By Walid Shoebat (Shoebat Sunday Special)

“These are the days when the Christian is expected to praise every creed except his own.” – G.K. Chesterton.

The words of Chesterton ring true today. From Asia’s Hinduism, Buddhism, Islam to Europe’s revival of national pride, Eugenics, national-socialism’s Alt Right in Germany … the battle between God and Lucifer  can never be understood without understanding God’s attributes and lucifer’s theft of such attributes adding what he is not shy about, his true evil essence and his real evil names. Christians easily understand that God is the Alpha (The Beginning), Omega (the end), Healer, Comforter, Protector, Almighty, Everlasting Father, The Son, The Holy Spirit, Truthful, Just, Righteous, Immutable (Unchangeable). He is also the Emmanuel – God With Us. Unless one combines these major attributes, they would miss the true God and become the sons of satan. There is no exception.

Understanding the nature of God and the nature of Lucifer, is key to not being deceived when the deception is so powerful, to even deceive the very elect, if he can. The main opposition to the God of the Bible is The Luminous One: “ruler of the demons” (Mathew 3:22), “unclean and hateful bird” (Revelation 18:2), “God of War” or the “God of Fortresses (War)” (Daniel 11:38), “Deceiver” (Revelation 12:9), “Liar” (John 8:44), “manslayer” “who caused death” (John 8:44; I John 3:8, Romans 5:12), “ruler of the air” (Ephesians 2:2), “misleading the earth” (Revelation 12:9), “fallen from heaven” “morning star” (Isaiah 14:12-14), “beautiful angel” (Ezekiel 28:13-19), “lightening” (Luke 10:18), “deny father and son” (I John 2:22), “ruler of demons” (Luke 11:15), “ruler of the air” (Ephesians 2:1-2), “ruler of this world” (John 12:31-32), “power of darkness” (Colossians 1:13-14), “wicked one” (Ephesians 6:16), “the serpent” (Genesis 3:1), “afflicter” (Job 1:13- 19, 2:7-8), “counterfeiter” (II Cor. 11:13-15, Revelation 2:9, 13) “deceives the nations” (Matthew 4:8-9, Ephesians 6:12), “Proud” (Ezekiel 28:12, I Timothy 3:6), “Wanting to be god”, “Heylel Ben Sahar” (Son of the morning, lucifer, luminous, crescent) as in Isaiah 14:12-14.

Therefore, by “wanting to be God” Lucifer became the founder of all non-biblical religions:

“By the multitude of thy merchandise they have filled the midst of thee with violence, and thou hast sinned” (Ezekiel 28:16).

Violence, rebellion and making cults is the hallmark of The Luminous One and all his tyrannies. In his sin of rebellion, “thou hast sinned” is why an exorcist reminds the demon of his sin as he casts him out not being able to take the feeling of guilt any longer.

When it comes to any religion, besides what the Bible ordained, we will find that their gods openly identify themselves with the same titles and names as those belonging to Lucifer. Dialogue with any religion, as if it is on the same footing with Christianity, is simply opening the door for demons.

For example, under the disguises of being The Most Merciful and such, Allah in the Quran is also Khayrul-makireen (the greatest of all deceivers, schemer, conniver), Al-Dharr (the afflicter), Al-Mumeet (the causer of death) and Al-Mutakabbir (the most proud). (1)

Lucifer, naming himself Allah, is not his only guise, and Islam is not the only religion that describes the god of this world as the “great deceiver”. From the deserts of the Middle East – the Shinar cult reached the cold frosty forests of Scandinavia. Take Odin, the chief divinity of the ancient Scandinavian pantheon. Like Allah, Odin was called Ginnarr (Deceiver) and Glapsvior (Swift in Deceit). Odin ruled over Valhalla (Hall of the Slain) and like the Islamic paradise with its carnal desires where shaheed (martyred warriors) enjoy endless orgies with harems and endless wine, Valhalla provides the heavenly harem or the valkyria to warriors slain while fighting the enemy. And if Islam had its mujahideen, the Norse, whom the Nazis exalted, had the berserkers, warriors who terrorized much of Christian Europe.

