Not much surprises me coming out of the National Socialist movement today. However, in an article on Daily Stormer that recently came out against alt-right Internet commentator Jack Posobiec entitled “Jack Posobiec is a Textbook Rat F*cker And Is Hurting the Trump Movement, there is the following statement that was a surprising admission as it was made openly:
I want to state clearly off the bat that I personally consider morality itself to always be a pragmatic and scientific endeavor. I believe high-minded moral principles to be decadent and selfish. For the inverse of “the ends justify the means” is “the means justify the ends” – that is to say, one justifies losing and failing to accomplish his goals by claiming he kept to moral principles.
Again, this is just my personal view – but I view failure itself as the real immorality. If your goals are related to the greater good – and if you are a man of honor then they certainly should be – then by failing you are letting others down. If you say “well I only failed others because I was being true to what I believed to be right,” then you have selfishly harmed others for the sake of a personal indulgence.
In my mind, “the ends do not justify the means” morality is something that the boomers embraced out of selfishness, the desire to avoid the harsh reality that is a part of life. In real, adult life, you are sometimes required to make choices that make you feel bad.
That having been said, even one who takes a non-pragmatic approach to morality (i.e., a boomer) surely has reason enough to justify viewing modern politics as an amoral affair where dirty tricks are simply part of the game. (source)
As you will notice, there is no point here when he says “I WORSHIP SATAN” explicitly. To the contrary, he keeps his explicit religious views private. However, no matter what one says he believes or does not believe in, a man’s beliefs are made clear by the positions he support or does not support. For example, a man might say he is Catholic, but if he publicly supports gravely sinful actions that are explicitly against that which the faith he claims to adhere to teaches, then he is either ignorant (certainly possible), or he is willingly giving consent to evil deeds. This can be said about many things, for when a man’s professed beliefs or idea do not accord or do not seem to accord with that which he teaches, one needs to look closer.
CA Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi. She claims to be a “Catholic” yet is an ardent supporter of abortion. She is just one of many examples of people who claim they hold one set of beliefs when their actions dictate otherwise.
Satanism is the explicit worship of the evil spirit who rebelled against God put himself into perpetual opposition to him along with the hosts of spiritual beings who followed him and now goes about seeking the destruction of human souls by obtaining their willing consent to follow his ways into misery and perdition. It is what St. Peter referred to as the roaring lion who goes about seeking whosoever he may devour, and is why in the St. Michael Prayer (full version) it is written:
“O Glorious Prince of the heavenly host, St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in the battle and in the terrible warfare that we are waging against the principalities and powers, against the rulers of this world of darkness, against the evil spirits. Come to the aid of man, whom Almighty God created immortal, made in His own image and likeness, and redeemed at a great price from the tyranny of Satan. (full version here)
Satanism has existed throughout history, and in recent times it has become very popular and continues to grow in the Western world as Christianity’s presence recedes. As Satanists themselves note and have noted, satanism does not per se necessitate an explicit worship of the devil in the obvious sense, such as through the participation in satanic rituals, black masses, or worship of the devil as the horned being he is portrayed as. Satanism is as much a philosophy as it is a religion, and many persons who call themselves “satanists” are admitted atheists who claim they see satanism as a form of secular or atheistic rejection of Christianity and Christian morality, asserting that as the devil declared himself to be equal to or greater than God through his declaration that he could define right and wrong, so is the satanist a person who rejects all moral authority and makes himself his own moral authority.
Historically speaking, all forms of occultism, divination, and paganism are forms of the worship of demons have been condemned as they sought power outside of God. Likewise, a distinction has always been made by the Church between pagan peoples who, without knowledge of the True Faith, attempted to know and follow God even though their ways in which they pursued it were erroneous, for as Christ imparted divine revelation to man that he would not have known unless he had come, and that the law of God is written on the hearts of all men, these men must be distinguished from those who sought to use religion or claims of religion as a means of power to control the masses of men for their personal benefit at the expense of the many. It is why wherever Christians went they preached the Gospel, and why many pagans converted, because what the were seeking but could not find is perfectly found in the revelation Christ made known to men. Much of the condemnation of the paganism is not merely because it is error, but because it is about power through which men attempt to make themselves gods among men.
The Church has been in an incessant war against paganism since the beginning of her establishment and will continue until Christ returns, as to reject Christ and persist in paganism after the Gospel has been preached is to willingly persist in error, to reject the message of salvation and instead work to be an advocate and agent for perdition. It is the reason why Christians historically waged war against pagan tribes just as the Hebrews, God’s chosen people of the Old Testament, waged war on the heathen tribes of Canaan and the surrounding areas, because their practices were evil and worthy of death. By the Hebrews bringing earthly justice to them at the Lord’s command, they carried out the justice of God just as the many people who turned to the Hebrew religion, while not being Hebrews by birth themselves, were themselves saved by the mercy of God carried out in the same way. God is Love, and as love is both mercy and justice, and that God became man so that man became like God, it is or man to become like God by so according himself to His will that he beings to reflect God’s mercy and God’s justice in his earthy life that will continue into eternity.
