they make themselves as being above God.

The sodomites see themselves as gods, bent on overthrowing the only God in Heaven, to recreate the human race, from being images made in the likeness of God, into vile idols of the devil, from being man and woman — for “Male and female created he them” (Genesis 5:2) — to being whatever creatures they see themselves as. You cannot deny this superiority complex. How else can you explain how they see themselves as empowered to recreate reality, to say that man is woman and woman is man, that reality is not what is, but only what is perceived in their reprobate minds?

How else can you explain that these people will suddenly stand up and declare, that the dignify of womanhood means nothing, that the profound nature of the woman to bring forth new life, to partake in the process of creation, is meaningless, that women have no distinct roles in the family, no significance, that the influence of a mother towards her child is but rubbish, in comparison to what they see as the superior system of seeing human beings as just mere living things that can be redefined a million times over until they have no distinction, until they lose the image of God that was given to them in mankind’s beginning?

They are like the pagans who “changed the glory of the uncorruptible God into an image made like to corruptible man, and to birds, and fourfooted beasts, and creeping things” (Romans 1:23), only these heathens corrupt the holy image in which mankind was created, changing it into the vile fantasies of sodomites, becoming “vain in their imaginations” (Romans 1:21) that are so plunged in the never-ending quagmire of odious viciousness. The sodomite looks to the woman and says, “You are just a living thing, your natural gift of bearing new life means nothing to us, except for producing children for our new world. You are just a breeder.”

You will deny that they think this way, but go ahead and tell the sodomite that two men cannot have children, and they will tell you: “Yes we can! We can use artificial insemination!” meaning that they will have a woman hold their seed, and once the baby is born, it is taken away to become a citizen of sodom and called their child. To these sodomites, the woman is nothing but a breeder, an incubator, only a means to an end in their utopia in which homosexuality is esteemed and held up as the superior way of living, and the conjugal union between man and woman is seen as only a method to bring children.

To the sodomite, the woman is not the one who bears the Seed that crushes the head of the serpent, but the incubator who holds a child who will only be added to the schools of Sodom to learn more of their rebellion against God; to the armies of Sodom, to learn more about cruelty, to be amongst the demons when they try to overthrow the throne of Heaven; to be added to the tyranny of confusion, where truth is oppressed, where the only god is the self, and where the only enemy is the One Who said: “Whosoever will come after me, let him deny himself, and take up his cross, and follow me.” (Mark 8:34) The sons of Sodom forever scorn the citizens of Heaven, in a spiritual war that is between Babel and the heavenly Jerusalem.

We have to prepare our minds and intellect for this spiritual war that we are in. This is why I made a 2-disk DVD series on teaching the warring spirit of the Christian Faith.




  • Eric

    Now that they think they have “won”–with the supreme court ruling–the mask is coming off. They see no more reason to hide. Hopefully, people awaken quickly, God willing.

    • Kamau41

      Right Eric. Perhaps, between the unlawful acts of the Supreme Courts to push this very sick diabolical agenda on the American people and what happened to Kim Davis, people will/are starting to awaken. We pray this will continue with speed along with God on our side.

      • Eric

        Indeed Kamau. I’ve already noticed a little bit of a change. So, like you said, may this continue with speed.

    • Trevor

      They won the battle but haven’t won the war.

      • Eric


  • Willing to die for Jesus

    Do homosexuals realize that by pushing the idea that there’s a “gay gene” (and if they find particular genes that “cause” homosexuality at the genetic level), couples that may be “liberal” on the homosexuality of others may be hypocrites and abort their own homosexual unborn child?

    Personally, I don’t think homosexuality is entirely genetic but also environmental, but that means there is partly a genetic reason for homosexuality. The Catechism teaches homosexual orientation, however, is inherently “disordered” but not sinful in itself which does seem to pathologize in a sense the homosexual inclination but still accepts chaste homosexuals as full members of the Church and deserving of respect as long as they are not acting upon their homosexual inclination. Many homosexually-inclined people overcome their disordered attraction and get married and start families in the sense marriage and family has always been understood.

    James Watson, who won a Nobel for unravelling the structure of DNA, in the late 90s, caused controversy by positing that women should be allowed to specifically screen for homosexual/lesbian traits and “gay genes” and be allowed to have abortions should they know they are carrying homosexual/lesbian children and not want homosexual children. This outraged the gay “rights” groups (and pro-life people). http://www.independent.co.uk/news/nobel-winner-backs-abortion-for-any-reason-1279136.html

    However, almost 20 years on, and with all the gains the homosexuals have had in the West during this time (quite forcefully and honestly through incessant propaganda and at the expense of the religious freedom of Christians), there are now tensions like never before between pro-life people and the homosexual “rights” groups. Most pro-lifers are committed Christians (who also stand for marriage as the union of a man and a woman as it’s always been following the Christianization of the West). In contrast, the barbaric “pro-choice” hedonists, side with the homosexual “rights” groups who have intruded into the entirely heterosexual marriage arena by fabricating the phrase “marriage equality” and dismantling the bedrock institution of man-woman marriage for the purpose of rearing children and procreation.