And with Ultra Nationalism arising in Germany today we must track the parallels. After 1917, the bankrupt, defeated and cosmopolitan Ottoman Empire contracted into a vigorous “Turanic” nation-state. In the early 1920s, the new Turkey was the first “revisionist” power to opt out of the postwar system, retaking lost lands on the Syrian coast and control over the Strait of the Dardanelles. Hitler, Mr. Ihrig writes, saw Turkey as the model of a “prosperous and völkisch modern state.”

Völkisch is “people-powered”, “folksy” and “folkloric”. According to the historian James Webb, the word also has “overtones of ‘nation’, ‘race’ and ‘tribe’…” The term völkisch has no direct English equivalent, but it could be rendered as “ethnonationalistic“, “racial-nationalistic” or “ethno-racialist“, or referred by some today as folkish.

But this time, as scriptures foretold, the deception is much greater than before. While the anti-immigration movement in Germany is arising, many Christians are happy for this, be warned, it accuses the German government of being “Volksverräter” (traitors) for allowing 890,000 asylum-seekers to come to the country last year. But “Volksverräter” carries a stench when used in these protests. It evokes Hitler and his henchmen going after those they labelled enemies of the state. Hans Kundnani, political analyst at the German Marshall Fund, noted that politicians would not have used these controversial terms two decades ago. “There’s been a shift in German national identity over the last 15 years or so, and I think the use of these terms has reemerged against that backdrop”, he said.

These days we see a revival of a beast that had a mortal wound, where all the previous demonic theologies are reviving all at the same time, everywhere. The völkisch movement did not start in Nazism, but had its origins in Romantic nationalism, as it was expressed by early Romantics such as Johann Gottlieb Fichte in his Addresses to the German Nation published during the Napoleonic Wars, from 1808 onwards, especially the eighth address, “What is a Volk, in the higher sense of the term, and what is love of the fatherland?,” where he answered his question of what could warrant the noble individual’s striving “and his belief in the eternity and the immortality of his work,” by replying that it could only be that “particular spiritual nature of the human environment out of which he himself, with all of his thought and action… has arisen, namely the people from which he is descended and among which he has been formed and grown into that which he is”.

And today, multitudes are being deceived with such ideology. While they think they are combatting Islam and Muslims, many are unaware, there is a clear resonance between the “völkish” and the “Islamist” conception of Ummah the seemingly organic relation between the individual and the “community” to which one is supposed to belong. To these demonic concepts, the individual is simply an “organ” or “member” as taught by Rousseau, long before Karl Marx, called for unity, communalism, socialism and collectivism. The “völkish” denounced private property and individualism. These aspired to build the ‘body politic’. Similarly Islam teaches: “The believers Ummah, in their love, mutual kindness, and close ties, are like one body; when any part complains, the whole body responds to it with wakefulness and fever…” “The faithful are like one man: if his eyes suffer, his whole body suffers.”

We find little difference between Muhammad’s Ummah and Rousseau’s Body Politic because these were inspired by the same source: Lucifer. Should we then wonder why Hitler united with the Muslim ultra-nationalists of the Ottomans? These two worshipped the same god.

Muslim recruits of the SS Handzar Division pray in 1943. PHOTO: HARVARD UNIVERSITY PRESS; GERMAN ARCHIVES

So when a Christian says “we all worship the same god” he has already fallen into the trap of this great deception. Is it any wonder why Hitler said: “It’s been our misfortune to have the wrong religion,” Hitler complained to his pet architect Albert Speer. “Why did it have to be Christianity, with its meekness and flabbiness?” Islam, according to Hitler, was a Männerreligion—a “religion of men”—and hygienic too. The “soldiers of Islam” received a warrior’s heaven, “a real earthly paradise” with “houris” and “wine flowing.” This, Hitler argued, was much more suited to the “Germanic temperament” than the “Jewish filth and priestly twaddle” of Christianity.

Therefore, mythical belief systems are not exclusively ancient history. It has also crept into modern history. We are after all, on a journey to show how the devil works for without understanding this, we cannot destroy the works of the devil, which was why Christ manifested in human form (1 John 3:8).

