Homosexual Man In The UK Grabs Infant, And As The Infant Screams And Cries, The Homosexual Sodomizes The Baby, Gets It On Film And Sends The Video To His Boyfriend

Ryan Simpson, homosexual who sodomized a baby

By Theodore Shoebat

A homosexual man in the UK sodomized an infant as the child cried and screamed, and filmed the entire evil act. He filmed the evil and sent the video to his boyfriend. I did a whole video on this:

So many today, fattened by materialism and lost in their own ego, want nothing to do with the holy words of the prophet Moses, nor any of the prophets after him, nor the words of the Apostle who declared that sodomites are worthy of death, but continuously want to teach the precepts of a vain secular moralism. I am not speaking of the atheist who denies everything holy and whose blasphemies are expected; I am speaking of supposed “Christians” who carry the title of conservative and who tout themselves as advocates for family values, while at the same time exert themselves to please the sodomites and the acolytes of perversion as they try to censure those who honor the laws of God.

I myself have dealt with this numerous times. I remember when I posted my video of me calling thirteen pro-homosexual and homosexual bakeries and asking them for a cake that says “Gay marriage is wrong,” and being denied service every time. The video went viral. Not too long after this happened, Janet Porter a well known conservative personality who I respect, contacted me asking if I would allow her to use clips of my video to add to her documentary exposing the homosexual agenda. I said it would be no problem. The documentary has been out for some time and has already had showings in select theaters in the United States.

But then, the spirit of fear crept its way inside. Peter LaBarbera, an Evangelical who is in the documentary, was confronted by the leftist media on the fact he is in the same documentary with me, the man who believes in God’s law that says that sodomites are to be put to death. Instead of defending the law of the Bible, which he claims to believe, this hireling decided to push for me to recant my statements, and said that if I didn’t that I should be removed from the documentary. Janet called me urging me to make a statement to “clarify” what I really believed, that I really don’t believe in the death penalty for sodomites, but simply in the anti-sodomy laws that were once enacted in Texas.

To be honest I was quite hesitant to do this because to do so would mean recanting all of my writings in support for the death penalty. Janet sent me the first draft of the statement to receive my stamp of approval. The draft stated:

“While I have had homosexual activists call for my death and beheading, etc., I have not called for anyone to take the life of those practicing homosexual behavior. I do want the laws of the United States to once again make sodomy illegal as they did prior to the 2003 Lawrence v. Texas ruling because such practice is not only immoral, but physically dangerous, as well.”

But Peter LaBarbera objected to the draft and expressed his dissatisfaction with it, pushing for me to recant my position that an inquisition should be established to uproot homosexuality and other perversities. Peter LaBarbera responded to the draft with this email to Janet:

“Not good enough, if he called for an “Inquisition” against homosexuals. We need to look at the exact comments and craft a statement based on those. I do not have time to do that today or tomorrow as I’m driving to DC. We need transcripts of the exact comments and then he needs to disavow that approach (or clarify what he meant). Otherwise people will keep asking about those specific comments.”

Peter Labarbera, more afraid of the sodomites than the law of God

Peter Labarbera, more afraid of the sodomites than the law of God

All of these words are filled with fear. LaBarbera is afraid of negative attention from the leftist media. Such behavior is contrary to God, Who is Love, “because perfect love expels all fear.” (1 John 4:18) Why should a Christian be afraid or ashamed of the law of God which states that “If a man also lie with mankind, as he lieth with a woman, both of them have committed an abomination: they shall surely be put to death” (Leviticus 20:13)? Why should a Christian be ashamed of the words of the Apostle when he said that homosexuals do things that “are worthy of death” (Romans 1:32)? They will say that such words are against love. But how could a Christian use such argumentation when St. Paul himself says that “the purpose of the commandment is love” (1 Timothy 1:5), and in the same epistle goes on to say that “we know that the law is good if one uses it lawfully, knowing this: that the law is not made for a righteous person, but for the lawless and insubordinate, for the ungodly and for sinners, for the unholy and profane, for murderers of fathers and murderers of mothers, for manslayers, for fornicators, for sodomites” (1 Timothy 1:8-10)?

