A group associated with the Islamic State has declared that in retaliation for airstrikes against ISIS in Syria, they are planning to burn the children of the Americans and Europeans with oil, and slaughter them in their hospitals and kindergartens according to a report:
A group affiliated with the Islamic State is calling on lone wolves in America and Europe to attack Western children in retaliation for the death of Muslim children during airstrikes in Syria, according to an intelligence group.
The message was posted in a pro-ISIS Telegram channel on Monday and spread across a variety of pro-ISIS chat groups.
“I wish that I could travel to Europe or America or Australia and, by Allah, burn their children with oil in place of their men and women,” read the message, which referenced the death of Muslim families in Albu Kamal in Eastern Syria.
“I would not choose a market, club, shopping center, or park… no… no… no… I would choose a kindergarten and a maternity hospital to slaughter them.”
U.S.-led and Russian airstrikes in Syria have killed many civilians over recent months, and experts say the threats against Western children are meant to call attention to these deaths.
“Islamic law has a lot of prohibitions against the killing of children, so this is designed to shock. By calling for the deaths of children in the West, they’re not only trying to inspire attacks in the West—they’re also trying to draw attention to how shocking it is that Muslim children have been killed, and no one was able to protect them,” Chris Meserole, a Middle East expert at the Brookings Institution, told Newsweek.
“Sadly, it’s a way for them to further position themselves as the defenders of Islam.”
Russian airstrikes were carried out against the eastern Syrian town of Al-Shafah on Sunday, killing 53 civilians. The UK-based Syrian Observatory for Human Rights said that 21 of the victims were children. It is unclear whether there was a new strike against Albu Kamal in recent days, or if Monday’s message was provoked by the liberation of the town from ISIS in early November.ISIS members often live among civilians, making it difficult to fight the group without killing innocents.
“It’s terrible human tragedy as many civilians are caught in between attacks by terrorist groups and attacks by the government, demonstrating the failure of many counterterrorism policies to halt the violence rather than contribute to an increasing cycle of attack and counter-attack,” Harrison Akins, a researcher at the Howard Baker Center, told Newsweek.
What’s more, terrorist groups often threaten children when they feel weak and powerless, Akins said.
“Many other terrorist groups have pushed the idea of avenging civilian deaths within their areas of operation by targeting children in cities and especially the children of those associated with the government and the military,” he noted.
“However, by calling for the targeting of children in Western countries by lone wolf terrorists, an especially heinous and morally reprehensible act of violence, they are perhaps demonstrating both their current weakness and their desperation.”
The message itself came from al-Qastantiyyah Foundation, which is considered an established media group in the pro-ISIS community, particularly among Arabic users, explained Rita Katz, Director of the SITE Intelligence group.
“ISIS has made numerous justifications of killing children, stating in issue five of its Rumiyah magazine: ‘one should not grieve over the collateral killing of kafir [infidel] women and children,'” Katz told Newsweek. (source)
Two years ago, Shoebat.com released an exclusive article in which we showed, citing recently uncovered CIA documents and connected through publicly accessible source, the fact that the CIA was directly behind the creation of ISIS:
Truth is stranger than fiction, and at last an open source link has been established that the CIA had a direct invovlement in the creation of ISIS. Via Zero Hedge:
Thanks to the resurrection of “J Pierpont Morgan”, these doubts and questions are no longer reasonable. They are, in fact, irrelevant. Because J Pierpont Morgan, apparently experiencing a Scrooge-like transformation, has seen the light. Yesterday he tweeted three public source documents that conclusively show a Senior CIA Spy– a major figure in operations from South America to the Middle East-is lobbying the US Government to destroy Iraq and formally create an independent Sunnistan on behalf of a Sunni terrorist.
…
That terrorist joined the Iraq insurgency in 2004 under the Al-Qaeda Iraq banner, and was given hundreds of millions of dollars by the CIA and CENTCOM to defect, joining the US-led coalition in the now famous “Surge.” Known as H.E. Shaykh Abdalrazzaq Hatem al-Sulayman, this self-described prince is the head of a 4 million strong (mostly Sunni) tribe in Anbar, and lived the high life on US taxpayer money– that is until Obama declared AQ and AQI dead, bolted from Iraq and pivoted toward Asia.
The documents showing the connection between Al-Sulayman and Greenhill
In late 2014 Sulayman connected with Jonathan Greenhill, “former” Senior Operations Officer at the CIA who set up shop in DC as a lobbyist. Makes sense. CIA Spy since the early 1980s, probably living oversees under non-official-cover, comes home to lobby Congress. Anyway, Mr. Greenhill incorporated the Greenhill Group, and Sulayman retained him. One wonders how Sulayman became aware of Greenhill’s lobbying venture.