And the goal of all false-religions is to build a war machine, fighters who fear nothing while filling the earth with blood and violence. The Arian Muslim-Shi’a are growing their revived qama zani (ritual self-mutilation) as did the berserkers, who did self-flagellation to whip themselves into a frenzy. They were ferocious fighters and just as the Turkish Muslim Dervishes, they were seemingly insensitive to pain. It was not uncommon for berserkers to even kill their own people in the heat of frenzy.2

Therefore, Lucifer under the name “Allah” or “Odin” is not that much different. Odin is described as Gapthrosnir (One in a Gaping Frenzy), Oðinn (Frenzied One), Oðr (Frenzy, Fury), Viðurr (Killer), Biflindi (Spear/Shield Shaker), Böðgæðir (Battle Enhancer), Herjafoðr (Father of Battle), Hildolf (Battle Wolf), Hjal- drgoð (God of battle), and Valtyr (Slain God).

The Deceiver is not a title only in ancient times; Thelema, a religion created by the progressive thinker and occultist Aleister Crowley, who loved Islam, wrote of this deceiver deity in his Vision and The Voice:

“I am the greatest of the deceivers, for my purity and innocence shall seduce the pure and innocent, who but for me should come to the centre of the wheel…I am he of whom it is written: He shall deceive the very elect.”3

Aleister Crowley dressed in Muslim garb. To Crowley, witchcraft was “the art or science of causing change to occur in conformity to the Will”. He saw it as a spiritual system and reconnected it to the great esoteric traditions of mysticism and self-transformation found in every other world culture. He also designed the Thoth Tarot deck, a profoundly esoteric deck which has been one of the world’s best-selling Tarot decks for the last 50 years or so.

Crowley understood clearly that the Quran’s Khayrul-makireen (the greatest of all deceivers, schemer, conniver) is the goal of his religion. Even the Bible attributes such titles to Satan, the adversary who is described as he “who deceives the whole world” (Revelation 12:9).

“When he [Satan] speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it” (John 8:44). “He [Satan] was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him” (John 8:44). “Forasmuch then as the children are partakers of flesh and blood, he also himself likewise took part of the same; that through death he might destroy him that had the power of death, that is, the devil” (Hebrews 2:14).

Satan is also called Apollyon “destroyer” (Revelation 9:11). And just as Lucifer is filled with pride (Ezekiel 28:12, I Timothy 3:6), Allah calls Himself Al-Mutakabbir (Pride filled, The most proud). Allah, in his own words, says:

“Pride is My Wear, Supremacy is My Dress, I will break anyone who vies with Me for them and I do not care”.4

It is no wonder that the phrase yelled by Jihadists in every operation Allahu Akbar – means Allah is greater, most proud. Odin is no different, for he is Hár (High One, Proud) and Jafnhár (Just as High). Allah (satan) wasn’t shy in describing himself as the bringer of evil:

“Say: I seek refuge with [Allah] the Lord of the Dawn from the mischief of the evil He created…the mischievous evil of Darkness as it becomes intensely dark” (Qur’ân 113:1-3).

Odin contains the name Bölverkr, meaning “creator of evil and evil worker.”

And if Satan in the Bible is the lord of the demons, then so is Allah, being described as the “Lord of men and jinn [demons]” (Q 69:43). Allah created “jinn [demons] and man to worship Me [Allah].”5

The demons are so fascinated with Allah that they collectively refer to him as “our Lord” (Sura Al-Jinn) they love Allah and Muslims commune with them through chants, swearing “by the self-reproaching spirit, the accusing soul” (Q 75:1) “the Lord of men and jinn [demons]” (Q 69:43). Similarly, in the Norse religion, Odin is Draugadrottin (Lord of Ghosts).

Such titles are not restricted to Nordic and Arab deities. In India, the god of the Hindus, Shiva, bears the name Bhooteshwara (Lord Of Ghosts And Evil Beings), Bhairav – Lord Of Terror, Chandrapal – Master Of The Moon, Kantha – Ever-Radiant (Luminous), Mahamaya – Of Great Illusions, Nityasundara – Ever Beautiful, Pinakin – One Who Has A Bow In His Hand, Bhutapala (protector of the ghosts). Satan is also given all these attributes in the Bible. He is the “ruler of the demons” (Mathew 3:22). His symbol is placed on the forehead.

Most do not realize it, Satan’s symbol, the crescent, is not exclusively Muslim. It is always brought up by all his religions, Arma, the Hittite Moon God, Artimes, the Greek Moon-Goddess, Coyolxauhqui the Aztec Moon Goddess, Diana the Roman Moon-Goddess, Ix Chel the Mayan Moon God, Khons the Egyptian Moon God, Mawu the African Moon God, Men the Moon God of Asia Minor, Turkey who is the god of Gygez (Gog), Luna the Greek Moon Goddess, Sin the Sumerian Moon God, Suma the Hindu Moon-God, Tsuki-Yomi the Japanese Moon-God, Yarikh the Ugarit Moon God and Heng-O the Chinese Moon-Goddess.