In Christianity, love and justice and indistinguishable, for all virtues, be it justice, charity or endurance, are in love, for God is Love, and in God is all virtue. So how could such Christians say that I am against love, when the purpose of the law is love, and this very law declares that sodomites are worthy of death?

Peter LaBarbera was blocked from entering Canada, and he goes before the media showing how persecuted he is, but yet he wants to block me — a Christian — from being in a documentary for being more politically incorrect than him. And at the same time, he kisses the feet of the sodomite to deny me as Peter denied Christ. A filthy sodomite who calls himself “Joe My God”, began to attack LaBarbera for being in the documentary with me. Peter LaBarbera quickly went on Twitter to appease the sodomite, even going to far as to address him with the blasphemous title of “Joe My God”:

pb copy

Why would a Christian address an evil person with such a blasphemous title as “Joe My God”? It is truly pathetic how these modern Christians get on their hands and knees for these useless sodomites. The sodomites make up such a small part of the population, and yet the Christians, who are supposedly the majority, are terrified of them. Caesar wanted the whole world to address him as kyrios, or lord. And yet you never see any of the early Christians ever address Caesar as kyrios. In fact, St. Paul went directly against this idea when he said “that every tongue should confess that Jesus Christ is Lord” (Philippians 2:11), that is that Christ is Kyrios. Yet this Peter LaBarbera wants to do an inquisition on me, firmly saying “We need to look at the exact comments” and “We need transcripts of the exact comments and then he [Theodore Shoebat] needs to disavow that approach”, while at the same time he runs to some sodomite to get his approval. What an absolutely pathetic person. Peter LaBarbera does not want to respect God, but rather “Joe My God”.

This is why the Christians keep losing ground and the sodomites keep gaining ground. Instead of using the attention that controversy brings, Christians run away from controversy. This is why Christendom is drowning.

Robert Spencer even works publicly with homosexual atheist, Douglas Murray, from whom we hear the sprinkles of the word ‘conservative.’ 

robert-spencer-and-douglas-murray-photo

Robert Spencer with sodomite Douglas Murray

Spencer would not dare expose Douglas who once boasted about how he argued for “the conservative case for gay marriage,” he also goes against, as he writes:

“the opinions of certain homophobes who claim that gays are dangerous precisely because they are somehow going to ‘gay up’ wider society.”

Another example of this demonic infiltration is Michael Coren, a heretic who lied about being Catholic while holding a position as a news host in Canada. He wrote numerous books about how great Catholicism is, and while praising the Catholic faith, he was attending Anglican church services. Now he has declared his renunciation of the Catholic faith, and has become an open agent for the sodomite religion. He expressed his leaving the Catholic Church by saying, “I could not remain in a church that effectively excluded gay people,” and also saying “I felt a hypocrite being part of a church that described homosexual relations as being disordered and sinful. I just couldn’t be part of it anymore.”

So Michael Coren has become an ambassador for the sodomites. Michael Coren is also a betraying, superficial effeminate. He denied me and turned his back on me as he cowered in the presence of two Muslims on Canadian television, when they berated him for referencing our website, shoebat.com. Here is the video:

Michael Coren, false Christian, cowered before Muslims, agent of homosexuality and acolyte of the Antichrist.

Michael Coren, false Christian, cowered before Muslims, agent of homosexuality and acolyte of the Antichrist.

If Michael Coren will betray me for saying that pagan Muslim Albanians need annihilation, then he most certainly will betray Moses for slaughtering the calf worshippers; he most certainly will betray Joshua for exterminating the Canaanites; he most certainly will betray Jehu and Elijah for killing the priests of Baal; and he most definitely has betrayed God Himself, for God ordered the extermination of the wicked.

