Benghazi is why Obama can’t be trusted on Syria

Today, Barack Obama told media sycophants Judy Woodruff and Gwen Ifill of PBS, that his administration had ‘concluded’ that Syria’s Bashar Al-Assad had used chemical weapons on his people. Of course, sycophants never do their job, which is why these two met their unassailable leader with adoring eyes instead of adversarial questions, which is what the media is supposed to do.

Obama sycophants: Gwen Ifill and Judy Woodruff

Obama sycophants: Gwen Ifill and Judy Woodruff

In any event, what Obama told the PBS lemmings was a heavy message. It is one that should come with credibility. The problem is (or at least should be) that one week after the attack in Benghazi last year, Obama lied about why four Americans were murdered. He did so on late night television with another sycophant – David Letterman.

Is it a good thing to be afflicted with Islamophobia? Get the new book from Walid Shoebat, The Case FOR ISLAMOPHOBIA: Jihad by the Word; America’s Final Warning.

Syria and Benghazi are both about foreign policy; they’re both about removing dictators; and they’re both about empowering the Muslim Brotherhood. When it came to Benghazi, Obama lied after people died and should have zero credibility on Syria:

h/t Hot Air


, , ,