But the Bible tells us, Christ will bring this image low as Gideon did in Judges 8:21 where Gideon crushes the “crescent ornaments” and in Isaiah 45-46 Bel (the moon god) bows “Before me every knee will bow; by me every tongue will swear … Bel [the crescent moon god] bows down”.

WHY SO MANY WILL MISS THE SIGNS OF THE TIMES
But besides understanding the titles and nature of Lucifer and evil, many will miss the signs of the times because of their pride in not understanding the role of women. It is really that simple. We have a woman prophesied about in Genesis 3. The hatred of women is key to understand why lucifer hates Mary and why Antichrist in Daniel 11 does “not honor the desire of women”.

Here we will explain everything from purely scriptural references, lest anyone complains. This participation of the saints in the coming battle alongside the “woman” is very crucial, for without, many will miss the narrow gate. This honor of women stems for when St. Mary, herself referred to Isaiah 2 in her Canticle, quoted in Luke’s Gospel regarding satan’s defeat:

He has shown strength with his arm; he has scattered the proud in the thoughts of their hearts;
he has brought down the mighty from their thrones and exalted those of humble estate (Luke 1:51-52) 

This very declaration by Mary stems from Isaiah:

For the day of the LORD of hosts Shall come upon everything proud and lofty, Upon everything lifted up—And it shall be brought low— (Isaiah 2:12)

So crucial is this, ‘bringing down what is exalted’ that from Genesis 3 to the Apocalypse, we find themes involving Gideon (who takes down the crescent in Judges 8), the Church, the saints, and even St. Mary participating in Christ’s victory over the devil, bringing low his pride and even his symbols. We find this especially in Revelation 11-12.

While this prophecy about the woman in Revelation 12 is always made into a controversy, insisting its exclusively regarding Israel or the Church (these are also true in a sense as in the Israel of God, the saints) we also find a clear reference where it speaks of “the Ark”:

“Then God’s temple in heaven was opened, and within his temple was seen the ark of his covenant” (Revelation 11:19)

So far so good. No one can deny, that at least there is an Ark, coming down to earth from heaven’s Mount Zion (God’s temple).

So was this ark always in heaven? No. When one examines this “Ark,” it was assumed to heaven from earth. This is etched so clearly in Psalm 132 regarding Christ’s resurrection which no Christian denies:

“Arise, O Lord, and go to your resting place, you [God] and the ark of your might … For the Lord has chosen Zion; he has desired it for his dwelling place: This is my resting place forever; here I will dwell, for I have desired it.”

There are two, not one who “arise”; the “Lord” and His “Ark” to go to heavenly Mount Zion.

So when did this happen?

Either Christ, when He resurrected, took a literal box to heaven or He took the very living ark that housed Him on earth. 

But if this “Ark” is a box, then Jeremiah’s prophecy is rendered worthless, since there will be no use for a wooden box-ark:

“…they shall say no more, The ark of the [old] covenant of the LORD [the box Ark]: neither shall it [the box] come to mind: neither shall they remember it [the box]; neither shall they visit it [the box]; neither shall that be done [the box observed] any more.” (Jeremiah 3:16)

This Old Covenant’s box-ark is no more, forever. So if the Ark in Revelation 11-12 is coming back to earth, how then is it a box-ark, especially when Jeremiah renders the box useless, worthless and even forgotten forever?

Therefore, when we combine this “ark” from Psalm 132 and the same “ark” in Revelation, it is a different type of Ark, it is “the ark of his [New] testament“. Therefore, Psalm 132 must be linked to a living Ark. Yet this same ark is clearly referred to in Revelation 11-12 as “the Woman,” she is queen since she obviously has a “crown and twelve stars”:

And the temple of God was opened in heaven, and there was seen in his temple the ark of his testament: and there were lightnings, and voices, and thunderings, and an earthquake, and great hail. And there appeared a great wonder in heaven; a woman clothed with the sun, and the moon under her feet, and upon her head a crown of twelve stars (Revelation 11:19-12:1)

Therefore, Psalm 132’s Ark, is none other than this woman’s assumption to heaven. She was assumed up to heaven and is resting with Messiah after His resurrection having endured much struggle and suffering “go to your resting place, you and the ark of your might” in “Zion” “the temple of God” which is His “resting place forever” and now this “temple of God was opened in heaven” to only see a woman with a “crown” which makes her a Queen in heaven. 