I wrote an email to Michael Coren, telling him:

I saw your debate with Shabir Ali and the other Muslim. I have always considered you an ally, and still do. But I must tell you one thing: The cock crowed three times, and you denied me thrice.

Michael Coren responded to me fearfully, like a shaking dog, saying:

I think we should speak. Is there a number I can call you on later today? Please hear my side before you condemn me. Michael.

I heard his side of the story on the phone and left it at that. I had no intentions at that point to make any actions against him. But after seeing how he is now advancing the sodomite religion and going against Christianity, realizing that his appeal meant nothing, now I must respond to him and confront him for the heretic he is. He is a heretic and the worst kind. There is one heretic that says: “I am a heretic. I hate God.” But there is the other type, the more deceptive strand that says, “I love God. I am orthodox. But lets tolerate the enemies of God, lets enable them, empower them, allow them to eclipse the light their darkness.” This is the worst type of heretic and the most dangerous kind.

There are major homosexual rings in the Vatican, what I like to call “homosexual hornets nests.” I myself have had experience with the homosexual infiltrators in the Catholic Church.

While we were doing some work in Texas we were told of a man named Msgr. Michael Yarbrough (also known as Michael Yarborough), of Holy Trinity Catholic Church, and how he is a deviant priest who forcefully kissed a young man named Hector Escalante on the lips, and how he was supporting a pro homosexual group called Call to Action. Here is a photo of Msgr. Michael Yarbrough:

Msgr. Mike Yarbrough

Well, we decided that we were going to bait Msgr. Michael Yarbrough. I visited him in a confessional booth where I told him my age and apparently it registered an interest and he asked me if I wanted to come and hang out with him. He fell for the bait. I found it very odd that a priest of his high position, with a very busy schedule, would all of a sudden want to spend time with me.

I accepted his offer, and gave him a call, and asked him if we would meet at a book store. He said that he preferred that we meet in his office. I found this quite disturbing because it was in his office where he kissed Hector Escalante. When I did research on Msgr. Michael Yarbrough, I found a 2002 report written in the San Antonio Express which stated:

Hector Escalante complained that Monsignor Michael Yarbrough kissed him on the lips and groped him in his office in 1998 when Escalante was 27, on his last day on the job as a St. Matthew’s Parish employee.

Yarbrough admitted kissing him but said Escalante misunderstood the gesture, which the priest said was common among men in his family. He denied groping Escalante.

Imagine, a man kissing another man on the lips as “common.”

I told Msgr. Michael Yarbrough that it would be better that we meet in a book store, to which he agreed. I asked him how much time he had, and he said, as long as I wanted. After doing some more research, I also found out that on top of kissing a young man on the lips, Msgr. Michael Yarbrough is a also a major donor to a pro homosexual group, called Call to Action, and I found his name on a list made by Call to Action designated as “major donors”. I took a snapshot of the list with Msgr. Michael Yarbrough’s name highlighted:

yarbarough copy

So, we had the meeting at the bookstore, and after some conversation, I busted him on his heresies and his scandals, and also paid a visit to his church where I was eventually kicked out by his followers (who probably know nothing on how evil this heretic is). Here is the video:

For years we have seen how the Vatican covers up for sexual predators and deviants, heretics and debased theologians. But we have never seen how the agents of the Vatican cover up for such evildoers in their private conversations. Well, Shoebat.com is now giving you this exclusive video showing you how the conniving is really done.

I confronted Deacon Ron Walker, an official of the Vatican, asking why the Church has done nothing to punish Robert L. Kincl, a priest and canon law judge who was appointed by the Pope himself, who teaches that if two men masturbate each other they do not commit sin, and who himself defended confirmed child molester priest, Fr. Robert Hrdlicka. This is after Shoebat.com filed a complaint against Kincl after we caught him teaching us depravity.

