By Walid Shoebat
Stupid Americans are being duped. When we reported on a Muslim attacking Walmart in Amarillo we had to delete hundreds of nasty people commenting trying to re-iterate the news pushing the nonsense that the attack was a “work place violence”.
While democracy has it pros, the cons is that it produces tremendous numbers of stupid people.
The media, FBI, Police and government are causing all sorts of confusion. The incident in Florida is also being used to advance the LGBT agenda. Even the police version from Amarillo Texas terror incident is politicized. In the Amarillo case, we transcribed the police communication to the best of our ability as we listened and monitored it closely. America will see several attacks on its soil and it will all be covered up. Some even dispute that we monitored the communication as if we were “liars”. However, another reputable blog that monitored the police scan at the Amarillo incident is The Right Scoop. They too monitored the police communication and what they have pretty much matches our account.
Coincidence?
The Muslim terrorist in Amarillo left a note in Arabic as was disclosed in the communication to only conclude the American favorite “workplace violence”.
It is becoming much more difficult to fight the American style propaganda labeling tactics than to address the truth that most stupid Americans do not understand the Muslim mindset. So lets start setting the record straight.
Muslims use terrorism in all sorts of occasions including personal disputes and Jihad is also used during personal conflicts. For example, what about Palestinians robing Christian homes on the West Bank. Rescue Christians are dealing with one rescue case currently of a Palestinian Christian trying to obtain his property in Ramallah where Muslims who told him they were ISIS robbed his home beating him and taking over the home. This is also Jihad. This is also terrorism. In the West this would be categorized under discrimination and racism and not Jihad terrorism. The Muslim in Amarillo carried out the same tactics, to terrorize his boss.
Confusion is running amuck.
When it comes to the Orlando case, the news cannot deny any longer that Omar Mateen was a faggot.
Stupid Americans are so sensitive that they even get offended at my use of the word “faggot” which was common years ago. I read their idiotic comments every day on my blog. Out of thousands of comments from dumb ignorant Americans on our articles on the Orlando and Amarillo cases, only one had it right. Father Matthew, a priest analyses it best and comments on the Orlando terror attack:
It is a Muslim homosexual killing NON-MUSLIM HOMOSEXUALS. At the end, the difference between Muslim and non-Muslim trumped the commonality. Having deep-seated homosexual tendencies, Omar Mateen most probably believed that his only chance for forgiveness from Allah was to die “in the path of Allah,” that is, jihad. This is essentially no different than the behavior we saw from the 19 hijackers in the weeks and months leading up to their attacks on the WTC and the Pentagon. They were known to frequent sex clubs, drink alcohol (with great enthusiasm apparently), and patronize prostitutes. This was the case, because they were fully aware that none of their sins mattered one iota, as long as they perished “in the path of Allah.” We should pay careful attention to this, since this very fact could be a powerful motivation to any Muslim, who feels trapped in obsessive and addictive vices in the future, just as it has been a powerful motivator in the past.
Father Matthew being a priest and listening to confessionals gets it 100% correct. Mateen was simply a married Muslim who committed adultery and feared hellfire and martyrdom was the only way out. There are thousands of cases to prove this point.
This is fag on fag terrorism combined with Islam’s Jihad and the desire for martyrdom. PERIOD.
Homosexuality is rampant amongst all God haters. Only Christianity prohibits homosexuality.
Motivations could be different. What is true is the coverups. James Wesley Howell, the 20-year-old Indiana man who was arrested in California on Sunday headed toward the LA Pride festival. Reports reveal how even police backs off making judgments: “Early police reports suggested that Howell told Santa Monica authorities he intended to inflict harm at the gay pride parade in West Hollywood. Department officials later walked those comments back, saying the man had only told them he was headed that way.”
So lets walk this through. Howell drove his car all the way from southern Indiana to Santa Monica, Calif a week prior the incident in Florida to initially “do harm” loaded with three assault rifles, high-capacity magazines and ammunition, along with a five-gallon bucket filled with explosive chemicals. This is similar behavior to the Muslim ISIS sympathizer, Omar Mateen. Howell’s boyfriend, Joseph Greeson, of Clarksville stated that Howell was “gay” (faggot). So why would this gay person go to the gay parade with bomb making material and an array of assault rifles?