    The radical homosexualists (aka “gaystapo”), who want a return to the ancient Greek/Roman pre-Christian era and see Christianity as “oppressive” towards them may just get their wish, but the atheistic scientific establishment is not on their side. Homosexualists wanting to justify their orientation on genetic grounds (to lay claim to their sexuality being “normal” or “natural”) are collaborating with those who may lead to their very downfall. If “gay genes” are discovered, I wonder how many couples would use prenatal genetic testing to screen them out – like the 90% that now do who know they are expecting Down’s syndrome children. Sarah Palin and Rick Santorum’s families specifically knew they were going to have Down syndrome children following prenatal genetic/chromosomal testing and still had these children – and I admire them deeply for this.

    Homosexual academic Timothy F Murphy has written on this very topic of screening for homosexual unborn children in Ethics, Sexual Orientation, and Choices about
    Children (MIT Press, 2012)

    Pro-lifers would still uphold the right to life of unborn homosexual children (many don’t even want, refuse or agree with this whole genetic testing business, like the evil of “embryonic stem cell research”)… I wonder how many otherwise liberal people would uphold the right to life of unborn homosexual children? The very liberals for whom choice is so sacrosanct they would support “homosexual marriage” and abortion because it doesn’t “affect them”. After all, liberals tend to follow the mantra “if it doesn’t hurt me, what could be wrong with it” since they don’t hold onto universal values or Truth but change like the wind and the latest social trends (like the apostate “churches” that are constantly changing to accommodate their values to whatever’s the latest morality in society).

    Perhaps homosexuals may want to re-think who are really their allies.. the non-Christian atheists who want to usher in a designer-baby, anything-goes society.. or Christians with their morals based on the Natural Law, like abortion is wrong/ against the natural law, is MURDER… for whatever reason?

    Feel free to raise these issues with any (activist) homosexuals you know or family members… I occasionally work with homosexuals with unwanted homosexual attraction in my pro-life/ pro-family work.

    • HeatherMaeC

      Sexual behavior is learned.

      • mspip

        heather, see above. could it not be both learned and genetic? .

        • HeatherMaeC

          Maybe there has been some molestation in the situation. Also all the estrogen they got in our food and water supply has to be damaging to our boys.

        • Saxon Warrior

          If it is genetic then how is the gene passed on? Homosexuals don’t normally reproduce. The gene would have become extinct.

          • susan

            Lol Saxon Warrior you’re going to drive them off the cliff with your sane logic 🙂

          • mspip

            not usually but not impossible.

          • Saxon Warrior

            Not impossible, but statistically unlikely. It’s an ever-diminishing return through each generation. Chances are such a gene would not survive after all this time.

          • mspip

            it is not their usual but not impossible. sodomites were threatening to rape ms. davis.

    • mspip

      very good assessment of this. sadly my sister in law the mother of 5, 3 daughters and then 2 boys. both boys are gay. this had to hurt her to the core but she would not speak of it. one has a live in person who he has called his “hubby.” the other seems to be a bit effeminate. they were not raised that way, there are at least 2 others older than these in that bloodline, makes me wonder if there is a genetic problem. does anyone know?? at family reunion and funeral these guys appear because of the southern way of kinfolks tho they live a long way off. don’t know whether to avoid them or speak to them….

    • Marcos Filipe Guerra

      Much like Bill Maher being pro abortion and condemning God for judging the world by the flood. Noah preached, but the world was rebelious:

      “For Christ also hath once suffered for sins, the just for the unjust, that he might bring us to God, being put to death in the flesh, but quickened by the Spirit:
      by which also he went and preached unto the spirits in prison;
      which sometime were disobedient, when once the longsuffering of God waited in the days of Noah, while the ark was a preparing, wherein few, that is, eight souls were saved by water.”

      1 Peter 3:18-20

      “and spared not the old world, but saved Noah the eighth person, a preacher of righteousness, bringing in the flood upon the world of the ungodly;”

      2 Peter 2:5

      The “waters” will sweep the world again, but this time waters means multitudes of believers and jews glorified by God. God will come again and the baptism and justice will be fulfilled in Christ as He purifies this world again, but this time with FIRE judgement, vengeance, and not with WATER judgement, atonement for sin and repentance.

      “As it was in the days of Noah, so it will be at the coming of the Son of Man.
      For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark;
      and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and took them all away. That is how it will be at the coming of the Son of Man.”

      Matthew 24:37-39

      See, just like the days of Noah were. Walid and others are preaching about Jesus’ second coming: “REPENT! Jesus is coming again, and He will judge the world with fiery judgement! He will FIGHT the nations that go up against Jerusalem! The Bible lists the muslim nations! Don’t associate with islam or the homosexual agenda! God will require the blood of innocent babies too!”