Deacon Ron Walker and the Bishop of Austin, Joe Vasquez, and Vicar General Daniel Garcia, did nothing to have Robert L. Kincl punished, even after they promised to take care of this evil. Shoebat.com realized that they were just patronizing us and so we made this video.

Here is the video:

Robert L. Kincl, who was appointed by the Pope, had befriended us as a fan of Shoebat.com acting as conservative, yet referred to homosexual fondling as permissible in the conversation. Having been shocked at his remarks, I told Kincl:

How can you, as a priest, be so liberal toward such a sick evil as two men fondling each other, or as two men having a “relationship” just as long as they are not going with other men. It is evil and it is reprobate.

I also told him:

It is not tolerable for you, as both a priest and a canon law judge, to be permissive to somebody having a homosexual relationship just as long as they are not being promiscuous with other men. It is deplorable, and in the words of St. Paul, “worthy of death” (Romans 1:32).

Kincl defended his position and responded with a rejection of the Old Testament and a twisting of St. Paul’s condemnation of homosexuality in Romans, stating

We do not follow the Hebrew Scriptures. We follow Jesus Christ who never mentioned gay relationships. When St. Paul mentioned such a relationship he was referring to the promiscuousness of the Romans using sodomy.

Shoebat.com decided to investigate Kincl and found that he has a dark past. In 1993, Kincl worked as a Commander in charge of clergy at the U.S. Navy, and while he was in the service he defended another chaplain confirmed to be guilty of child molestation, named Robert Hrdlicka.

The investigation revealed that Robert L. Kincl had even written the authorities, not to charge the pedophile who molested the young boys, but urged them to send him back to serve as a chaplain:

Catholic chaplain Lt. Robert Hrdlicka pleaded guilty to molesting boys in 1993. Before his sentencing, six other Catholic Navy chaplains and the church’s archbishop for the military services urged authorities to send Lt. Hrdlicka to a church-run treatment center.

“It is my fervent hope and prayer that he will be able to return to the active ministry as soon as possible,” wrote then-Cmdr. Robert L. Kincl.

Instead, Lt. Hrdlicka went to prison.

Shoebat.com looked up Kincl’s My Life page, to find out that after all these years Kincl is still friends with Hrdlicka the pedophile, since he is on his friends list, of which I took snapshots:

ted kincle photos 4-1 copy

ted Robert Hridlicka copy 2

Just as we have Muslims, like Bergdahl, who have infiltrated the military, we have people like Kincl who have infiltrated both the military and the Catholic Church, with their depravity.

Kincl is now serving as a priest in Our Lady’s Maronite Catholic Church alongside Msgr. Don Sawyer. When I confronted Sawyer on Kincl, Sawyer vehemently defended Kincl.

Robert L. Kincl, depraved priest who defended another child molesting priest

Robert L. Kincl, depraved priest who defended a child molesting priest

Don Sawyer, Msgr. at Our Lady's Maronite Catholic Church where Kincl serves

Don Sawyer, Msgr. at Our Lady’s Maronite Catholic Church where Kincl serves

Shoebat.com decided to contact the Diocese of Austin to file a complaint, and spoke with the Very Reverend Daniel E. Garcia as the Vicar General for the Diocese of Austin, and Chancellor and Secretariat Director for Administration, Deacon Ron Walker, who were under Bishop Joe S. Vásquez of the Diocese of Austin.

We asked them how could someone who supports homosexuality and defended a pedophile still be serving as a priest and not be excommunicated, to which Deacon Ron Walker, rolling his eyes, said that the Church’s main objective would be to reconcile him with God, and not excommunicate him.

It seems that the Diocese of Austin could care less if one of its priests supports homosexuality and defended a pedophile.

Bishop Joe S. Vásquez

Bishop Joe S. Vásquez

Vicar General Danny Garcia of the Diocese of Austin

Vicar General Danny Garcia of the Diocese of Austin

ron-walker

Why is this man serving as a priest when the Catholic Church, in its teachings, forbids homosexuality?