Joseph Greeson, 18, disgusting (Photo: Michael Anthony Adams/IndyStar)
He matches Mateen who had no hatred for faggots since he too was a faggot and simply wanted to kill because certain faggots rejected him. The IndyStar reports: “Greeson and others told IndyStar that Howell harbored no violent feelings toward the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender community. In fact, they said, Howell is gay.” Zach Hambrick, another ex-boyfriend from Charlestown also stated he was gay and violent.
Gays kill gays at high numbers.
The event in Orlando is causing quite the noise as if the world while sympathizing with the loss of life, they are to be arm-twisted to also sympathize with the gay agenda.
With an estimated 2% of the population being gay 69% of serial killers were faggots. To verify this number, a random sampling of 59 U.S. serial killers after 1960 was collected and studied. Of those 59 convicted murderers, 39 were found to be gay. This would mean that 66% of all the serial killers stem from the 2% male gay community.
This would be close to the Muslim problem in the U.S., where the bulk of terrorism comes from this small percentage. This does not include the 84% of the 28,574 children under the age of 14 who were raped in another study were victimized by homosexuals.
Society is degrading and is going downhill fast. Even the Counter Jihad Movement is telling half-truths. Robert Spencer of Jihad watch who does not want to offend gays and does not mind offending Muslims is doing the rounds simply trumpeting that “Islam teaches that gays are to be executed.”
This is a half-truth.
These same groups even expose the fact that Islam has a reversalist agenda:
“lying is forbidden—but permissible to empower Islam; intentionally killing women and children is forbidden—but permissible during the jihad; suicide is forbidden—but permissible during the jihad, called “martyrdom.”
Yet when it comes to Islam’s support for homosexuality, they are completely deaf, mute and silent.
Why?
The answer is simple, since homosexuality is becoming acceptable and is politically correct in western cultures, any of Islam’s acceptance of homosexuality would mean that Islam is somewhat good.
Spencer who trumpets “political correctness is the problem” is advancing ‘political correctness’.
A Christian avoiding Christianity becomes a budge of contradictions.
What my observations see is that the conservative movement is itself becoming evil.
Let us not be confused over the issue of ISIS and its homosexual tendencies. IBTimes reported in 2014 ISIS is plagued with homosexuality:
In a joint statement released on August 13 2014 two senior United Nations officials spoke out against Isis’ “barbaric acts” of sexual violence and “savage rapes” of Iraqi minorities. “We are gravely concerned by continued reports of acts of violence, including sexual violence against women and teenage girls and boys belonging to Iraqi minorities,” Zainab Hawa Bangura and Nickolay Mladenov said.
One detail in Arango’s story, however, stands out: it is the reference to homosexual sex in an Isis training camp. “He [Barho] said he saw men having sex with other men behind the tents in the desert night.”
Spencer, Geller and others set themselves in check since these use the argument on how Islam is a package of contradictions where they write books on exposing abrogations on how Allah says he loves Christians and Jews and then calls on Muslims to kill them in Surah 9, Spencer’s favorite reference.
With homosexuality, one cannot quote Lot’s story in the Quran without quoting the Muslim heaven where it speaks on the eternal Ghilman, boys prepared for Muslims to have eternal sex with. Facts from archives of history shows that Muslim tendencies when it comes to homosexuality is an issue of taste; they prefer their gay partners to be smooth skinned, effeminate and passive. The case in Orlando is simply Muslim gay killing infidel gays and has nothing to do with Islam’s hate for homosexuals.
Hurriet Daily News from Turkey has an interesting article on the homosexual connection with Islam and Islamic history wrote that nowhere in the Quran is homosexuality explicitly condemned:
Until the modern era, there was no word for sodomy in Arabic or Persian. Nor is there any prohibition of it in the Quran. Some make reference to the destruction of the town identified as Sodom of the Old Testament (which is supposed to be the origin of the word sodomy) in the Quran, Surah 15: 73-77 as if it were the source. But it is quite clear that the city was destroyed because its inhabitants refused to offer hospitality to strangers. Where does the prohibition against sodomy come from? The reference is to some hadith, the sayings and acts of the Prophet Muhammad, which the Sunni interpretation of Islam uses to provide a legal basis for legal matters not covered in the Quran.
A recent article by Elyse Semerdjian that dealt with cases brought before the shariah court in Aleppo over a period of 359 years when it was under Ottoman control has turned up four, but only one concerning sodomy against a young man and his mother. The youngster is supposed to have brought men known to be involved in sodomy to his home to the anger of the people of his neighborhood. The two were expelled from their community, a customary punishment for prostitution that had become noticeable enough to disturb the neighbors. Sodomites, on the other hand, were not punished.