      Many don’t pay attention, dismiss it as fantasy; “The vatican and the NWO will come after islam with the antichrist. What are you talking about?” Others say that God is a myth, like Thor, Zeus and Ares or that Jesus didn’t exist really, all the disciples were after the believers’ money, Paul had an illusion of course. That’s what I get. When I say historians are pretty much sure that Jesus existed and died on a cross, they dismiss me as I was CRAZY and delusional.

      I just want to remind the unbelievers, and believers, of something that is very frightening: GOD close the door behind Noah when he entered the ark. GOD closed it from the outside. God warned Noah SEVEN DAYS BEFORE the flood came and after the animals got in passed the SEVEN days, Noah and his family got in and what happened?

      “The animals going in were male and female of every living thing, as God had commanded Noah. Then the LORD shut him in.”

      Genesis 7:16

      Could those 7 days be a shadow of the 7 years peace treaty of antichrist? Maybe, wouldn’t make a book about it, because it’s already handed out in Daniel and Revelation, but Jesus tied His second coming with the days of Noah, and I believe there’s a link there.

      • Trevor

        Great exposition. It’s incredulous to see someone praying for a flood to wipe out the west and forgetting that God swore an oath to never again destroy with the flood, and to ask God to break His own oath is the height of ignorance.

        • Marcos Filipe Guerra

          God said He wouldn’t flood the world again a few times, in fact, even in Isaiah:

          “For this {is as} the waters of Noah unto me: for {as} I have sworn that the waters of Noah should no more go over the earth; so have I sworn that I would not be wroth with thee, nor rebuke thee.”

          Isaiah 54:9

          It’s jaw breaking that some condemns the whole of western world and leave Saudi Arabia, Gaza and Jordan out of it, completely. “IT’s the NWO, man! They rule the countries secretly!” If it’s supposed to be secret they don’t do a very good job at it. They are giving attributes to these “iluminatis” that only belong to God. They know everything! Lord have mercy! They supposedly control governments, who will be ousted out, who will win the elections in the whole world. I mean all kinds of things that GOD said He alone could do. Bananas, totally.

          • Trevor

            Praise God that there are sane Christians who have not bought into conspiracy theories! You and I need to have beer together, my treat.

            There will be a one world government and it will rest with Christ.

          • Marcos Filipe Guerra

            Please, forgive me, but I’ll have to accept that. LOL. Oh, I’m waiting for that One World Government. Very much. Praise God for what He has done to us.
            I hope I can help my fellow evangelicals to at least look at the right direction of end times. They say we can’t drink wine, we can’t smoke, we can’t listen to any music but the gospel music, to wich I reply, in due sensible time, “Of course, because when we meet Jesus and He asks ‘Why should you enter my kingdom and be saved?’ we will say that we didn’t drink, smoke or listen to any music but gospel. *The silence* Oh, dear. I’ll only say Luke 18:10-14.

      • susan

        Men like Maher defend the right of babies to be killed in the womb so that his ilk can indulge in sexual pleasures without the “hassle” of children. One day he will understand.

  • Delta Rain

    Great Article and video. Thanks.

  • Kamau41

    In this generation, we are currently witnessing the full forces of evil and wickedness coming out and advancing at breath taking speed. For the past two decades we have been seeing the Sodomites push their absolute deviant agendas from Gov’t down to indoctrinate our children’s minds into such evil. It is well past time for Christians in the West to boldly rise up and fight with all of our heart, mind, and soul. With God’s help and speed, may the Spirit of Christendom arise and quelch and vanquish this evil.

  • Smith

    I remember when if you were a fag people beat you up usually with sticks, fists or a wooden bat.

    This article is very good but all of this dick-up-the-ass talk makes me wanna hurl. Thank God my wife is a looker, now I’m gonna have to tell her we need to cuddle right now, to get these gross images out of my head.

  • Julie LaBrecque

    Well, Kim certainly has the attackers coming after her, I suspected this would happen, she and her family need extra prayer for protection from the Sodomites that threaten them with bodily harm. Thanks for the good history on the perverts and how they violently react when rebuffed, I had read about St. Pelagius years ago, good to have it refreshed in my memory.

    • RodK1975

      Interesting, isn’t it? The sodomites go to great lengths to explain away the reason God destroyed Sodom and Gomorrah, claiming it wasn’t because of the homosexuality… Yet, listening to these threats against Kim Davis and her family… they sound just like the sodomites at Lot’s door…

      • Delta Rain

        Yeah, with a lot of cussing, they say it was because Sodom lacked good manners of hospitality?

        • AnthonyM

          Seems like the nouveau sodomites are lacking more than good manners and hospitality.

  • 1Bobby8

    Bottom line is, sodomites are a bunch of deviant narcissists.