It is not surprising to see how far reaching homosexuality has gone in the Vatican. What other deviancies will enter the Vatican in the next decade remains to be seen. Whatever happened to normal sin? In the good old days, steeling a chicken perhaps constituted such sin, but these days, its sleeping with it.

Christianity is not about sycophancy, its about war against evil and the devil. We must arm ourselves to fight in this war.

CLICK HERE TO GET OUR NEW 2-DISK DVD SPECIAL ON CHRISTIAN MILITANCY AND PREPARE YOURSELF FOR THE WAR AGAINST ISLAM, TYANNY, AND THE FORCES OF DARKNESS

PERSECUTION IS COMING, AND EVENTUALLY SHOEBAT.COM IS GOING TO BE PULLED OUT OF FACEBOOK. PRETTY SOON THE BEST WAY TO REACH US WILL BE THROUGH OUR NEWSLETTER. CLICK HERE TO JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER, AND CONTINUE EDUCATING YOURSELF ON WHAT THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA WON’T REPORT

print
  • magaforever

    He deserves decapitation king David style

  • susan

    Homosexuality is NOT normal. It is NOT healthy. It is NOT genetic. It is a decision. And they are pedophiles.

    The following is an excerpt from article DH055-1 from the Christian Research Journal. The full article can be read by following the link below the excerpt.
    IS HOMOSEXUALITY AN ILLNESS? IS IT “NORMAL”?
    An even more important question, though, is if homosexuality constitutes pathological behavior. Is it an illness? Gay rights groups continually assert that homosexuals are as “normal” as heterosexuals, that homosexuality is not an illness or psychological disorder. For example, Peri Jude Radecic, a member of the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force (NGLTF), asserted on the ABC news show Nightline: “Homosexuality is not an illness, it is not something that needs to be cured. We are normal, natural and healthy people.”14 Moreover, these groups universally contend that all competent psychiatrists and psychologists are in agreement on this. As proof of this, the American Psychiatric Association’s (APA) 1973 declassification of homosexuality as a mental disorder is always cited. Before examining the contention that all competent psychiatrists and psychologists agree that homosexuality is normal and healthy, we need to look at the APA’s 1973 decision for a moment. For 23 years homosexuality had been listed as a mental disorder by the APA. Why was it decided, at that particular point in time, that it was not pathological? I do not have the space to go into a detailed analysis of the history leading up to the APA’s decision.15 Nonetheless, it is a misconception to think that this came about only after dispassionate and scholarly discussion, and only after listening equally to all sides of the issue. Also, it is important to note that the APA’s vote was anything but unanimous. In the three years leading up to the 1973 APA meeting, the previous national meetings had been repeatedly disrupted by gay activists. At the 1970 meeting in San Francisco certain sessions were broken up with shouts and jeers, prohibiting any rational discussion or debate. At the APA’s 1971 meeting in Washington, threats and intimidation accomplished what discussion could not. Ronald Bayer, in a work sympathetic toward homosexuality and the gay rights movement, recounts: “Using forged credentials, gay activists gained access to the exhibit area and, coming across a display marketing aversive conditioning [i.e., punishing an organism whenever it makes a particular response] techniques for the treatment of homosexuals, demanded its removal. Threats were made against the exhibitor, who was told that unless his booth was dismantled, it would be torn down. After frantic behind-the-scenes consultations, and in an effort to avoid violence, the convention leadership agreed to have the booth removed.”16 These tactics continued in the same manner at the APA’s 1972 national meeting. It was against this backdrop that the association’s trustees finally made its controversial 1973 decision. When a referendum on this was sent out to all 25,000 APA members, only a quarter of them returned their ballots. The final tally was 58 percent favoring the removal of homosexuality from their list of disorders. Four years later, Dr. Charles Socarides — who was at the meetings and was an expert in the area of homosexuality, having treated homosexuals for more than twenty years — described the political atmosphere leading up to the 1973 vote. He writes that during this time, “militant homosexual groups continued to attack any psychiatrist or psychoanalyst who dared to present his findings as to the psychopathology [i.e., the study of mental disorders from all aspects] of homosexuality before national or local meetings of psychiatrists or in public forums.”17 Elsewhere Socarides stated that the decision of the APA trustees was “the medical hoax of the century.”