…
What we do know is one of the most important spies in the CIA, one with a major role in the Near East (probably Iraq), definitely was retained as a lobbyist by Sulayman. And Sulayman retained him to “create an autonomous Sunni region in Iraq or an independent Sunni State.” In other words, destroy Iraq by formally creating and recognizing Sunni-Jihadi-stan. Or a safe-zone for Sunni terrorists. Or what it actually is, a caliphate.
Mr. Greenhill even lists his “accomplishments” on LinkedIn.
(source)
Since that time, we have published many articles about related stories, but the fundamental premises remains the same, and that is when speaking about ISIS and the situation today, the terms are interchangeable with CIA, Mossad, and the various European special operations because Islamic terrorism is among other problems being used by the governments of the Western world to foment or aggravate already existing social unease in order to cause a war by certain families who control the industrial and financial interests of the world and believe it is in their interest to see a reduction in amount of people alive as well as an increase in their personal wealth as part of their pursuit of power at all costs in what will be a futile quest to attain divinity just as the heathens of the ancient world sought to accomplish.
Now ISIS has made many threats before. Back in January 2016, it proclaimed it was going to make a “final battle” against the “West,” and so many were worried at the time. But really, could this even have been a realistic possibility, that an army who was trained, supported, and directly aided by foreign entitied and continually relied on foreign assitance in order to support its operations could really turn and successfully defeat its own backers? In an objective sense, it is impossible. However, it is the fear that it could happen that drove the public to make what is an objectively impossible goal something to worry about.
It is similar to the situation with North Korea. There has been much anxiety among Americans about North Korean “nuclear weapons” and as of late, the idea that a North Korean weapon might be able to strike the USA now. But as we have pointed out, the logistics involved in having an actual nuclear weapon be able to travel from Pyongyang to even Hawaii or Alaska (let alone mainland USA) are considerable because there is a GIANT ocean between any such points, all of which is patrolled by the US Military, with the Navy guarding the waters and the Air Force the skies who are constantly watching for potential threats to US interests, both of which given the technology of today that can hit a minute target with surgical accuracy using powerful weapons. Does one not think that the US military would not have the time to hit a giant, lumbering missile through the sky going thousands of miles, and destroy it before it gets anywhere near its end destination? That is, assuming, the missile is able to fire, given that the North Korean military, as it has been reported on before, uses outdated weapons that break frequently, and that the military is so large only because the entire nation is starving and entering the armed forces guarantees a meal a a day instead of being forced to eat grass?
Likewise, assuming that North Korea actually did have a working missile, its closest, greatest, and most on-going historical conflict is with her neighbor, Japan. Why would it make any logical sense to lob a missile thousands of miles across a wide ocean to hit a target far, far, away when one could attack one’s neighbor, who one has a historical animosity against, easily?
(source)
A simple analysis of the North Korean military shows that it is a joke but useful for policy manipulation, for like ISIS, the potential fear of an event taking place is more powerful than the actual probability of such an event happening.
We can also draw another conclusion from this, which is that given the relative weakness of these groups or how they rely completely on external support for their continued operation, that any terrorist activity that they are able to carry out is not an accident and was known about by authorities. Such attacks, called “false flag” attacks, are simply meant to drive policy in a particular direction for a designated end. False flags have always been practiced throughout history, such as when Nero burned the city of Rome and then blamed the Christians in order to stir up public anger against them so he could persecute them. In modern times, major events of American and European history have to a great extent been defined by false flags such as the Spanish-American war, Operation Ajax, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, and as it has been seen over the last decade, the wars in Iraq, Libya, Ukraine, and Syria. All of them have had incidents of terrorism or other social disorder happen in order to allow for a greater end. Even if the disorder is real and the crisis is real, the fact is that such crises were allowed to happen in order that a greater objective would be achieved.
One such example as we have covered at length is that of the Muslim “migrations” to Europe and the Americas. As we and many other sources have pointed out, many of these people are outright rude, disordered, and the disgust the people feel towards them in Europe and America is natural and justified, for they mock the charity given to them by people of good will. There are hundreds, and perhaps thousands, of cases of these people from Muslim nations as well as African nations not just engaged in crimes and actual sexual abuse, including the abuse of children, but in destroying food and clothes given to them, using welfare to buy prostitutes, threatening to murder people trying to help them, murdering children and then mocking the deceased, committing highway robbery, threatening to destroy Christianity, defecating in the streets, and doing all kinds of disordered, filthy behavior that is more aligned to the behavior of animals than humans:
There is almost nothing nice that can be said about such people, and by that I speak of the many, many cases involving individuals and groups such as the one shown above.