    • HeatherMaeC

      And clearly demon possessed.

      • 1Bobby8

        That’s for sure.

  • Trevor

    Judgement occurs in the House of God. It will start there.

    • RodK1975

      Right on, Trevor!

      17 For the time is come that judgment must begin at the house of God: and if it first begin at us, what shall the end be of them that obey not the gospel of God?

  • John Galt

    He’s quite right. I have found that the more you talk about “love” as the motivation for your opposition to homosexuality, the more vicious they become. This happens to me constantly online. In other words, if you say things like, I want to warn gay people about the consequences of sin because I love all human beings, then they start yelling and screaming at you. Or if you point out that their rejection of females has “tricked” them into avoiding something that would bring them greater happiness than their homosexuality brings them.

    It’s not even just gay people, but also their straight defenders that get really vile at comments like that. I think the problem is a classic one in debate: when you destroy your opponent’s narrative they can only respond with anger and insults. By avoiding gay slurs and so forth, you protect yourself from the whole “bigot” accusation. And by using “love” you are ripping the “love wins” narrative from them. And they CAN’T STAND IT!! After all, love is the foundation of Christianity.

  • HeatherMaeC

    We as Christians need to stop placing our hopes in national elections where the only choice is lesser of two evils, and put more Kim Davis’ in local office to defend our beliefs. We need to get Christian sherifs that will close down islamic training camps that have been allowed for years. We need Christian state legislators to defund and regulate planned parenthood out of our states ( like in Texas). We need to change this from the local level up.

  • Marcos Filipe Guerra

    “Sodomism is the ideology of homosexual superiority, in which the homosexuals desire to usher in — through propaganda, violence and state coercion — a utopia in which homosexuality is seen as a supreme ideal, and those who believe in the conjugal union as is affirmed and established by the Christian Faith, are viewed and treated as enemies.”

    True. I’ve heard all the time that homosexuality is beautiful, cultural rich, a great thing that iluminates society. I mean, as I said in one of my comments, they try to make homosexuality be in par with God’s plan of Salvation.

    I ask you: What is so divine about having two men commit vile things to each other and put the reproductive organ into a secretion organ? That’s disgusting! FILTH! That’s what they do in their intimacy: FILTH! It’s horrendous, disgusting. It’s like asking your friend to play in the sewer waters. “Hey it’s fun, you should come with me. It liberates you in such a divine aspect, that is so bright and beautiful.” It’s how we should speak about this pratices. Filth as a football game in the sewers.

    Why is it that they don’t attack mostly Islam? It’s because christianity was made to be TOO SOFT on sin and deviant things. One of the commentators here told me that the gay people in Russia only go to night clubs, but they don’t dare come into daylight about this, otherwise they would pay dearly for that. Doing deviant things in front of children, they beat you up for that and in front of the police! The police then arrests the homosexual deviant! I saw it on video! That’s what christians should do. Protect children. Pass a law that protects children from these deviants. Then the point is made and christians can perform a citizen’s arrest publicly. It’s what we should fight for, society protection of children, then every one can act in righteousness. Our Lord Jesus loved the babies and the children:

    “People were also bringing babies to Jesus for him to place his hands on them. When the disciples saw this, they rebuked them.
    But Jesus called the children to him and said, “Let the little children come to me, and do not hinder them, for the kingdom of God belongs to such as these.
    Truly I tell you, anyone who will not receive the kingdom of God like a little child will never enter it.”

    Luke 18:15-17

    We need to fight for a child’s innocence. The nation then will raise to be God’s.
    God bless.

  • ChiRho

    Disgusting and true. We must know our history so it isn’t repeated.

  • ChiRho

    Another to add to the list, Elton John said that he thought Jesus was just a highly intelligent gay man.

  • richinnameonly

    Hmmm. I didn’t hear anything on MSM about these threats to Kim Davis and her husband. Maybe they should have made a big report on it and have it presented by one of the gay news analysts, like Anderson Cooper or Rachel Maddow. I wish there were somewhere the LGBT’s and Muslims could be sent to, and isolated. Let them fight it out among themselves.

  • jaguar

    You need to grow a brain!!!

  • HeatherMaeC

    There’s a whole lot of pharmacies out there. I would just go down the street to another….probably a Christian owned one. You act as if there are limited choices in this country.

  • 3%

    The Tolerant are only that way when you agree with them. Disagree, and this article shows what they become. They won’t stop until America is a totally homosexual society, and straight will be the deviancy (to them).