    This is an uphill battle we fight to expose the true nature of homosexuality. God abhors it.

    • Grandmere

      And the authors are being savagely attacked for telling the plain truth.

  • jami

    Finally can catch up with Shoebat.com. no internet , had been away for long, glad to be back. God bLess Shoebat.com.

    • Grandmere

      I was worried about you, Jami. It’s nice to see the flowers blooming. God bless you.

      • jami

        Hey Grandmere, I always had you all in my prayers. Glad to be back. God’s peace and grace be with you always.

    • We were wonder ing about you Jami. Is all okay?

      • jami

        Yea Walid, all ok. I was just peeking a boo, like reading your articles here and there, internet too expensive here in Germ. Lol. Cant just let go, your wisdom is like directly from God. I didnt know whats happening in the world when i stopped reading from here.Kept you and family always in my prayer. My situation has got better on the worse side. Lol. I’m like Ms. Abraham, i had to give Isaac up. This is Germny. Very few children but whatever they have is snatched away. But who cares we have the Shoebats . Pass some Falafel here.

        • Glad to see that you are okay. I know your difficult situation. You still do have visitation?

          • jami

            Was offered one n half hour visit per week in an office with a person to watch over me . I’m treated worse than a deadly criminal. But the visits have not yet begun. Since December lasto year i’v seen her once in her kindergarten in the presence of loads of other parents . I’v been to Media.

        • Grandmere

          My heart is breaking for you. I will be praying about it.

          • jami

            Thanks Grandmere. God bless you.

  • Flame blue

    I am so sad for this little baby. I take it, he has survived and l pray he’s not badly damaged, but l would think he would be badly damaged! Sixteen months, yes, the pedophile homosexual needs to be put down like a rabid dog! Don’t worry, if the prison officers turn a blind eye, look away, this depraved beast will be killed in the prison by other prisoners. However, these foul creatures ask to be put on a special wing away from prisoners who would harm them, then they brag to each other and plan further atrocities when they get out of prison.

    Yes, that is a person who has gone to Satan and has become invested with demons. A very clear case for the death sentence!

  • This is like saying your mother slept with the local farmer and you came out looking like a goat. Would such an analysis be proof?

    • Higlac

      From what I’ve seen of their profiles, I would recommend against having any more to do with “Articulus Rex” and “Cory Carlson” than you’re positively forced to. They strike me as NOT good people… [It’s horrifying how much work you obviously have to do to keep your Weblog clean from so many, many trolls and enemies – truly, God Bless you!!!!]

  • Higlac

    Your words are NOT those of a genuine would-be debater: they’re the words of somebody out to slander &/or libel others.

    You’re obviously out to attack people for who they are without being fair to their points of view – you’re out instead to provoke anger and emotions instead. You’re NOT doing any good by in essence attacking Mr. Theodore Shoebat as “a genuine serpent” and saying that all who “agree with his poisonous words” being “used in the most un-Christ-like of ways”.

    Granted that some of Mr. Theodore Shoebat’s words can strike one as immoderate: they still are not such as to deserve disrespect. Once you become disrespectful like that, it’s obvious that you’re simply UNINTERESTED in any truly-meaningful debate. I know too well what the strategy and tactics of all too many people in today’s society who’ve fallen for the Marxist/humanist tripe and dung (and yes, I both despise and HATE Marxism and humanism generally for the great evil they’ve done to the world, including the mass-murdering of almost as many people as Islam to date – and which figure is poised to even surpass as much!!!) this anti-theist age and its stooges are more than happy to be guilty of.