Therefore, after the Lord “arose” from the dead, He ascended, and later He took His Ark, which John describes having a “crown” making her queen in Mount Zion, heaven, taken into heavenly glory as the true ark of the New Covenant: “the ark of his testament“.

And since the box-Ark housed God, the Shekina Glory in the Old Covenant, this would specifically make this ark as the Ark of the New Covenant that housed God on earth. This debunks any argument. For if this “Ark” is not Mary, what is it then? Jesus? How could Jesus arise with Jesus in Psalm 132? The Church? How could the Church (the Ark) have housed the bread of life Who is Jesus? There is no room for wiggle here. From the primitive Church, till now, this has been the interpretation and understanding from Ethiopian, Copt, Orthodox, Catholic …

In fact, the ancient Israelites believed that the original ark was made from incorruptible wood, so this passage also foreshadows the bodily incorruption given to Mary by Her Risen Son.

While John 3:13 says: “No one has ascended into heaven, but he who descended from heaven, the Son of man” Mary did not ascend; she was assumed. To say she ‘ascended‘ would deify Her, God forbid.

All Christians agree, Jesus ascended by his own divine power, as he prophesied he would do in John 2:19-21, while Mary was powerless to raise herself; she had to be assumed into heaven in fulfillment of Psalm 132. This is why the verse is clear, that it is God Who will arise (ascends): “Arise, O Lord and go to your resting place, you [God] and the ark of your might” He will take with His power (assume) the “ark of your might”.

Naysayers, unless they accept this divine truth, they can never interpret Psalm 132 other than Jesus also bringing up His Mother to the heavenly Mount Zion. Pay close attention to the verse “Arise, O Lord, and go to your resting place, you [God] and the ark of your might … For the Lord has chosen Zion; he has desired it for his dwelling place: This is my resting place forever; here I will dwell, for I have desired it.” 

This “Zion” is the very “Mount Zion” where we approach God in Hebrews 12 and what we find baffles the mind on how we ought to approach God in our prayers:

“But you have come to Mount Zion and to the city of the living God, the heavenly Jerusalem, and to innumerable angels in festal gathering, and to the assembly of the firstborn who are enrolled in heaven, and to God, the judge of all, and to the spirits of the righteous made perfect [saints], and to Jesus, the mediator of a new covenant, and to the sprinkled blood that speaks a better word than the blood of Abel.”

“Therefore, since we are surrounded by so great a cloud of witnesses . . .” The Saints, who also surround us, encouraging us in our race to fight against the wiles of the devil. No where in Scripture do we find that the saints’s death means that they are not present with Christ in heaven (2 Cor 5:8, Hebrews 2:14-15, John 3:16). This Mount Zion, while all prayer ultimately goes to Christ, we still approach “innumerable angels,” “assembly of the first born,” who already “enrolled in heaven,” and “spirits of the righteous made perfect”.

This then must include His Ark (Mary) who comes from heaven because she was assumed to heaven. Therefore, Saint Mary has a special role unlike any other saint in heaven. Anyone who would argue this must contend to a simple question that will debunk any naysayer: to who has God ever given the privilege to house Him on earth besides her?

God in Psalm 132 says He, ‘the Big Boss’ “desired it”.

And when the war begins, “Then God’s temple in heaven was opened and within his temple was seen the Ark of the Covenant and there came flashes of lightning, rumblings, peals of thunder and earthquake and great hailstorm and a great and wondrous sign appeared in heaven.” (Revelation 11:19)

So beware, these who will reject this, as a satanic apparition, will only end up in hell, since when Jesus comes He too will confirm this and the naysayers will combat against Him since He does not fit their imaginations or the mold they constructed from their faulty reading of scripture. Keep in mind, just as scoffers missed the first coming by insisting to a certain interpretation of the text, scoffers who are in the church will also miss His second coming preceded by His Mother since these ignored how the primitive church interpreted these verses.