    Next war, all the women go …………….The men want equality ……….TRUMP 2016

    Next war, all the gays go ………………..The heterosexual men want equality ………………………….TRUMP 2016

    1Th 5:3……………For when they say, “Peace and safety!” then sudden destruction comes upon them, as labor pains upon a pregnant

    woman. And they shall not escape………..TRUMP 2016


    Next war, all the women go …………….The men want equality ……….TRUMP 2016


    Next war, all the gays go ………………..The heterosexual men want equality ………………………….TRUMP 2016


    Next warrrrrrrrrrrrr, all the gays go ………………..The heterosexual men want equality ………………………….TRUMP 2016


    trump 2016




    i like freedom

  • CorruptionInColumbia

    Kim Davis is nothing more than a pathetic “attention hoar” (mis-spelling intentional) who is exploiting her incarceration caused by malfeasance in office to get her allotted 15 minutes of “fame”. She puts herself out there as some “holier than thou” martyr, but she is divorced more than once with kids conceived out of wedlock and by different fathers. So much for the “sanctity of marriage” facade. She “inherited” her lucrative job from her mother and her son works in her office. Nepotism has been good to her family.

    With the publication of this lengthy piece of frivel, much of the respect I had for Shoebat has been lost.

    • Andy Holland

      For three years a lesbian judge refused to marry Heterosexuals. Nothing in the news about that nor condemnation of her illegal activity refusing to do her job. Kim Davis actually upheld the Constitution of Kentucky against pitiable sodomite marriage. Kim Davis was elected.

  • triangle whip

    Faggots are the true Nazis. Don’t believe me? http://www.thepinkswastika.com/5294/index.html

  • Andy Holland

    Article started good but all that Greek pagan Islamic stuff – vile and disgusting. Saint John Chrysostom rightly points out in his 4th Homily on Romans that ties the malady to the theatre and luxury which you also point out. and he mentions Salon etc… without rubbing our nose in their trash.
    I would suggest quoting him on it – it is an excellent analysis. Also the pink Swastika is interesting; homosexuals tend to be extreme right wing nuts, they are the fascists.

  • AnthonyM

    There is no homosexual gene. Research with 942 nonclinical adult participants, gay men and lesbian women reported a significantly higher rate of childhood molestation than did heterosexual men and women. Forty-six percent of the homosexual men in contrast to 7% of the heterosexual men reported homosexual molestation. Twenty-two percent of lesbian women in contrast to 1% of heterosexual women reported homosexual molestation.

  • AnthonyM

    You can get help here:

  • susan

    “The boat has sailed….”

    Lol. Not out of the harbor. Supreme Court judges don’t live forever. Every breath we take is by the power of God. It’s time we obey God rather than man.

  • mspip

    that makes sense. their father was in the home when he wanted to be, he liked to go out and drink. maybe the boys felt neglected.

  • susan

    They like to murder and they’ll give any excuse they like to justify it.

  • Higlac

    This would be excellent news if we could verify as much via Web-links to the research site or sites, please?

    • Julie LaBrecque

      How does this fit with the study was done on identical twins, which one twin was gay and one was straight? Did one twin avoid the effects of high cortisol and not the other?

      • Higlac

        Wow, while I’ve yet to check those “studies” I’m in this way alerted to that one of the supposed “fixed-constants” turns out to be variable.

        Ah, it’s so obvious just how science is flawed – just as anything human is. Thanks for the alert…

        • Julie LaBrecque

          I think the study was done in Australia, not sure, and can’t remember where I read about it.

  • Higlac

    Sorry, but that’s false!!

    I’m absolutely no sympathiser to homosexuality whatsoever – in fact, I completely sympathise with those who want to push it back into the closet!! [Their frequent cooperation with the Marxists especially disgusts me!!!] However, can we truly throw the plays of Oscar Wilde, the music of Pjótr Iljích Chaykóvskiy (Tchaikovsky), the art of Leonardo da Vinci (e.g., the “Mona Lisa” and the “Last Supper”) into the garbage???

    I particularly grieve over the Russian’s death (officially due to cholera but very possibly due to suicide via arsenic poisoning meant to simulate cholera in order to avoid public disgrace): much of his music is dearly beloved not only by myself but MANY, MANY, MANY OTHERS…

  • Catbr

    Warning, Catholic basher here.

  • Catbr

    By the way, nice picture if you like looking at 2 weirdos in a fit of staged passion.

  • Phil aka Felipe

    James 1:12-16

    (12) Blessed is the man that endureth temptation: for when he is tried, he shall receive the crown of life, which the Lord hath promised to them that love him.

    (13) Let no man say when he is tempted, I am tempted of God: for God cannot be tempted with evil, neither tempteth he any man:


    (15) Then WHEN LUST hath CONCEIVED, it BRINGETH forth SIN: and SIN, when it is finished, BRINGETH forth DEATH.

    (16) DO NOT ERR, my beloved brethren.

    What could be a more apt description of the fruit of men and women that have turned away from God and been given over to their OWN UNGODLY LUST to do that which is unnatural? Romans 1:18-32.

    The offspring of this LUST is DEATH–of mind, body, spirit, and society!!

    Notice the contrast. LIFE to those who ENDURE or resist temptation of their OWN LUST; DEATH to those who Yield to their OWN LUST.