Many have opposed the Church throughout history from antiquity through today. Some have been outright pagans. Some apostatized from the Faith. Some were occultists. Many were the countless heretics that have existed throughout history, and indeed it was out of many heresies that the fuller apostasies and problems came. Some were atheists. Some were “secularists.” All of them believed they could redefine morality in their own terms on some level, and all of them rejected the Church’s teachings because they saw them as obstructions to their own goal. Satanism as seen today has existed therefore in both the historical, literal practice of demon worship as well as in the support of philosophies which promote the greatness and worship of the self over and as a substitution for God.
While modern satanism dates from the late 16th and early 17th century, much of the philosophy as it applies to the “atheistic satanism” emerged in the 19th century closed tied to Darwinian Philosophy. Darwin’s philosophy, while not outwardly supporting satanism, was itself satanic because by proposing that man is essentially a rational animal no different than any other beast, he is just another creature whose sense of right and wrong is a trained reaction to environmental stimuli created to serve its situations that is not based on any sort of objective end. Aside from being used to support racial and cultural theories, it naturally gives support to paganism and demon worship because it justifies the creation of a personal, subjective morality just as the demons rebelled because they wanted to define what is wrong and right for themselves.
The 19th century book Might Is Right by Ragnar Redbeard, which was heavily plagiarized by Anton Lavey’s “Satanic Bible,” the book dedicates the entire first chapter and many part of the book to decrying Christian morality, saying it is for “losers” who use it as an excuse for their “failure” and in which he calls for the “Northern Race” to liberate itself by casing off morality and defining in terms of the “rational” option, which is that morality is the force of a man’s will on another to what he wants:
How is it that “men of light and leading” hardly ever call in question the manufactured “moral codes,” under which our once vigorous Northern race is slowly and surely eating out its heart in peaceful inaction and laborious dry-rot? Standard “moral principles” are arbitrarily assumed by their orthodox apologist to be a fixed and unalterable quantity, and that to doubt the divine-rightness of these “principles” is treason and sacrilege. When the greatest thinkers of a race are incapable, or afraid to perform their manifest and logical function, it is scarcely to be wondered that average citizens are also somewhat unwilling to “risk life, fortune and sacred honor” for the overthrow of popularized “right and wrong” concepts, that they know from bitter personal experience, are unworkable falsities. Although the average man feels in his heart that nearly all political and religious conventionalisms are dynamic deceits, yet how cautiously he avoids any open display of antagonism thereto? He has not the courage of his opinions. He is afraid to say openly what he thinks secretly. In other words he is living in a state of subjectiveness; of vassalage. He allows his brain to be dominated and held in bondage by the brain of another. From his infancy he has been deliberately subjected to a continuous external pressure, especially designed to coerce his understanding into strict accord with pre-arranged views of moral, political or religious “duty.” He has not been permitted one moment of real mental liberty. (Page 4)
All ethics, politics and philosophies are pure assumptions, built upon assumptions. They rest on no sure basis. They are but shadowy castles-in-the-air erected by day-dreamers, or by rogues, upon nursery fables. It is time they were firmly planted upon an enduring foundation. This can never be accomplished until the racial mind has first been thoroughly cleansed and drastically disinfected of its depraved, alien, and demoralizing concepts of right and wrong. In no human brain can sufficient space be found, for the relentless logic of hard fact, until all pre-existent delusions have been finally annihilated. (Page 7)
Masterful men laugh with contempt at spiritual thunders, and have no occasion to dread the decisions of any human tribunal. They are above and beyond all that. Laws and regulations are only for conquered vassals. The free man does not require them. He may manufacture and post up Decalogue regulations, to bind and control dependents with, but he does not himself bow down before those inventions of his own hands, — except as a lure. Statute books and golden rules, were made to fetter slaves and fools. Very useful are they, for controlling the herds of sentenced convicts, who fill the factories and cultivate the fields. All moral principles therefore are the servitors, not the masters of the strong. Power made moral codes, and Power abrogates them. A man is under no obligation to obey anything or anybody. It is only serving-men that must obey, because they are caitiffs by birth, breeding, and condition. Morals are only required in an immoral community, that is to say a community held in a state of conquest. (Page 10)