Now imagine the richness of God’s Holy Word, the Bible, that once this piece of the puzzle is understood, we can also understand the nature of this battle. This living Ark participates in the Battle of Armageddon. How else can we understand how the Ark was used in battles in ancient Israel, where it went before the army?  This Ark was the same in Luke 1:35: “And the angel answering said to her, ‘The holy Spirit shall come upon thee and the power of the Most High shall overshadow thee.” This is similar to the Ark in Exodus 3:9 “The cherubim spread out their wings above, overshadowing the mercy seat [of the Ark] with their wings …” 

If Mary was no queen, we would have to sweep under the rug so many passages in the Old Testament where the queen mother of Israel interceded on behalf of the subjects of the kingdom. Mary in Revelation 11-12 described as a queen coming from heaven crowned with the sun participating in the act of destroying the devil.

If she was “Hail, full of grace, the Lord is with you!” Luke 1:28, can we argue that she is also hail, Queen Mother full of grace?

St. Mary addressed as “Hail full of Grace,” this is the “Grace” the very essence and mercy from God by which we are saved through faith. She is John’s rendering as “the Ark” while in Patmos (Revelation 11:19-12:1) who stomps the devil. The crushing of Satan’s kingdom is indeed through Christ but also includes His body, the Church (Zechariah 14) “and all the saints [the church] with You”. “All the saints” must then include St. Mary, a woman.

Therefore, these prophecies should be ideal for women. All this talk of women empowerment, when emulating Mary is the most advanced method for women empowerment, where God chose a woman to also aid in the destruction of the works of the devil.

And lest there be any doubt, that the Ark is Mary, listen therefore to the voices of our fathers, in the Church Militant, which one can easily inquire, we will not include here since we promised to keep it strictly scriptural.

She was the one spoken of in Luke 1, even linking to Daniel 9, when Israel was given 490 years to deal with the sin of the nation and prepare for the coming of King Messiah. The annunciation by Gabriel to Zechariah had six months (180 days) later the annunciation by Gabriel to Mary, then nine months later Jesus is born (270 days), and thirty days later Christ is presented in the temple. You add up in the six months, in the nine months and the 40 days in the presentation and it adds up to 490 days. She was prophesied of in 2 Samuel, the Ark of the Covenant, as recorded having remained for three months in the hill country after its return from the land of the Philistines. We are told, “David arose and went” to the hill country of Judah “to bring up from there the ark of God” (2 Samuel 6:2) and the ark of the Lord remained in the house of Obededom the Gittite for three months, and the Lord blessed Obededom and his whole house. Not accidentally, Luke notes that Mary “arose and went to the hill country of Judah” (Luke 1:39) where she (the Ark) remained with Elizabeth for “three months.”

In Luke 1:48 Elizabeth calls Mary “Mother of my Lord” or “Mother of my God”. Many who cringe at calling Mary “Mother of God” should also cringe at Elizabeth. Even God Himself announces His Mother in an explicit clear sense:

“Listen, O coastlands, unto me [God]; and hearken, you people, from afar; The LORD has called me [The Son] from the womb; from the body of my mother [Mother of God] has he made mention of my name.” (Isaiah 49:1).

So far, we have kept it purely scriptural. This is so clear “the body of my [God’s] mother”. Even Luke describes her womb similarly as the Ark:

“and he will be filled with the Holy Spirit even from his mother’s womb” (Lk 1:15)”.

Even God, the Holy Spirit, was using Mary as His physical temple to carry Messiah symbolized in the Ark in Hebrews 9:4, as the “little urn,” which “held the manna” (bread of life/Christ).

Moses and Joshua bowing before the Ark, painting by James Jacques Joseph Tissot, c. 1900

Therefore, to miss the crucial piece of the biblical puzzle has eternal consequences for it is the spirit of rebellion. To say these verses (especially Isaiah 49:1) are not about Mary, then these must agree with the Jew that Isaiah 53, Psalm 22 and Zechariah 12 are not about Christ’s Passion and Crucifixion, but are about “Israel’s suffering”. If so, Zechariah 11 is then isn’t about the foreshadow of Christ being sold for 30 pieces of silver. And so since these reject such arguments, they must then agree that the Ark foreshadows Mary or be just as guilty as the Jew. These would point the finger at the Jew not realizing they are guilty of doing the same thing. It is this spirit that will miss the Second coming, just as many Jews missed the first coming by not having oil in their lamps through accepting such faulty arguments.