    This is the age old problem of man; Blessing and Life to those who resist the temptation and lies of the world, the flesh and the Devil, Cursing and Death to those who believe and give in to of their OWN LUST through the temptation of their own flesh, the world’s pleasures and the deception and lies of the Devil .

    O wretched man that I am! who shall deliver me from the body of this death? I thank God through Jesus Christ our Lord. Romans 7:24-25

  • Trevor

    Yuck! I hate fruitcake!

  • Julie LaBrecque

    Your photo is sickening.

  • Julie LaBrecque

    How then can one identical twin be gay, and the other straight?

  • HeatherMaeC

    Several things can lead someone to a deviant sexual lifestyle. Molestation, pornography….ect. If gays are born that way where is the gene? And if they find a gene shouldn’t it be something that is fixed?

  • Andy Holland

    Ernst Roehm – yes and the Nazis were left wing as well. It is complicated but I would argue homosexuality and fascism seem to go hand in hand – until the long knives.

  • Impeach Obama Now!

    You belong on Politico! Be off with you!

  • mspip

    ms davis had the job before the gay marriage thing was put into law of man

  • mspip

    rainbows in the sky are beautiful and now they have been made to be a symbol of evil. don’t think the creator of rainbows approves of this.

  • mspip

    the men of sodom wanted to rape the angels who had come to help lot get out of the wicked place. there are plenty of men now that wish to have sexual relations with men as these men living in sodom did. that is the point i was making.

  • mspip

    saw one of these pervs in the greyhound bus post house, paducah kentucky, many years ago while waiting. you could almost see the wickedness on him, there is generally a look of lust towards young boys or young men and something about the mouth sort of loose. my son needed to use bathroom there, i told him to get in and out of there as fast as he could and don’t talk to anybody. i agree that this is a pox on humanity.

  • mspip

    it is a probably archaic term used by some to describe male perverts. seems a fitting don’t you think??

  • Towa Tei

    Flagged for violent speech.

  • Saxon Warrior

    Artificial for them… not for us. Artificial because it is not homosexual. Yet, they claim that their sexuality is natural. I was kind of being tongue-in-cheek there.

  • Saxon Warrior

    Nevertheless, a gene that is not replicated often enough will die out. Yes, I do understand genetics, but statistically, over a long period of time, over many generations, any gay gene would have died out by now. A population cannot be sustained if it does not produce enough offspring.
    And the reason that straight people have children that become gay has nothing to do with genetics. Gays are NOT born that way.

    Straight people also have children who become thieves, they have children who become murderers, they have children who become pedophiles.
    The day that they discover a ‘gay’ gene is the day that you can lecture me. Despite their search they have never discovered a ‘gay’ gene and they never will because no such gene exists.

    Wishful thinking on the part of the sodomite lobby…. but wishful thinking does not make it true.

  • sharon

    Stop quoting bible scriptures, u don’t even know what it means silly!!!

  • Saxon Warrior

    Truth, not opinion. There’s a difference and I guarantee that one day you will find out.

  • Saxon Warrior

    I’m a normal man and I find homosexuality repulsive, so do many of my ‘normal’ friends. I’m not really interested in what sexual deviants have to say.
    You’d have to be a moron to believe that homosexuality is healthy – the ‘plumbing’ is all wrong for starters. Even a village idiot could see that. But perhaps elementary engineering is not your strong point.

  • Saxon Warrior

    Liberals rarely quote facts.
    They believe in man-made Global Warming despite the fact that it conflicts with the evidence of their own eyes and ears.
    They believe in evolution which is non-scientific because it can’t be tested, can’t be duplicated and can’t be observed, and they believe that transgenderism really exists even though it defies logic.
    Liberals hate facts.

  • Does the same theory you propose goes for pedophiles and polygamists, you loon-bin Armen Trout brains? Get out of my clinic. Can’t you read the sign “Only the Mentally Ill”? You’r beyond sick, you’r plain evil.

  • Vaughn Bang

    Religion is a lifestyle choice for the lazy minded.

  • pianoman

    I thought it was 1.5 Billion now… but I could be wrong.

  • Timothy Ketterling

    he uses sodomite to refer to the people from sodom just as americans is used for those from america. read the bible in its original language.

  • Saxon Warrior

    You don’t need to dumb it down. It’s already a dumb article.
    By the way, I wasn’t always a believer but then I came to the logical conclusion that Christianity was the truth after much research. But oh no, I’m going to have to change my mind just because some article tells me that I have a lazy brain.
    Of course you were unable to address or refute any of my points. What’s wrong? Have a lazy brain, do you? Or are you too much of a coward to address that points that I made, knowing damn well that you’d lose the argument?
    So tell me about evolution. Let’s discuss the science behind it. By the way, I am a scientist myself, having a phD in Chemistry with Nuclear chemistry.
    Not bad for some body with a lazy brain, is it?
    So come on,let’s start the discussion. Tell me how we evolved and how the Universe came from nothing.