  • Higlac

    In response to your “ProTip”: if you had really read the Bible AND the Qur’ân (both of which I have, and both of which are online for all to study), you wouldn’t be trying to make such an inference (not to mention LIBEL). Furthermore, my ancestral peoples have suffered for as much as 1,400 years (directly or indirectly) thanks to the preaching of the latter (not to mention that “Prophet’s” oral “traditions” known as the Hadith!!!

    No, I don’t see anything about what’s “histrionic” about what I’ve written regarding yourself. However, your charging me as such only convinces me all the more to beware of you. [And no, I’m not interested in any parody, self or other.]

  • Grandmere

    You don’t know much about debate, do you? Maybe you should do some research on the subject.

  • Higlac

    That kind of “college education” being talked about here is nothing more or less than Marxist/humanist-derived PROPAGANDA combined with Darwinist “evolution” thinking. It’s a major reason why “education” has become so perverted and with such a negative connotation (and no wonder given how around 90% of all Western academicians are either openly or secretly Marxist).

    Such an assertion as postulated by “Cory Carlson” is patently FALSE – and what one thinks one can see in nature is not what God Almighty Intended for us human beings to take to heart as examples.

    I really wanted to stay silent; however, allowing such drivel to remain unanswered would be less than what we really need.

  • Higlac

    It’s not a question of “ecclesiastical law” but of what people do relative to the teachings of the texts in question. For example, Islam teaches one the very OPPOSITE of empathy, kindness, love and everything else for non-Moslems – the POLAR opposite of Christianity!!! Grasp this and then you may start understanding what we “infidels” are all up against…

    Are you Native North-American? If so, I can and do regret that the colonists of the past centuries didn’t treat your ancestors with greater respect – alas, we all pretty much learn from our mistakes and worse. The colonists were themselves not equipped with the background we’ve learned (including means to keep away in order not to transmit communicable diseases that hurt the natives as dreadfully as they did. No, in those days it was a FAR MORE BRUTAL struggle for survival (not until the 19th-century did people seriously start tackling health issues – for example – with real success, which really took off over these 100 years).

    • Articulus Rex

      All of the great Abrahamic religions of the world had to go through an evolution, Christianity used to be a whole lot closer to Islam in terms of how bloodthirsty the faithful were when it came to ‘heretics’.

      To claim that one has all the answers and the other 6 billion plus people on the planet are the dupes is the very height of arrogance, and I’d have to say, not very Christian.

      • “To claim that one has all the answers and the other 6 billion plus people on the planet are the dupes is the very height of arrogance, and I’d have to say, not very Christian.”

        Noah was one man and the whole earth were wrong and drowned and died. One man can have the answers. It is usually the case.

      • Higlac

        Islam explicitly FORBIDS the very idea of “evolution”: it’s supposed to literally be a “PERFECT religion” because Mohammed to Moslems was and is “THE PERFECT man”.

        That means that the tiniest, most minute deviation from the ultra-murderous, genocidal, wholly-misogynistic (and everything else) teachings he and his “companions” were responsible for is enough to earn you a DEATH sentence – and Moslems are furthermore inculcated with an ANTI-individuality, anti-humanistic, anti-alternative mentality from conception through death!!!!

        As long as you don’t get these things through your head in toto, you’ll NEVER understand the extreme DANGER Islam poses!!!! Compared to Islam, Christianity is Snow White!!! [And don’t give me that crock of dung regarding heresy: even Wikipedia confirms that Christianity can’t be blamed for more than 16,000,000 deaths since the accession of the Emperor Constantine around AD 306. Compare that with Islam (275,000,000 in 1,400 years) or atheism (anti-theism, via Communism and Nazism, who in 100 years killed off 180,000,000).]

  • Grandmere

    Not so. You tube has plenty of debates between Christians and Atheists. But they follow the rules. They don’t “flame”.