But this should not be a difficult issue for a converting Muslim, which The Woman, in Genesis 3, if her seed, or even her feet, crushes the serpent, in Revelation 12, she is seen doing the same, stepping on the crescent moon. Therefore, there should be no qualm over Genesis 3, having Mary, or even the saints, as co-participant in stomping the serpent. We get it. Schisms love to create controversy. This signified her vanquishment over Lucifer. As one scholar puts it:

“Her foot rested in the crescent moon – She had clearly vanquished their foremost deity, the feather serpent ‘Quetzalcoatl’, this being the primary reason for converting the Aztecs of Mexico.

The struggle in Mexico revives today, as we see lucifer reviving his ancient systems, all the way to Pergamum to even reach as far as Germany, with the repackaged ‘same old same old’. Today we are beginning to see this revival of old devils coming on the horizon. Shoebat.com prepared this clip with a holy Polish song in the background, just see the parallels from the past and now, so prepare:

But the crescent is not exclusively a ‘crescent’ it is also a bow. This bow-crescent is not a predominate symbol of the Aztecs, the Hindu god, Pinakin – One Who Has A Bow In His Hand, the Muslim world also dominates with this symbol of the bow (crescent), to even the Antichrist himself is described holding a bow:

“And I saw, and behold a white horse: and he that sat on him had a bow; and a crown was given unto him: and he went forth conquering, and to conquer.” (Rev 6:2)

And besides Hinduism, an eye opening for a converted Muslim is the discovery of “the stele at Petra” dedicated to Qos-Allah (Glueck 516). To a Muslim this sheds more light in understanding the symbolism. The Arabic “Qos” or “Qaus” literally meant “bow” and the crescent-bow symbolized Allah and still does. This hunter Allah was also found with the same name “Alla[h]” in the Epic of Atrahasis chiseled on several tablets dating to around 1700 BC.

Therefore, Allah, as one of the names of lucifer and it is extremely ancient (1700 BC). The stele at Petra is horned and displays a star and crescent (Browning 28), both consistent with a moon deity. In fact, in Islam it is forbidden to call a rainbow anything but Qos-Allah (Allah’s bow). This even drew the shape of the Muslim sword in crescent form resembling the crescent-bow of Allah. So from a Muslim perspective, when viewing the image of Our Lady of Guadalupe in Mexico or the Woman in Revelation 11-12, the Lady is not exclusively threshing the crescent, the very symbol and honor of Islam, but also Islam’s crescent sword and the bow of the Mahdi as the early Muslim transcription of prophet Mohammed’s Hadith, Ka’b al Ahbar writes:

“I find the Mahdi recorded in the books of the Prophets [Apocalypse]…For instance, the Book of Revelation says: ‘And I saw, and behold a white horse. He that sat on him had a bow … he went forth conquering and to conquer.’”

Egyptian authors Muhammad Ibn ‘Izzat and Muhammad ‘Arif then go on to say,

“It is clear that this man is the Mahdi who will ride the white horse and judge by the Qur’an (with justice) and with whom will be men with marks of prostration on their foreheads.”

So it is not only the mark of prostration that is on their foreheads, but the very symbol of Heylel (crescent) as in Isaiah 14th rendering of Lucifer’s name in the ancient semitic languages, the pride of the Muslim Ottomans shooting the bow while riding backwards on their horses are “Tarshish, Pul and Lud, that draw the bow, to Tubal, and Javan…” (Isaiah 66:19). These today are the Turkic regions whose pride is the crescent, the bow and war where Gog is chief prince of Meschech and Tubal.

The evil is reviving everywhere, especially the slander of Christianity which did not evolve from paganism where bow and crescent were honored symbols, on the contrary, God announces the Mahdi’s defeat:

“Then I will knock the bow out of your left hand, and cause the arrows to fall out of your right hand” (Eze 39:3).

The scoffers hate holy images, yet God Himself uses imagery in the very Scripture so many claim to exclusively use where in Revelation 12, we have a Red Dragon who “persecuted the woman, who brought forth the man child” by “making war with the rest of her seed, who keep the commandments of God, and have the testimony of Jesus Christ.”