  • Saxon Warrior

    A man who uses foul language on a Christian website is telling me to grow up – that’s laughable.
    By the way, I realize that you’re not very bright so I’ll make this as simple as I can.
    Creation and all it’s splendour does not include perverse deviation. Perhaps you think that mental illness is healthy. Perhaps you think that being blind or deaf is healthy. Perhaps you think that being deformed or paralyzed from the neck downwards is healthy. After all, isn’t it all just ‘creation in all its splendour?’
    Homosexuality is NOT natural or healthy. Perhaps you actually believe that penises were designed to fit inside anuses, in which case your knowledge of biology is shockingly poor and your sense of design is terrible.
    I really, really hope for your sake that you are not employed in any ‘practical’ trade such as plumbing or engineering, you must be terrible at it.

    What a joke you are. So because I can clearly see the errors of homosexuality then I must be latent myself. Really? Is that the best you can do? As if I’ve never heard that before. Yawn….. you get zero marks for originality.

    HOMOSEXUALITY IS WRONG. Anybody with half-a-brain can work that out. But as I’ve already pointed out, ‘design’ is definitely not your strong point is it?

    But after decades of brainwashing by the gay lobby, the feeble-minded are actually beginning to believe their crap. Next they’ll be telling you that it’s possible to change gender and that transgenderism is normal even though it conflicts with simple biology, and idiots like you will probably believe it.
    By the way, I don’t make false claims, I’m just not gullible enough to disbelieve the evidence of my own eyes and my own ears, but you clearly are. The propaganda sure has worked on you hasn’t it? If somebody told you that a giraffe was an elephant you’d probably fall for it.

    But, as I pointed out already….. you’re not very bright!

  • Saxon Warrior

    So coward, once again you evade what I have said. Are you scared that I’ll destroy your arguments? Tell me how evolution is scientific? Let’s have a proper debate. You’re avoiding the issue. You know I’ll destroy your arguments.
    So evolution is non-scientific. It fails the basic science test. Refute my claims. You can mock me as much as you like and keep slithering away from the real issue here but every time you do that you’re proving to everybody who reads this just what a lazy mind YOU have.
    Come on, I’m waiting!

  • Saxon Warrior

    I’ve explored it and it’s a farce. In fact as I have already said, it fails the basic scientific test because it cannot be observed, duplicated or tested. In fact the leading biologists are now moving away from evolution as being a fact. We now have scientific evidence that all humans came from a single original male and a single original female that lived at the same time. It’s also genetically impossible for one species to change into another over time as some geneticists are now pointing out, but most of this evidence is being ignored. It’s all there if you care to research it and I’m sure you will because unlike myself you don’t have a lazy brain, do you?
    As for homosexuality, well if you believe in evolution then you must know that homosexuality already carries its own Darwin award as homosexual activity cannot lead to reproduction. Using your own logic, homosexuality is actually genetically inferior to heterosexuality. Yet, you claim that it’s all part of the integral design of animal species by natural selection. Sorry, but it isn’t. There are no advantages to homosexuality and in fact it is not genetic.
    Nobody is born homosexual and there is no gene for it that has ever been discovered. You’re suffering from cognitive dissonance if you believe in evolution and also believe that homosexuality is natural and healthy.

    • susan

      Good comment Saxon. There are many scientists out there who follow the truth wherever it leads them…going against the current fad of the day.

      • Saxon Warrior

        The theory of evolution would have been confined to the bin of history if it were not for secular movements constantly promoting it. It is so fashionable that other biological research has often been twisted to fit in with it.
        150 years after Darwin proposed it and it’s still a theory. It has never been formulated, quantified or measured in any way. Even Darwin had doubts about it. It is based merely on speculation and a tremendous amount of wishful thinking and blind faith. There are many scientific reviews that doubt it especially after recent research into genomes, yet these reviews get little if no publicity. You literally have to search for them.

  • Saxon Warrior

    No, gravity can be measured and is REAL and that’s why the Bible doesn’t say that it’s caused by invisible demons but it’s typical of people like you to speculate on what a book might have said instead of what it really says.

    Quite often the truth doesn’t support your arguments so you have to imagine what could have been or might have been. It’s nice to be told what we might have believed had a book said something that it didn’t. Unfortunately for you the Bible says no such thing but I bet you wished it had, then you might actually have something to back up your crazy laughable theories about what Christians are like.

    Just for the record, Isaac Newton was a devout Christian. The law of gravity has been tested, validated and even made use of in practical applications unlike evolution. Newton also developed differential calculus too, but according to people like you he must have been retarded.
    After all, he was just a dumb, superstitious Christian!