Now the answer being proposed to the many problems caused in Europe by the Muslims and others is a return to the ethnonationalist, darwinian ideas of the 20th century. However, the question that one needs to ask is how did all of these people arrive in Europe in the first place, and the answer to this question is that the problem was intentionally imported to Europe by governments knowing that such disorder would take place. This was no small operation either, as it has been reported since last year, that major companies and charities have been directly contracted by the European governments with American help to import these people into Europe:
The pagan commenter Varg Vikernes, who was a major player on the Norwegian heavy metal satanic circles as well as the national socialist groups and horribly murdered his colleague Oystein “Euronymous” Aarseth by stabbing him almost 70 times, makes videos now in support of National Socialism, paganism, and again Christianity. In a recent video, he made a scathing criticism of Americans in which he said and for the most part accurately recalling historical fact, that America was the ‘trash can’ of Europe where the nations practiced a form of eugenics by getting rid of the people they did not want by giving them a one-way ticket to America:
Varg is an evil person, but “even a broken clock is right twice a day.” Europe understands completely what she is doing from a historical perspective.
As Vikernes points out, Western Europe has a deep historical understanding of herself with regard to dealing with people her nations do not like. It is not an accident that she expelled those she did as well as makes it VERY difficult for men to immigrate legally to Europe, but at the same time has allowed a veritable “free for all” for the “refugees.” The leaders in power are not merely “mad” in that they are insane or lacking an understanding of what they are doing, but to the contrary, they know EXACTLY what they are doing, except instead of the past, where they wanted to “clean the trash” out of society, this time they want to take in a new form of “trash”- and I do not speak of all of the refugees to Europe, since many are honest, legitimate people fleeing a real conflict, as the governments of the West have admitted their conflict sparked the ‘migration crisis,’– but in terms of subsidizing the transfer of thousands upon thousands of people who have absolutely no education, no economic prospects, no money, no skills, no motivation, no sense of respect for themselves, or their environment, no concept of sanitation, and no future yet are being given money, food, clothes, housing, cars, living stipends, and given them while imparting the expectation that these people will continue to receive them and it is the European people’s money that will subsidize them as though it is their perpetual duty to do so.
Again, it is understandable that anger should be directed to these people because of their blatant, open contempt for the society that has taken them in. At the same time, more anger needs to be directed not just at the people who allowed such individuals to enter in the government offices and political seat, but at the silent, under the surface funders in business and finance who have directed such events to take place in order to cause a revolution. These people are the real criminals, since they are manipulating the sentiments of the people in the worst way possible by creating and worsening true social problems to which they are then providing the “answer” for, which is a nationalism backed by these same people who cause the crisis, and to which they will respond the answer is war, eugenics, and genocide. It is a conflict that is nothing less than satanic, because in the end there is no winner, since not only will there be a genocide of these Muslim peoples, but the European peoples themselves will also be massacred in a war and find themselves suffering the same fate at the hands of those who promised to help them. This does not even get into the issues of European self-eugenics such as how Europeans refuse to have children, will abort most babies with suspected birth defects, believes that babies should be murdered for the good of society, choose to sodomize each other instead of reproduce, or then will kill themselves because they can. The nations of Europe will be quick to blame “foreigners” for having “too many children,” but the fact is that Europeans refuse to have children themselves.
All of the talk about “genetic selection,” “R/K theory,” and the emphasis that somehow the Muslims, Africans and other non-European persons are “genetically inferior” that is coming today from America and Europe has been nudged to public discussion using the real crises of the “migrants” (perhaps better called “invites”) and Islamic terrorism. Yet the joke is on the public, since it is the government of these nations who had used your taxpayer money to fund the rise of Islamic militancy, and people will attack the Muslims but rally around the men who gave the Muslims the money, logistics, power, and training to do what they are able to do. Likewise, people will attack the “migrants” and sometimes even those who openly support them, but will refuse to scrutinize those who claim to be against them yet have a long history of supporting these same groups. To make matters worse, the will also ignore the Church, saying that they do not want to be a slave to “religion,” yet they exchange merely one yoke for another, except that yoke is the yoke of nationalism lead by the same men who they claim they are trying to free themselves from but cannot perceive it.
God says in the Bible that one must take up His cross and follow Christ, to give up his life if he wants to save it. Likewise, he says that His yoke is sweet, and His burden is light, for God came to do the impossible, which is to bring salvation to man from his sin, from the kind of preternatural disorder that permeated the ancient world and which is showing itself again.
The Bible warns that one will hear of “war and rumors of war,” and one must watch the news of one’s times and be careful, since all men are products of and influenced by their environment, However, men must also understand that our time on earth is but a shadow, and that all men’s actions must be filtered through the context of our created purpose, which is to know, love, and serve God, to be content with Him in this life and forever happy with Him in the next. While men live in nations, man was not created for nationalism, and while the world is filled with all kinds of people, man was also not created for internationalism.
Man was created for God, and the way that a man must respond is that way which gets Him to Heaven. Anything else, regardless of the objective or perceived good it presents, is but a deception. While men must certainly respond appropriately, which includes both giving mercy and justice when they are due, one must do so in accordance with the teachings of the Catholic Faith, for lacking absolute truth imparted by divine revelation as a guide, it is only a matter of time before the heart will lead a man astray with his emotions as his guide to his mind.