The very scripture has this woman with children who call her mother, for obviously this can be deduced from the verse, where it says of the Dragon as “making war with the rest of her seed [her children]” which pertains to the true church. So if she has “seed” (children) it becomes obvious that her children would call her (Mary) as “our mother”.

The images of Mary also depicts Her conquering what injured her heart: “And thy own soul a sword shall pierce …” (Luke 2:35). Persecuting “her seed” is persecuting Christ as if a sword pierced her heart. This is why she is called in Mexico and Spain as Our Lady of Guadalupe. In Arabic Guadalupe is Wadda-Lubba which means that the very Love (Wadda) is in Her Core, (Heart, Lubba). Even the Arabic for Guadalupe, symbolizes the Ark of God since in Arabic it is literally The Love Who sits in her core. Prince Shakib Arslan was known as “Prince of Eloquence” (amir al-balagha) that is the eloquence of the Arabic language. He was an influential Muslim writer, poet and historian who travelled in the footsteps of the Muslims who invaded Spain. In his book “What Arabs Said About The Geography of Andalusia (Spain),” he calls “Guadalupe” as “Wadi Al-Lubb” “وادي اللب”. The Arabic Wadd means “love” it also means “desired” while “Lubb” is “gem” “heart” or to be more specific “core”. In essence Wadda-Lubba (Guadalupe) has a response to Islam. This “Wadd” (love) is Christ Who was in the Womb of Mary, the Ark, and is why Christians say “blessed is the fruit of your womb (lubb), Jesus.” In Arabic, Lubb is the part of the fruit where the core is and is where lays the seed as in the core of an apple. In her womb (lubb) always resides the seed and it is this “fruit of Her womb” that is this blessed one. To learn further about this fascinating study [link here]. What Christian can deny that it was Mary who in turn provided humanity with Christ, the ultimate and only acceptable sacrifice. In Chapter 2 of St. Luke’s Gospel, the evangelist twice reports that Mary kept all things in her heart, that there she might ponder over them. Luke 2:35 recounts the prophecy of Simeon that her heart would be pierced with a sword.

Simeon presents an image (the pierced heart). This became the most popular representation of the Immaculate Heart. St. John’s Gospel further invited attention to Mary’s heart with its depiction of Mary at the foot of the cross at Jesus’ crucifixion. St. Augustine said of this that Mary was not merely passive at the foot of the cross; “she cooperated through charity in the work of our redemption”. St. Leo said that through faith and love she conceived her son spiritually, even before receiving him into her womb [lubb], and St. Augustine tells us that she was more blessed in having borne Christ [her Wadd] in her heart than in having conceived him in the flesh. Therefore, it is an utter demonic insult to portray St. Mary as a mere “incubator” of God.

Such piercing is metaphorical depicting the suffering of God’s people. Through her Son we defeat the bent dagger (Hanzar) of Islam which was made in the shape of the crescent during Nazism, when the Ottoman-Nazi conscripts of the Hanzar (literally Muslim dagger) division united with the devil. She steps on the crescent bow including the sword that symbolically pierced her heart when Muslims and Nazis killed “the remnant of her seed” (the Christians) as Rome did, and as Israel (whom God will redeem) did as they participated in the killing of Christ.

This is an ongoing ancient war where pre-Islam Nabatean inscriptions in the Sinai and other places regarding Allah as Shalm-lahi ‘Allah is peace’ (we still continually hear today how Allah is the god of peace) and Shalm-allat, ‘the peace of the goddess Allat’ (Allat is the feminine Allah the transgender god), Amat-allahi ‘she-servant of Allah’ and Halaf-llahi (Caliph ‘the successor of Allah’).

Therefore, lucifer always covers his identity claiming he is god while repackaging old religions. Yet to God He addresses lucifer including all his religions as the same old devil. Christ’s purpose in making Himself manifest, was after all, to expose and destroy the works of the devil. (1 John 3:8)

Barabbas: Crucifixion, Ending by vincentyeo

CHRISTIANS ARE BEING KILLED AND RAPED EVERY SINGLE DAY, PLEASE CLICK HERE TO MAKE A DONATION TO OUR RESCUE TEAM THAT WILL SAVE THE LIVES OF CHRISTIANS FROM PERSECUTION

SOURCES

1 Islamic City

2  Encyclopedia Mythica, Berserks, By Micha F. Lindemans