  • Saxon Warrior

    I know what I find physically repulsive and what I don’t but it’s kind of you to tell me otherwise. Perhaps you could tell me what my favorite food is seeing as you seem to know better than I do.

    As for John 1:3, well I hope you apply this logic to everything. God created murderers, rapists and thieves too.
    I sincerely hope that you defend their right to kill, rape and steal as much as you defend the homosexual’s right to engage in homosexual practises.
    After all, you wouldn’t want to seen as a hypocrite or a cherry-picker now would you?

  • Saxon Warrior

    Oh dear…. how terribly predictable. So if I criticize homosexuality, I must be ‘closet’.
    Allow me to educate you.
    I wasn’t always a Christian. When I was younger I was a rebel and would do anything to shock my parents. Believe me if I was gay I would have come out of the closet long ago. I used to hang around with all sorts of people including gay men just to prove what a rebel I was. I’m not afraid of my sexuality. I just happen to be straight. Being gay would have been great twenty years ago – the best thing ever to wind up my straight-laced family.
    I don’t need ignorant little boys like yourself to lecture me on what I am.
    I’ve heard all the ‘closet’ arguments before. It’s tiresome, it’s monotonous and …..seriously….. is that the best you can do?
    As for being uneducated, well I’m very educated and frankly your arguments are the same arguments as I myself would have used years ago. I could have written your script for you.
    You sound like me when I was younger and an idiot.
    You’re so…… last decade !

  • Saxon Warrior

    Yes and there are species that reproduce asexually by splitting into two. Maybe you’re one of them…. but the rest of us are considerably higher up in the food chain than that.

    • Polybius

      It’s easy to ignore a fact and change the topic.

  • Saxon Warrior

    Oh dear….. it’s simple chemistry. Look it up, for crying out loud! You’re making this big thing out of REAL CHEMIST and REAL CHEMISTRY.
    It really is very basic stuff.
    I’m not dishonest – just look it up, you dunce!

  • Saxon Warrior

    Oh dear.
    Listen to me. Prussian blue is Potassium Hexacyanoferrate – it contains iron. If there is no iron available in the walls there is no prussian blue. It’s that simple. You can look it up and it will prove me right. My statements are true. If you want to prove me wrong then provide something to show me otherwise.
    You can’t of course. ANY chemist will tell you that Potassium hexacyanoferrate contains iron. You don’t even need a degree in chemistry – it’s basic stuff. The clue is in the name hexacyanoFERRATE…
    ferrate, as in ‘ferrous’ or ‘ferric’.

    Now go away – you’re an idiot. And idiots annoy me.

  • John Galt

    Thanks for proving my point, friend!

    But one aspect of your response concerns me. How on Earth can you logically make the jump to rape based on my original comments?

    How is my love founded in unhappiness and hate? Do I “hate” the alcoholic when I urge him not to get drunk? Is the alcoholic truly happy with himself, even if he claims to be? It seems to me that indifference or encouragement of self injury would be greater evidence of “hate.”

  • John Galt

    I am not trying to treat anyone like children. Every human being is worthy of respect, whether I disagree with them or not. My position is that a wound may exist without the person knowing it. There are many things in this world that produce a small amount of SHORT TERM happiness while producing a large amount of LONG TERM pain. So it’s easy to think you are doing something “happy” before you end up paying the price in the end. That is the point Christians make about homosexuality. And in the abstract, this is the very thing that entraps Christians (like myself) and others in sin; being “tricked” into thinking something is pleasurable in the short term while being deceived about the long term concequences.

    I will also point out that an abundance of psychological research backs this up. Gay/transgender people are far more likely to suffer from mental illness and suicide. I don’t say this out of any “hate” but because I don’t want gay people to suffer, based on the scientific evidence. So my “love” is driven by a desire to warn people about long term consequences about things that give the illusion of happiness.

    You are perfectly free to disagree with me about “what is happiness” but I’m perfectly free to warn you as well. I don’t think it’s too much to think we can agree to disagree while still living peacefully together. The big problem is that liberals and LGBT activists tend to think we cannot (and to be fair some Christians are in this camp as well). My original post pointed out that I can’t so much as disagree with the LGBT narrative without receiving venomous hatred and intolerance in response.

    The Bible (and all ancient Greek culture) points out that there are many “forms” of love. Some yield better results than others. I only try to point this out on an intellectual level while liberals tend to view it from an emotional perspective. No “hate” here, just disagreement. So…it seems you think all forms of love are equivalent, is that true? If so, how do you justify that position?

  • 1Bobby8

    You get real idiot. You’re living in a fantasy world, thinking sodomy is normal, and than to rationalize your sick perversion, demanding everybody else live in that fantasy world.

  • I used my Gatling. There in no trace of him. If someone cannot tell that teeth are for eating and eyes are for seeing and and .. is for … then they don’t deserve to live.

    • 1Bobby8

      Amen Walid, and the worst part is they want everybody else to be just as confused as they are.