So in 359 years only one case and it was a case of ‘disturbance’ and nothing more.
Muhammad, contrary to Scripture, in fact wore the clothes of his child-bride Aisha as a ritual to receive revelation from Allah.
In the Sahih Collection of al-Bukhari, Hadith Number 2442,
Chapter 52, Muhammad says:
The revelation does not come to me when I am in the garment of any woman except ‘A’isha.
In Sahih al-Bukhari, Hadith Number 3941, the same impostor states:
Do not hurt me with Aisha; for by Allah, the inspiration did not descent on me while I was in the coverings (lihaf) of any of you (women) except Aisha.”
In the Sahih collection of Imam Muslim, Hadith Number 4472, one Zaynab Bint Jahsh requests a visit to see Muhammad
while he was with Aisha in (fee) her robe (Mirt) and in the same state that Fatimah found him in.”
As we write in our book, For God or For Tyranny, the Quran itself promises boy loving for jihadists in paradise.
The followers of Muhammad consisted of mukhannathun, or cross dressers. It is the same word as mukhannatah, which in Arabic means homosexual.
Daayiee Abdullah, an openly gay imam, describes the mukhannathun as
sort of a male-female, cross-dressing types. They existed. And they also lived or worked in the household of the Prophet. Aisha, one of the Prophet’s wives, indicated that there were men who worked in the household. They were mukhannathun. That generally meant that they were not necessarily castrated, but not having an interest in women.
Muhammad not only was a cross-dresser, but he had gay friends.
This is why over 40 percent of U.S. Muslims said they supported same-sex marriage last year, in a survey by the Washington-based Public Religion Research Institute.
Dr. Zuhair Mohammed Jamil Kutby who laments (I translated from Arabic):
“When we come back to read some pages of our history—not the history written by the western orientalist lest we claim they are antagonistic. We find that our Arab history is full of conflict, crowded with a culture of lying and exposed by sexual and moral deviation… is it not considered wrong and shameful the spread of corruption and sexual deviation in the corridors and palaces during [Muslim] Arab rule?”
Kutby was not discussing some odd ruler or some abberrant phenomenon, no, he was discussing the highest pride of Muslim history rulers:
“Plentiful were these [deviations] written in our history books, novels and stories. For example, The Abbasid Caliph Harun al-Rashid spent his nights with a boy named Al-Majin and the immoral poet Abu Nawas…Here are the verses that indicate sexual decadence and corruption in which Abu Nawas says ‘Adela blames my choice, a boy smooth as an Oryx … leave me alone, I said, do not blame me, I am committed to what you hate and until death do us part . Did not the book of Allah instruct? To prefer boys over girls…’”
Throughout Muslim history, Muslim sultans were very fond of handsome young slaves whom they kept close to their persons as pages, service-boys, bodyguards, special troops and as gay companions. Infatuation for such slaves was a bane of the life of Muslim royalty and nobility in particular, although they considered it to be a fashion. In fact, the whole of the Muslim armies and system was a gay tryst.
Almost all of the Muslim caliphates beginning with the Rashidun, Umayyad, Abbasid, Córdoba Spain, Fatimid all the way down to the Ottomans, from the highest leaders to the lowest of low they indulged in ghilman (boy love).
This is why Erdogan of Turkey, today sent support:
Erdoğan offers condolences to Obama for Orlando attack https://t.co/Nkg67m3CKRpic.twitter.com/Hj6Uf0gIBh
— Turkish Minute (@TurkishMinuteTM) June 15, 2016
Erdogan is so evil that he makes a good candidate for an Antichrist, a debate on which many Christians argue that Antichrist is homosexual. Lately we revealed very strange and revealing reports coming out of Turkey’s media of Erdogan’s mesmerizing powers was able to change male major media moguls to lust after Erdogan wanting him to mount them. Al-Monitor news revealed:
On May 15, the Turkish media were rocked by the words of the media mogul Ethem Sancak, who bluntly declared his love for President Recep Tayyip Erdogan in a TV interview. Sancak said, “While working on his campaign to get him elected prime minister, from my hometown Siirt, I met him. I saw his honesty and courage. I saw his opposition to oppression, his ability to protect the victim. The more I saw him, I feel in love [with him]. To be honest, during my days as a leftist, I could not understand the love between Mevlana [Jelaluddin Rumi, the poet] and [his companion and spiritual guide] Shams al-Tabrizi. As I got to know Erdogan, I realized that such a kind of divine love between two men is possible. When I [first] declared my love to him, I was already among the top 20 on the Forbes’ list. I did not need to wait for any favors by holding on to Erdogan’s coattails.”