    • Higlac

      SNAP!!!!

      Well said, “Grandmère”: you know well what real debate is all about.

  • Higlac

    The Torah is part of the Bible (much of which I’ve regularly read and reread since childhood): it’s in fact that part of the Bible known as the “Law” (particularly the Pentateuch, the first 5 books of the Bible). Ergo, I’m not all that ignorant of it.

    As to the Qur’ân: I indeed have read significant parts of it (including chapters 8 & 9, the last two to actually be written). First, you need to know the historical order in which it was made; second, look up “the principle of ABROGATION”, where parts that used to be peaceful and which are still included are superseded by new, much more VIOLENT parts. It’s these LATTER parts that are the ones governing Moslem behaviour and rules; the remainder is used as part of their efforts to fool and destroy us “filthy, stupid infidels”.

    What’s more, I know well about the Qur’ân and the Hadith being online: this is the Weblink I use to look it up. [A companion link serves for the Hadith.] http://www.usc.edu/org/cmje/religious-texts/quran/

    When you read it with its proper historical order in mind – and knowing which parts have been abrogated – then the puzzle will become clear to you.

  • “I just don’t think you can identify it based on the way someone looks/speaks/prays/etc.”

    I agree. You could have a churchgoer who is a hitler and a heathen who can do saintly deeds. It is the story of the good samaritan Christ spoke about and the Samaritan in these times was not looked at favorably from a theological perspective.

  • “On the Samaritan, are you familiar with King’s Beyond Vietnam address?”

    No I have not O great Articulus.

    “On the one hand, we are called to play the Good Samaritan on life’s roadside … A true revolution of values will soon look uneasily on the glaring contrast of poverty and wealth with righteous indignation.”

    You speak wisdom great Articulus. Truly I tell you, I have not found anyone in all of Israel including even my Falafel stand with such great wisdom.

  • ” have been exchanging messages with Walid, he shows a level of respect that you could perhaps learn from.”

    I have found no fault in her O great Articulus. Do you see this woman? You came into my house and no one gave you any response for your wisdom, but she gave water for your camels and your sheep.

    She does show a “level of respect”. Why have thou neglected her wisdom?

  • Higlac

    I’ve told you above that while historically one may THINK that “Judaism, Christianity and Islam are Abrahamic religions”, the truth is quite different!!!!

    Christianity builds upon and respects Judaism – it only sheds some relatively minor things (dietary, sartorial, medical habit {circumcision} and other matters that aren’t of real importance other than to Jews or those who wish to formally join the Jewish people) that the Christian elders determined weren’t necessary for the Gentiles to obey. You’ll find Acts 15 critical in this matter – note verses 28 and 29: For it seemed good to the Holy Ghost, and to us, to lay upon you no greater burden than these necessary things; that you abstain from meats offered to idols, from blood, from things strangled, and from fornication: from which if ye keep yourselves, ye shall do well. Fare ye well.

    Furthermore, Christianity NEVER, EVER, EVER REJECTS the Jews and Judaism – whereas Islam rejects BOTH Judaism AND Christianity!!!! Worse yet, it calls for the OUTRIGHT EXTERMINATION OF ALL JEWS, then all Christians!!! Ergo, for you to insist that they all three are “Abrahamic” is a LIE; especially since Islam rejects the Judæo-Christian God. To boot, this isn’t merely a political matter relative to the USA (which seems to be the only viewpoint you’re caring about – know that I’m NOT an American): it matters to the entire West and its civilisation!!!

    One can deliberately choose to persist in a lie – it however doesn’t change the lie into truth. Also, I would advise you to be more careful in differentiating between what’s written in sarcasm as to what’s unvarnished truth relative to Mr. Shoebat (when he uses sarcasm, it’s truly powerful!!).

    • Grandmere

      Poor Rex! He doesn’t see sarcasm when it hits him in the face. Oh, by the way, you are doing an excellent job on the grinder.