Human rights and wrongs are not determined by Justice, but by Might. Disguise it as you may, the naked sword is still king-maker and king-breaker, as of yore. All other theories are lies and — lures. Therefore! If you would conquer wealth and honor, power and fame, you must be practical, grim, cool and merciless. You must ride to success (by preference) over the necks of your foemen. Their defeat is your strength. Their downfall is your uplifting. Only the powerful can be free, and Power is non-moral. Life is real, life is earnest, and neither heaven nor hell its final goal. And love, and joy, and birth, and death, and fate, and strife, shall be forever. This earth is a vast whirl of warring atoms — a veritable revolving cock-pit. Each molecule, each animal, fights for its life. You must fight for yours, or surrender. Look well to it, therefore, that your beaks and spurs, your fangs and claws are as sharp as steel, and as effective as science can make them. (Page 12)
Woe unto those that stumble! Woe unto Ye who fall! They who accept the “Equality, Faith, Hope, and Charity” ideal, in any shape or form whatever, interpret the facts of mortal life as they are not — as they have ever been, as they can never be. Indeed when the animal world becomes ‘moralized’ and ‘equalized’ it will be extinct. No doubt when contemplating the dark side of all this, Pascal was impelled to write with superstitious medieval diapason: — ‘I am affrighted like a man who in his sleep has been carried unto some horrible desert island, and there awakes, not knowing where he is, nor how he shall escape.’ Degenerates only are thus affrighted at the tragic majesty of their surroundings. (Page 51)
There is an inherent overlap between racism, Darwinism, paganism, and satanism, because all come from the same root which is the rejection of absolute truth and the reduction of truth to a personal standard which a man follows as he defines on his own terms, and heresy is one of the common ways through which these evil enter into Christian or formerly Christian societies. One cannot say the National Socialists acted in a philosophically isolated manner with their embrace of paganism, racialism, and darwinism. To the contrary, they were logically consistent in carrying out that which they followed and had been already firmly established before them. The same applies to Andrew Anglin’s writings above, as he is, to his credit, expressing the same philosophy which is the basis of the National Socialists, the anti-clericalists, the eugenicists, and the demon worshippers from ancient times.
Observe how in his post he blames Baby Boomers for using “morality” as the excuse for their failure as a generation. To Anglin’s credit, many times his criticism of them Boomers is justified and good, and it even reflects many of the positions we have held on Shoebat.com. However as we have been constantly saying, the evil of National Socialism is not that it rejects controversial facts, but that it embraces them an expects persecution because for the National Socialist, these true but culturally “unacceptable” facts are but vehicles for seducing the intellectually inclined, as after people finally admit that the facts given are true, it is at that point that the poison is adminstered, and that is to offer National Socialism as the answer to the problems mentioned. Other times, the National Socialists will tell the truth but will add a *tiny* lie into the discussion o the truth, so much that it is difficult to notice unless one looks carefully, and in combination with the small lie a discussion can be leveraged to reach a conclusion of National Socialism.
Nobody can argue at all that the Boomers cared about morality at all. Born between 1945 and 1964 and therefore coming of age (which I will define as being between the ages of 15 and 25) between 1960 and 1989, nobody who lived through that age can argue that “morality” was valued. To the contrary, this was the period of the great rebellion in American, European, and many societies throughout the world. It was the age of “sex, drugs, and rock and roll,” a time of unprecedented hedonism, occultism, socialism and disordered behavior at a time when America was also at the height of its economic prosperity that was fueled by the same generation for at least several more decades by profligate debt-spending, borrowing, and monetary creation that has created the largest wage inequalities and debt accumulations which the world has ever seen and only now is beginning to fall apart, as it has been slowly collapsing under its own weight since the financial crisis of 2008. He claims that the boomers took a “non-pragmatic approach to morality,” and one must argue that is true in that they did not think about the future of their children or society because it is an obvious fact they did not- no responsible parent accumulates mountains of debt and then dumps the bill on their kids. However, at the same time it is an absolute lie because by their rejection of morality they made their own morality in which they could justify their selfish actions and then, theoretically, exonerate themselves of any responsibility for their mess. The mention of the Boomers in this piece was fundamentally a distraction from his writings on morality, which was to advocate for the same philosophy which defines darwinism as much as satanism.
In Might is Right, Redbeard writes openly of his hatred of Christ:
Behold the crucifix, what does it symbolize?
Pallid incompetence hanging on a tree. (Page 3)
“Pallid incompetence” is 19th century language for a cuck. If objective morality, laying down’s one life for the sake of righteousness, and the sacrifice which Christ made is “pallid incompletence,” and if true “freedom” is found in the promotion of one’s own man-made morality, then the conclusion is clear. It means that in terms of its philosophy, the emergent National Socialist movement has just admitted that it views Christ as a “cuck” but satan and his demonic hordes as models of strength because they view themselves as gods and the rest of humanity as animals to subjugate.