The strange phenomenon can only be explained by what Shoebat.com last year has predicted and revealed prior to this report that if Erdogan should be nominated as Antichrist, then the greatest spiritual influence into this movement must stem from none other than the Muslim theologian Jalaluddin Rumi. Ever since our reports things are falling into place that Rumi’s Sufism with all his strange homo-erotica will revive along with it, all the homosexual and pedophile deviances which stemmed from the Ottoman Empire.
The outspoken fashion designer, and LBGT activist Barbaros Sansal tweeted, with a colorful photo, “I have been a gay man for fifty years. I have never seen a gay affair like this.”
This is because Sansal does not understand the spiritual dynamo of all this which stems from the weirdest of spirituality called Sema. In our Islam Is A Homosexual Cult and prior to this report, Shoebat.com exposed how in Sufism, corrupting the Shema (Hear O Israel) in their own deprived version, Sema (to listen, hear) is now regarding pedophile trance:
The very disturbing ritual called “Sema” in which Sufi mystics would surround young boys and stare at them until they fell into a demonic trance (as Hurriyet Daily News, a Turkish media) revealed: “Some of the Sufis even organized what were known as “sema” during which ceremonies, they would sit in a circle and concentrate on the beautiful young boys in the center, concentrating to such an extent on what they perceived as beauty that they might fall into a trance.”
And if one thinks this is an isolated incident, Sancak’s statements is neither the first nor the last to publicly reveal strange affection for Erdogan. Indeed, a day after his comments, an Erdogan male supporter waiting for the president to appear at a rally said to a news crew, “I would bite Recep Tayyip Erdogan and lick him”.
Whether in the West or in the East, we are being prepared for the Antichrist. The Ottoman Empire in Turkey brought with it all the deviancies of Ottoman history including men, as the more preferred performer, for doing the Belly Dancing at weddings, parties and night clubs, instead of women.
These days, forget the usual Belly Dancing watching from the romantic orient where a woman entertains lusting men smoking hookahs. These days, Belly Dancing is provided by Muslim men for the sexual gratification of other Muslim men. The article reveals:
“In spite of the growth of this phenomenon recently in Turkey, it is not entirely a recent phenomenon, men belly dancers goes back to the Ottoman era where the men were dancing in front of the sultans, rather than women who were not allowed to dance in front of the audience at the time.”
Headline says: “Men Belly Dancers At Night Clubs In Turkey To Revive Ottoman Heritage”.
The Muslim empire, as it turns out, is an empire of queers where the American LGBT that harbors special hatred towards Christian ethics will find itself better fit in the re-arising Muslim Ottomans where if sexual diseases don’t kill them, Islam will.
The West in its era under Christianity has not known the phenomenon we call the homosexual movement until the 20th century. During the Christian era, whenever homosexuality was discussed, it was almost always considered an abberation imported from the Muslim orient which there it was always considered not just an acceptable practice but a norm and is why homosexuals tend to be more sympathetic towards Islam over Christianity. Well now they got a taste of their own medicine.
While the Book of Revelation is filled with surprises, the proof that the empire of Antichrist being an empire of queers is rather simple, historically Muhammad and his companions, Khalid, Ali, Omar, Abu Bakr including all the Muslim dynasties after them … such ghosts from a dark history past were miraculously released from the depths of the pit into your social media network and youtube all with the original mascara eyed men, red dye henna beards, long hair like women (Revelation 9:8), dress, sexual habits including all the depraved strange preferences and unimaginable brutality.
What the western analyst fails to consider is that the Muslim world underwent a period of westernization in which the British Empire slowly rid us the sickness of Sate in India, child brides throughout the Muslim world and to somewhat set up laws which collided with Shariah but failing to completely obliterate it. And for the LGBT apologists to argue that their agenda has nothing to do with Pedophilia, all one has to do is examine history, homosexuality has always lead to instituting pedophilia.
Muslims and homosexuals frequently say that we, their critics “know nothing about Islam or homosexuality”. They are correct. I humbly yield, they won this debate. The truth is that no one truly understands such evils, neither Muslim scholars nor LGBT experts. The only way to fully comprehend evil is to be the devil himself.
After reading this, here, a spiritual breath mint to clear the soul:
That was refreshing, don’t you think?